― MarkH, Monday, 2 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Tom, Monday, 2 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― mark s, Monday, 2 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Matt D'Cruz, Monday, 2 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Geoff, Monday, 2 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ally, Monday, 2 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
i'm glad ally and i agree on something other than joy division. then, i always thought "new dawn fades" made a great metal power ballad so it might be the same thing after all.
― sundar subramanian, Monday, 2 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Robin Carmody, Monday, 2 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
New Dawn Fades is kind of a power ballad but really it's not about love or women or shit like that so it isn't.
Still, my favorite will always be Here I Go Again by Whitesnake. That song was da bomb and still is.
― Chewshabadoo, Monday, 2 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
But there you go... Every Rose Has It's Thorn.
It's a weird and oft-overlooked connection: in the mid-eighties, *everything* big was hair-metal. At least in the sense that both sides of things---the guys in Poison and the women belting out the pop hits---were both spawned by the same late-70s rock juggernauts: the sounds of Journey, Styx, REO Speedwagon, Kiss, Meat Loaf . . .
But hey, some great songs came out of it. This stuff was like Wagner- --its sole purpose was always to be bigger, grander, and more dramatic than you'd imagined possible. Mostly it blew, but when it achieved that goal, look out. "Total Eclipse of the Heart"---it's like opera. For a few years, it's as if every American pop artist was looking to be Queen.
[Apologies for the generalizations---obviously I'm aware that other stuff was going on in the early-to-mid-80s. But I'm only speaking about the particular power-ballad-pop continuum. . .]
― Nitsuh, Monday, 2 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
i also do not completely agree with this statement:
At least in the sense that both sides of things---the guys in Poison and the women belting out the pop hits---were both spawned by the same late-70s rock juggernauts: the sounds of Journey, Styx, REO Speedwagon, Kiss, Meat Loaf . . .
poison were quite clearly influenced by glam-rock (as in bowie, t. rex) and pop-punk, probably more than they were by meat loaf. other hard rock bands of the time, such as guns 'n' roses or cinderella, were clearly more influenced by stuff like aerosmith or ac/dc. surely the pop divas had other influences than styx et al? (tina turner? soul divas?)
what about the modern rock ballad, e.g. "with or without you," "pictures of you," "everybody hurts?" where does it fit in? i can see at least as much connection between "everybody hurts" and celine dion as between "sweet child o'mine" and celine dion.
I wasn't necessarily trying to draw actual lines of influence bewteen those styles---at the time, obviously, Poison and Bonnie Tyler were perceived to be coming from opposite sides of the spectrum, and a look at the details makes it clear. I just meant that if you back up a few steps and take a top-down sort of view of things, there does seem to be a particular *quality* that defines the big rock and pop hits of the era. The grandiosity of that period---all of the big guitars and crescendos and smoothed-out multi-tracked vocals, the way every song started with the drama already at 10 and just cranked it up from there, the squinched-face *emoting* of the whole thing--- seems directly attributable to the grandiosity of late-70s pop and rock, whether it be the UK's glaminess (Bowie, T Rex, or even the Bay City Rollers) or the US's arena-rock (Speedwagon or Styx or Meat Loaf).
I suppose, though, that you could trace the squinched-face emoting of the late-70s all the way back to the squinched-face emoting of Joplin or Hendrix in the sixties. Come to think of it, I liked music a whole lot better before the squinched-face emoting came along.
― Nitsuh, Tuesday, 3 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)