One thing that bothers me about High Fidelity (the movie)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Rob acts like Dick and the other guy are the biggest nerds ever when he himself owns the friggin store and has more records than a small country. When Dick tells him of a rare record he found Rob just rolls his eyes.

, Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

You hate the most in other people what you hate the most about yourself.
Or at least that's what my eighth grade teacher useta say.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

Who would be the real world equivalent of the Lisa Bonet character?

maria b (maria b), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:21 (twenty-one years ago) link

Lenny Kravitz?

dave225 (Dave225), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:25 (twenty-one years ago) link

God, I can't think of one. Which is MY one thing that bothers me. The book implies a Lucinda Williams type, which is a bit more believable. Lisa seems much more Lilith Fair (I'm thinking female Lenny Kravitz too, but that's probably just because of their former marriage). Maybe Jewel? Definitely nobody who'd be playing the goddamn Lounge Ax.

My friend Ken, who runs the record store here, says he doesn't believe Rob (who's a hell of a lot like Ken on a bad day) would fall for a hippy chick singing "Baby I Love Your Way". She does seem like she should be setting bullshit detectors on high. But I blame Lisa Bonet's performance.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:25 (twenty-one years ago) link

Right.
Music nerds like Rob Gordon will go for any chick who knows which way to hold a guitar.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

But I blame Lisa Bonet's performance.

So you really blame Edith Frost, then?

hstencil, Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:30 (twenty-one years ago) link

Well, if he did it all for the nookie, maybe. Which, actually, he kinda did.

I haven't heard enough Edith Frost to really getthe joke, hstencil. But I think I know what yer getting at.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

I thought Lisa Bonet's character was supposed to be a Dionne Farris/Res/Macy Gray-style VH1 soulstress. And in the book she was supposed to be a Mary Chapin Carpenter/Lucinda Williams NPR country-folkstress. Either way, I mean, the guy's in his late thirties and he's pushing himself away from his immature record-geek past. It make some sense.

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:33 (twenty-one years ago) link

There's no joke. The music "played" by Lisa Bonet in the movie was Edith Frost.

hstencil, Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

What doesn't make sense is why the other two like her so much.

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:35 (twenty-one years ago) link

she does Frampton covers? yick!

and I was referring more to Bonet's performance as an actress with Cusack. Not her singing voice.

I'll hand it to Jody, at least ONE of three would think she sucks ass.

One out of three music nerds always do.

Eek! I found a fault in one my favorite movies! Time to run through a windowpane.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

No, no, the music that Lisa Bonet "played" at the "Lounge Ax" was not Edith Frost, but the scene where they put on a CD in the store and one of the clerks says "This is the record by [Lisa Bonet's character]"--that is Edith Frost.

If we're picking among Chicago-based female solo singer-songwriters I think a closer mark would be Rebecca Gates (sorry, Rebecca).

Amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:38 (twenty-one years ago) link

I wonder if this film had any impact on Drag City's sales. Surely the Neil Hamburger cameo must have done them some good.

Amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:39 (twenty-one years ago) link

NB to Anthony: one of the high points of the book, actually, was Rob doing the standard hipster fretting, i.e. "Why in the world am I so taken with someone singing, of all things, 'Baby I Love Your Way" ... in other words his poor world's been so crushed that his hipster moorings are lost (and he's all the better for it, in Hornby's eventual estimation).

I think sifting in slow-mo through the DVD to pick out acquantances is going to become a sizable Chicago pastime.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:41 (twenty-one years ago) link

what? Where is Neil Hamburger in High Fidelity? I missed that.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

Also the original complaint doesn't make sense to me: isn't it basically standard form for those who have dedicated themselves to a particular interest and grown completely jaded with it to act precisely that way toward both (a) the young, fresh, and enthusiastic, and (b) the ones in the same boat who for some reason haven't grown jaded? (The first one goes "hey, you idiots, don't you realize you're going to turn out like me?" and the second, the one more in action in this instance, goes "don't you idiots ever feel like you should maybe be doing something more with your lives?")

