Am I a gullible twat for buying Draft7.30 or not? (or am I just a twat? no, wait don't answer that)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I think we might have discussed this album briefly before but I wanted to discuss Autechre as a whole. For a fair while now I have been enchanted by their ability to create something beautiful out of what at first sounds like a sterile cacophony. I slowly but surely fell in love with Autechre's self-titled black album about four years ago and have since then bought their entire back catalogue and loved much (but not all of it).
Then Confield came out and a lot of people went "wtf?!" as is expected of a new Autechre release, it's half the fun. But even now I can't REALLY appreciate this album though I've heard it countless times. There are elements I do appreciate to it and a few tracks are passable but some tracks I honestly can't bear. Still I listen to it trying to make some kind of sense from it all. After all albums like "LP5 and "Chiastic Slide", which are up there as some of my favourite albums took several listens to do this.
So why in God's name did I buy Draft7.30? I've had it on repeat since I bought it this arvo and I find it strangely pleasant but it's even more impenetrable and arguably pretentious as Confield - even less melodies, weirder time signatures and harsher sounds.
I love Autechre, but is it a reason to buy everything they've done? Will I buy their next release?

Don't really know what I'm asking here. I suppose that's kindof typical considering Ae are full of false clues and beautiful spiralling dead-ends. I wnat to know what's in their heads. Why have they done this? Is it good? Is it crap? Am I trying to make sense of something that cannot be made sense of? Is that why I like them and if so is this the wrong way to go about appreciating music?

Help! Let's discuss Autechre!

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 8 April 2003 17:11 (twenty-two years ago)

autechre's first two albums are obscenely beautiful. gorgeous melodies criss-crossing, nice soft textures etc. i bought "tri repeate" as well, but i don't like it as much. i'm not so keen on the harsher, percussive sound (although i do like more than half of the record, i'd say.) I'm guessing the new one probably isn't for me, then, but i'd like to hear it anyway.

weasel diesel (K1l14n), Tuesday, 8 April 2003 17:37 (twenty-two years ago)

i think simon r's "autechre-autism" connection is quite apt, esp. w/r/t confield (i haven't heard their latest). i find them most moving when they're making noises like a pre-motor skills boards of canada: an endearing stumble to make sense/meaning out of recondite forms, finding and losing patterns/rhythms. if you see a three year old playing with their genitals, fine.

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Tuesday, 8 April 2003 18:59 (twenty-two years ago)

What is Draft 7.30's running time?

Neudonym, Tuesday, 8 April 2003 19:09 (twenty-two years ago)

i had heard the new one was a return to more melodic/accessible stuff
i only really know the cichli suite album,which is great,although i don't listen to it much
i have an mp3 of garbage though,it is one of the most beautiful pieces of music i've ever heard

robin (robin), Tuesday, 8 April 2003 20:50 (twenty-two years ago)

as a longtime autechre fan who was completely confounded by _confield_ (but not surprised), i will let them take me anywhere they like as long as there is some semblance of melody and rhythm/pattern in the music. _LP5_ was honed to perfection, but _confield_ just seemed like an exercise in process and randomness to me. _draft_, after a couple of listens, sounds pretty damn great.

heywood jablomi, Tuesday, 8 April 2003 21:03 (twenty-two years ago)

I just got Draft, listening to the first track now (sounds great). I didn't get into Autechre through their early stuff, which I still mean to check out, I got into them from Chiastic Slide on, including Confield. While I love it when they come up with a great melody and think they have some beautiful tracks, am I the only who explicitly LIKES odd time signatures, fucked up beats and deliciously harsh sounds?

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 8 April 2003 21:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Btw, did anyone get the ATP comp or the Gescom ep (don't know if that one actually came out today actually)?

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 8 April 2003 21:07 (twenty-two years ago)

am I the only who explicitly LIKES odd time signatures, fucked up beats and deliciously harsh sounds?

