Graphic Design in Pop

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
It's gone from gatefolds in the 70s to jewel cases in the 80s and 90s, to mp3s on Zip disks in the zippies. Graphic design in pop music got smaller and smaller, and may disappear altogether if music becomes an online-only commodity.

I want to ask a whole slew of questions about graphic design. Unless otherwise specified, imagine them in 12 point Helvetica Light, please.

a) Let's get the list thing out of the way. List, if you must, outstanding record sleeves, or particularily poor ones.

b) Did a good sleeve ever make you buy a bad record? Did a bad sleeve almost stop you discovering musical gems?

c) Are some sleeve designs the perfect corollary for the music inside, to the extent that they might almost have come from the same creative intelligence? (I'm thinking perhaps of 'Snowbug' by the High Llamas, or sleeves by Denim and Cornelius. Or Yes and Roger Dean!)

d) In a pomo superflat kind of world where we don't assume the inherent superiority of some artforms over others, is anyone out there prepared to go so far as to say that sleeves are as important as the records they contain? Can graphic design be as 'artistic' as music?

e) Can we imagine a parallel world where hack musicians are commissioned at the 11th hour to make complementary sounds for the latest meisterwerks produced by genius designers, who've been locked up for years in the studio with their G3s and laser printers, giving painful birth?

f) Sometimes designers make music. Are there genres they're better at? (The breed seems to take to techno or kitsch bubblegum -- cf. Underworld / Tomato, or bands like Delaware and Stereo Total).

g) If there's some sort of moral imperative for bands to play their own instruments, write their own songs, etc, shouldn't that be extended to designing their own sleeves?

h) Outline, in 300 words or less (Bellbottom, 8 point), the relationship between indie labels and their in house designers: 4AD and Russell Mills, Factory and Peter Saville, etc.

i) Lots of rock writers and musicians contribute to this forum, but I'm not aware of the presence of any graphic designers. Why? Is thinking about music an alien culture for them? Are they so buried in right brain formalism that putting words together bores and stresses them?

j) - z) If you want any more you can sing it yourself (Barnbrook Gothic, 36 point).

Momus, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Best example of jumping a train after it's left the station - the prog bands who tried out 'new-wave' graphics in the early 80s. Jethro Tull('Under Wraps', 'A'), Renaissance ('Camera Camera') elicited derision for it. King Crimson ('Discipline','Beat') actually got kudos. Yes and Genesis actually sold a shitload, unbelievably. Around that time, the ridiculous-grpahics torch was passed to heavy metal.

tarden, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Helvetica is unpleasant, Momus. Geneva, that's what you want.

d) Potentially, sure. But though I care about design and the visual arts I still think the music inside is more important - that's just a personal preference. It is wholly reasonable to me that there are design freaks out there who lament the tyrrany that is the availability of album art work only via the purchase of worthless music CDs.

i) Kate went to art school, yes? Surely there are others. (Yo Ethan.)

b) All the time. I'm probably really bad about this. Sleeves I think are nice are more likely to make me buy the records I buy on impulse (though I buy on impulse records with covers I'm not impressed by, too). Also the other way for covers I don't like. Hard to think of examples divorced from my muscial pre-knowledge, but maybe: Dylan's John Wesley Harding cover probably helped keep me away until I knew enough about him from reading, and other records, that it became irrelevant what the cover looked like.

e) See (d).

God, I've had no caffeine for a week until today when I drank like 72 oz. of it, 24 of them a few hours ago. 4 AM is my normal bedtime, ha, but I'm NEVER going to get tired.

Josh (4:12 AM), Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Roxy Music 'Flesh + Blood', Black Sabbath 'Technical Ecstasy' - 2 best covers by 2 of my favorite bands - worst albums by both.

tarden, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Hmmm. Hopefully the word 'style' comes up a lot, because from my slightly ignorant perspective 'style' is something very important to both design and pop. So it only seems reasonable that there'd be plenty of affinities between the two.

Everyone is going to wake up today and read their ILM and say 'what rubbish! Josh has been awake all night replying to all the threads!' Hahaha.

Josh, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

A) Good: PiL's Metal Box (and therefore anything else released in a tin/metallic type-deal, especially the early Chain Reaction discs), Gang of Four's Entertainment, Talking Heads' More Songs About Buildings and Food, Comsat Angels' Waiting for a Miracle (nighttime shots -- bonus!), Big Black's Lungs EP, Throwing Muses' Throwing Muses, My Bloody Valentine's Isn't Anything, Afghan Whigs' Gentlemen, Mojave 3's Ask Me Tomorrow, Stevie Wonder's Innervisions, John Cale's Vintage Violence, Kevin Ayers' Whatevershebringswesing (the one with little boys hatching out of eggs, as another tot relieves himself behind a wicker basket), Isaac Hayes' Hot Buttered Soul and Brian Eno's Before and After Science (bald head shots usually work) and the immortal Box of Hammers by the Brain Surgeons; bad: most everything else, especially anything by the Scorpions or records made by 'local' acts.