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:44 (twenty-one years ago) link

I mean, it's the tension that comes from "outgrowing" something that others are defiantly not outgrowing. Not that this is at all a defense of the movie, which I still have no opinon on: I've only seen it the once, still, and I was too busy recognizing things and making book comparisons to form much of an opinion.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:46 (twenty-one years ago) link

i think (could be way off) that amateurist is confusing al johnson with neil hamburgerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.

gygax!, Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:47 (twenty-one years ago) link

It worked in the book, I agree, Nabisco. But I think the book did a better job of making her sound genuinely interesting. All we got from the movie is that Lisa Bonet might do some pleasant karoake and wears a floppy hat. I'm being harsh, but I think this part was much more thought out in the book. Sometimes I wonder why Lisa Bonet even got the part. What had she been up to?

Rebecca Gates is a good call. I heard her recent EP for Badman and thought it sounded like something Lisa Bonet might do.

I'm also with Nabisco on the original complaint. There's a reason he reminded me of my record store manager friend "on a bad day." Though I don't think the other two need to necessarily outgrow their interests, as long as it doesn't tear them up with self-loathing.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

Naw, I'm pretty sure the "Baby I Love Your Way" vocal perf is Edith, too. No, it's not something she normally covers.

Surely the Neil Hamburger cameo must have done them some good.

Uh, didn't think there was one, but perhaps the few people who know Al Johnson thought his Beefheart-obsessed fan was funny. Drag City did work pretty extensively with the filmmakers on various things (hello, product placement!).

And of course there's a part where Ian Williams is walking through one scene in the store, but no lines.

Rebecca Gates = truly horrid

hstencil, Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

(last post accompanied by sound of chain being pulled)

Amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

You mean like bat chain pullah, pullah, pullah, right?!?!?!?

Al Johnson as Beefheart-Obsessed Fan, Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

But nabisco, it's not that he has grown jaded. It's like he never was a music geek. Oh, he just can't stand having such nerds coming to his store. Later he is seen categorizing his record collection in an auto biographically order.

, Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

High Fidelity DVD Commentary Menu

Track 34: The Coctails
"Yeah, those are puppets of us above the bar there."
"I'm the good-looking one."
"Shut up, Archer."
"No you shut up, Barry."

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

Lounge Ax ,,,(

Paul (scifisoul), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 19:57 (twenty-one years ago) link

Sorry, email, it's very specifically that he's become what I'll call jaded: the whole plot of the thing, both in book and film form, is the story of a person who realizes that his consumption with particular interests and fantasies is in fact not making his life more enjoyable, and that, in the end, it is possible and preferable for him to work out appropriate realistic balances between those interests and other ones toward which he'd not really been putting in enough work. Yes, he clings back and forth over the course of it, and in the most textbook conflict-development manner possible.

I mean, the thing starts with his cozy record-geek existence getting dealt a big blow (girlfriend leaving): his biggest mistreatments of both employees and customers seem to come basically as a result of finding the whole field of music geekdom just pointless and annoying once real life has started making big scary noises in the background.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 20:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

So he has become a prick basically.

, Wednesday, 15 January 2003 20:05 (twenty-one years ago) link

can we name all the cameos?

i can only think of:

ian williams
al johnson
liam hayes

(i only saw the movie once).

gygax!, Wednesday, 15 January 2003 20:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

Sure, if that's the way you want to look at it; Hornby's more basic suggestion would obviously be that he's grown up and accepted responsibility and is finally coping with the importance of a real-life world beyond his record collection. (It is not as if this is a terribly difficult book to decode.)

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 20:13 (twenty-one years ago) link

I mean that's why Hornby books get made into movies, the character shifts and moralistic turns are about as blatantly telegraphed as they are in screenplays. You could write the whole thing up on index cards ("part six: reorganizing your record collection is an inadequate substitute for reorganizing your life"), which, on the plus side, is much of what makes it all so readable.

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 20:16 (twenty-one years ago) link

'nother cameo: isn't that Jeff Parker playing guitar for Lisa Bonet during said "Baby I Love Your Way?"

A friend of mine who worked at D.C. at the time claims that he was written for a scene with Sara Gibson (who was in the movie for all of like, what, two seconds?), but that it was dropped because she was so short, the D.P. couldn't frame them. Keep in mind this guy is quite a bit shorter than me, and I'm 6'.

hstencil, Wednesday, 15 January 2003 20:18 (twenty-one years ago) link

But Rob was unlikeable - esp. in the book. It's merely a testament to John Cusack's charisma that he's that much less so in the film. Horace Mann was OTM up there when he said that "You hate the most in other people what you hate the most about yourself." Additionally, reading the book as a woman was a pretty frustrating experience. Why does Mr. Hornby think that we're aliens?

