When a BAND has ALBUMS that YOU as a FAN forget to mention when listing their discography - they should quit.
Examples:
Superchunk - Indoor Living Pavement - Brighten the Corners
etc etc. Try it!
Hearty praise for good bands / artists smart enough to break up and /or die while they were still relevant - from Hendrix and Ayler to At the Drive In and Chavez. Yes?
― scab dahlia (roger adultery), Thursday, 6 March 2003 02:33 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mary Anne With The Shaky Hand, Thursday, 6 March 2003 02:35 (twenty-three years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 6 March 2003 02:39 (twenty-three years ago)
mary anne, right on with the cure and killing joke, but the fall?? no way. i can name you every Fall album IN A ROW off the top of my head. I won't. but I could.
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Thursday, 6 March 2003 02:45 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jon Williams (ex machina), Thursday, 6 March 2003 03:04 (twenty-three years ago)
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Thursday, 6 March 2003 03:12 (twenty-three years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 6 March 2003 03:13 (twenty-three years ago)
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Thursday, 6 March 2003 03:18 (twenty-three years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 6 March 2003 03:21 (twenty-three years ago)
see? this proves my point I guess.
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Thursday, 6 March 2003 03:24 (twenty-three years ago)
And those two are on Red Medicine too.
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 6 March 2003 03:28 (twenty-three years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 6 March 2003 03:29 (twenty-three years ago)
― Jon Williams (ex machina), Thursday, 6 March 2003 03:33 (twenty-three years ago)
End Hits is tough to get in to, and not very catchy (except "Break") but it doesn't bore me like that one did; all of the others I'd say are thoroughly engaging and worthwhile. And The Argument, as has been stated, is totally amazing and brings back whatever respect I may have lost for them Fuggers along the way.
― Ian Johnson, Thursday, 6 March 2003 03:33 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ian Johnson, Thursday, 6 March 2003 03:35 (twenty-three years ago)
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Thursday, 6 March 2003 03:39 (twenty-three years ago)
Do you really think you could name and differentiate between all Swans releases though? That's fucking impressive, man... there's quite a few of them, and their various periods are very similar (within themselves; differentiating albums within the bludgeoning/industrial/heavy days is particularly tough for me)
― Ian Johnson (orion), Thursday, 6 March 2003 03:46 (twenty-three years ago)
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Thursday, 6 March 2003 03:59 (twenty-three years ago)
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Thursday, 6 March 2003 04:21 (twenty-three years ago)
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Thursday, 6 March 2003 04:22 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ian Johnson (orion), Thursday, 6 March 2003 04:28 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 6 March 2003 05:43 (twenty-three years ago)
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Thursday, 6 March 2003 05:49 (twenty-three years ago)
Goddamn well loved it, I did.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 6 March 2003 05:52 (twenty-three years ago)
i say if the theorem works, it works for any type of music. i think it would be easy to find A BUTTLOAD of very disposable albums outside of indie... one may quickly turn to ...oh say... classic rock and find ac/dc making the same record 20 years later.
i still did love "thunderstruck" though. that was a good riff.
billy joel is gross now.
salt and pepa ...ahem.
sun ra has quite a few albums... not all of them wonderful. miles davis too.
the stones... dude, give it up. although mick does have something like moves still. god, and as long as keith can keep his body moving, we should let him play.
talking heads... ew... that got nasty near the end.
night ranger... hehe...
i think a better test is to find those that break the above. has anyone made 10 amazing albums over time? or even 5? m.
― msp, Thursday, 6 March 2003 06:16 (twenty-three years ago)
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Thursday, 6 March 2003 06:20 (twenty-three years ago)
I guess there was some point at which I decided that maybe it's best for people to just go on releasing things that I can just ignore: for some reason I think this is important for indie -- and especially indiepop -- where so many bands I enjoy wind up releasing slight variations on the same record for long periods of time. I like the idea of just owning any random two of such a band's records, and then occasionally seeing their further releases in record bins and smiling a little, happy to know they're still floating around somewhere.
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 6 March 2003 06:33 (twenty-three years ago)
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Thursday, 6 March 2003 06:35 (twenty-three years ago)
(Best example of this phenomenon is Belle and Sebastian: it seems like an awful lot of people adore B&S up to and including whatever point they started following them.)
― nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 6 March 2003 06:40 (twenty-three years ago)
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Thursday, 6 March 2003 06:44 (twenty-three years ago)
― J-rock (Julien Sandiford), Thursday, 6 March 2003 06:47 (twenty-three years ago)
― Lee G (Lee G), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:11 (twenty-three years ago)
Bonnie "Prince" Billy sounds pretty much like Palace, so what is the difference?
Would people percieve Mark E. Smith's music differently if he had instead put out all of those records as half a dozen different band names instead of branded under The Fall moniker?
Another thing I can never understand is the use of most of the time is the word relevant. What is it relevant towards? Some mythic temple of music? A scroll in the dead sea listing LPs and the amount of drugs, sex, booze, enlightenment, and degredation accumilated in the musics presence?
― earlnash, Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:41 (twenty-three years ago)
Heh, all of 'em.
― hstencil, Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:44 (twenty-three years ago)
OK - I can't think of any others .. maybe it's just those two...
― dave225 (Dave225), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:47 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nick A. (Nick A.), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:47 (twenty-three years ago)
Somewhat related tangent: I saw the original cover vinyl of Today's Active Lifestyles in a store yesterday. Anybody need it?
― hstencil, Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:48 (twenty-three years ago)
I'll also submit Wire as an exception. They've too many albums to remember anyway, but Read & Burn is good.
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:25 (twenty-three years ago)
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― Evan (Evan), Thursday, 6 March 2003 19:21 (twenty-three years ago)
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Thursday, 6 March 2003 19:24 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 6 March 2003 19:30 (twenty-three years ago)
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Thursday, 6 March 2003 19:32 (twenty-three years ago)
that's on purpose for some of us
― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 6 March 2003 19:39 (twenty-three years ago)