B) Yes and yes.

C) Yes; that's when they work best.

D) Yes.

E) Sure.

F) Tomato > Underworld, but not by much (not really a compliment for either, but the sleeve for Second Toughest in the Infants is nice.)

G) Not necessarily. Sometimes people outside of the band are better at interpreting the music than the band itself.

H) I do like it when labels can be associated with a certain graphic style. Blue Note, Factory, etc.

Andy, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

a)Worst cover - Aerosmith, 'Toys in the Attic'. Creepy and disgusting for some reason, odd for party rockers.
h)ECM. Their visual identity is so strong, it makes me wonder if a)it affects the performers subconsciously, to accomodate their playing/concepts to one of those covers, or b)if their more 'out' stuff (Evan Parker, say) is made more acceptable to a wider audience by the ECM packaging.

tarden, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Andy - what? 'Innervisions' is just bloody awful, a clumsy illustration of the title you'd expect to find on a prog/metal album! And the Scorpions' 'Lovedrive' - absolute classic! It's the expression on the guy's face that makes it.

tarden, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Good lord help me, I'm answering a Momus question. To preface my reply, let me explain why I may seem to burned-out and world-weary of the idea of graphic design. I used to love it, be obsessed with it, to the point where I had typeface catalogue posters up on my walls. Two years of working at an ad agency nearly killed my love of the artform, much like I believe that being a prostitute destroys people's capability to enjoy sex. So pardon my cynicism, this is a subject I *used* to care passionately about- probably far more passionately than I have ever cared about "fine arts" in the 20th Century. I'm going to try and remember some basic formatting skills to make the question/reply thing easier to follow, and because I share Momus' dislike of the tyranny of Times New Roman on this board. I really hope it works or I'm going to look like an even bigger fool than some of the viewpoints expressed already make me look. ;-)

a) Let's get the list thing out of the way. List, if you must, outstanding record sleeves, or particularily poor ones.

Rather than getting into a list of categorising the "album art canon" or whatever, the last time I was seriously impressed with the graphic design of a CD- cover, to the point where I actually thought "wow, what a lovely *thing* I am pleased simply with the visual aspect of this" was the Sigur Ros album. Maybe the silver circular insert echoing the CD itself was a cheap trick, but it was still an effective one. My all- time favourite still remains the uber-cool diskette format of "Power, Corruption and Lies" (spelling mistake and all). Though the Spiritualized pill-packaging gimick was still pretty durn KEWL, especially when it was carried through to the liner notes. Yay for the prog-rock concept album not being dead!

b) Did a good sleeve ever make you buy a bad record? Did a bad sleeve almost stop you discovering musical gems?

God, yes. And yes, too. I used to go on cheap CD-gluts at Venus Records, and buy a dozen $1 CDs at a time, based on silly things like sleeve design and the bands names. Most of them were awful, but some were nice. And bad sleeves... argh, the panty lines on the live Velvets album continue to turn me off. I taped it off a friend, but cannot bring myself to own the album itself.

c) Are some sleeve designs the perfect corollary for the music inside, to the extent that they might almost have come from the same creative intelligence? (I'm thinking perhaps of 'Snowbug' by the High Llamas, or sleeves by Denim and Cornelius. Or Yes and Roger Dean!)

In an ideal world, this should always be the case. Though I spent ages as a wee dot looking at my dad's Yes albums, trying to imagine what weird otherworldly music would eminate from the discs, (grown men! wearing cloaks!) and I was eventually disappointed with the hippie prog-rock drivel. An unpopular answer will probably be to say that this is how I see "OK, Computer". Like it or hate it, the whole album, cover, insert and music, all worked together to form a complete artwork. Lyric sheets that went well beyond "just the words".

d) In a pomo superflat kind of world where we don't assume the inherent superiority of some artforms over others, is anyone out there prepared to go so far as to say that sleeves are as important as the records they contain? Can graphic design be as 'artistic' as music?

I don't get "pomo" - no one has ever adequately defined the concept for me (then again, how do you adequately define a movement which eschews the authority of definitions by its very nature?). Of course Graphic Design is an artform, in and of itself, and the only people in the Post-Bauhausian world who try to claim it isn't were the sniffy Fine Arts students upstairs who got sniffy and snobby about their "artistic statements".

