politics in music

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
are politics in music needed or just plain irritating. im on the side of irritating? well, i listen to the mc5 but tune out the nonsense lyrics.

tom cleveland, Tuesday, 1 April 2003 03:20 (twenty-two years ago)

yes, the mc5, the nation of rock'n'roll

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 03:26 (twenty-two years ago)

what about the Dead Kennedy's or Gang Of Four?


Mike Taylor (mjt), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 03:33 (twenty-two years ago)

i listened to entertainment! the day after they announced the start of the war and it sounded shrill and hectoring (in a bad way)

the freewheelin bob dylan fared better

the great 28 fared even better than that

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 03:36 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah i think gang of four work best when there's nothing *big* to be outraged about so you can be all "yeah fuck a big mack fuck it!" and imagine that leisure really *is* a problem.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 03:45 (twenty-two years ago)

what's really amazing is the er/aura of "mutually assured destruction" all these "great" politicized post-punk albs were made in...the sleeve of entertainment! is just so austerely serious it's silly..."those in power make decisions for us and we love them for it here lemme suck your dick", well no shit sherlock. also andy gill's guitar is not very cathartic.

this is probably why i like the ones which seem itchy and dread-filled without really making a point to say why, exactly.

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 03:50 (twenty-two years ago)

but where do the dk's fit into the equation?

Mike Taylor (mjt), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 03:51 (twenty-two years ago)

and also, what if politics is the central theme of the band, such as the dk's, what would be left if that was removed? Whould they lose their power is some sense because of that?

Also, what about PIL, they are political. Were they shit too?

Mike Taylor (mjt), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 03:52 (twenty-two years ago)

also, I think Gang of Four suffered more from their musicianship and songwriting than they did for their politics. You could be singing about how great the Maury Povich Show is and it still wouldn't make it better or worse.

Mike Taylor (mjt), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 03:54 (twenty-two years ago)

this is a band who actually thought "is my cock big enough, is my brain small enough, for you to make me a star" was a brilliant insight into the enterainment industry, so you tell me

pil weren't political in the "explicit" sense, the way the gang of four were. and all the better for it.

i don't think anyone here has said the gang of four were shit here.

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 03:54 (twenty-two years ago)

i think i'll just use the word "here" a few dozen times more

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 03:55 (twenty-two years ago)

PIL never struck me as humorlessly political, Mike. The point isn't that political music is automatically bad, but rather that OVERTLY political music can often come across as self-righteous and dull.

(Note: I, too, like the Gof4, but I think the complaint is a valid one.)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 03:58 (twenty-two years ago)

I think Religion or Careering are fairly political. Perhaps they might not have expoused a particular ideology(communism), but I found them to be political statements.

dk's were also the band that wrote Holiday in Cambodia and California Uber Allies, which musically put them miles ahead of anything PIL ever did, lyrics aside.

Mike Taylor (mjt), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 04:00 (twenty-two years ago)

I know what you mean tho, it is a bit of the Billy Bragg Syndrome, isn't it.

Mike Taylor (mjt), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 04:01 (twenty-two years ago)

dk's were also the band that wrote Holiday in Cambodia and California Uber Allies, which musically put them miles ahead of anything PIL ever did, lyrics aside.

mike whatever the drugs are it might be time to scale back

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 04:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 04:05 (twenty-two years ago)

I will stick up for the dk's, because they are not cool, but they were vastly under-rated as musicians. East Bay Ray was one of the best guitarists that came out of American Punk. Their rhythm section did not slouch either. I guarentee you that if PIL and the DK's went head to head on a stage in 81, the DK's would have blown PIL off the stage.

I know it is not cool to say that because English bands who whine and play really sloppy dub = rox0r on ILM, but it is the truth. The first three PIL studio records are cool, I've had them for years, but at the end of the day, Lydon had a shitty backing band that ruined those songs. There was a spark for the first half of First Issue, but they never seemed to regain that spark for any of their classic albums. Second edition/metal box would have been the shit if the band had a bit of pep, but they just kinda dragged those songs out. No spark, no verve.

Dk's would have left them for dead in a live setting. The lyrics might not have been as clever, but everything else was.

Mike Taylor (mjt), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 04:16 (twenty-two years ago)

I always liked the Gang of Four for their rhythm section more than their politics.

The Mekons seem to get away with it pretty well. I've been listening to "Thee Olde Trip to Jerusalem" a lot the last few weeks. They were right on top of this shit.

