The Mary Chain4s Phycocandy - Great Or Crap?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
The Jesus And Mary Chain4s Phycocandy. Noise Pop at it4s best (my opinion) or a desastrous and painfull listen?

manel pogas, Tuesday, 5 September 2000 00:00 (twenty-four years ago) link

A mix. Some brilliant singles and tracks but like just about every JAMC album I don't think it holds up as a completely memorable album song for song. I do think that it's the best of all their albums, though -- after it the split between the 'great' and the 'competent to bad' was about even. For "Never Understand," "My Little Underground" and "Cut Dead" alone, it's a keeper. RAWK, etc.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 6 September 2000 00:00 (twenty-four years ago) link

I never actually got the point of Psychocandy when I owned it way back when, I thought it was monotonous, a real one-trick album, and much preferred their next couple of records. So I sold Psychocandy, got a classic "Can't believe you're selling THIS" look off the guy in the shop, and have to this day not heard it again.

I did realise its 'importance' when I came upon some 1985 music papers, which were otherwise very listless and chock full of the likes of Paul Young and The Alarm. But even there you've got this lingering suspicion that it's all a bit of punk nostalgia - ooh! we've found a new Pistols! In the absence of anything but my memories to go on I've got to say DUD.

Tom, Wednesday, 6 September 2000 00:00 (twenty-four years ago) link

Psychocandy, pretty good for what it spawned, pretty lousy in itself. Which means in my books history tends to confine it to a dustbin, since I only bought it two years ago. I have a feeling my reaction might be different if I had bought it when it came out. Still, the sweet tooth evident in the whole JAMC career made most of their songs lyrically vapid - and whilst the noise is the thing its not grade A noise. The vague idea that it represents for pop what Trainspotting did for literature (ie - shows how dull a smack addiction really is) still leaves a sour taste in my mouth too.

Peter Baran, Wednesday, 6 September 2000 00:00 (twenty-four years ago) link

No no no no no....

No rambling stuff this time but Psychocandy was *THE* album for me when i was growing up. Total classics every song (well, actually, maybe not all of them...).

100% gold classic, honest.

Gruf, Wednesday, 6 September 2000 00:00 (twenty-four years ago) link

damn all y'all:

a fucking MASTERPIECE 'tis. "some candy talking" suffers from production but otherwise glorious melodies, heart-stealin' harmonies, delightfully nihilistic lyrics (yeah, you can't take 'em seriously -- that's a bad thing?), a sense of ROCK that neither the velvets nor any shoegazin' pansies could even pretend to, and OH the noise. smears, sunrises, rainshowers, it's all there. seemingly simple but smarter'n' you might think.

sundar subramanian, Thursday, 7 September 2000 00:00 (twenty-four years ago) link

I don't think 'some candy talking' was on the original release, was it? Petty point, but we are talking about the album...

I think someone once said you could sum up JAMC with a few words - 'gun, candy, jesus, honey, fuck, sky.' Have I missed any?

One of the best albums of all time. That simple. A work of exhilarating, nihilistic sheer fucked-up fun. Music to riot to. With tunes.

ps Anyone agree that the old Sunkist advert bore a certain resemblance to 'Never Understand?' 'Drink it in the su-u-u-n etc' or was I just doing too much acid at the time?

mishmash, Friday, 8 September 2000 00:00 (twenty-four years ago) link

Am I a heathen because I've never heard _Psychocandy_, but I adore _Honey's Dead_?

