Music and morals

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I was wondering what people think about linking music to morality. Remember the concept of playing classical music at train stations to decrease crime? Or the idea that you couldn't show Elvis gyrating his hips on national TV because it would lead to corruption among impressionable young ladies? Or perhaps (worst of all), today's accusation that a rap artist would kill his flatmate and eat part of her lungs to maintain his 'gangsta' cred. I'm trying to write a zine article on the topic and would greatly appreciate any opinions, examples of incidents, etc

the idea of classical music being all puritan is kind of funny given the tawdry lives some of the composers lived...

L T Lam, Monday, 14 April 2003 10:09 (twenty-two years ago)

two months pass...
Well, I'm with Freud here. I think that and puritans are full of unconscious lusts and perversions. The puritanism is in self-defense.

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Monday, 23 June 2003 06:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Why 'unconscious'? Maybe the puritans are the only ones who realisticaly acknowledge what the human consciousness is capable of, and correctly decide to repress it.

dave q, Monday, 23 June 2003 15:59 (twenty-two years ago)

some people are dumb enough to do what they think songs are telling them to do regardless of whether it harms somebody somehow. i blame the parents.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 23 June 2003 16:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Or perhaps (worst of all), today's accusation that a rap artist would kill his flatmate and eat part of her lungs to maintain his 'gangsta' cred.
Wouldn't that act only count if he killed/ate peices of a rival set member (ie crip eat blood/blood eat crip)?

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Monday, 23 June 2003 16:11 (twenty-two years ago)

gangsta vs. mere thug

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 23 June 2003 16:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, the thing is, puritans and gangsters have a fatal attraction to one another. The cop coulda been a gangster,and maybe will be next year. The surgeon coulda been a murderer, and maybe will next year. Don't tell me surgeons don't get a private little kick out of 'accidentally' killing patients.

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 02:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Is that why malpractice insurance in PA is $200,000 a year?

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 11:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Music isn´t a moral treatice and musicians ain´t misionaries...so you can´t link morals into it. You might talk about ethics though or some kind of social morality..which in itself depends on the place and context. Some music has a place, gangsta rap was a necesary statements, a reaction. That´s why it was good..but now it has lost it´s charm, it´s context...now all there is to it is the "blim, blim". It´s ironic that rap music was a response to white capitalism..yet now they commercialize it, became one with their own enemy.Yet, if you ask me Limp Bizkit and Creed (and am trying hard to make a theory and blame all of this on both Puff Daddy and Madonna)probably screw it all up, forget morals, those two are just plain evil!. "uhh look at me.. am Creed.. am Creed.. I drink a lot and GOD &%#"&() still loves me"...no wonder am a f"%/@¡ atheist.If you ask me I think Christina Aguilera is more inmoral than Lou Reed. But hey that´s just me. At least Lou Reed accepted what he was..in his own ambiguous way. He didn´t aim at being a spokesman.

Siñor N.K. Loveless (Siñor N.K. Loveless), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 12:41 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.