Convince me that electronic music isn't a total dud

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Okay. I'm a rockist (well not really, but close enough.)

I'm looking for recommendations for more current electronic music, just to see if i'm really missing anything. No, i don't have P2P, so you have to recommend things that i can find at a decent indie record store (in the US). No vinyl, no white label promos, no editions of 23.

Sampled guitars would be a plus (only 'cos they're familliar, i guess). I thought that "MBV Arkestra" off of _XTRMNTR_ (quit snickering!) was great and would love more stuff in that vein. Not big on house overall, but i'm willing to give stuff a chance.

Go back as far as ten years or so, maybe more if they're really outstanding. Hit me.

Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:10 (twenty-three years ago)

busy at the mo, but read the reviews for

Ulrich Schnauss, Far Away Trains Passing By

http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/experimental/reviews/schnaussulrich_farawaytrains.shtml

DJ Martian (djmartian), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:13 (twenty-three years ago)

Underworld - Dubnobasswithmyhedman
Massive Attack - Mezzanine
Primal Scream - Screamadelica
Orbital - Brown Album (II)
Prodigy - Music For The Jilted Generation.

Philip Buesa, Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:14 (twenty-three years ago)

If Computer World by Kraftwerk doesn't move ya, then you won't be budged.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:15 (twenty-three years ago)

The first track on the Richard D. James album is amazing, but you sound like a troll.

Jon Williams (ex machina), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:15 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeh, start with those and then get the Come to Daddy EP by Aphex Twin and you'll be on your way to knowing your Devos from your Richard Devines in no time.

dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:19 (twenty-three years ago)

Aphex Twin--I Care Because You Do (a few duds)
for house, Derrick Carter stuff, Yoshitoshi, Tummy Touch and Naked Music (those are labels)
Boards of Canada--Music has the Right to Children
Coldcut--Let Us Play (first 6 tracks or so)
Um...drawing a blank
Wagon Christ/Plug
Bjork

I'd stay away from Come To Daddy, not very accessible

oops (Oops), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:23 (twenty-three years ago)

but you sound like a troll.

Why'd you go and say a thing like that? It was the bit about liking Primal Scream, wasn't it?

Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:29 (twenty-three years ago)

I'll second all of Philip's suggestions, although I think The Fat Of The Land is probably a better Prodigy album for an inveterate rockist. I'd also suggest Leftism by Leftfield, Psyence Fiction by U.N.K.L.E. and Bjork's Greatest Hits.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:30 (twenty-three years ago)

I dont even want to think about the implications of this thread because I have hundreds of CDs and crates of vinyl and I love all of it...
why not try "walking Wounded" by everything but the girl, as they use very traditional soong structures, and so you could become familiar with the sounds of electronic music before leaping into the void, so to speak.

also, portishead's s/t album.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:31 (twenty-three years ago)

Hrvatski SWARM AND DITHER/Keith Fullerton Whitman PLAYTHROUGHS

Any Aphex Twin stuff, but since you're a rockist, start with COME TO DADDY and then get RICHARD D. JAMES or I CARE BECAUSE YOU DO

An excellent starting point would also be a compilation called THE COSMIC FORCES OF MU, which has a lot of great stuff, very varied.

Other stuff to try that *isn't* guitar based but is adventurous and interesting:

Squarepusher GO PLASTIC
Autechre CONFIELD, CHIASTIC SLIDE
mu-ziq (can't make the Greek mu, sorry) ROYAL ASTRONOMY, LUNATIC HARNESS
Leafcutter John MICROCONTACT, CONCOURSE E.E.P.
Jega GEOMETRY
Matmos A CHANCE TO CUT IS A CHANCE TO CURE, THE WEST (which has guitars)

That should be enough for now.

jodi shapiro (burun), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:32 (twenty-three years ago)

Can I ask: what is it that usually makes it difficult for you to get into electronic music? I guess I'm making the assumption that you've heard certain things that just didn't work for you -- if that's true, and you have any sense of why (e.g. too mellow, too repetitive, too inorganic, whatever), we could do a better job of directing you to where you might have more luck.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:34 (twenty-three years ago)

no, it's because jon comes from mars.

anyway, these are terrible choices by and large, but i understand they're "rockist" standbys. i agree with music has a right to children (and maybe partially i care because you do but that era of idm has aged so badly for me.)