However, the idea of saying that the sleeve design is more important than music is just silly. It's just a different artform. You wouldn't say "cinema is more important than architecture!!!" would you? They are related, but not in the same way that you wouldn't have ballet without both the music and the dance, as music without dance is still music, but dance without music is... well... silly. Graphic design exists externally, it's an interesting but slightly artificial development that graphic design has become so linked with the album as "artform". I mean, how does classical music- which was developped to be performed, rather than recorded as part of a package- fit into that equation?

e) Can we imagine a parallel world where hack musicians are commissioned at the 11th hour to make complementary sounds for the latest meisterwerks produced by genius designers, who've been locked up for years in the studio with their G3s and laser printers, giving painful birth?

BWAH HAH HAH HAH HAH!!!! You've never worked in an advertising office, have you?

f) Sometimes designers make music. Are there genres they're better at? (The breed seems to take to techno or kitsch bubblegum -- cf. Underworld / Tomato, or bands like Delaware and Stereo Total).

No, I find no correlation. Except maybe that graphic designers are anally retentive twats who are more drawn to styles of music where they are able to be "auteur" (maybe explains the techno link?). Bubblegum is historically as much about packaging and presentation as the music- this explains some of the appeal. Yet none of this explains why there are so many ex-art students in genres like spacerock/drone?

g) If there's some sort of moral imperative for bands to play their own instruments, write their own songs, etc, shouldn't that be extended to designing their own sleeves?

Another absurd proposition. Songwriting ability and performing talent are two related skills/talents, which often overlap, but often don't. (I don't hold it against Brian Wilson that he didn't play a note of bass on Pet Sounds.) Music and graphic design are two very different artforms, with very different skillsets. Sometimes they overlap, more often they don't. Why would I hold it against a band if they were talented songwriters, but not talented visual artists? I mean, god forbid I ever have to look at another John Squire designed sleeve again. ;-) (j/k - the Stone Roses' sleeve art took a bizarre downturn around the same time the music did, so I can't help but think there's a connection.)

h) Outline, in 300 words or less (Bellbottom, 8 point), the relationship between indie labels and their in house designers: 4AD and Russell Mills, Factory and Peter Saville, etc.

Oh GAWD, this is about 40,000 threads in one. I actually think it's far more telling and interesting if the *label* designs the bands' covers, or has an "in-house" designer. It shows that the label has put a great deal of thought into making a cohesive sound and image, rather than a random collection of bands that they like.

Obviously, the highlights include the Peter Saville/Factory connection - the glacially cool, romanto-techno function-becoming- form of Saville's genius years perfectly complimented the sounds of the bands coming out of Factory. 4AD/V23 - in the early days, it seemed that there was a distinct effort made to make the sleeves resemble or echo the music of the artists themselves. Although all the artists could broadly fall into the same etherial-psychedelic world that the artwork suggested, each was unique. By the time that the label has coallesced into the "4AD SOUND" set in stone, the record sleeves had all begun to look alike, to the point where you could no longer tell a His Name Is Alive record from a Lush record.

I don't feel that this is a dead art, despite the fact that many complain that first CDs, then the internet is killing the visual aspect of the packaging. For a start, smart and graphics-conscious artists are expanding their "branding" (to use the cynical advertising term) or their "graphic image" into the internet. Why do all Radiohead fan sites look and feel alike? Granted, I think that "OK, Computer" had brilliant design - which unfortunately, has rather been killed by repetition. The old Radiohead site from about 1997 was an utter benchmark in interesting use of a website which made itself an album-sleeve like work of art in and of itself, rather than just a big promo tool for the band.

And there are still indie record labels which go out of their way to establish a reputation for excellent design- Constellation spring most readily to mind.

i) Lots of rock writers and musicians contribute to this forum, but I'm not aware of the presence of any graphic designers. Why? Is thinking about music an alien culture for them? Are they so buried in right brain formalism that putting words together bores and stresses them?

Like I previously stated, I worked for an advertising agency for two years, and this nearly killed my love of art and design to the point where I have not been to a gallery or museum or even been to the art section of my local bookshop for over a year. I disagree that there are no designers here- but design has moved on. Ask how many people here are *web* designers, and I think you'll find a great deal more.

j) - z) If you want any more you can sing it yourself (Barnbrook Gothic, 36 point).

personal experience... this is going to be about The Lollies, so if you're not interested in hearing about what goes into the packaging from an artist's PoV, then don't yell at me. When we self- released the Lollies's EP, I think we spent nearly 3 times as much on the packaging than we spent on actual recording costs. (That is *just* the printing costs- I'm not even adding in the time spent on art and graphic design, because I did it myself, rather than going to a design firm. It could have gone into the £1000's if I'd been doing it for a client.)