Dan Perry, Friday, 8 September 2000 00:00 (twenty-four years ago) link

I find it impossible to care about anything the mary chain ever did. That doesn't mean I dislike them, or even that I don't actually *like* some of their songs: I can care about them when I end up listening to them, and when I might pick up something by them resonating in my mind, latch on for a moment, why not. But why, why would I ultimately care? I learned to make this distinction during the past year after I found dozens of noise-pop albums like this one surrounding me for some reason. I think I sought them out in search of one unified sound, like a cathedral to dwell in, then realized that would never happen, that I needed to approach the Noisemakers, themselves, rather than the Noise. It was great! Picking out all the sub-Prince theatrics on MBV's _Isn't Anything_, realizing that the only Ride album I cared about was for _Taratula_ for some reason, trading in Spacemen 3's _Dreamweapon_ because it was **so** **boring**. . . but as for the Mary Chain . . . there was NOTHING about them to dwell on like that! Just the Noise. And, oh, yeah, the Pop. NOTHING MORE. Just noise and pop. Aristotle would probably call it the best noise pop album ever, then, because of its singleminded pursuit of excellence in NOTHING but noise/pop. Of course, I would say that they "excell" so much at this limited fixation that in a broader way they end up not that excellent at all. But here's how they're at least remarkable: The JAMC might have been the only band in the history of pop who did absolutely nothing more than they set out to do. They may also have been the most zenlike, totally extinguishing themselves and handing themselves over to the Wheel of Rock and Roll, younger sibling of the Wheel of Life and Death. But I never thought that *submitting* one's self to drowning made much in the way of art (or pop): music isn't the sea to drown myself in, because life is the sea I could be drowning in already. I swim *up* to music, needing it like oxygen; when I swim down into it, craving it like death, I still want to come to the surface in my mind, even as I plunge my spirit into what looks like an abyss. If you plunge down to drown because it makes upward sense to you, then the directions reverse, the spirit rises, the view switches for me. But it's not the Mary Chain's kind of nihilism, which is more like drunkenly driving your car into a lake. Of noise. Pop. But yeah, I'd say they excell at that.

ben mann, Saturday, 9 September 2000 00:00 (twenty-four years ago) link

>>> Aristotle would probably call it the best noise pop album ever, then, because of its singleminded pursuit of excellence in NOTHING but noise/pop. [...] The JAMC might have been the only band in the history of pop who did absolutely nothing more than they set out to do. >>>

I think that's a very interesting angle, and very well said. I fear that the enthusiasts for 'Psychocandy' on this thread are being nostalgic. Why fear it? Perhaps because it means they're happier than me, for I count nostalgia a fine thing, a close thing to love; and if they can muster nostalgia for this particular record from 1985, they have something going for them that maybe I don't. Nonetheless, my point is still that I think the rosy view of the JAMC owes a good deal to emotional extra toppings, not to the record itself. Quite possibly 'PC' is their best LP - though I always felt that Darklands had the best *titles* - but I don't know that that's saying much. For many years I waited in vain through track after track by the JAMC to hear... a minor chord. Minor chords aren't, I believe, terribly complex things: I recently saw Em described amusingly as 'the people's chord'. But the JAMC eschewed these very basic building blocks of pop, either because

a) they hadn't thought of using them - an astonishing proposition; or b) more along the Aristotelian lines above, they were pursuing a particular aesthetic (if that's not too elaborate a word for this) project which banned minor chords.

But I don't think the motivation matters. I think what matters is that the absence of minors impoverished their pop songs: and this is just one little, quasi-representative instance of the generalized impoverishment of their writing. 'Writing'? What did it amount to? E- A-B-A, here she comes, walking down the street, etc - stuff which is fun once, twice, even the eyebrow-raising fifth time, but once it becomes plain that that's your entire take on creativity, it seems almost desperate.

In many ways I could happily listen to 'PC' again now. It has its pleasures, it may have had its historical significance (but I don't really think it should be compared to the staggering invention and emotional landscapes of 'isn't anything') - but it is indeed a one- trick pony. It could be fun, even exhilarating in the right circumstances, but I think we now have enough hindsight on the JAMC to know that they weren't really brilliantly playing dumb... they were just dumb.

A Pinefox, Sunday, 10 September 2000 00:00 (twenty-four years ago) link

Mr OxyPhine's discussion of "playing dumb/being dumb" puts me in mind of an old Biba Kopf article in The Wire from 4-5 years ago. In it, Kopf celebrated the 'stupid' - ignoring the rules, stealing from high art and low, uninhibited by 'disapproving glances', a place where pop "exhausted, always returns to regenerate itself". He cites the Butthole Surfers ("pointing out the emperor's new clothes, while thinking it might be fun to try them on") as a prime example (along with Iggy Pop, Bootsy Collins and The Birthday Party). Kopf then berates the 'stoopid' ("when people who should know better suppress their intelligence and unconvincingly play stupid"). Glass, Adams and Branca fall into this category, apparently.

So, were JAMC '85 stupid or stoopid? And, if the former (genuinely dumb), isn't this a whole lot better than pretending? With subsequent LPs, did they reveal themselves as stoopid or confirm their real, 24-carat stupidity? Can anyone cite examples of post-JAMC stoopidity - bands that thought "well, we *can* play minor chords, but we want on the Reid gravy train (cheap day return) to rock'n'roll oblivion (back by tea-time, if poss)".