"electronic" albums that have moved me, maaaaan, in the last year or so:

herbert - secondhand sounds (k7 were supposed to reissue around the house and if your store has it, go for that first)
recloose - cardiology
m mayer - immer
mri - all that glitters
farben - texstar
adult. - the singles comp i forget the name of right now
kevin drumm - sheer hellish miasma (ha ha if you liked "mbv arkestra", try this)

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:35 (twenty-three years ago)

if you can download, then get la rock by Vitalic, maybe try Jess's Adult suggestion and Kittenz and Thee Glitz by Felix Da Housecat. I think electro is probably the best stuff for making this step right now.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:40 (twenty-three years ago)

I think maybe it would be more useful to say what you don't like about it or find a turn-off Matt, cos then we can recommend stuff which either avoids those things or incorporates them in ways that might convert you.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:41 (twenty-three years ago)

for a bit more balance (i love IDM but that is only a small bit of the electronic music world and "IDM is more intelligent than sweaty dance music has been disproved in anti-science science shockah)
try:
Juan Atkins: WaxTrax Mastermix V1 (some techno classics)
Derrick May: MayDay Mix (excellent DJ skillz)
Danny Tenaglia: Global Underground Athens (solid mix of techno, house, trance and electro)
Various Artists: Welcome to the Jungle! (great and cheap comp of early jungle)
LTJ Bukem: Logical Progression (ambient jungle manifesto)
Chris Duckenfield: Sheffield Mix Sessions (good recent house tracks and a good sense of humor)
Tiga: Montreal Mix Sessions (some micrhouse, electrocrach, techno, etc.)
Swayzak: Groovetechnology (microhouse)
these are all readily available and practically canonical IMHO

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:41 (twenty-three years ago)

If we're going to include rehashed new wave here, why not include the Faint? They have guitars sometimes, right?

Jon Williams (ex machina), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:42 (twenty-three years ago)

The Adult is Resuscitation, and it's freaking tremendous -- not much of a route into rockist-approved electronica but certainly electro cream-of-the-crop. The MRI is fantastic, too, but Jess: if someone says "I don't like house" suggesting Force stuff doesn't seem like enough of a jump to appease him!

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:43 (twenty-three years ago)

leap into void, I say! Get some friends together, dress up a little maybe, find a club (if there's one nearby) and GO DANCING!! That may be the only convincing that'll really matter.

g.cannon (gcannon), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:43 (twenty-three years ago)

the faint is good but it is more indie rock in spirit. it is not hard to find people who like them but dont like electroclash.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Others will know doubt disagree, but Avant Hard by Add N to X rocks really hard and you might like some stuff by Trans Am cuz they mix up traditional rock formations with cool electro type stuff.

Scott Seward, Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:45 (twenty-three years ago)

I agree w/Aaron's picks (though I haven't heard some of them)

oops (Oops), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:46 (twenty-three years ago)

Aaron Grossman,

me! ... except chicks on speed and tracy and the plastics


Add N to X = win!

Jon Williams (ex machina), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:46 (twenty-three years ago)

anybody a fan of rhinoceros (sp)? I'm not but I remember hearing that they incorporated a lot of guitars and were supposed to be 'the next big thing' a few years back (URB sux)

oops (Oops), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:48 (twenty-three years ago)

jess did you ever hear "pink-eyed pony" by crane a.k.? another force-tracks microhouse full-length.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:49 (twenty-three years ago)

this will convince you (of goodness):

the books - thought for food

marcg (marcg), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:52 (twenty-three years ago)

I heard rinocerose (not sure of spelling either but it was something like this), the album was crap. Nearly every house record I've liked in the last year has guitar in it, maybe the ones I don't like too. I think it's standard procedure now.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:52 (twenty-three years ago)

I think that the best stuff these days is on vinyl. You guys are all listing this experimental "IDM" crap that is no fun to listen to. There is a load of good house music out there, if you're willing to wade through the crap. There's also great stuff in the NuSkool breaks genre, and there are plenty of lesser-know downtempo and "IDM" (ugh) "bands" that kick the crap out of anything you will find on CD. Go to your local DJ shop and ask the guy behind the counter to help you out. Often times, they either have mix CDs by local DJs, or they have racks of more-obscure electronic music CDs that you might enjoy. As for stuff like Aphex - c'mon! Does anyone here REALLY enjoy any of his stuff post analogue-bubblebath? It's hard-to-listen-to, it's full of creepy sounds, etc. And electroclash is its own thing.