Album cover design is *very* important to me, and we wanted a sleeve which would instantly tell people what the music sounded like before they even heard it, which meant splashing out for 4-colour process printing, and including an 8-page lyric booklet in the form of a 60s Girly Comic book. (I like lyric sheets. I just do. Don't ask me why- even though I seldom pay attention to lyrics while *listening*, I actually like to see them presented graphically.)

masonic boom, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Herr Professor Momus, did you just read my entry under "Introduce Yourself," or what? If not, you must be reading my mail, as Tom Waits once said. There's so much I could say about the importance of graphics in pop music... but I won't. Everyone else already has so much clever and interesting to say. (Although I sure miss those old pop-surreal Hipgnosis sleeves, which actually almost led me into buying Wishbone Ash.)

By the way, I was an art major, too. Oh, OK, one tiny insight: Isn't David Hamilton's "White Album" the first and last word on the subject? Who was that group inside the sleeve?

X. Y. Zedd, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm having my morning coffee write now and can only jot a few notes, but I have to answer this one:

" Are some sleeve designs the perfect corollary for the music inside, to the extent that they might almost have come from the same creative intelligence? (I'm thinking perhaps of 'Snowbug' by the High Llamas, or sleeves by Denim and Cornelius."

I tend to be more impressed by *good* CD packaging as it's more difficult, and it demonstrates an ability to adapt to new design problems - size restrictions, environmental restrictions, etc. We recently got the 3-CD "Man from Ipanema" (I think it's called). Of course, Antonio Carlos Jobim is dead and could not have designed it, but this was the first packaging and design in recent memory that just floored me. It comes in a little CD-sized spiral notebook and uses different colors of paper cut in different shapes for the inner sleeves - one is a shell, another leaves and I can't remember the other one. The cover is transparent, and there is a lot of creative paper cutting and folding. It's just so elegant and light as air, with soft corals and blues for the colors. I swear it's almost as good as the CDs inside, I love holding it. I guess that's partly because I love good design and partly also because I've heard stuff like "Corcovado" eight million times. Also, the CD does not have "Surfboard" on it, which is inexcusable.

Kerry Keane, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Personally, I don't care about cover art. The Zak Feuers of the world do not excite me. Usually, in my experience, there is not much corolation between image in mind provoked by music and image on album cover. I have thought albums would be good based on their cover and they weren't and vice versa. You can't judge a book by its cover. Should the artist design the cover? Not if you see the cover of Joni Mitchel's "Clouds". Anyways I see a future where muisic is mostly in mp3 form and the bands WEBSITE is where their art is.

-- Mike Hanley, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Re: Isaac Hayes covers - I love them, too. Hot Buttered Soul just makes you want to listen - you *know* it's gonna be good. I also like the cover of _The Isaac Hayes Movement_ - Isaac in the center of all those spirals.

I personally love all the photographs on Sparks album covers, but that's not so much graphic design as brilliant staged photography. But I could write essays on some of those, especially the plane crash one.

Kerry Keane, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Is it 'cheating' when record covers use already-famous images? (Pearls Before Swine using Bosch, Destroy All Monsters using the Zapruder film, Led Zep's 1st)Also, were the Smiths just lazy for using 'found' images all the time?

tarden, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"Good: PiL's Metal Box (and therefore anything else released in a tin/metallic type-deal, especially the early Chain Reaction discs)."

A couple of years ago, while thumbing through CD drawers at WNUR in Chicago, I sliced my hand open on the packaging of Aube's "Metal de Metal" (I think)---the record composed entirely of the sound of big sheets of metal, and therefore packaged in little, *sharp* sheets of metal. I bled over the latter half of the As.

Only later did it occur to me that the Aube record based on water sounds, which is packaged in a thin plastic baggie containing actual water, was shelved right next to the metal record. I haven't been up to NUR in a while, but I'd be willing to bet that at some point, the metal punctured the plastic and a great deal of discs by bands whose names start with A were ruined.

I only mention that to mention this: record packaging should not involve metal.

As for best cover design: Sam Prekop's self-titled solo record--- which, incidentally, is a painting by Prekop himself (although I can't speak for the actual design and text layout). Seeing this on vinyl makes me want to cry.

Nitsuh, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

A few particular favourites:

Max Tundra, "Some Best Friend You Turned Out To Be"

The Fall, "This Nation's Saving Grace", "Grotesque (After The Gramme)", a lot of their earlier albums actually.

Aphex Twin, "Richard D. James Album"

Delia Derbyshire / John Baker / David Cain, "BBC Radiophonic Music"

Telstar Ponies, "Voices From The New Music"

Stereolab, "Aluminium Tunes"

particular unfavourite, Radiohead, "OK Computer". I didn't even like the design to "Kid A" as much as I thought I might. I much preferred the music on "Kid A" to anything they'd done previously, though.

Robin Carmody, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Oh, and the High Llamas' "Hawaii" and "Gideon Gaye". Not so much the later records though.