Kim (Kim), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 21:20 (twenty-one years ago) link

I was very frustrated at the blurb on the book's back cover -- "Hide this book from your girlfriend!" or what have you.

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 21:25 (twenty-one years ago) link

I mean, it's not exactly a book about testicular cancer; I don't think it's so impossible for females to be able to relate to what's going on.

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 21:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

You home from work again Kim?

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 21:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

Jody, I know! He doesn't get it at ALL.

(yep Zac, it got lots worse, a nice respiratory infection - I'm finally on the mend now I think)

Kim (Kim), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 21:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

Especially since the point of the book/movie was that Rob needed to be more honest about his emotions. Not to play that idiotic boys'n'girls "Swingers" each gender on opposite sides of a cute war thing. That perspective stops getting cute once they're older than say, New Edition in the '80s.

But the blurb and the book are two different things. I thought more that the character of Rob had issues more than the writer. But I may have missed the boat a bit. A lot of guys DO think women are aliens, so I assumed Hornby was showing this rather than espousing it.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 21:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

um, first paragraph was about blurb. second about book. I wasn't very clear.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 21:33 (twenty-one years ago) link

The thing I hated most about High Fidelity:

"It's not what you're like, it's what you like."

Ten pages into the book I realized I was going to be spending 300 some more pages with a person who I would avoid in real life.

keith

zaxxon25 (zaxxon25), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 21:38 (twenty-one years ago) link

I haven't read it in a long while now, But IIRC, it's almost more about the way he writes all the women characters as if they could *never* have these same problems, the same identity confusions, they're just patiently waiting for the boys to grow up. The women in that book are almost parental for chrissakes.

Kim (Kim), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 21:45 (twenty-one years ago) link

Hm, I thought the whole point of the book, and the movie to a certain extent, is that the Rob character has spent so much time with his obsessions that he's never learned what it means to be able to interact with someone else, and the book and movie detail his realization and the beginning of his turnaround. Perhaps I enjoyed both of them a whole lot more because I went through that whole process myself, learning how to interact with people on something more than a superficial "what do you like" kind of level. I never really thought of Rob so much as a prick as I thought of him as socially stunted.

Oddly, the women I know who've read the book have enjoyed it quite a bit, and actually found the Rob character more likable in the book because at least there was some explanation as to what was going through his head.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 21:48 (twenty-one years ago) link

No, you're right. That's what I was trying to get at - I can relate to most of the character exactly and the bits to dislike about him are very similar to what I would have disliked and tried to change in myself. It's just that it's such a frustating read when at the same time as you're empathising, you're essentially being told "as a woman, you couldn't possibly understand!".

Kim (Kim), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 21:53 (twenty-one years ago) link

My copy was actually nearby - the exact quote on the back is "Keep this book away from your girlfriend -- it contains too many of your secrets to let it fall into the wrong hands." -- Details

Details, I know, but stillll....


I guess I don't count as a woman Sean knows. Add me to your database pls.

Kim (Kim), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 22:05 (twenty-one years ago) link

Guys like to think they're somehow mysterious. Or something. Don't blow the illusion, Kim.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 22:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

Pick whichever response is more to your liking, Kim:
a) Urk, I meant other women, because I was responding to you specifically and therefore didn't include you in that tally.
b) Shit, you're a WOMAN? All this time I just thought you were an ILXer!

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 22:08 (twenty-one years ago) link

the film was pretty terrible. I don't know why the woman went back to him. i can't recall him repenting or anything (that's how i remember it but i watched a couple of years back).

haven't read the book.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 22:09 (twenty-one years ago) link

Cleary women are aliens; they have INVERTED BUSINESS.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 22:13 (twenty-one years ago) link

At the end of the book (I forget whether this happens in the movie as well) his attempts at becoming more sensitive/caring/mature include making his gf a mixtape with HER favorite songs on it. Because women apparently don't like being exposed to new things.

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 22:15 (twenty-one years ago) link

I thought he made her a mixtape of stuff she'd LIKE, not stuff she already had. I'm sure of that in the movie at least.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 15 January 2003 22:17 (twenty-one years ago) link

Al Johnson as Beefheart-Obsessed Fan

I dunno, a real Beefheart-Obsessed Fan might have noted that today is the good Captain's birthday. He turns 62.

Chris P (Chris P), Thursday, 16 January 2003 04:16 (twenty-one years ago) link

so I'm guessing it was his ascension that caused the UK hatred more than his pure existence, no?