Michael Jones, Tuesday, 12 September 2000 00:00 (twenty-four years ago) link

Sex Pistols, Stooges, Motorhead, MC5, Ramones......

3 Chords, none minor. A problem for them?

Gruf, Wednesday, 13 September 2000 00:00 (twenty-four years ago) link

A problem for them? No.

A problem for us? Possibly.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 13 September 2000 00:00 (twenty-four years ago) link

one month passes...
great great great fucking violent...and great

ff, Friday, 13 October 2000 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Well, I've only managed to get a copy of it recently, and was most impressed! I wouldn't say it was perfect album- the quality of the songs are defiantely ropey in places (Mostly erring on the 3 chord EAEABA side of things...). It's the single-minded audacity of the production and arrangement that I think makes it really stand out...

I remember when I first saw JAMC doing "Never Understand" on "Whistle Test" and my jaw hitting the floor at the way the way a fairly "nice" song with youthful (if indistinct) vocals was being propelled by white noise guitars, triple-tracked unrelenting feedback, and anguished howls in the background! Even some of the "ballads" (Which are the weakest part of JAMC's stuff) have a strange cavernous quality, probably due to the overuse of reverb throught the entire album. I reckon a lot of the sound was accidental, (eg the way the use of echo magnified the guitars into a Phil Spector style Wall of Noise) but some of the other areas (especially in the feedback and noise overdubs) suggests pretty deliberate attempt to make something out of the noise.

OK, I may be making it sound like a triumph of style of over substance, which is probably the case, but the idea of using a sound style more associated with "non-music" as a musical tool is a pretty neat idea! And no matter how much JAMC actually intended to go in this direction, there are quite a few good examples on "Psychocandy" which suggest this is viable idea. :)

Michael.

Old Fart!!!, Friday, 13 October 2000 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

three weeks pass...
sound is substance.

sundar subramanian, Friday, 3 November 2000 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

two weeks pass...
it has to be 'Great'. This is the album that turned my head when I was 15 or 16. It still sends shivers down my spine. Noise pop @ it's best. And that's what you have to remember. This record was an 'oasis' in the desert of 1985. The Sisters of Mercy pah? The Cult Pah? and god knows what was actually in the chart. Probably Queen. It really was a POP record with great tunes. Bags of attitude. What more can I say......?

www.sowingseeds.co.uk I even named a website after one of the tracks.

Trevor, Thursday, 23 November 2000 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

It's not at all 'crap'. 'Great' is such an amazing underestimatation. IT BLOWS MY F***IN HEAD AWAY EVERY TIME! It's the damn coolest album EVER by the damn coolest band EVER. It's got all the ingredients of perfection - white noise, simple drummin, deadpan vocals, crazy- beauiful-crazy lyrics, and most of all - SONGS. Heehee...obssessed? Me?! Yeeeaaahhhhhhhhhhh... ;-)

Gem, Thursday, 23 November 2000 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Nowhere near a painful listen, unless you realize that the chances of ever hearing these songs live again are remote. Classic sound. It was best that they never made Psychocandy2, leave perfection where its at. You know if Jimmy or William were reading this, they'd be happy. Because they like the chaos they've created with such a silly debate as this. Whoever mentioned it earlier, you're absolutely right, they did accomplish exactly what they set out to do, stir up the drab musical world and get people to take an opinion about what is shit and what is not. Even if you do think this album is shit, the JAMC had their way with you.

Taste the floor bitches, Steve

Steve, Thursday, 23 November 2000 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

The best things are those things that where not meant to be the best.

Just playing music that comes out of yer balls & brains instead of taking sabbatical years, reading postmodern essays, drinking red wine, composing epics on an ancient piano, feeling ruined by 'the system'(?) or talk about the latest Uzbekistan translation of Baudelaire's poems. That's more an OK-computer thing. Now, Psychocandy is made for the no-nonse rocklover who takes music for real. Drinkin', smokin' & fuckin'. THAT'S what life is about, isn't it.

Ginger Satan, Friday, 24 November 2000 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

Word!