Nope.

hstencil, Tuesday, 8 April 2003 21:08 (twenty-two years ago)

am I the only who explicitly LIKES odd time signatures, fucked up beats and deliciously harsh sounds?

any one who *Likes* odd time signatures is a priori a pretentious twat. go join a laptop drummers circle...with all the other new-tech tabla players.


Savin All My Love 4 u (Savin 4ll my (heart) 4u), Tuesday, 8 April 2003 22:45 (twenty-two years ago)

the new gescom ep is superb. track 3 is finally the studio version of that insane scattered rotating rhythmic breakdown that they were playing in their '99 shows (the one that sounds like a further variation of their Phoenecia remix, one of my all time favorites) track 4 is strict tempo drive-your-car-to-sleep beauty...

buying 'draft' at Aquarius when i get off from work in about 5 minutes

milton, Tuesday, 8 April 2003 23:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Listened to it a few times now and I've gotta say that it sounds like a much better version of Confield. Perhaps a tiny bit more accesible as I'm already starting to appreciate it and it took me months with Confield. I have a theory it might have been written before Confield since the Warp serial number actually predates the latter and some of the tracks mimic each other (compare tracks 3 on both cds to see what I mean - they could be distant cousins).
Autechre recently admitted a love of "Troutmaskreplica" which I can really see, particularly in the drumming patterns.
Draft7.30 is 62.53 long. If you're wondering about the name, the only clue I have is that it's Autechre's 7th proper album and all their other album titles refer to the release's number (e.g. incunabula=first edition amber=the second light on a traffic light). Except Confield, their sixth album which I've never ben able to fathom the title. Maybe that was done to confuse people even more, eh?

dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 00:40 (twenty-two years ago)

That sort of codebreaking etc. etc. and constant speculation as to what UTTER GENIUS the pair of them are "up to this time" has always been what completely turns me off about the music. It's not as if they are out there wielding some magical tools- same as the AFX mystique - the guy sequences samples together. Get over the fucking method and listen to the tunes. I'm sorry if it doesn't apply to anybody here specifically but this is exactly the kind of parp that made me unsub from IDML.

Ninety-nine percent of their output, to me, is crap. I find Phoenecia to be of higher quality, esp. on their last outing. It's a sad day when your spawn have outdone you, and Richie Devine passed up Ae a long time ago in my book. This whole bit you folks keep going on about with 'melodies' and whatnot has somehow completely escaped my notice. Since when is a nigh-random series of sad spooky noises automatically a 'melody'?

Eh. I prefer something with at least a semblance of a cadence, that can get stuck in my head. Pass the Speedy J.

Millar (Millar), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 00:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Since when is a nigh-random series of sad spooky noises automatically a 'melody'?

when it's arch carrier.

That sort of codebreaking etc. etc. and constant speculation as to what UTTER GENIUS the pair of them are "up to this time" has always been what completely turns me off about the music. It's not as if they are out there wielding some magical tools- same as the AFX mystique - the guy sequences samples together. Get over the fucking method and listen to the tunes. I'm sorry if it doesn't apply to anybody here specifically but this is exactly the kind of parp that made me unsub from IDML.

I listen to Aphex completely differently from Autechre. Aphex I find the most entertaining because of his ability to chameleonise himself to many very original styles of music and do it with a sense of humour and lots of fun ideas to keep you entertained. He's the most accessible and succesful because he's punk rock and appeals to rockists who find the idea of bands like Autechre too scary. I listen to Autechre for purely aesthetic purposes - the nonsensical names, the facelessness is all intentional. They are not a comedy project (no they're not!). It sounds cliched but with Ae one has to leave all sense of humaness behind and concentrate only on the sounds - not their haircuts or whether they found it a bit of a laugh or if they're making a big political statement (which they have done with the Anti EP). It's just so difficult to discuss Autechre - there as big a puzzle as their music and trying to figure just why they're good throws up as many non-sequitors and paradoxes as ever. I'm sure it's intentional. Like how the four inlay cards that come with Draft7.30 look like they should fit together but don't quite. It's as if they're simultaneously trying to egg you on, half genius half having a laugh at your expense but not really telling you...

dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 01:10 (twenty-two years ago)

any one who *Likes* odd time signatures is a priori a pretentious twat. go join a laptop drummers circle...with all the other new-tech tabla players.