Nick Hornby ate scarabs and turned into a giant serpent? I think that would have made him more likeable rather than less.

I thought both book and movie were meh: I went into the movie hoping Cusack would make up for the more unlikeable bits of the book, but it never quite worked.

Nicole (Nicole), Thursday, 16 January 2003 04:20 (twenty-one years ago) link

I dunno, a real Beefheart-Obsessed Fan might have noted that...

Might have noted that the record shown in the film was NOT a rare French pressing of Safe As Milk?

paul cox (paul cox), Thursday, 16 January 2003 04:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

I happened to notice that the Index LP in the record collector's house was not the original.. and that it appeared in racks the shop too. Which was odd because the repress is also worth $$$

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 16 January 2003 04:38 (twenty-one years ago) link

Nick Hornby ate scarabs and turned into a giant serpent? I think that would have made him more likeable rather than less.

Nicole has reached the point of no return. Sad, really. ;-) *flees*

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 16 January 2003 04:40 (twenty-one years ago) link

My big problem with the movie was that it chronicles a self-centered shit and expects us to feel pity for him.

mosurock (mosurock), Thursday, 16 January 2003 07:11 (twenty-one years ago) link

The best thing about this film is that it was set in the US, with John Cusak, Lisa Bonet etc. No matter how bad you think it, it would have been infinitely worse (from a Brit pov)if, like the novel, it had been set in North London & starred Colin Firth / Hugh Grant / Anna Friel etc

bham, Thursday, 16 January 2003 09:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

Personally I do not consider myself above relating to self-centered shits.

This thread actually inspired me to borrow it from a friend and watch it a second time, and I found it pretty much the same: generally enjoyable, and a decent enough treatment of mundane laundry-list sorts of angst. And reasonably funny. The music is terrible, but I doubt most audiences cared too much about that.

I was also thinking about the Hornby issue from the US to the UK and basically yes: the tastes of Hornby and the tastes of Hornby's Rob are both sort of old-mannish -- you get the sense that both would have basically given up somewhere around 1987. I'm not sure why he gets more of a free pass on this in the US: I get the sense that music-obsessiveness is a much smaller phenomenon in this country, possibly, and so Hornby, with this particular book, gets let off lightly as a godfather of sorts. (I.e., some sense of different era / same concerns.) It's very jarring seeing the tastes of Hornby's Rob slotted into the context of the film, where a guy who spins dance music wanders around an apartment decorated with indie-rock show posters talking about ... old soul records.

Confidential to hstencil: the performance scene sounded a lot like Lisa Bonet to me -- if that really was a Frost overdub Frost might be better off not admitting it to anyone.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 16 January 2003 09:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

It's also one of very few movies that make Chicago look like a nice place to be.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 16 January 2003 09:13 (twenty-one years ago) link

When he reviewed the book at the time of its original release in 1994, Will Self in the Modern Review suggested that it verged on being a half-baked UK equivalent to American Psycho, but that Rob Fleming makes mixtapes for women at just a couple of removes from cutting them up. Fleming is, on objective reading, a pretty unpleasant and partly psychotic character, and it's not difficult to see why women would keep him at arm's length. The philistinism implied by Barry's Damascene conversion in the final two pages is insufferable (subtext to the thirtysomething reader: "don't bother with all this awful new music that's so difficult to listen to - stick with Twist and Shout and Peter Frampton." Pandering to the lowest common denominator of his readership when he should be seeking to stimulate the highest).

Not about testicular cancer? Well, cancer does enter the book fairly late on as a McGuffin/excuse for not committing to a relationship. "I don't want to have to come home from work in 20 years' time to be faced with a pale, frightened woman saying that she'd been shitting blood." He asks us to believe that he doesn't commit because he's scared that his partner will die. Smarter writers like Richard Yates or Banana Yoshimoto could have written a perfectly fine book just from that theme, but here it feels gratuitous and I have to say, As One Who's Been There, it is spurious bullshit.

Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 16 January 2003 09:33 (twenty-one years ago) link

The book reminds me in many ways of Kingsley Amis' "Lucky Jim", which was similarly hugely popular in the 50s, because it featured a protagonist & attitudes (young, educated, provincial, middle class, cynical/mocking)that many people recognised & sympathised with & that they felt hadn't been portrayed before. "This person is just like me/my husband/boyfriend, I must buy this book for them."
In 10 or 20 years time when the recognizable features (Black 501s, DMs, Smiths b-sides) mean less, it will clog second hand bookshops as K Amis does now

bham, Thursday, 16 January 2003 10:46 (twenty-one years ago) link

this film was shit.

