dark side of the moon.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
i must be getting old. having hated the very idea of 'the floyd'
and every thing they stand/stood for i inadvertently heard 'time'
last week (as background music on fashion tv no less !)
and having downloaded, well i can't stop listening to it.
it's timely as that re-re-re-release has just come out
and i'm wondering if the whole album could possibly be as
great. i dunno what it is i like about 'time', it's
glum, depressing...but it's so uplifting !

i hated 'the wall' and 'bike' and all that crap.

piscesboy, Monday, 14 April 2003 09:48 (twenty-two years ago)

I've never understood why everybnody hates Pink Floyd. I think they're one of the greatest bands of all time.

Evan (Evan), Monday, 14 April 2003 09:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Nothing wrong with the Floyd. Apart from their entire output after 1979.

Alex K (Alex K), Monday, 14 April 2003 10:12 (twenty-two years ago)

i think "dark side of the moon" is the album that encapsules the 70s (and pink floyd) best. for me it is an extremely nostalgic listen nowadays. i was ten when it came out. in those times it was something pretty progressive with all the everyday sounds. the mood of it is dark but warm at the same time. and pretty dense. there is not one bad track and it has to be listened in once as all albums used to in the good "old" times.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Monday, 14 April 2003 10:29 (twenty-two years ago)

nostalgic for me too. so its hard to get a good perspective on its merits for new listeners. but alex is otm. its consistant. if you like time there's a strong chance you'll like (almost) all of it. "Money" is crap though...

gaz (gaz), Monday, 14 April 2003 10:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Alex K OTM (but back it up to 1977 for me)

SplendidMullet (iamamonkey), Monday, 14 April 2003 11:41 (twenty-two years ago)

can't stand much else by them, but Dark Side has some cool moments. all the segues from song to song especially.

Al (sitcom), Monday, 14 April 2003 12:48 (twenty-two years ago)

I love Floyd, but I haven't been able to stomach The Wall since sometime after my 14th birthday.

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 14 April 2003 12:59 (twenty-two years ago)

If only Johnny Rotten had worn a "I Hate Steely Dan" shirt instead, then maybe there wouldn't be all this Floyd guilt today.

And it's not The Wall that's so hard to stomach, it's The Final Cut.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 14 April 2003 13:08 (twenty-two years ago)

...so what's the extra stuff on the 'Moon' re-issue, then?

I love Pink Floyd up to and including Final Cut (and some of Momentary Lapse of Reason - but only some)..... and if it wasn't for Mr Gilmour, we'd have no Kate Bush, so that's reason enough to love them.......

russ t, Monday, 14 April 2003 13:17 (twenty-two years ago)

...and if it wasn't for Mr Gilmour, we'd have no Kate Bush,
so that's reason enough to love them.......


I'm afraid I'm not as up on my Kate Bush trivia as I should be. Is this true?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 14 April 2003 13:21 (twenty-two years ago)

its hard to get a good perspective on its merits for new listeners.

solution: Dub Side of the Moon!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 14 April 2003 13:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Alex -
yep, he was the guy who, after hearing Kathys Songs (her demo - raw mixes of lots of Kick Inside and some of Lionheart), went straight to the head of EMI with it. They gave her a unique deal whereby they'd let her continue her studies and nurture her talent until she was ready to make an album, so keen were they to get and keep her.

russ t, Monday, 14 April 2003 14:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Never woulda guessed it. Thanks, Russ.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 14 April 2003 14:49 (twenty-two years ago)

The Kate Bush stuff is all true, sadly. Sadly because it negates my wish to have PF wiped from existence.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 14 April 2003 14:50 (twenty-two years ago)

I like a lot of Pink Floyd stuff, but I don't rate "Dark Side Of The Moon"... it's a bit too self-indulgent, and all those "woahhhh Bodyform" backing vocals are somewhat laughable.

Pink Floyd I like: Meddle, Wish You Were Here, Relics, Piper At The Gates Of Dawn, Saucerful of Secrets.

Is Animals any good?