Robin Carmody, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Does anyone have the vinyl to Fleetwood Mac's "Tusk"? WTF were they thinking with that? I can never put that one back together right: sleeves within sleeves within sleeves, and the sides of the sleeves have to match or it won't go in. Ugh. I'd try to find some intended meaning in that, but I don't think Fleetwood Mac were deep enough for that. Maybe they just didn't want you to put the LP back in its sleeve - EVER.

Kerry Keane, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm not sure what to do with Le Grande Magistery boxes the jewelcases come in, SHould I return the jewelcases to them when not listening? SHould I pin them up? Eat them? Store fags?

-- Mike Hanley, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

a)Personal favourites. Spititualized - Ladies and gentlemen.. one of the few funny sleeves which doesn't grate. Sparks - Propaganda. Human League -Dare. Saints -(I'm) Stranded. Colourbox - Colourbox (so un 4AD). Roxy Music - First. Blur -Parklife. Durutti Column - Return of.. Plus loads of others I'll remember later.

Duffers Oasis -Be here now. Prince - Emancipation. Public Enemy - fear of a black planet (great LP though)

b) Not a bad LP but not one I listen to oftern is Peter Sellers - songs for swingin' Sellers. Extremely black, extremely funny. Amazing it came out on EMI in 1959, it's the sort of sleeve which punk acts in the late 70's would have rejected as too sick.

c) Basement Jaxx -Remedy. That sensual, multicultural, cosmopolitan vibe is well reflected by the sleeve. Aphex Wins - Ambient works vol II - Industrial archelogy as music.

d)No . yes.

e)I thought some music was being comissioned for art e.g Stereolab.

Billy Dods, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I don't have time to answer the many essay questions proposed by Momus, but I'm a graphic designer and think that jacket design is tremedously important. LP size kicks CD's ass. I like the design for "Tusk", as well as the Pixies. Yes, Joni Mitchell's "Clouds" is awful, but her "Hissing of Summer Lawns" is great. Back to work.

Sean, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Too tired and stressed to give Momus's questions the time they deserve, but in response to Josh's sub-thread question: I'm busy with my first year at art school.

Mitch Lastnamewithheld, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

a) Let's get the list thing out of the way. List, if you must, outstanding record sleeves, or particularily poor ones.

The sleeve to Look Into The Eyeball by David Byrne is one of my current favourites. The multiple covers for Different Class should also get a mention but I'll just leave it there for now.

d) In a pomo superflat kind of world where we don't assume the inherent superiority of some artforms over others, is anyone out there prepared to go so far as to say that sleeves are as important as the records they contain? Can graphic design be as 'artistic' as music?

Has no-one mentioned Mike Alway and El yet? Isn't there a story that once at El they discovered the person reviewing the singles at NME that week was a huge El fan. Unfortunately, the records due to be released hadn't been delivered in time so Alway simply sent in the sleeves on their own, inevitably getting Single Of The Week. Whilst this obviously isn't only because of the sleeves (the fact they were El for instance). Alway suggested that not only was there nothing wrong with only sending the sleeves out, but that was exactly was El was about.

"We were making music at the record end, there weren't any concerts. We weren't interested in that sort of thing at all. There was no money, no promotion, nothing, it was all about the artefact. That's what you put out, the artefact. Therefore, you don't really need to hear the music."

e) Can we imagine a parallel world where hack musicians are commissioned at the 11th hour to make complementary sounds for the latest meisterwerks produced by genius designers, who've been locked up for years in the studio with their G3s and laser printers, giving painful birth?

Again, didn't Alway used to do this sort of thing?

Ward, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Grrrr! It happened to me again. I was in a record store last night with Kahimi Karie, and we both bought overpriced copies of a new album on Warp, 'Vocal Studies and Uprock Narratives' by Prefuse 73. I'd say I bought this record 60% because of the sleeve, 20% because I found it in a 'trusted curated store' (Nadiff in Harajuku) and 20% because it was on a 'trusted curated label', Warp. Unfortunately, it sucked, at least in comparison to the sleeve.

The sleeve is pretty simple: a high contrast image of a man on an old- fashioned bicycle, and a mixture of small Clarendon and big early 70s fat paper cut-out-style lettering. The associations this sleeve set up in my mind were: Brazilian movie poster, circa 1972. De Sica's warm, socialist realist 50s Italian movie 'Bicycle Thieves'. The sound of bicycle spokes. Early 70s radical chic. Sunshine, the light sensuality of Brazilian music, a certain atmosphere of exotic sensuality. I imagined all that mixed with the cutting edge electronic that is Warp's trademark, and rushed to the check out counter.

When I played the CD, it was bits of rap spliced in innovatively unintelligible ways over early Aphex Twin-style electronic backings. I was probably a lot more disappointed than I would have been if I hadn't had all those false expectations set up by the sleeve. My only consolation was the thought that I can now go and make myself the kind of music I was imagining such a sleeve to contain: a clanky yet electronic mixture of bicycle spoke sounds and 70s Brazilian radical chic.