Problem is, it seems that the only electronic music that gets any distribution is the stuff with (usually WAY-cheezy) lyrics. You gotta go to the DJ shop to get the good stuff.

schwantz, Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:56 (twenty-three years ago)

One thing you CAN find on CD is the album "Wide Angle" by Hybrid. Great breaks, and even throws in some real orchestra.

schwantz, Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:58 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm a rockist convert to electronica, and I still find it very difficult to get some of my old rockist friends into electronica. The main barrier I find is people coming back to me with the "it's soulless" line quite a lot, like on the nu-electronica thread that's knocking about. I think it's a barrier in moving from one to the other and I think I appreciate electronica with a different criteria to the way I appreciate rockist stuff.

Personally, I find the "trying to break out of the box" side of electro quite soulful these days. It's like wether you consider a lot of extreme jazz stuff to be soulful or not. You either do, or it takes a bit of a leap of faith, or you just ignore it.

Recommendations
For a mellow introduction - Bomb the Bass's Clearcut EP, Mum, Rei Harakami
For a funky / hip hop style introduction - DJ Food, Kid Loco, Thievery Corporation, Q-Bert
For a jazzy introduction - the Breakbeat Era EP, Amon Tobin, Squarepushers "Feed Me Wierd Things". I think Go Plastic is a bit much for an introduction!

Lynskey (Lynskey), Thursday, 6 March 2003 17:58 (twenty-three years ago)

Matt is being serious and not a troll, and I know that part of what he really likes in music, being a musician, is a sense of improvisational texture over rigid structure per se, though this doesn't describe all of his listening taste by any means. He's as much a dronerock boy as anyone ever (but is married and is not dirty, alas for Kate!), and so stuff like Kraftwerk I believe pretty well already works for him, as anyone who is a Spacemen 3 fan would be. ;-) But doubtless he'll say more about this whole thing. And why the hell have I never been able to find any Adult. albums anyway? Are they hand produced by a CD factory in Laos?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:00 (twenty-three years ago)

I agree to some extent Shwantz, but I think most people get into the club stuff and the vinyl stuff via the album artists.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:03 (twenty-three years ago)

Another suggestion - Delusions of Gandeur by Hardkiss. Chock-full of mid-nineties gems.

schwantz, Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:06 (twenty-three years ago)

Ned: Ersatz Online. They have okay distribution in the midwest, but maybe not out on the coast?

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:06 (twenty-three years ago)

P'raps.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:08 (twenty-three years ago)

another guitar-based thing you could check out is manual - until tomorrow. cool melodic guitar lines over subdued beats. very cool.

re: one of the earlier posts--is there any way that the term IDM could be banned from use ever again? is has to be the stupidest term ever...

marcg (marcg), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Ned, I've got an Adult album on my wishlist at cduniverse.com. I think they still have it. (if you order from the 'net)

lawrence kansas (lawrence kansas), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:10 (twenty-three years ago)

Matt should seek out "Plastic Dreams" by JayDee. It's a ten minute Hammond improvisation over a drum loop and it's UTTERLY BRILLIANT.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:10 (twenty-three years ago)

"As for stuff like Aphex - c'mon! Does anyone here REALLY enjoy any of his stuff post analogue-bubblebath? It's hard-to-listen-to, it's full of creepy sounds, etc."

Um, yes, I do. I really love DRUKQS, and I hope he continues putting out more piano stuff. The creepier, the better, says I.