DV (dirtyvicar), Monday, 14 April 2003 15:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Animals is quite possibly their best, if you ask me.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 14 April 2003 15:44 (twenty-two years ago)

I think it's kinda boring. If you like "Time" you'll probably like it because I seem to remember them including that song a couple different times with different titles and lyrics. "Us & Them" is OK, I guess. Pink Floyd in general has a sucks-all-the-air-out-of-the-room quality for me.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Monday, 14 April 2003 16:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Bah!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 14 April 2003 16:59 (twenty-two years ago)

I like Animals best, too.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 14 April 2003 17:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Wish You Were Here is listenable.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Monday, 14 April 2003 17:07 (twenty-two years ago)

If I had to choose I'd actually probably take The Wall over DSOTM because it's not all slow and the songs are shorter. Why do people love this band so much? What makes them better than Supertramp?

sundar subramanian (sundar), Monday, 14 April 2003 17:10 (twenty-two years ago)

What makes them better than Supertramp?

The absence of Roger Hodgson.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 14 April 2003 17:15 (twenty-two years ago)

I love Animals as well but a lot of other folks do not. And I like Pink Floyd better than Supertramp because their drummer is the Phil Rudd of self-indulgent rock. Just found that one drumbeat he likes and stuck to it for 20 years!

original bgm, Monday, 14 April 2003 17:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Let me also add that while he may otherwise be a fat, humorless aristocrat these days, David (Never 'Dave') Gilmour is a damn fine guitarist.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 14 April 2003 17:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Big for it's day -- dated today. The Wall is even worse. Meddle gets my top vote, followed by Animals.

christoff (christoff), Monday, 14 April 2003 17:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Wish You Were Here is my favorite, Animals second.

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 14 April 2003 17:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Animals is my fave too, followed by the live side of Ummagumma. Side 1 of Dub Side of the Moon is great.

Omar (Omar), Monday, 14 April 2003 17:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Wow, I can't believe all the love for Animals on this thread! That record is wretched. Sometimes I think Wish You Were Here might be my favorite, but it's hard to argue with Dark Side.

Totally agree about Mason, and I kind of think the same of Gilmour. He certainly wouldn't rank among my favorite guitarists. But then, I don't really listen to Pink Floyd for the "musicianship."

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Monday, 14 April 2003 17:59 (twenty-two years ago)

I never liked Animals and Wish You Were Here as much as DSOTM as I owned them and loved especially WYWH to pieces. The special thing about DSOTM was that I only heard it at other people's places. It was the soundtrack to the parties I went to in my early adolescence around 1975/76. Animals is fine but a little boring over-all. By no means it can live up to DSOTM. It's a real underdog in comparison. I heard Meddle once and found it ok but not spectacular. Maybe I should listen more to it. The Piper at the Gates of Dawn and A Saucerful of Secrets is a different band. Much weirder and more psychedelic due to the crazy diamond Syd Barrett.

Actually I think DSOTM is so good as it is so self-indulgent. Self-indulgence was what art-rock was about, wasn't it?

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Monday, 14 April 2003 18:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Animals is easily my favorite. They beat Lil' Louis to the punch by over ten years by reading parts of the Bible through a vocoder ;-)
the AMG makes it sound like this record is too challenging for the average Floyd fan, which makes me laugh. Its like a small beachhead of hipsterdom uneroded by watery hippies ;-)

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Monday, 14 April 2003 18:16 (twenty-two years ago)

Pink Floyd in sudden ILM re-evaluation shockah!

Hell, I would have figured that everyone around here hated Animals (it one of my faves). Everyone (even the haters) owes it to themselves to listen to one high-quality PF bootleg from the mid-70s when PF was mucking around with the arrangements of the DSOTM, WYWH and Animals material.

Chris Barrus (Chris Barrus), Monday, 14 April 2003 18:26 (twenty-two years ago)

I guess people only like Animals so much as you can't hear it anywhere. DSOTM and WYWH and The Wall were omnipresent at their time and are still played a lot in pubs and public places. Whereas Animals is almost a rarity. It doesn't make it better though. It's going nowhere and fun for all the animal sounds but that's about all there is in that album.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Monday, 14 April 2003 18:35 (twenty-two years ago)

I occasionally like Pink Floyd .. just to be clear I'm not here to bash them...

My eyes are getting tired since it's near the end of the day for me .. and everytime I see this thread's title, it looks like "Dark Side of the Moron."