Hey, just because you can't feel it if it's not in 4/4, don't ruin my fun (I love the idea of a laptop drummers' circle btw)

Since when is a nigh-random series of sad spooky noises automatically a 'melody'?

When it's Gelk, or especially when it's Cichli (god that song is genius...yeah, it's in 5/4 and the melody is made up of 3 beat units and it all lines up every three bars, but you don't know have to know that to know that it's pretty).

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 01:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I never got why people had a big problem with autechre's "difficult" material. I mean, why does everyone suddenly turn into Geir Hongro when talking about Autechre? There are far more amusical groups (NWW, Merzbow, Jandek etc.) that people don't seem to have such a problem with - just don't go on expecting incunabula/amber/tri-repetae-era pretty melodies w/ nice beats. That being said, I thought LP5 and EP7 were mediocre - excellent tracks on both, but lots of filler, especially the more drill 'n' bassy one. Confield was excellent, and based on a fairly simple idea - take a loop, and slowly fuck with it as it repeats itself - and excecutes it very well. Ganz Graff was crap though, it sounds like filler tracks on ep7. I haven't got Draft 7.30 yet, i will pick it up this weekend.

fletrejet, Wednesday, 9 April 2003 01:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Exactly, fletrejet - but I don't see people going on and on and on about all the different wicked beautiful genius moves that Masami Akita incorporates into his every recording. And I'm not Geir Hongro. I mentioned 'cadence'.

I just don't understand why what Ae does is so wonderful compared to, I don't know, the entire Schematic records posse.

Millar (Millar), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 01:41 (twenty-two years ago)

They were the first to do that sound by a long shot. As with labels like Schematic, whole scenes have developed around Autechre but no-one managed to better them. And no, definitely not Richard Devine.

dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 01:44 (twenty-two years ago)

because if you make electronic music outside of Detroit, Chicago, or New York, you don't matter.

(am I being serious?)

Mike Taylor (mjt), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 01:47 (twenty-two years ago)

See, I just don't buy it, dog latin. That's just crap.

Mike: You mean I have to take NYC seriously now? WTF.

Millar (Millar), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 01:50 (twenty-two years ago)

just cuz of the dfa.

Mike Taylor (mjt), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 01:51 (twenty-two years ago)

and Arthur Baker and Mantronix.

Mike Taylor (mjt), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 01:51 (twenty-two years ago)

but don't worry, they will be considered lame overhyped twats in 6 months anyways.

(do I mean The DFA or NYC?)

Mike Taylor (mjt), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 01:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Jess needs to come in here and make the slam-dunk.

Mike Taylor (mjt), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 01:53 (twenty-two years ago)

>This whole bit you folks keep going on about with 'melodies' and
>whatnot has somehow completely escaped my notice. Since when is a
> nigh-random series of sad spooky noises automatically a 'melody'?

In the realm of IDM autechre were the kings of melody - one of the main reasons that there was a time when 90% of IDM was comprised of people ripping off autechre's first three albums. Just to add to the list of obviously melodic autechre songs: garbagemx, leterel, krib, goz quarter.

fletrejet, Wednesday, 9 April 2003 02:03 (twenty-two years ago)

>Exactly, fletrejet - but I don't see people going on and on and on
>about all the different wicked beautiful genius moves that Masami
>Akita incorporates into his every recording. And I'm not Geir Hongro.
> I mentioned 'cadence'.

And I said "far more amusical" than - autechre's musics has far more structure than merzbow - incunabula to chiastic slide it was loops and loops, lp7 to ep7 saw a little randomness thrown in, confield moreso, but even then , it was a slow mutatation of loops and usually not just random bleep bleep.

fletrejet, Wednesday, 9 April 2003 02:09 (twenty-two years ago)

In the realm of IDM?