Emma Littleton, Sunday, 26 November 2000 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

three weeks pass...
This is more classic than dud...pretty much the best thing they've done and includes their best singles (and also tracks like "The Hardest Walk" which are just gorgeous). I bought it at the time in late '84/early '85. "Darklands " was a real disappointment afterwards for me, and it's a shame what happened to the Mary Chain, I thought that they'd stick around a bit more and show us more of their craft.

cyclotron, Monday, 18 December 2000 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

three weeks pass...
Thanks to the "Psychocandy" I got into the Velvets, Stooges, MC5, and Pil. Downhill from then on 'Docklands' was a snore, but I still stick "the Hardest Walk" on now and again. Top album.

Stevo, Thursday, 11 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

two weeks pass...
Great album. This is THE noise pop pinnacle. I haven't heard much else that's better. Rock on...

Dutchdawg, Friday, 26 January 2001 01:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

five months pass...
Just bought it in the HMV sale on a whim (must be the new haircut) and yeah I'm enjoying it hugely, half 8 in the morning, sitting in work, watching all the ladies coming in. So I'm changing my plea to classic.

Tom, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

I'm guessing you're listening to it on CD, then?

Uuuhhhhh... how odd. I still cannot get my head around the CD of it. It's like watching home movies on cinemascope. That album needs the warmth of well-worn vinyl, the crackle and pop of your own particular abuse humming along with the gale of noise.

But obviously, erm, given my temperment and history, CLASSIC, it changed my life, etc. etc. etc.

masonic boom, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-three years ago) link

eight months pass...

THREAD REVIVAL!

Inevitably, this was one of the very first Classic or Duds. I was thinking of starting a "Say something interesting about the Jesus and Mary Chain" thread today, but we may as well do it here, as Ben Mann and the Pinefox already made a good start upthread.

Another supp. question: leaving aside whether it's any good or not, how in retrospect do ILMers assess the influence of Psychocandy on later music, great or small, and IYHO is that GRATE or crap?

BTW, as is the case with many famous white-boys-with-guitars LPs, I have never heard it (I know the singles obv).

Jeff W, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

I used to really hate it but quite like it now. Why? I dunno.

DG, Monday, 11 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

probably because it's the greatest album ever made. probably because it's the most romantic album ever made, the most affecting album, AND because you can turn it up to 10 and the neighbours will go spare. works on every level. i've never known a record that inspires so many simultaneous emotions, or that has made me DAAANCE so...

kieron, Wednesday, 13 March 2002 01:00 (twenty-two years ago) link

one year passes...
I've been listening to PC nonstop today while I sort of sorted out my room. And it occurred to me, this here plan...
Take out your classical/acoustic guitar, if you have one. If lacking, run to yr nearest pawn shop! For this, it will be worth the trouble to get off your fat ass, tubby. Now strum along and start conjuring a melody.
G C D
Then hum or sing in harmony, and in a gentle fashion (all twee like), to the imaginary squalor, razor-sharp, of 'You Trip Me Up'. EVERYTHING (meaning life itself) will make sense.

Francis Watlington (Francis Watlington), Tuesday, 23 September 2003 01:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

I actually have to concur with Tom's post back from 2000. I find the noise on the debut pretty annoying and prefer songs from the later albums.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Tuesday, 23 September 2003 01:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

Heathen!~ ;)

Francis Watlington (Francis Watlington), Tuesday, 23 September 2003 01:56 (twenty-one years ago) link

I was surprised by how current they sounded when I saw "Lost In Translation" which uses them in the soundtrack. I don't think I'd listened to the album in over ten years.

What always annoys me (though I'd love to find out that I'm wrong) is that with all their singles collections, they never got around to compiling "Vegetable Man" from their first single. That's the first time I heard that song, and their version is so great (and also makes it clear that they weren't influenced by VU only).

dlp9001, Tuesday, 23 September 2003 02:38 (twenty-one years ago) link

Much prefer 'Darklands'. Perhaps I am on the wonk.

Muppet Boy, Tuesday, 23 September 2003 03:45 (twenty-one years ago) link

Classic. Just the perfect noise-pop album.