Just wanted to share.

dave225 (Dave225), Monday, 14 April 2003 18:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Animals appeals to me as it's a bit bleaker in sentiment than the comparitivley whistful Wish You Were Here, and a good deal more "rocking." And musicianship-shmoocisianship, David Gilmour plays with STYLE. Dark Side of the Moon is a fantastic record, and anyone who refutes that is steeped in a giant, gooey vat of bubbling, viscous denial.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 14 April 2003 18:50 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought that DSOTM was a load of classic rock wank, but then again the first time I ever listened to it was a month ago. I suppose had I had to have been there to get it.

fletrejet, Monday, 14 April 2003 19:03 (twenty-two years ago)

'Wish You Were Here' sounds better every year.

Andrew L (Andrew L), Monday, 14 April 2003 19:06 (twenty-two years ago)

"Wish you were here" is my pick, followed by "The Wall" ex-aequo w/ "Meddle". I think that "Dark Side of the Moon" is a tad too experimental, too self-indulgent, living for its sound, not its songs. The SACD hybrid new edition sounds great though... (even on a standard CD player).

JP Almeida (JP Almeida), Monday, 14 April 2003 20:28 (twenty-two years ago)

I like Animals for how Pink Floyd's instruments and personalities seem almost direly incapable of stanching the inevitable progress of the tracks. They just GO. The instruments add or subtract, build or subside, but they can never quite turn the tide except for a few rare moments, which, when they occur, are glorious. It's a little like techno; the songs have this sense of hanging on for dear life to a runaway train, the group doggedly following the thrust of each song down dark pre-designated avenues, that can, on occasion, burst open like fireworks. I think it's just totally bleakly beautiful.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 14 April 2003 20:38 (twenty-two years ago)

I have to vote for Wish You Were Here over Animals. A few years back I tried giving it another chance after Mark Kozelek was raving about it, but I think Animals consists of one good song ("Dogs") and a collection of misfires.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 14 April 2003 21:49 (twenty-two years ago)

its hard to get a good perspective on its merits for new listeners.

solution: Dub Side of the Moon!

whats this? is it by the orb?

gaz (gaz), Monday, 14 April 2003 21:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh boy oh man. Dark Side I love like a giddy glue-sniffing child; my lips have never touched a marihuana cigaret yet it is one of my favorite records because... well, it's like "thank you Phil Spector and Brian Wilson, now let's see what we can do when we put tons of guitar lamentations into the mix here". Everyone says "yay/ick, prog", but it also seems like an evolution of soul to an odd degree, like the acid casualty whitefolks' answer to Isaac Hayes ca. 1969. Plus they got great squishy-sounding keyboards and the bassline to "Money" is just that. Bling!

Animals is completely bonkers. I remember scanning through the Rolling Stone archives on microfiche at the U of Minnesota library and found that the illustration accompanying the (negative) review was some anthropomorphic Crumbalike '70s retro-deco hallucinogenic rendering of a giddy giraffe chick with her headphones on and Frampton paraphenalia about the room in some odd display of juvenilia-j'accuse condescencion. That image only makes the record better. I really wish it was a double LP and had some songs about badgers and hyenas and lemurs and so forth, but as it is it's pretty good, severely underrated (everywhere but here), and "Sheep" is propulsive synthfuck nightmare fuel that lots of people would be hailing as the greatest avant-stuff acheivement of pop '70s if it were done by oh say Can. (Or not; people don't seem to like late-period Can too much. But I do. So fuck 'em.)

The real ish that gets third-place love from me: Obscured By Clouds. This is like their Virgin Suicides/Made In USA turn where they do a soundtrack with lots of repeating musical themes and so forth, and if Rog and Dave didn't seem so protective of their music vis a vis copyright stuff you'd hear a sample from this record at least once a year in a mid-sized RZA or Automator-produced semi-hit. Damn does it bang. And "The Gold It's In The..." is a pop single Alex Chilton would hit his own penis with a sledgehammer for.

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Monday, 14 April 2003 23:00 (twenty-two years ago)

The real ish that gets third-place love from me: Obscured By Clouds

Ah, yes, this I'll agree with wholeheartedly. "Wot's Uh the Deal" is on this one, right?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 14 April 2003 23:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes indeed. Great subtle springish sort of thing.

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Monday, 14 April 2003 23:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Wish You Were Here is their apex, to me.

Joe (Joe), Tuesday, 15 April 2003 00:11 (twenty-two years ago)

The only thing in the band that kept a decent pulse was their echoplex, which, unfortunately, was stuck on "half-dead". Classic rockers whine about punk lacking musicianship but what about these guys? I don't think they're half as good as even Santana.