I'm a rockist who actually *plays* "electronica" (I really, REALLY hate that term, as well as IDM), but the stuff I really love is not beat-oriented stuff, but rather the stuff that is not neatly slotted into any one genre. It all depends on how you're exposed to it - if you don't like to dance, chances are the records that are made for clubs will not do it for you.

jodi shapiro (burun), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:11 (twenty-three years ago)

(ned, forget cduniverse, the albums been removed)

lawrence kansas (lawrence kansas), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:12 (twenty-three years ago)

Two words: Basic Channel. Two more: Chain Reaction. (those are labels, btw). Beyond that, DJ Scud, Pita and Vladislav Delay have always been disparate favorites - you're totally missing out man

roger adultery (roger adultery), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:14 (twenty-three years ago)

Drukqs is really unfairly maligned and I'm glad to see someone mention it here.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:15 (twenty-three years ago)

I second Kid Loco and Amon Tobin (it's hard to think of these things w/o my collection in front of me)

I also am a big fan of downtempo stuff--Fila Brazilia's 'Power Clown' and 'A Touch of Cloth' are pretty good.
Plus, Blue States--Nothing New Under the Sun
Tosca--Suzuki
(these may all be too loungey/coctail party for you)

oops (Oops), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:15 (twenty-three years ago)

I'd love to try & help Matt but I need to know what he likes & dislikes first.

Mark (MarkR), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:17 (twenty-three years ago)

Likes: Spacemen 3 (as noted ;-)), Ash Ra Tempel (early), Stooges, and much more besides.

Dislikes: "Hey Matt! What do you think of Max Martin's production and songs?" "AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARGH!"

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:22 (twenty-three years ago)

heh, aaron i think pink eyed pony would break his brain if he doesn't like most electronic music...even i found it a little opaque

nitsuh, i am not interested in appeasing the touchy feely tendencies of rockists! throw the baby in the deep end!

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:26 (twenty-three years ago)

How about Fennesz Endless Summer, Greg Davis' Arbor, Accelera Deck's Addict (three pretty electronic recs. w/ guitars that most indie stores have or at least can order).

Mark (MarkR), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:26 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah, fennesz is a good choice. maybe mouse on mars too, iaora tahiti or instrumentals

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:27 (twenty-three years ago)

also can someone recommend some rock music please?

mark p (Mark P), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:32 (twenty-three years ago)

There's that one band with the one guy and that guitarist? He rocks.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 6 March 2003 18:34 (twenty-three years ago)

yowch. prodigy stands test of time? i'll freely admit to loving FOTL when it came out, but right now i think the only music that has aged worse than that album is "incense & peppermints".

Dave M. (rotten03), Friday, 7 March 2003 04:27 (twenty-three years ago)

ezperience is one of the best albums ever!! rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrush!!

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 7 March 2003 04:29 (twenty-three years ago)

believe it or not, i was once a rockist as well. oval's "sistemisch" was one of the first electronic records i heard that had the "soul" i was looking for. there were others as well, but that's the one that's still held up for me. it had a pulse but not a rigid beat; it had texture in spades, and was all about the surface of sound. i'd still recommend that as an entryway.

matt, if you're drawn to dronerock and/or improvisational structures, i would recommend everything on the smalltown supersound label, especially alog. very interesting fusion of electronics and live instrumentation, all boiled down into a dense, groggy mass. i'm doing a shit job of explaining it but just trust me on this one.

philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Friday, 7 March 2003 04:45 (twenty-three years ago)

I'm not going to add more records to the many good lists up-thread, you've got enough on your plate for now. But there is one piece of advice I consider absolutely essential to buying electronic music, and no one has mentioned it yet so...

Listen before you buy.

Many of my rockist friends find this very counterintuitive, and even the ones interested in electronic music are uncomfortable grabbing a stack of records and listening to them. But I find it essential.

This is why any store that has any pretenses to selling electronic music (which most decent indie stores nowadays do) should have a turntable/cd player and headphones available. I advise you to listen listen listen.

Matt B. (Matt B.), Friday, 7 March 2003 13:31 (twenty-three years ago)

I agree with Matt. I often have to listen to 200 records in order to find two or three worth buying.

Also, if you want to hear some house/breaks, I've posted a segmented mix to my Yahoo briefcase:
http://briefcase.yahoo.com/schwantzter/

You'll need to download Stuffit expander to join the files together, but it's a free program, so...

