The Reason Why Hip Hop is So Popular Now

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
because you can hum the songs, i.e. melody has been given a larger role?
(this was prompted by my rocker friend admiring progression used in the chorus to "Roll Out")

oops (Oops), Monday, 3 March 2003 23:48 (twenty-three years ago)

Now as opposed to all these previous years when there was no commercial profile and no hooks to hum?

(I'm not making fun of you, but your cloth-eared friend.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 00:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Hip hop is more melodic now because of the Kate Bush i*******e, obviously.

EC, Tuesday, 4 March 2003 00:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, it's not that there's an emergence of melody -- what there is an emergence of is more traditional song-oriented structures and formats, but even that's over the past several years. There is a certian level on which I think the rise of actual songwriter/producer figures and the move away from broad sampling to individual-assembly and micro-sampling was sort of what hip-hop needed to cement the last step of its flexibility. I was thinking about this the other day: I think what Rakim and contemporaries did with rapping, your modern producer/songwriters are doing with the music of hip-hop -- taking what used to be straightforward and direct and opening it up to all sorts of new variations and angles. (It's definitely been a gradual process with the production, with lots of midpoints -- e.g. the Bomb Squad and Prince Paul's whole sample-pastiche thing were giant leaps into what hip-hop could do beyond straight-up sample loops -- but I think it's just really been flowering over the past three or four years.)

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 00:21 (twenty-three years ago)

Most hip-hop I hear now has much more repetitive use of one or two samples than much of what the Bomb Squad did.

(I don't like it much--or the stuff I like the most on an asethetic level is too disturbing to me based on its lyrical content--and I haven't followed it closely since around '92/'93, but I have actually ended up listening to enough (in the form of radio, borrowed CDs, mp3s) that I feel I can comment.)

A Music Consumer, Tuesday, 4 March 2003 00:39 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't think that's at all true, but anyway I don't think the issue is so much the quantifiable level of repetition at all: it's more a question of feel, of static and rushing versus the richer, more flexible types of tracks coming around today (and if you think of them as more repetitive, you might be missing some of the subtle mutating and twisting in on themselves that's the current mode).

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 00:49 (twenty-three years ago)

That is the reason why Hip-hop is slightly better now. It has always been popular.

Anyway, Eminem is obviously more melodic than most rappers before him, and several of his melodies are even composed by himself, which is absolutely a positive thing.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 01:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Eminem is obviously more melodic than most rappers before him
Ick.
Eminem is overrated and Tone Deaf, The big single he does for "8 Mile" is PAINFULLY off-key!

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 01:06 (twenty-three years ago)

I am not going to disagree about Eminem being tone deaf (However, I have heard singing by Snoop Doggy Dogg that was even worse).

I guess the only rappers that can actually sing are Missy Elliot, Lauryn Hill and that guy who used to be in P.M. Dawn.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 01:10 (twenty-three years ago)

Okay. I'll vouch for all that, but I still don't get why you think Eminem is (in any way) "melodic"

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 01:15 (twenty-three years ago)

There is a certian level on which I think the rise of actual songwriter/producer figures and the move away from broad sampling to individual-assembly and micro-sampling was sort of what hip-hop needed to cement the last step of its flexibility.

I wasn't sure what you meant by this, but when I saw you use the term "micro-sampling," this is what I remember liking about some (maybe not even most) Bomb Squad tracks: that you could hear it was genuinely a collage or assemblage, not simply one loop over and over again. (I can think of some P.E. songs that did feature repeated loops though.) Something like "Night of the Living Base-Heads" that Terminator X "Valley of the Jeep Beats" (or whatever it was called) had a lot more going on with its sample (as I remember) than just one thing repeated over and over again.

(I understand if you don't want to argue it with someone who is only marginally familiar with current hip-hop, as I am. Here's what I can remember hearing of things from the last ten years (not a very systematic look at the genre): Eminem The Marshall Mathers LP, Outkast Stankonia, an album by Eve (with the "Who's that Girl" song), Common Electric Circus, Handsome Boy Modeling School, inividual songs by Jay-Z and Nas heard on the radio, some Missy E. songs (if you count her--I had been thinking of her as R&B until recently seeing people class her under hip-hop around here), Floetry (not sure that's even worth mentioning), a Bahamadia CD, one Tupac mp3, some Delinquent Habits songs, a Cannibal Ox mp3, and random unidentified stuff on the radio or coming from passing cars.)

A Music Consumer, Tuesday, 4 March 2003 01:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Okay. I'll vouch for all that, but I still don't get why you think Eminem is (in any way) "melodic"

"Cleaning Out My Closet" (the chorus)
"Marshall Mathers"

And I have also heard there is one song on his last album where he does actually sing rather than rap throughout the entire song. Definitely a step in the right direction, despite the fact that he cannot sing.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 01:41 (twenty-three years ago)

Should we maybe hold off discussing hip-hop until the forum gets a little less white? I feel out of my depth sometimes, and I know for a fact a lot of you guys are.