RJG (RJG), Thursday, 16 January 2003 11:05 (twenty-one years ago) link

Is it Rob's psychological set-up to get his emotional satisfaction from his records and his physical/sexual satisfaction from /etcetera?

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 16 January 2003 11:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

That's sort of how it "works."

Marcello Carlin, Thursday, 16 January 2003 11:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

Does that suggest then that anyone with lots of records (ie; us) is actually some kind of emotionally retarded twat?

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 16 January 2003 11:13 (twenty-one years ago) link

the movie seems to treat most rec collectors as emotionally retarded, which is a problem.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 16 January 2003 11:21 (twenty-one years ago) link

i was happier when i was in denial about it

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 16 January 2003 12:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

...one thing I hated about the book was when he slated Kate Bush..... neanderthal!

Thing I loved about the film: the Lene Lovich poster for 'Stateless' up in the shop. Inspired!

russ t, Thursday, 16 January 2003 12:06 (twenty-one years ago) link

The book might well conclude that you need to pay less attention to musical minutiae and more to the important things in life, but, cmon....would Saint Etienne really come into Rob's shop and ask to put a poster promoting their gig up? Leaving aside the fact that they restricted themselves to lip-synched PA's in the early years. It reads like Hornby just picked the name of a (then) 'hot new band' from the NME at random.

Ha I am a nerd.

Rayas Blancas, Thursday, 16 January 2003 12:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

It's also one of very few movies that make Chicago look like a nice place to be.

Yeah but if you're from or have lived there, you have to ignore how completely disjointed it seems (he's on the Blue Line! Now he's on the Red Line! Whoa!).

I once went to a party in the apartment that was used as Tim Robbins's character's apartment in the movie. It's next to the Division Street Baths. And there's no payphone out front where you can get soaked in the rain.

I agree with whomever upthread said that there was no real motivation for the girlfriend to get back with him. If girls got back together with dudes because of mixtapes, well... That's my main problem with the movie: there's no motivation for the characters to do anything. Which ultimately makes it seem pretty false. Dunno about the book, never read it, but seeing the movie makes me not want to.

hstencil, Thursday, 16 January 2003 15:50 (twenty-one years ago) link

Why do I feel like people who are into music hold this film to Russian-Lit standards of theme and development, as opposed to saying things like "It sure was better than Serendipity" or "That bit with Dick and the air conditioner was pretty funny?" Not that I don't understand this tendency: this film was marketed as some sort of deep examination of people who like music -- the general public was told that This is Your Life -- which is sensitive and insulting and so on. But as a film -- as a romantic comedy, really -- surely it's not so sub-par. I mean, I can't believe I'm sticking up for anything so ham-fisted -- this is essentially my old girlfriend talking here -- but saying that the character is a self-centered jackass doesn't get much more out of me than saying that Bridget Jones is a self-centered twit: they have to be, in that the crux of the confessional is that the character has something to confess. (And more precisely that thing things they're confessing are safe bets for the reader/viewer's most mundane character flaws magnified by a factor of ten. In Rob's case his entire "character" is made out of the pretty everyday self-centeredness that most of us don't verbalize much: he's the proxy, which is most of why we're expected not to care much about what, precisely, his positive qualities are. This, in fact, was the main thing I remember finding interesting about both reading the book and about seeing the Bridget Jones movie: do you really need particularly good qualities to be loved? The proxy-assignment in both of these works from the assumption that all of us make: that we're decent, reasonably normal people and don't particularly need to defend ourselves or write up resumes because surely we "deserve" for someone to like us. Someone should be writing a hilarious confessional-novel about that one.)

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 16 January 2003 17:28 (twenty-one years ago) link

I agree with whomever upthread said that there was no real motivation for the girlfriend to get back with him

I dont know, but who says that the reason they got back together was because of something he did? (I havent read the book). I mean, the real reason could simply have been - she wanted to- she still wanted to be with him. No other grand reason necessary. The mix tape was simply a pretext.

insectifly (insectifly), Thursday, 16 January 2003 17:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

don't particularly need to defend ourselves or write up resumes because surely we "deserve" for someone to like us.