And if this post is considered spam, I'm sorry - I'll never do it again.

schwantz, Friday, 7 March 2003 17:56 (twenty-three years ago)

two years pass...
Rinocerose? Crap Album?...cannot beleive what I'm reading.... they maybe were a bit amateur 4-5 years ago.....but not now. They are "the next big thing" in the rock-electronica world for the moment. And that is only in the cd. Wait to see them live. I just did last week in Santander Summer Festival in Spain....that was gorgeous. Chemical Brothers were supposed to be "the big band" out there, and Rinocerose blast them out in audience.
They have incorporated a new singer and the french formers at the guitars with tremendous energy take you really high.
Beleive me, they are not any more the "brazilian rythim based electronica band". They, right now, are very energic guitar + frenetic rythims + awesome melodies + funny vocals.... they are cool !!

JChico, Wednesday, 13 July 2005 11:29 (twenty years ago)

Horray! Google-ahoy!!!

In reply to the original poster: 'MDMA' by 'Ecstasy' might be the answer!!!

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 11:35 (twenty years ago)

i would ad Souvlaki by Slowdive and the Lost in Translation soundtrack to the list. They're probably a bit more accessible to someone used to rock and pop than say, computer world. Not completely electronic, but for the most part not guitar bass and drums rock either.

AaronK (AaronK), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 11:37 (twenty years ago)

Late entry here... but, these are records that "rockist" friends of mine have approved of... maybe that will help. Most of them tend to lean on the ambient edge for some reason. :)

-Seefeel "Quique" or "Ch:Vox" !!!!!
-Aphex Twin "Selected Ambient Works II"
-Mark Van Hoen "Playing With Time"
-Sun Electric "Kitchen"
-Black Dog "Bytes"
-Gas "Pop"
-Biosphere "Patashnik"
-Future Sound of London "Lifeforms"
-Sabres of Paradise "Sabresonic"
-Ultramarine "User's Guide" (for some reason more than anything else by them...)
-Underworld "Dubnobasswithmyheadman"
-VA: Speicher 2 (strange one... but all my "rockist" friends think this comp is amazing but, not the first one.)
-Sanso Xtro "Sentamentalist"
-a majority of the Profan titles, seemed to be a turning point for rockists that became latent electronic fanatics in the 90's...

There are also a lot of early bands that friends of mine who are rockists have liked certain records by... but, that is for a different discussion I would think. Kraftwerk, first two of OMD, bits of DM, Fad Gadget, Cabaret Voltaire, etc...

ebenoit, Wednesday, 13 July 2005 12:21 (twenty years ago)

Aaron, if I was to add a Slowdive record it would be either the "5EP" or "Pygmalion"... a lot of Rockists I have known hated "Souvlaki" but for some reason loved the other two. Gofigure.

ebenoit, Wednesday, 13 July 2005 12:23 (twenty years ago)

shit, sorry. I totally totaly meant pygmallion!

AaronK (AaronK), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 12:27 (twenty years ago)

which is such an awesome album.

gofigure indeed. souvlaki is also great.

AaronK (AaronK), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 12:27 (twenty years ago)

oooh, i love souvalki as well... i kind of thought you meant pygmalion which is why i said something. :)

ebenoit, Wednesday, 13 July 2005 14:08 (twenty years ago)

I'm surprised no one said this already, but the real issue is changing the way you think rather than what you listen to.

After all, what's "electronic music" anyway? All the music you listen to is sound, and it's all recorded sound, and it's all electronically recorded sound, and most of it now is probably digitally recorded or reproduced sound.

That said, you might find that there is something about the sound product of "actual instruments" you like better than the sound product of most computer music. But in the right hands electronic sounds can be as subtle and textured as acoustic instruments, even if they can't replicate the exact same kinds of textures.

That said, I recommend maybe starting with DJ Shadow, because he uses so many samples that involve "real instruments." But the things he does with them might subtly make you question the line between what is and isn't "electronic music".

Hurting (Hurting), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 14:18 (twenty years ago)

i've always wanted to run a synth/keyboard through a good tube amp, sadly i cant for lack of the former.

AaronK (AaronK), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 14:43 (twenty years ago)

i ran my casio through my rig and it made it sound kick ass though.

AaronK (AaronK), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 14:43 (twenty years ago)

electronic music isn't a total dud.


M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 22:42 (twenty years ago)

Tangerine Dream - Phaedra, E2-E4.... things like that might be good to recommend in this case. And anything with connections to dub/reggae.