Obv. not including Plaid, Black Dog before them, AFX, Bola, Cylob, Squarepusher, Speedy J, Orbital, anybody from Detroit ever even Kenny Larkin, LFO, Mouse on Mars, Sabres, 2 Lone Swordsmen, the list goes on and on of people who I would say have much more to do with 'melody' than Ae ever have and were around before them or around the same time.

But I'm tired of this argument, I was on IDM-L for six years, and for what it's worth the final nail in the coffin for autechre is that they have gone beyond 'undanceable' well into anti-funky territory (like many of their spawn) and why this is any sort of achievement (like Masonna topping Merzbow for sheer unlistenable audience-abuse) is quite beyond me, possibly because I'm not as entertained by "Godel-Escher-Bach" as some people.

Millar (Millar), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 02:28 (twenty-two years ago)

i've just realized that i find this nu "whatever this thing that dizzee rascal's doing turns out being called" emotional in very much the same way that i find confield emotional: i'd make the case for "vi scose poise" and "looks like i am losing it" as both touchingly, almost embarrassingly, honest.

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 18:00 (twenty-two years ago)

he's impervious to idm because he is idm dammit! (no wait..jess.. i didn't mean it..you get me?..no! STOP! NOT THE EYES!!ARGHH!)

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 18:11 (twenty-two years ago)

EP7

Cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 18:12 (twenty-two years ago)

for what it's worth the final nail in the coffin for autechre is that they have gone beyond 'undanceable' well into anti-funky territory (like many of their spawn) and why this is any sort of achievement is quite beyond me

is it really so hard to grapple with two aesthetics (yrs and ae's) diverging? doesn't this kind of shit happen all the time?

the problem seems less to do with autechre than with a listener's inability to accept that they aren't making tri repetae (or lp5, or whatever you like) anymore. you don't have to like confield, but sean & rob aren't out to spite you.

ben sterling (frozen in time), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 18:58 (twenty-two years ago)

After a couple of cursory listens, it seems like Draft7.30 should appeal to people who thought Confield was too out. However, it's hard to miss the fact that they are using the exact same squishes, cracks and thuds. I mean, the beats are there, but it almost feels like I'm listening to Confield again because of the sounds.

dleone (dleone), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 19:04 (twenty-two years ago)

I listened to the first half of Confield last night, and it didn't seem that difficult.

hstencil, Wednesday, 9 April 2003 19:06 (twenty-two years ago)

sorry, what new gescom ep is this?

zemko (bob), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 21:02 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not sure about the new album as a whole yet, but can I say how great V-Proc is when they drop that straight hip-hop beat and then clang it up?

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 21:24 (twenty-two years ago)

they still sound like man parrish 2 me

bob snoom, Wednesday, 9 April 2003 22:05 (twenty-two years ago)

new gescom ep is called 'ss sa' it's on skam.

my favorite stuff of theirs remains 'lp5' and 'ep7', that was just a breakthrough year for them. I was impressed with the simple fact that 'confield' went even further out, but it seemed like a transitional record: it was as if their sound vocabulary had gotten so abstract that they had to let go of the melodic counterpoint that had been a strong point on every single previous album. There were a few nicely composed lines and chords here and there but no melodic development, probably because the sounds and structures had been emphasized to a point where traditional development would have seemed out of place alongside... so 'confield' seems a bit dashed off to me in comparison to previous albums, it sounds great but doesn't have any depth.

too early to tell about the new one but so far I'd agree with the party line, it's 'confield' with more time spent on it, more elaborate, more odd details. even less to hum along to then ever before, and yes they're still using the same softsynth sounds that they discovered around the time of lp5, but it seems like there's a lot more to this record than the last one, it's still difficult but somehow more seductive.

milton, Wednesday, 9 April 2003 22:22 (twenty-two years ago)

i like autechre 100x more than i did only 12 months ago, but i still fail to see why anyone would really "need" this album if they had even one or two of their other records. life is too short.