Actually, this sleeve looks a lot like the (excellent) graphics Mike Alway is currently doing for Alan McGee's label Poptones. And it was misleading in the same way. I haven't bought any Poptones releases because I know that although the sleeves look so alluring and exotic, childish and colourful and quirky, the music is probably the usual McGee formula of feebly sincere powerpop.

I wonder to what extent record sleeve design is always going to hold out some sort of false utopia which the music can never quite deliver on? I've been toying in recent essays with the idea of Design as the closest thing we have now to a religion or a philosophy with a vision of The Good and The Beautiful. If that's the case (and you certainly don't see many throat-catchingly Utopian lifestyle magazine spreads about the promise inherent in music these days -- at least not outside of Bjork interviews!) how can music ever compete with the design that surrounds it? How can a diversion compete with a religion?

Momus, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

> >'Vocal Studies and Uprock Narratives'

Fuck, I might have bought that for the name, for the first part at least. It sounds so academic, instructional and impersonal - "Vocal Studies", like some fifties record on proper breathing techniques.

Kerry Keane, Thursday, 14 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

A couple of years ago the boutique magazine The Idler ran book reviews entitled Judging A Book By Its Cover, a premise that, for the most part, worked. In my own literary shopping I tend to avoid any book with moody pics of pine trees and snow on the cover.

When I was a teenager I had a massive case of Smiths-itis, in no small part due to the cover art, which was there to signpost all sorts of other, complementary, cultural artefacts. And although today we'd call them 'screen grabs' these pictures pointed me in the direction of Cocteau, Warhol, and all manner of groovy things that make it easier to be ambitious in the provinces. Does anyone here reckon this still happens, and which groups - not B&S, which is an empty version of the Smiths' regime - are similarily engaged?

Nick's correct to identify Design Zen as a form of secular religion and there are probably quite a few of us here who are weary of the concept of 'design classic' to boot. Orthodoxy, to me, is a VERY bad thing. Suggests to me it's time to rip it up and start again.

Oh and BTW, when a label has a recognised house style that causes its aficionados to splash out, but what's inside the sleeve is utter pants, that's the first sign that yer favourite label is about to go massively off the boil. Could this be the beginning of the end for Warp? Or will this come in September when they release Vincent Gallo's LP?

suzy, Friday, 15 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Incidentally, X.Y.Zedd, I'm completely charmed by the parallel universe you've constructed where David Hamilton designed The White Album. That must be why, when you hold the album up to the light at just the right angle, you can see, printed white on white, the erotic image of a pre- adolescent pre-raphaelite girl, naked in grainy soft focus.

Momus, Friday, 15 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Ouch--I have been been nicked!

Please don't tell any of my Art History teachers that I mistook David for Richard or vice-versa. "In Every Homepage A Heartache."

What, then, is the logical, obvious antithesis to "The White Album"? Not Prince's "Black Album," but The Velvet Underground's "White Light/White Heat," of course--though I've always had trouble seeing that skull (just as I did in Holbein).

Incidentally, I once had a Folkways album made up entirely of the sounds of bicycles--gears, bells, spokes, rattling frames--recorded long before "Tour De France." Also one of the few albums I gave away almost as quickly as I got it--to a bicycle racer I knew.

If you buy your furniture from thrift shops, is that the same as being Unitarian?

X. Y. Zedd, Friday, 15 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Way up there Josh mentioned being put off by the cover for John Wesley Harding. I'm suprised no one mentioned that if you hold the record upside-down you can see the Beatles in the tree-bark, right at the "bottom" (top) where the photo gets cut off by the border. Can't really see it on the CD.

And of course if you hold any Ronnie James Dio album upside-down the DIO spells "Devil".

I had a friend buy me a Kahimie Karie CD on one of his trips to Japan about 4 years ago. He assumed he was buying a full-length CD but the poster, CD, booklet, and mini-CD inside were only of one song. I of course perversely liked the overkill but I have not listened to it since.

Tracer Hand, Friday, 15 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

d) + e) If ,as we're always hearing, 'the kids' are just downloading albums for free and ripping CD's, all that's left to make an album genuine is the packaging. I'll bet the next few years will see bands releasing albums with more 'physical' properties (etched boxes, free posters, t-shirts etc) to counter their loss of control over the 'digital' properties. g) I dont think so...how you feel about this depends on how close you feel the sleeve is to the 'artistic' side of making a record rather than the 'promotional'. You wouldn't expect a band to press their own records or sell them from the shops, would you?

Mat Osman, Saturday, 16 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The beautiful lightning sleeve on "An Electric Storm" by White Noise was meant to be luminous. Island Records in 1969 said no. They still do. Shame.