But Tangerine et al, especially, because I wonder if part of the barrier to "getting into electronic music" in 2005 is perhaps some kind of analouge nostalgia/mistaken belief in it's superiority over digital? Anything that helps ease people into realising the gap isn't actually as distinct as it seems could be useful. And that instruments are just instruments, whether it's guitar/drums/bass or 303/808/sampler. It's all capable of emotional expression in different ways.

I have certain friends who still can't get 'into it'. It's frustrating not being able to get them to make the leap. Especially because it's not that I hate rock/guitar music, or am totally biased towards 'Dance" just that SO MUCH of it... sucks balls, has close to zero imagination/interesting production/original melodies or thematic inspiration by comparison to the majority of electronic music (dance, or otherwise) I stumble across these days personally. And these are BOOM TIMES for guitar rock!

But they aren't even hearing it. It's like holding out watching only black and white television because it "expresses feelings better, and has more soul". Not a direct quote but AAArrrgh!!

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 23:14 (twenty years ago)

I agree it takes a kind of shift in how you listen. I think when I was... 15 a kid I knew who was into the burgeoning rave scene (I missed out! Hindsight is a bitch) explained that you just "listened to the beats, and how they change" instead of the typical melody lines I suppose.

I think everything else explained itself from then onwards. That could possibly be the most enlightening, useful piece of advice I've been given in my whole life.

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 23:25 (twenty years ago)

in the right hands electronic sounds can be as subtle and textured as acoustic instruments, even if they can't replicate the exact same kinds of textures

essence of rockism right here. electronic sounds can be as textured? i would say electronic sounds always ARE as textured. does a formica table have less texture than sandpaper? just because your hand slides smoothly over it, does that mean your fingers feel less? do your nerves do less work? does your eardrum transmit fewer signals along the nerves to your brain when it hears an 8-bit drum sample than when it hears someone in a room pluck an acoustic guitar?

vahid (vahid), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 23:35 (twenty years ago)

does your eardrum transmit fewer signals along the nerves to your brain when it hears an 8-bit drum sample than when it hears someone in a room pluck an acoustic guitar?

from what i've heard, yes.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 23:41 (twenty years ago)

was the person who told you that trying to sell you fancy speaker cables?

vahid (vahid), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 23:42 (twenty years ago)

where is mr maxwell?

mullygrubbr (bulbs), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 23:42 (twenty years ago)

no he was a professor on some telecourse
i mean there's a reason why it's so hard for electronic instrument makers to reproduce seemingly simple sounds like acoustic guitar and piano, and that's cause there's a lot more to them then one might think. undertones and overtones and crosstones and whatnot.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 23:44 (twenty years ago)

that's nonsense. you never hear the argument that a 12-string guitar has more "texture" than a banjo.

vahid (vahid), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 23:48 (twenty years ago)

you are treading dangerously close to psychoacoustical hongroism.

vahid (vahid), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 23:49 (twenty years ago)

in the beginning, electronic instruments produced completely pure tones. one frequency. booooop. beeeep. etc. it really did and does take a lot of work to get them to produce more texturally interesting sounds. i don't see what is at all rockist about noting that.

xpost i don't see what that has to do with this

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 23:49 (twenty years ago)

your reasoning is rather blunt. "texturally interesting sounds"? please define. you are arguing that "textural interest" is somehow related to the complexity of the waveform?? WTF, as if the music center in your brain is an oscilloscope connected to your ear?

vahid (vahid), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 23:53 (twenty years ago)

how so? you're reading value judgments into what i'm saying when there aren't any.

you are arguing that "textural interest" is somehow related to the complexity of the waveform??

i guess i'm using texturally "interesting" as a synonym for "complex". in general, people prefer complex sounds like a guitar pluck to that of a radar ping. you though are free to dig whatever sounds you choose to, baby.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 23:57 (twenty years ago)

electronic instruments that exist for the purpose of perfectly reproducing non-electronic instruments C/D?

fandango (fandango), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 23:58 (twenty years ago)

in general, people prefer complex sounds like a guitar pluck to that of a radar ping.

the pop charts disagree

tylero (tylero), Thursday, 14 July 2005 00:00 (twenty years ago)

classic if you've ever tried carrying a grand piano with you on the bus.

xpost don't think so. name me one hit song that consisted of pure tones.

oops (Oops), Thursday, 14 July 2005 00:01 (twenty years ago)

some sounds have a richer texture than others. that does not necessarily make them better.

in general, people prefer complex sounds like a guitar pluck to that of a radar ping.

ok i dunno about that. sometimes i want a chocolate cake and sometimes i just want a small, perfect piece of chocolate.