Kris (aqueduct), Tuesday, 15 April 2003 01:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't think they're half as good as even Santana.

Bahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha. Santana?? BAHAHAhahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 15 April 2003 01:23 (twenty-two years ago)

"synthfuck"

Nate, once again, the typo has made the coolest description ever.

Unless it's not a typo, in which case it's slightly less impressive, for some reason.

Johnney B (Johnney B), Tuesday, 15 April 2003 11:33 (twenty-two years ago)

I second Joe on WYWH. However, I think DSOTM was a great album too (as was their entire 71-77 output)

"The Wall" is still terribly overrated though.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Tuesday, 15 April 2003 12:41 (twenty-two years ago)

four years pass...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhCIECMFo6k

the shins doing "breath". how bizarre, yet not very creative..

Zeno, Wednesday, 29 August 2007 01:07 (seventeen years ago)

two weeks pass...

Jesus, this record sucks.

Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 12 September 2007 08:52 (seventeen years ago)

The dub version is wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy better.

Mark G, Wednesday, 12 September 2007 09:00 (seventeen years ago)

This revive is predicated by the Dave Gilmour & Friends thing on BBC over the weekend, which my girlfriend and I watched in horror for about ten minutes, all the while she was bitching at me to "turn this shit off". She's not normally overly vocal about disliking music, but she FUCKING HATES the Floyd.

She used to work in a record shop and through that developed a serious aversion to what she calls 'wanky boy music', which included Floys, Zep, and Hendrix. She's actually now grown to really like Hendrix, but Floyd hold the same awful terror.

And I've got to admit, I don't like them either. Ignoring the gig on TV, which appeared to be several really dull songs that consisted entirely of pained, slow verses and really long, pained, slow guitar solos AND OH MY GOD GRAHAM NASH WAS IT WHO WAS DOING THAT OLD-MAN AIR-DRUMMING AND SMILING OH FUCK AT LEAST DAVID CROSBY HAS THE DECENCY TO LOOK LIKE A MENTAL COWBOY TRAMP, DSOTM itself is just shite, isn't it? I put it on, under serious protest, before we went to bed, and just that opening lyric and its delivery, fucking hell, what complete and utter piffle. And the music! So slow and flat and boring and wanky.

Wish You Were Here and Meddle are a bit better than DSOTM, but still, PF suck. I've never listened to The Wall - just the tunes you hear on radio were enough to convince me I'd hate it. Does anyone REALLY like DSOTM, and Floyd in general, apart from middle-aged Boomers who score some weed off their stepsons and relive their youth?

Feel free to build more strawmen.

Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 12 September 2007 09:07 (seventeen years ago)

If the dub version loses all the wanky wanky lyrics, it could be fine, aye.

Scik Mouthy, Wednesday, 12 September 2007 09:07 (seventeen years ago)

I hate pretty much all Pink Floyd I've ever heard, which is quite a lot, but for some reason I absolutely love the Wish You Were Here album. Weird, because it doesn't really sound that different from most of their other stuff.

nate woolls, Wednesday, 12 September 2007 09:46 (seventeen years ago)

i find wish you were here to be a little bit insubstantial somehow, even though 'shine on you crazy diamond (part 1-V)' is breathtaking and astonishingly good, and the title track is timeless.

i don't know maybe my point of view stems from having heard 'welcome to the machine' (not the most inspired track in the first place) about 800 times too many

Charlie Howard, Wednesday, 12 September 2007 15:19 (seventeen years ago)

six months pass...

still fantastic i don't care what anybody says.

pisces, Saturday, 29 March 2008 04:58 (seventeen years ago)

It's tough to like anything when your girlfriend is ragging on it the whole time.

Z S, Saturday, 29 March 2008 05:33 (seventeen years ago)

Every gland in my body hates this album. Horrible lite jazz-rock. Ugh, and don't even get me started on that grotesque sax throughout the album.

Turangalila, Saturday, 29 March 2008 20:08 (seventeen years ago)

Also this is one of those rare moments in which I find myself seconding Nick Southall.