I find the idea that someone would fall in love with me to be a laughably absurd idea.

, Thursday, 16 January 2003 17:35 (twenty-one years ago) link

nabisco = OTM

Alan (Alan), Thursday, 16 January 2003 17:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

nabisco- do you think his girlfriend should have got together with him in the end?

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 16 January 2003 17:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

Julio: I don't think it really matters! The story's not about whether or not they belong together -- it's assumed from the beginning that they loved one another for whatever particular reasons they had. (Rob makes a list: why is it so hard to imagine Laura having her own list of whatever qualities made her love Rob?) The first question is whether Rob's character has changed enough during the course of the thing to "earn" her back: as usual, the book did a much better job convincing me of this than the movie did, though (sort of weirdly) in both the biggest shifts come after she's already come back to him -- i.e. dropping the other-girl daydreaming and the half-proposal.

What's actually more interesting to me is that there's lots of room to think that Laura is actually going through a parallel process of conversion: I don't remember the nuance of it in the book, which I read a long time ago, but in the movie her decision to go back to him is sort of a ... well, you can frame it in two ways, one mean and one nice. The mean way would be to say that it's giving up, it's a decision that she's just not up to the stress and hassle of changing her life -- but the nice way would be to say that in a moment of actual need she realizes that it's Rob she feels comfortable with, Rob she wants to be around, Rob who feels like "home" (the word "home" is much used in the screenplay) ... and it's possible to claim her own character-shift is going on in realizing that this is somehow more important than the aspirations she has that Rob doesn't share. (Explication of his good qualities is off-page and out-of-frame, so we only learn that she's decided he's worth it. And if he's working as our proxy that's exactly what're supposed to want to hear -- despite your ridiculous flaws you're worth it.)

Em@il: That's not actually incompatible with feeling like you deserve it anyway.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 16 January 2003 18:18 (twenty-one years ago) link

Nabisco:

1. No, Hornby was always an utter tosser, at least from his first big-hit book on. (That book is [even?] worse than this one.)

2. 'People hold it to Russian-lit standards': yes, and 'people' = 'American people' - that was my point, and is perhaps sth only visible from here.

3. You are correct, I think, about the careless genre-mix-ups, etc.

Others:

4. I prefer the film to the book: partly because it has less... Nick Hornby in it. Whoever said Hugh Grant would have made it worse: yes, indeed.

5. Justyn D: no, I don't think Americans are boring. If I did, I'd say so. I think they're... exciting.

the pinefox, Thursday, 16 January 2003 18:25 (twenty-one years ago) link

I got the impression that the movie was somehow this protrait of these obesesives and that the love story was kind of thrown in, actually. And the way she got back to him was basically strange because as far as i can recall, he treated her like shit.

I'll revive this thread when i see it again.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 16 January 2003 18:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

I don't hold it to Russian Lit standards, I hold it to romantic comedy standards. And when I say that, I don't mean 1990s American Hollywood bullshit romantic comedies, I mean the good stuff: 1930s Hollywood witty and fun romantic comedies. I find myself not caring about ANY characters in Hollywood films any more, they're too wooden (even if they're supposed to be "quirky," a la Cusack's character), esp. compared with, say, a Lauren Bacall or Kathryn Hepburn type.

hstencil, Thursday, 16 January 2003 18:39 (twenty-one years ago) link

I agree with both hstencil and nabisco, if that's possible. It's true that contemporary romantic comedies are usually pretty feeble compared with Love Affair with Charles Boyer, or Gueule d'amour with Jean Gabin, or even more recent stuff like 10 and Avanti!. That said, even those films were pretty schematic and wouldn't hold up subjected to the standards of realism some people are applying here. There's a kind of streamlining of character and narrative that goes on in the genre that I find perfectly acceptable. Second, you have to judge a film by its most proximate neighbors and High Fidelity is a pretty charming contemporary romantic comedy with a number of moments that ring true. I didn't love it but it's a respectable piece of work, nothing to be ashamed of.

Amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 16 January 2003 19:00 (twenty-one years ago) link

I dunno, I found High Fidelity to be a slightly-higher-class version of the "Man = Boorish Slob; Woman = Fastidious but Loyal to Boorish Slob" formula that Hollywood loves so much these days.

hstencil, Thursday, 16 January 2003 20:28 (twenty-one years ago) link

Exactly, man, "higher-class!"