Ok, ok, you're right. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. But what if to the people who make this music and care about it most, your opinion is patently ridiculous?

Ok, ok. I'll just slink away quietly.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 01:45 (twenty-three years ago)

"...until the forum gets a little less white?"
ATTN, Forum Moderator: please add bgcolor=#000000 to the BODY tag of this forums template at the first possible opportunity.
Thank you.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 01:53 (twenty-three years ago)

This thread has managed to attract (mostly) the people least fit for a discussion of hip-hop (including me): it is doomed.

A Music Consumer, Tuesday, 4 March 2003 02:20 (twenty-three years ago)

I can't hardly wait till the Jay Z and Nas people get a load of Geir Hongro.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 02:26 (twenty-three years ago)

This thread has managed to attract (mostly) the people least fit for a discussion of hip-hop (including me): it is doomed.

This is also a thread about melody, and a thread about melody attracts me, obviously. :-)

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 02:27 (twenty-three years ago)

Have you been to the shrink lately?

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 02:29 (twenty-three years ago)

(i want to appolgize for my poor writing skills right now, i'm exhausted)

i think the idea that hip hop is more popular now due to more melody is just ridiculous. there has been melody apparent for many many years. there have been crossover acts that blend singing and rapping since the late 80s / early 90s at least.

why is hip hop more popular now than it was in the 80s or 90s? because it's been around longer. there's a whole generation of kids that have grow up w/ nothing but hip hop in their lives.

why is rock more popular than it was in the 50s? the same reason hip hop is more popular now than it was 20-30 years ago. the public has grown accustomed to its sounds, styles, and lingo. it has become part of the culture as apposed to an underground movement.

JasonD (JasonD), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 03:12 (twenty-three years ago)

Should we maybe hold off discussing hip-hop until the forum gets a little less white? I feel out of my depth sometimes, and I know for a fact a lot of you guys are.

this is possibly the stupidest thing i've ever read on ilm

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 03:14 (twenty-three years ago)

i mean, no offence, but just because this place is overrun with corny indie motherfuckers these days doesn't mean that there aren't/weren't people who were knowledgable about hip-hop here, many of them white as fuck

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 03:16 (twenty-three years ago)

also, one of the black guys on this board knows more about bad goth/industrial than i ever hope to, etc.

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 03:22 (twenty-three years ago)

I resemble that remark. Though I am white.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 03:26 (twenty-three years ago)

this is possibly the stupidest thing i've ever read on ilm

-- jess (dubplatestyl...), March 3rd, 2003 4:14 PM.

check these out:


Dave Matthews Band : Name Your Reasons Why They Are So Bad & Hated.

Dave Matthews Band : Name Your Reasons Why They Are So Bad & Hated.

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 03:26 (twenty-three years ago)

haha blount i think what's left of my brain just oozed right out the side of my head

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 03:28 (twenty-three years ago)

(i meant, "supidest by a regular" but even that is probably hyperbole)

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 03:37 (twenty-three years ago)

hahahaha!

M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 03:42 (twenty-three years ago)

hey
hey,james...
guess what, d00d...
DMB STILL SUXX.
always and forever.
like my love for you.
x's and o's.
in binary.bitch.

eded on a coffee bender, Tuesday, 4 March 2003 04:19 (twenty-three years ago)

http://www.milenariocomics.com.ar/06mar02/bender.jpg

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 04:22 (twenty-three years ago)

haha it's a meme now!

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 04:26 (twenty-three years ago)

I gotta second jess here & also I think nabisco has a point. The aspect which freed hip-hop the most is the rhyhtmic innovation I think, where the dj premier refinement of the classic hip-hop beat (dj premier to hip hop as horsepower to 2-step?) gave way to becoming one among many ways to approach beats.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 04:32 (twenty-three years ago)

(i meant, "supidest by a regular" but even that is probably hyperbole)

Well, if you notice, I felt half bad about posting that even at the time. I guess I was speaking for my hip-hop DJ friends who won't touch this board just because the hip-hop discussions piss them off so much, and I guess it's not my place to do that. It's just that their cringes have rubbed off on me somehow.

Ok, slinking back into my indie dork corner now. Once again I find myself out of my depth. Hey, at least I'm aware of it.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 12:00 (twenty-three years ago)

kenan what if yr friends are pissed off abt the same things that piss jess off? they shd post anyway

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 12:06 (twenty-three years ago)

Reasons hip hop is popular now:

1.) Wear-in
2.) Hooks
3.) Critical acceptance
4.) Heterogeneity

easy

Jacob (Jacob), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 12:51 (twenty-three years ago)

Hip-hop sales declined in 2002, in fact. It's not as popular as it used to be, therefore. Maybe.