Turangalila, Saturday, 29 March 2008 20:11 (seventeen years ago)

loved it when i was young, not so much anymore. it's a gateway drug.

oscar, Saturday, 29 March 2008 20:30 (seventeen years ago)

Watch the Dark Side of the Rainbow paranoid mashups with the Wizard of Oz on youtube...amazing!

iago g., Saturday, 29 March 2008 20:57 (seventeen years ago)

u crazy, T! jazz rock done beautifully, love the sax. yumm

Surmounter, Saturday, 29 March 2008 21:32 (seventeen years ago)

I loved The Wall until I realized it wasn't about the searing pain I felt when Melanie Koening turned me down junior prom. Dark Side, Wish You Were Here, and Obscured by Clouds are still awesome, though. So are you, Melanie, wherever you are!

Terrible Cold, Saturday, 29 March 2008 22:43 (seventeen years ago)

awful record

banriquit, Sunday, 30 March 2008 00:19 (seventeen years ago)

Third album I ever listened to in its entirety (after Braveheart Soundtrack and the Inner Circle Bad Boys album. I had a fucked up childhood, music-wise). I still love it, although I listened to it so many times in 11th grade I'm not sure it's necessary to spin it more than once every few years anymore. Once again, I'm not sure the haters dislike the band or the music so much as the belief among the 12 CD a year crowd that Pink Floyd are rock gods and that Dark Side is an untouchable behemoth.

I can't help thinking that if this record wasn't made by Pink Floyd, and you picked up this record on a whim in a record store for 75 cents and it was called Y INFINITY by Dawn Soldiers, you'd be hardpressed to get halfway through "On the Run" without satisfying the urge to email/call someone and let them know about your awesome find.

Z S, Sunday, 30 March 2008 04:54 (seventeen years ago)

I've enjoyed Floyd for 20 years + and I've never liked Animals. It's like one long bluesy classic rock solo.

Mark Rich@rdson, Sunday, 30 March 2008 04:58 (seventeen years ago)

That's why it's one of my favorites!

Pleasant Plains, Sunday, 30 March 2008 05:12 (seventeen years ago)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNHu8AZxJmo

for anyone who hasn't seen it.

pisces, Sunday, 30 March 2008 05:16 (seventeen years ago)

one month passes...

I don't understand why so many people find DSOTM to be self-indulgent-I find it to be sparse, restrained, every note just where it should be. Clean and sculpted. The album's not even all that long.

thirdalternative, Sunday, 11 May 2008 21:30 (seventeen years ago)

Pink Floyd is what I personally consider the best rock band in history, and its not because of Dark Side of the Moon, or the Wall, or Animals althought those are good albums.

It's Because of Wish You Were Here, Ummagumma, Meddle, and Atom Heart Mother.

wesley useche, Sunday, 11 May 2008 21:48 (seventeen years ago)

I didn't like a lot of this album for a while, probably more because of overexposure than anything. I developed a newfound appreciation for Us and Them when it was used as part of the soundtrack to Dogtown and Z-Boys. There's also that surfing reference in the first song that i hadn't really caught until recently.

I had never "read" the album as Southern California music. I had always associated it with gloominess and England and the kind of imagery that was in The Wall movie.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Sunday, 11 May 2008 21:57 (seventeen years ago)

Again, why are people so into Animals. You guys like Gilmours solos that much?

Mark Rich@rdson, Sunday, 11 May 2008 22:25 (seventeen years ago)

I like Animals for its uncomparable misantropy.

thirdalternative, Sunday, 11 May 2008 22:27 (seventeen years ago)

IMO, Animals is special not for its solos, but b/c of the interesting soundscapes and fun melodies.

Surmounter, Sunday, 11 May 2008 22:53 (seventeen years ago)

lyrically, animals is really good. but typically overstated in true waters fashion. the songs are really listenable despite their length. dogs is great.

dark side is not good as background music. you need to sink into it - the musical landscapes are rich enough to allow for that. it's definitely a classic and comes together really convincingly as an overall piece. and then there's some outstanding standalone numbers on there as well ('time', 'us and them' etc.)

anyway, i don't listen to floyd much these days. but about seven years ago used to obsess.

Charlie Howard, Monday, 12 May 2008 09:57 (seventeen years ago)

Can't get past the awful, awful lyrics on this record and never have been able to. "Breath, breath in the air / don't be afraid to care". I don't mind nonsense lyrics but, y'know, make them proper nonsense and hide them a bit, please. Not this wishy washy middle-class hippy bullshit. Uergh.