Oh well, at least they released an album that year (Fairport Convention's "What We Did On Our Holidays") with a cover of a vandalised blackboard at a famously leftish / radical British university of the time. In an indulgent way I like the idea of this being the filter through which Paris in May '68 reached Britain.

Robin Carmody, Saturday, 16 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Mat - If you're THAT Mat Osman then HOORAY for your sleeves, every last one of them. When I was in Venice last week Veruschka was kicking around the parties and it was satisfying to explain to artheads who really should have known better who she was via Drowners artwork.

suzy, Saturday, 16 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Malcom Garrett's cover for Orgasm Addict has the lot,and reminds me mostly of Max Ernst's frotages.

Bill, Monday, 18 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

hmm, well..

some of my faves:

} Mike Mills's sleeves for Cibo Matto's "Viva La Woman", & his work on Air's "Moon Safari" and the related singles & videoes

} Just about everything Julian House @ intro has done for Stereolab... as well as the sleeves for "Emperor Tomato Ketchup" "Aluminum Tunes" & "the Underground is Coming" by S'lab, and the "Turn On" EP by Tim Gane & Sean O' Hagan

}High Llamas' "Buzzle Bee" & "Snowbug"

}Siesta's Free Design reissue comps

}lots of Saul Bass

}some of Andy Votel's Twisted Nerve sleeves

}Add N to (X), "On the Wires of Our Nerves" & "Avant Hard"

}the US edition of Mouse on Mars' "Niun Niggung", as well as the related singles

}the Slits' "Cut"

}Masakazu Kitayama of HELP! Japan- pretty much everything he's done for Trattoria records. }EYE of Boredoms, for Shock City Shockers, which, bizarrely, became the back cover of Beck's Midnite Vultures (sadly , MV lacks the refractive holographic typeface in a fabulous font i wish i knew the title of) }pretty much everything by Futura 2000 )the Upsetters, "Super Ape"

i could go on forever. i get really disappointed when a favorite artist who usually gives great sleeve comes up w/ a bad one on the followup. ah, Nick, by the way, the Folktronic sleeve is fucking fabulous as is the US version of Stars Forever. my only gripe is that Matt Jacobsen doesn't do vinyl! they need to be bigger!

i think it's rather sad that many industry types don't realize that digital downloads aren't as harmful to the biz because people like myself still adore record sleeves and CD booklets. i like having something to look at and explore visually as well as aurally... Boards of Canada have gone so far as to but braille on the LP cover of "Music Has the Right to Children" and the "Hi Scores" EP, giving almost a full sensory experience... all we need now are scratch & sniff sleeves! it's always refreshing to find that an artist cares just as much about the packaging of their album AND about the music therein.

damn you, nick, for starting such an erotically charged thread!!

PS- i'm a design student, so i guess you'd consider me a musician and a designer...

mike j, Wednesday, 20 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I see it's become canonic to to call it "Malcolm Garrett's Orgasm Addict sleeve": well, OK, MG designed it — ie chose lettering etc anf fitted it into the square — but the pic itself (nude torso with irons on tits) is by the fabulous LINDER, and this shd not be forgotten. Linder's band Ludus once performed (Manchester Free Trade Hall) with Liz Naylor and Cath Carroll as its, er, Go-go dancers, dressed in black dildos and capes of fresh liver. Now THAT'S what I call Graphic Design, haw haw!!

mark s, Wednesday, 20 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Oh: iron for HEAD; hungry mouths for tits. Linder = also longtime buddy and pre- Smiths encourager of Stephen Patrick Morrissey

mark s, Wednesday, 20 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Ah Ludus! No-one EVER mentions them anymore. I file them alongside the Passage in "(Manchester) bands that everyone's forgotten because they were too *difficult* to fit in to a convenient category, but were great anyway".

Saw them at, I think, Stafford Futurama in 1981.

Dr. C, Wednesday, 20 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yep I suppose it was naughty of me not to give Linder due credit for the image on Orgasm Addict: this is what she's up to currently (from Ian Greaves' great shotbybothsides website)

'Linder continues to work in music and visual art. Latter day projects have included the composition of her own requiem, entitled 'Clint Eastwood, Clare Offreducio And Me'. The Linder requiem connects with a larger fascination with Eastwood something explored in her musical performance - art presentation The Working Class Goes To Paradise. "I am the bearded woman," she says. "I'm looking at Clint Eastwood, redemption, revenge and the European tradition of bearded female saints."'

Momus's best sleeve 'timelord' and I do love the ones where his chin has been inexpertly airbrushed smaller too.