Lukas (lukas), Thursday, 14 July 2005 00:01 (twenty years ago)

some sounds have a richer texture than others. that does not necessarily make them better.

exactly.

oops (Oops), Thursday, 14 July 2005 00:03 (twenty years ago)

i guess i'm using texturally "interesting" as a synonym for "complex". in general, people prefer complex sounds like a guitar pluck to that of a radar ping

well, there you have it. easy assumptions about music based on status quo of rock instruments (although i question how easy and natural is it to substituting "interesting" for "complex", esp in the garage rock revival era?) quickly becoming normative statements (also suspect: given the popularity of lil jon and the neptunes, you've got to really wonder what people prefer in general). that's your rockism right there, baby.

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 14 July 2005 00:03 (twenty years ago)

texture is a quality, not a quantity, ye fules. why did the greeks sculpt in marble instead of mud studded with pebbles and twigs? did they not understand the primacy of texture??

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 14 July 2005 00:04 (twenty years ago)

classic if you've ever tried carrying a grand piano with you on the bus.

Fair point!

fandango (fandango), Thursday, 14 July 2005 00:04 (twenty years ago)

it has nothing to do with rock instruments! all non-electronic instruments ever created in the history of man to thread!

oops (Oops), Thursday, 14 July 2005 00:05 (twenty years ago)

i think most people would prefer the cheesiest electric piano to the majority of instruments in the history of man (pre well-tempering).

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 14 July 2005 00:07 (twenty years ago)

smooth is a texture, yes. but generally when people say something is textured, they mean it as opposed to being smooth. though i guess they assume they're aren't any pedants eavesdropping on them.

oops (Oops), Thursday, 14 July 2005 00:08 (twenty years ago)

thanks for playing!

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 14 July 2005 00:10 (twenty years ago)

i just have to laugh cause you calling me rockist is like getting on geir for his obsession with beats.

oops (Oops), Thursday, 14 July 2005 00:15 (twenty years ago)

texture is a quality, not a quantity, ye fules.

it's both! some simple sounds are very pleasing, some sounds with very rich textures are not. more of my music is made of sine waves than recorded instruments, but yeah, a guitar string has a richer texture than a pure tone.

marble, by the way, is a very rich texture: it's translucent, each piece has unique strands of color (hence the word "marbled") etc.

Lukas (lukas), Thursday, 14 July 2005 00:34 (twenty years ago)

other than the electric guitars what exactly is electronic about 'souvlaki'?

keith m (keithmcl), Thursday, 14 July 2005 00:35 (twenty years ago)

they play the guitar like a roland jp-8000 lmao mint

fe zaffe (fezaffe), Thursday, 14 July 2005 00:48 (twenty years ago)

er, loops, and shit loads of reverb.

AaronK (AaronK), Thursday, 14 July 2005 02:03 (twenty years ago)

the point is that it's sort of a bridge between traditional rock and electronic music that might beging to convince someone that elec. music isnt a total dud.

AaronK (AaronK), Thursday, 14 July 2005 02:05 (twenty years ago)

fuck me.
im a total idiot, but this time i blame the whiskey! its pygmalion thats full of loops and reverb.

dude, kieth, my apologies.

AaronK (AaronK), Thursday, 14 July 2005 02:07 (twenty years ago)

I didn't mean to make "acoustic instruments" the point of comparison for all music so much as try to illustrate the thought process by which someone who believes that can get over it.

For me, Endtroducing just happened to be the bridge, because the music all sounded "organic" or whatever, and that allowed me to get past my prejudice and really dig it. But the more I listened, I realized he was making the samples do things that "real instruments" couldn't do -- like taking real drum sounds but playing them in rapid succession and making them decay immediately. Hence my barriers to electronic music started to lower.

Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 14 July 2005 04:19 (twenty years ago)

Of course I'm not saying he was the first guy to ever do anything like this, it just happened to be the first thing that high school me got into.

Hurting (Hurting), Thursday, 14 July 2005 04:19 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.