Scik Mouthy, Monday, 12 May 2008 10:02 (seventeen years ago)

Does anyone REALLY like DSOTM, and Floyd in general, apart from middle-aged Boomers who score some weed off their stepsons and relive their youth?

Have you been to a college?

If someone tells me how surreal it is to synchronize Dark Side with the Wizard Of Oz I tell them to try it in sobriety as a family function. This was when I was a lot younger, before I knew that my dad was a champion stoner in his day, before I knew just how much alcoholism had it's part in my family. It had never occured to me that my mom (though possibly the most straight laced of the bunch) wasn't always a Sunday School teacher.* I wish I had the capacity to express how strange and awkward this was.
But this is how I first heard the album and I've had a nostalgic little soft spot for it ever since. Apart from Dark Side and the first record I've never had much use for the Floyd, though...

*(does that read like bragging? I'm neither proud nor ashamed)

OTM about the lyrics, though.

RabiesAngentleman, Monday, 12 May 2008 10:37 (seventeen years ago)

(It seems I don't know the difference between "it's" and "its")

RabiesAngentleman, Monday, 12 May 2008 12:25 (seventeen years ago)

wow that is a bad lyric -- "don't be afraid to care." i never realized that.

i guess this album's fault is that at times it sounds a little too meaningful for its own good. or something.

Surmounter, Monday, 12 May 2008 12:45 (seventeen years ago)

But this is how I first heard the album and I've had a nostalgic little soft spot for it ever since. Apart from Dark Side and the first record I've never had much use for the Floyd, though...

a shame

Surmounter, Monday, 12 May 2008 12:46 (seventeen years ago)

So I'm told. Total lack of effort, on my part.

RabiesAngentleman, Monday, 12 May 2008 12:48 (seventeen years ago)

just buy Meddle and put it on one saturday

Surmounter, Monday, 12 May 2008 13:11 (seventeen years ago)

yeah meddle is the shizzy

Charlie Howard, Monday, 12 May 2008 13:12 (seventeen years ago)

^^correct usage of the term "shizzy"

Surmounter, Monday, 12 May 2008 13:14 (seventeen years ago)

hahah

meddle really is close to being my favourite floyd record though. just so compelling. and they really weren't able to match the moodiness and ethereal quality of 'echoes' elsewhere in their canon of work. ok, so maybe 'remember a day' and 'cymbaline' touched on those feelings substantially as well, but 'echoes' is such an anomaly in the floydian world. it and 'shine on you crazy diamond' are the essence of the band in prime form for me.

Charlie Howard, Monday, 12 May 2008 16:22 (seventeen years ago)

the 1st 4 tracks are pretty amazing

Surmounter, Monday, 12 May 2008 16:42 (seventeen years ago)

"I made a conscious effort when I was writing the lyrics for Dark Side Of The Moon to take the enormous risk of being truly banal about a lot of it, in order that the ideas should be expressed as simply and plainly as possible. . . . If you write ‘Breathe, breathe in the air/Don’t be afraid to care’, you leave yourself open to howling derision,” says Waters. People just go, ‘You fucking wanker! How pathetic is that?’ It’s very adolescent in its intensity, but I’m very happy now that I took that risk.”--Roger Waters

thirdalternative, Monday, 12 May 2008 17:01 (seventeen years ago)

haha waters is way too self-conscious to leave any stone unturned

xpost
yep, one of these days, pillar of winds, fearless are all lovely, each with an underlying dark mood.

Charlie Howard, Monday, 12 May 2008 17:25 (seventeen years ago)

I think Waters is actually crazier than Syd Barrett was, or at very least much more of a sociopath.

thirdalternative, Monday, 12 May 2008 17:40 (seventeen years ago)

^^ this

mh, Monday, 12 May 2008 17:50 (seventeen years ago)

nine years pass...

i just listened to this whole album really loud on my klipschs. sounded awesome. nearmintfirstu.s.pressing.

scott seward, Friday, 17 November 2017 15:01 (seven years ago)

I always think I'm over this album until I listen to it, particularly the 'Brain Damage'/'Eclipse' segue... not Nick Mason's finest hour as a drummer, though.

Gholdfish Killah (Turrican), Friday, 17 November 2017 15:11 (seven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.