JoB (JoB), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 13:40 (twenty-three years ago)

Has anyone else noticed the similarity between "Lose Yourself" and "Oliver Twist" by Luke Haines?

Lynskey (Lynskey), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 13:49 (twenty-three years ago)

Kaleefa Saneh (sorry for the spelling) wrote an article a couple of years ago adressing the metrical formatting of hip hop since the early eighties. His thesis was that hip hop was initially based on a pretty perfect iambic tetrameter and has branched off from this point. If you (sorry for the English lit talk) scan Run DMC, for instance, Saneh is pretty much bang on. He suggests that hip hop has developed through experimenting with different rhyme schemes, conversational delivery, and increased use of more complex and varied devices (like alliteration, assonance, internal rhyme, etc.).

Although I thought this was interesting, I think that the reason why hip hop is "better" now is because of Philadelphia.

cybele, Tuesday, 4 March 2003 14:07 (twenty-three years ago)

surely the answer is "three men and a baby"?

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 14:09 (twenty-three years ago)

I guess the only rappers that can actually sing are Missy Elliot, Lauryn Hill and that guy who used to be in P.M. Dawn.

*ahem*

Cee-Lo, Andre 3000, Lyrics Born, Jill Scott, Nelly, Kool Keith, Princess Superstar, I'll mention Cee-Lo again 'cause he's THAT GOOD a singer, Wyclef Jean, Mos Def, Ol' Dirty Bastard (he's gotta a helluva voice, actually), Bone Thugz N Harmony, Michael Franti, there's HELLA rappers who sing.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 15:09 (twenty-three years ago)

ILM hip-hop threads always go wrong because they turn into loads of people disparagingly theorizing about hip-hop as a concept, which means the people who actually like hip-hop and would have interesting things to say about it either wander off shaking their heads or are forced to defend the genre as a whole. There need to be more threads where the "hip-hop in general" talk is tabled so people can actually talk about, like, which records are good and which ones aren't.

Maybe we should pledge that when something like a 50 Cent thread starts and posts appear that begin "90% of hip-hop" (or end "that's why I like Def Jux so much"), everyone should just ignore them and concentrate on discussing the topic normally.

Kenan, have you friends tried the Nas vs. Jay-Z sub-board?

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 15:29 (twenty-three years ago)

(And yes, I know I do the "speaking in general" theorizing too. I'd just rather see threads where it wasn't called for at all.)

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 15:32 (twenty-three years ago)

As evidenced by the ? at the end of my initial statement, this idea was tentative and I wanted to see what everyone else thought of it.

why is rock more popular than it was in the 50s?

Um, it's not.

Hip hop obv has been popular for quite awhile, but it was never the mainstream, as it is today. The few hip hop songs that cracked into the mainstream during the 80s and early 90s (after its novelty had worn off) did so by either blatantly sampling an old hit (Vanilla Ice, MC Hammer), by having a good hook/melody (Biz Markie), or w/comical lyrics that everyone could relate to (Fresh Prince).
Dr. Dre & Snoop Dogg=memorable hooks/melodies (sing along w/me "smoking endo, sippin' on gin & juice")
Outkast=ditto
Try to hum any song that was very popular among hip hoppers, but didn't reach a massive audience (T.R.O.Y, I Used to Lover H.E.R., etc.) I can only think of one that could be hummed (The World is Yours)

nabisco said something about micro-sampling and production innovation, but then later noted (or was it someone else) that the Bomb Squad and Prince Paul pioneered these techniques. Now, isn't it just a case of people infusing this template w/melodies and hooks?

(Obv I'm not arguing this is the only factor in the popularity of hip hop, but I think it may be a large one)

oops (Oops), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 15:41 (twenty-three years ago)

Kenan it might be that your hip-hop DJ friends are misguided about hip-hop ;) I know quite a few people who are equivalently expert on indie pop and rock and I think the way most of them approach it and think about it seems (to me who also knows a lot about it) really flawed and insular. Now I know enormously less about hip-hop but it seems to me that similar things may apply.

For instance - one of the things that characterises the approach to hip-hop on this board is that most of the posters are musical magpies who relate to hip-hop as part of a broad spectrum of music and don't particularly relate to it as a culture, which is the way many more committed fans might see it. Now it might be that thinking about hip-hop as part of pop means you miss out on a huge chunk of the experience, but it might also be that thinking about hip-hop as culture means you lose out on something, too. It's an argument that can't really happen on ILM as it's currently constituted.

(I agree with Nabisco that the generalist slant of the discussions doesn't help at all, and here I am not helping, doh.)

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 4 March 2003 16:53 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.