Jim Eaton-Terry (Jim E-T), Tuesday, 23 September 2003 08:38 (twenty-one years ago) link

SUCH and absolute classic. If you disagree, you're simply wrong and a fatuous, foul-smelling ass.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 23 September 2003 13:10 (twenty-one years ago) link

I was right in 2000 and wrong in 2001. Get the singles collection and you don't need any more of this band's stuff.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 23 September 2003 13:13 (twenty-one years ago) link

'barbed wire kisses' is an excellent collection of early stuff, extra versions, b-sides, covers. I had psycocandy but i sold it: Its one of those records that are really really great for a while and then you just don't need to hear it anymore...you get as much out of it as you can but then you move on.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 23 September 2003 13:21 (twenty-one years ago) link

Or you turn it up

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 23 September 2003 13:23 (twenty-one years ago) link

Not that I'm really that big a fan, but it was pretty impt to me for years. I'd rather have 'Automatic' or something by now, I think.

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 23 September 2003 13:24 (twenty-one years ago) link

Get a singles collection and _HONEY'S DEAD_. I cannot emphasize enough how fantastic I think this album is.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 23 September 2003 13:26 (twenty-one years ago) link

Honey's Dead - The last album they made worth listening to.

Darklands has its moments as well, but Psychocandy still casts the tallest shadow.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 23 September 2003 13:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yeah 'Honey's Dead', that's the one I meant! I like it better too, esp now I recall what it actually is

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 23 September 2003 13:41 (twenty-one years ago) link

Classic. Perfect. All of it, including _______ (insert track of un-choice).

(btw, True, Vegetable man never got compiled)

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 23 September 2003 15:13 (twenty-one years ago) link

I finally got this on CD a couple of weeks at a boot sale replacing my worn out tape. Funnily enough I gave the seller an I can't believe you're selling this look as well.

For what it's worth, utter classic. It's the only record of theirs you really need (and Barbed wire kisses too I suppose), everything else is just a retreat into sulky self parody.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Tuesday, 23 September 2003 19:56 (twenty-one years ago) link

Billy, you are so wrong about that (IOW have you listened to _Honey's Dead_ recently?).

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 23 September 2003 20:51 (twenty-one years ago) link

I will dig out my copy of Honey's dead and give it another spin tomorrow. I haven't listened to it in years but if I recall the thing I liked best about it was the typography.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Tuesday, 23 September 2003 20:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

Tom, you're so fickle.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Tuesday, 23 September 2003 23:13 (twenty-one years ago) link

Personally, I would say neither. I think I can hear some truly great songs there - too bad they are buried by guitar noise...

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Tuesday, 23 September 2003 23:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

I listened to a couple singles the other day and "Reverence" was LOTS of fun. It sounds stripper-style decadent! My fave song of all is probably "Blues From A Gun." The more full-of-shit bonkers their lyrics are, the better.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 24 September 2003 02:11 (twenty-one years ago) link

I'd really like to hear that cover of Vegetable Man. They have cited Syd Barrett as a major influence a number of times on the interviews I've read.

As for me, I could never get into most of the post-Psychocandy singles, really, save for a few exceptions. It's mostly due to a personal peeve and the fact I haven't listened to the other albums so I know not of the tunes' context within the albs. I own the singles compilation and I usually find myself listening to the early PC-era songs the most, so I tend to opt for the debut instead. To my ears, the production past Darklands is rather dull, thus, failing to bring out the rawk lobster in them, that unpleasant prickly sensation, the hematomas, the danger (of hearing loss)! The whole drum machine synthetics of the latter-day material I happen to find pretty boring. That cavernous quality and tinny, quasi-shitty fidelity of the Psychocandy recordings gave the music that life-sustaining edge. Kitten teeth that gnaw naggingly. Rosebud swabs. It's some seriously kinky shit, that.

Francis Watlington (Francis Watlington), Wednesday, 24 September 2003 02:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

"Vegetable Man" is the b-side to the "Upside Down" single. I paid $15 for my copy some years back, but I don't really know how much it goes for. Maybe it's on the internet somewhere.

dlp9001, Wednesday, 24 September 2003 03:03 (twenty-one years ago) link

Robyn Hitchcock's cover of "Vegetable Man" is nice....if a bit too faithful. I'd be very curious to hear the Mary Chain's take on it.

Favorite non-Psychocandy track of theirs: "Kill Surf City", a slogan I used to scrawl on walls and blackboards as a petulant yoof.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 24 September 2003 13:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

seven years pass...

An old thread revival for the tenth birthday...

Mark G, Tuesday, 7 June 2011 11:09 (thirteen years ago) link

(10 years ago)
good grief that makes me feel old

zappi, Tuesday, 7 June 2011 11:31 (thirteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.