I agree with whoever said they liked implied politics more than explicit politics. Although sometimes the most specific stuff can work too -- a chorus like "Four dead in Ohio" is as subtle as a brick, but it resonates (even after Neil kissed up to Reagan). I dunno. Maybe it has more to do with how the songwriter's feeling at the time they write the song -- are they really pissed off or passionate or whatever, or are they sitting there thinking, "I should really write a political song..." In the case of "Ohio," I think Neil was really pissed off (and he probably wrote it in 5 minutes). Ditto a lot of Woody Guthrie's best stuff (e.g. "Deportee") -- it's too angry and/or mournful to seem self-important.

Of course, my favorite political song of the past few years is "White America" -- which somehow didn't provoke the furor it seemed to me it should have. I think people were so locked into seeing and hearing Eminem one way (especially people who'd never actually listened to him) that they kinda/sorta missed the whole thing. Oh well.

Jesse Fox (Jesse Fox), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 04:18 (twenty-two years ago)

The Dead Kennedys were a pretty good comedy band. PiL were a better one.

Sean (Sean), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 04:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Metal Box/Second Edition is about a zillion times more interesting than anything that the Dead Kennedys ever recorded. I could give a fuck who was the better live band, dude, NEITHER you and I are gonna see these two bands duke it out on a stage. On the record, this isn't even a close fight.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 04:22 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, pil were very very funny; i don't know why that gets lost so much

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 04:24 (twenty-two years ago)

what PIL was trying to rip off was a million times more interesting. If I want to hear white guys play sloppy sub-dub I can record my friends playing in my living room with a boom box. Add a little reverb and it will sound like 2nd ed.

If PIL could have actually done what they set out to do they would have been absolutely brilliant, but they couldn't. The had a shite drummer and a sloppy bass player and they tried to jack dub reggae. That is mental suicide, because it doesn't work. If it had, it would sound like ESG to the 10th power, but they were sloppy, so it just kinda lurches around and sounds grey.

The Dk's rocked in a way that PIL never could. the difference is DK are a simple idea that was well executed, and PIL was a clever idea that never came off.

Mike Taylor (mjt), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 04:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Anyone who ever saw the legendary American Bandstand performance will catch the humor, that's for sure.

Mike is right about East Bay Ray (although for some reason I thought he was the bassist and Klaus Flouride was the guitarist? though I could just be on crack).

Of course, my favorite political song of the past few years is "White America"

I actually think this is probably his best song.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 04:30 (twenty-two years ago)

You are right tho Jess, The Suit is one of the funniest anti-scenester songs ever.

Mike Taylor (mjt), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 04:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Early on PiL was more like performance art than political. Gang of Four just had issues with the middle class and the plight of yoof. I dont see either as overtly political (interviews aside). DK fans often would just heckle the lecturing because the band did indeed rock. Bands who were based on only politics like Crass were just boring and sound dated like every hardcore band at that time that went on about Ronald Regan and the neutron bomb.I think using science we can determine thus:
Gang of Four/Clash/Jam=class issues=not suck
Crass/Flux/U.S.hardcore=party/ war/ leader issues=suck

girl scout heroin (iamamonkey), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 07:38 (twenty-two years ago)

oops! forgot to mention that because class issues are often personal the music speaks to you not at you

girl scout heroin (iamamonkey), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 07:40 (twenty-two years ago)

all music is political folks. you can't get away from it.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 07:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Songs about stuff that the people writing the songs care about = always irritating as fuck.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 12:39 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm gonna listen to Sandanista until I turn Honduran

girl scout heroin (iamamonkey), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 13:39 (twenty-two years ago)

(bites tongue)

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 14:19 (twenty-two years ago)

for my own music at least, i feel that politics MUST be in the music. i'm really not into sloganeering though, but i find that as far as lyrics i want to express things that move me and make me think, and politics are the main example of this.

one of the best examples of politics in music ever: THIS HEAT.

j fail (cenotaph), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 14:44 (twenty-two years ago)

I love loads of political music but i think it's just the strong belief in _something_ that makes the music good.

I love DK but it's all the kennedy/brown stuff is dated politics from the other side of the world to me.

Rage are talking about what?

Le Tigre? Feminism?

Love 'em all mind.

mei (mei), Tuesday, 1 April 2003 17:53 (twenty-two years ago)

twelve years pass...

Non-snarky question: do the bands that get covered in the UK music press these days talk about politics/the general election and generally support Labour?

djh, Tuesday, 5 May 2015 18:36 (ten years ago)

Apart from Charlotte Church.

djh, Sunday, 10 May 2015 21:01 (ten years ago)

The guy from The Enemy wrote a fairly eloquent anti-austerity piece a few weeks back. Shame his music's so fucking shit.

p:s nerds know (dog latin), Monday, 11 May 2015 11:23 (ten years ago)

Billy Bragg urged us all to vote Lib Dem in the 2010 election.

You've had your say, now it's my turn (Tom D.), Monday, 11 May 2015 11:55 (ten years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.