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 9 April 2003 22:25 (twenty-two years ago)

milton and dleone are otm with their last posts.

dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 10 April 2003 00:16 (twenty-two years ago)

If you're wondering about the name, the only clue I have is that it's Autechre's 7th proper album and all their other album titles refer to the release's number (e.g. incunabula=first edition amber=the second light on a traffic light). Except Confield, their sixth album which I've never ben able to fathom the title. Maybe that was done to confuse people even more, eh?

re: Confield being the sixth aelbum, look at track 1.

Leee (Leee), Thursday, 10 April 2003 22:55 (twenty-two years ago)

>re: Confield being the sixth aelbum, look at track 1.

but what about Chiastic Slide?

fletrejet, Thursday, 10 April 2003 23:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Chi = grecian X, which has four points/corners, is the best I've heard.

Leee (Leee), Friday, 11 April 2003 00:22 (twenty-two years ago)

oh jesus fuck.

helpsuit, Friday, 11 April 2003 00:28 (twenty-two years ago)

my aesthetic diverging from ae's = they suck now obv

also helpsuit is OTM

Millar (Millar), Friday, 11 April 2003 00:29 (twenty-two years ago)

ach, go back to yer Buzzcocks records.

AUTECHRE ROXXOR U R ALL GAY!

dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 11 April 2003 16:52 (twenty-two years ago)

i agree with bob snoom. it's just electro

"just"

zemko (bob), Friday, 11 April 2003 17:10 (twenty-two years ago)

spent some more time with that new gescom ep... it sounds exactly like ep7 leftovers, which is good news for me at least. some of the pieces are nearly alternative takes made with the same samples. the first two tracks take a while to get going, but once they do they're lovely. and track 3 bounce bounce bounce bounce bounce. if you like lp5/ep7, you'll probably enjoy this.

milton, Friday, 11 April 2003 17:59 (twenty-two years ago)

ok ok i'm gonna get anal just this once.. when is this gescom ep out? there's no info anywhere... is this fresh off the idm-list or something

other thoughts: the cover should have ae and co dressed nazistyle hence living up to the 'arid idm' hype: ("sa ss"!) or they should call it "sass" and try and be sassy!

zemko (bob), Friday, 11 April 2003 20:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Isn't the Gescom ep out on Warp? They have the info at their site at any rate.

Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 11 April 2003 21:38 (twenty-two years ago)

actually the name of the ep on Skam is "ISS:SA", you dropped a vowel and a colon, MILTON...

helpsuit, Friday, 11 April 2003 22:10 (twenty-two years ago)

a nazi football game! even better!

zemko (bob), Friday, 11 April 2003 22:46 (twenty-two years ago)

New gescom track 4 is great. Sounds like my speaker is melting.

Lukas (lukas), Monday, 21 April 2003 16:49 (twenty-two years ago)

'draft 7.30' is outstanding. yes they're the same sounds but they've learned how to deploy them. I'm realizing, my problem with 'confield' was that the sounds had grown beyond their traditional ways of composing their tracks, and they've figured out how now. 'confield' was interesting but not satisfying because it felt dashed off, improvised. 'draft' feels unbelievably tightly composed, the closer you listen the more precisely placed each sound is.

quite impressed.

milton, Saturday, 26 April 2003 00:08 (twenty-two years ago)

OK, I'm intrigued by this coded-title thing that doglatin brought up, and can't believe I never spotted it before. They practically gave it away with LP5, and Tri Repetae finally makes sense to me now. Seems to go off the rails with Confield, sadly. And wouldn't Draft be album 6? Or am I miscounting?

rgeary (rgeary), Saturday, 26 April 2003 04:11 (twenty-two years ago)

draft 7.30 kicks ass!!!!!!

chaki (chaki), Saturday, 26 April 2003 06:44 (twenty-two years ago)

eight months pass...
I've just listened to Draft again and it makes me want to gouge my eyes out with rusting copper wires. And it makes me miss Confield.

Leee Majors (Leee), Friday, 9 January 2004 23:33 (twenty-one years ago)

And apparently there's a new ae collab out with the Hafler Trio that I had no idea about.

Leee Majors (Leee), Saturday, 10 January 2004 00:00 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.