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 16 January 2003 20:41 (twenty-one years ago) link

(Again, also, it's in the nature of the gender-confessional that the character's own sex is terrible and the opposite sex seems to have everything mysteriously sorted, cf opposite organization in chick-lit, although the interesting difference is that chicklit gets to complain about all the awful men out there whereas in blokelit there are no awful women, they are part of a vast sea of unacknowledged nothingness within which only the occasional star shines.) (Is this another realistic shittiness of men or not?)

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 16 January 2003 20:45 (twenty-one years ago) link

(That last question's not rhetorical.)

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 16 January 2003 20:45 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yeah well both approaches are both wrong. Fuck it, I'm gonna go see "A Guy Thing." I'm sure it's better than "High Fidelity" anyways.

Kill me now, please.

hstencil, Thursday, 16 January 2003 20:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

four years pass...

better than i remember this movie. way better.

pisces, Monday, 9 July 2007 00:49 (seventeen years ago) link

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/12/08/arts/Chase600.jpg

scott seward, Monday, 9 July 2007 01:10 (seventeen years ago) link

oh no this actually happened

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Monday, 9 July 2007 01:24 (seventeen years ago) link

a musical? what the..

pisces, Monday, 9 July 2007 01:40 (seventeen years ago) link

By BEN BRANTLEY
Published: December 8, 2006 NY Times

excerpt:
Surely geeks grow in Brooklyn too. Yet in the musical version of “High Fidelity,” directed by Walter Bobbie, these overgrown lads have shed both their sting and their pain. The characters have the same names and say many of the same things. In addition to Rob — who takes inventory of his romantic past while mourning the departure of his live-in girlfriend, Laura (Jenn Colella) — there are his customer-scaring employees and best friends, the meek Dick (Christian Anderson) and the brash Barry (Jay Klaitz, in the Jack Black role).

If you’ve been a die-hard patron of Broadway over the last decade, you have probably noticed that something weird happens to figures from books and movies when they enter the land of musicals. The rough edges and prickly quirks that made them distinctive soften into a uniform blandness. ...

...Still, “High Fidelity” definitely deserves a place in my own catalog of Top 5 lists. That would be on the roster of All-Time Most Forgettable Musicals. Now if only I could remember the names of the others.

curmudgeon, Monday, 9 July 2007 02:56 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh hells no!

Ok fine, a musical version of High Fidelity. But then shouldn't the music sound like Belle & Sebastian? Or Stevie Wonder? Or anything besides Tin Pan Alley one hundred times removed? Is the music of The 13th Floor Elevators or Smog forever incompatible with Broadway?

P. S. Hedwig was TPA in glam drag.

Kevin John Bozelka, Monday, 9 July 2007 03:09 (seventeen years ago) link

It seems like Broadway basically has one musical, and when they adapt something they just change the names of the characters.

filthy dylan, Monday, 9 July 2007 03:18 (seventeen years ago) link

Why did I think this already opened, bombed and closed?

Hurting 2, Monday, 9 July 2007 03:34 (seventeen years ago) link

wow, that just looks horrible

Morley Timmons, Monday, 9 July 2007 04:45 (seventeen years ago) link

Yeah, what Hurting said. I remember reading about this a while back.

ailsa, Monday, 9 July 2007 07:24 (seventeen years ago) link

Oh aye, that article's dated December last year. As you were.

ailsa, Monday, 9 July 2007 07:24 (seventeen years ago) link

seventeen years pass...

Saw this tonight for the first time since 2000. The record store in an incel den! But loved seeing all the locations and posters and such on a big screen.

Posted when Zoe Kravitz was in high school and two decades before the reboot:

Who would be the real world equivalent of the Lisa Bonet character?
― maria b (maria b), Wednesday, January 15, 2003 7:21 PM (twenty-one years ago) bookmarkflaglink

Lenny Kravitz?
― dave225 (Dave225), Wednesday, January 15, 2003 7:25 PM (twenty-one years ago) bookmarkflaglink

bratwurst autumn (Eazy), Sunday, 29 December 2024 07:56 (five days ago) link

Showed it to my 17 year old earlier this year and he loved it. Didn't we all know some of these people IRL? I certainly did. One of them pulled off the "I'll sell 5 copies of this album right now" when he played Sinead O'Conner's debut in the store.

Gerald McBoing-Boing, Sunday, 29 December 2024 14:16 (five days ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.