Malcom Garrett's older bitter brother (Steve)graduated from Salford Uni about three years ago,He was going through a whicker-weave vibe at the time,can't see it reaching any seminal sleeves though

bill, Wednesday, 20 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Linder: also partner of novelist/'England Is Mine' author Michael Bracewell. She had an exhibition of collages in a small gallery in London a couple of years back which considering her mythic status as no-bullshit rad fem person, was a little disappointing.

suzy, Wednesday, 20 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think there was an early Raspberries LP that did have a scratch'n'sniff cover.

Patrick, Wednesday, 20 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

is it true that someone was arrested in texas for possession of plastikman's sheet one lp, because the police thought it was a sheet of acid tabs?

gareth, Wednesday, 20 June 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

two years pass...
i don't think graphic design (or any design) is art. to simplify it, art affects you, there are 'big' ideas there. design is intellectual and functional. design can accompany art to make it more effective, but it's not art. it's like good grammar and good writing. a good piece of design never got you through your loneliness or your heartbreak or your ecstasy. you could give a shit about your cool eames chair when your dad just died. you could look at a motion designer's reel and appreciate their skill, technique, cleverness, originality, etc. but you can't look at 15 sec. clips of a filmakers work and surmise what they are about. that's why video directors usually suck at movies. videos are about moments, one-liners, style, mood - everything but the actual content.

ergo, the music is the meat- the art and will always be superior to the design. however, the design can bolster the art, create excitement, make it more accessible. it lets you know a tree is falling in the forest. can you imagine rows of white envelopes in record store bins?

as for artists doing their own cover, even if you were to consider design 'art' and had crossover sensibilities, the tools are so different and fairly sophisticated. it would take so long for the musician to get the hang of it enough to get their vision out (and know all the techniques, visual history, current trends, etc.) that it's not worth it. simple specialist division of labor stuff. it's like saying a screenwriter should direct, star in, light, style, edit, and do sound for their movie to make the vision truly theirs. they're gonna be shitty at half that stuff and then the vision gets lost. similarly designers aren't gonna go as far in music as someone totally dedicated to it. besides, designers would never leave their dayjobs and risk not being able to afford cool cars and shoes.

lolita corpus (lolitacorpus), Saturday, 21 June 2003 03:34 (twenty-two years ago)

b) Did a good sleeve ever make you buy a bad record? Did a bad sleeve almost stop you discovering musical gems?

I'll answer this one part before turning in for the night. I am completely floored by the packaging and design that went into Lusk's Free Mars album. Possibly one of my faves ever... Too bad the music doesn't do the art justtice.

Chris Barrus (Chris Barrus), Saturday, 21 June 2003 07:07 (twenty-two years ago)

funny. paul himself gave me that album. he was very proud of the artwork that was done. up for a grammy even (they give grammys for package design - but given the credibility of grammys, i'm not sure what that, or any award for that matter, is worth).

as for a parallel world where hack musicians are commissioned at the 11th hour to make complementary sounds for the latest meisterwerks produced by genius designers, who've been locked up for years in the studio with their G3s and laser printers, giving painful birth? i was talking recently to a friend about geoff mcfetridge's design for zwan which seems kind of like this situation. geoff is sort of a design star who has books of his work out, special edition japanese magazines, gallery shows around the world etc. etc. and he basically just lent some of his typical style to that new billy corrigan band which seemed kinda ridiculous to me. as if they wanted to jump on his cool/hip train. if i was in a band i'd be so much more arrogant about it. like 'you come up with something brand new that's just for me'. especially someone like billy corrigan. but i guess this kind of thing isn't so weird. i mean having hipgnosis do your sleeve in the 70's meant you've arrived. and i'm sure coop or kozik or shag is more well-known than some of the anonymous garage-a-billy bands they've done posters for.

lolita corpus (lolitacorpus), Sunday, 22 June 2003 08:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Monks: Black Monk Time

'nuff said

Millar (Millar), Sunday, 22 June 2003 08:45 (twenty-two years ago)

sometimes i think CDs should be sold in 12x12" approx packaging ala vinyl just so proper space can be allocated for accompanying artwork

as a consolation of sorts, at least DVD albums provide a platform for a different level of design/sound affiliation with videos accompanying each track and possibly galleries and galleries of photography and conceptual art added to illustrate further the ideas behind the album. the problem with such a practice is it requires MORE time to engage with (unlike just looking at a couple of static images in the form of cover art) and the way you can engage with it is more constrictive (only on a PC or TV screen). i have the Orbital 'Altogether' DVD but i've only watched about half of it, once.

stevem (blueski), Sunday, 22 June 2003 11:20 (twenty-two years ago)

aha, i see what you're doing. you're trying to get a cover for your next record/cd designed in such a way that people will just buy it for that reason alone, regardless of content.

well, let me know if your marketing ploy works , so i can do it next

frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Sunday, 22 June 2003 13:18 (twenty-two years ago)

well the content would/should be just as good

stevem (blueski), Sunday, 22 June 2003 13:43 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.