Shambolic fuzz-driven punkettes turn into over-produced fuzz-free forgettable pop act.
― Kim Tortoise, Wednesday, 16 April 2003 08:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Wednesday, 16 April 2003 08:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 16 April 2003 08:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 16 April 2003 08:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― M Carty (mj_c), Wednesday, 16 April 2003 08:42 (twenty-two years ago)
Remember Kenickie's last single & video? Shades of Fuzzbox there also.
― Johnny Jarvis, Wednesday, 16 April 2003 08:44 (twenty-two years ago)
true. but this remark...
"although sometimes it does shambolic fuzz-driven punkettes the power of good to become more of a pop act."
...wasn't specifically about sonic youth. in fact, "dirty" isn't as consistently excellent as other sonic youth albums. i was more commenting on the fact that lots of wanky-indie-types get better once they "sell out". the flaming lips were better when they "went pop", for instance.
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Wednesday, 16 April 2003 08:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― kim tortoise, Wednesday, 16 April 2003 08:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― Evan (Evan), Wednesday, 16 April 2003 09:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Wednesday, 16 April 2003 09:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Wednesday, 16 April 2003 09:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― beezlebub, Wednesday, 16 April 2003 09:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 16 April 2003 09:23 (twenty-two years ago)
yes, It can work in both ways.
With the FL the thing is they didn't change right away once they signed on the major labels. They were allowed to do what they wanted. A lot of their albums are more 'indie label' albs (though that changed on the soft bulletin/ zaireeka).
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 16 April 2003 09:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― pete b. (pete b.), Wednesday, 16 April 2003 10:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Johnny Jarvis, Wednesday, 16 April 2003 10:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― alexfack (alexfack), Wednesday, 16 April 2003 10:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― bham, Wednesday, 16 April 2003 11:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Wednesday, 16 April 2003 11:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Wednesday, 16 April 2003 11:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― earlnash, Wednesday, 16 April 2003 11:46 (twenty-two years ago)
Not TOO much in sound, but that last video took a rather worrying direction. I'm glad it didn't develop. I'm not knocking Kenickie - I know them actually (or used to anyway) and they thought the whole experience was a laugh.
― Johnny Jarvis, Wednesday, 16 April 2003 11:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― schnellschnell, Wednesday, 16 April 2003 11:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― Johnny Jarvis, Wednesday, 16 April 2003 12:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Momus (Momus), Wednesday, 16 April 2003 12:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil, Wednesday, 16 April 2003 12:41 (twenty-two years ago)
Oh and answer to the question at hand: The Smiths. They didn't even get to make a record, did they?
― suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 16 April 2003 12:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― briania, Wednesday, 16 April 2003 12:54 (twenty-two years ago)
Atari teenage riot did sign to a major label and they used the money from when they were dumped to form their own label etc.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 16 April 2003 13:04 (twenty-two years ago)
Fuzzbox - I loved them before and after the indie/major move. The Rules And Regs EP was brill - and their version of Walking on thin ice was superb, too - they were overproduced and glossed-out, but they were still loveable scamp-like foxes.Where are they now?
― russ t, Wednesday, 16 April 2003 13:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― kim tortoise, Wednesday, 16 April 2003 13:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― jm (jtm), Wednesday, 16 April 2003 14:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― mike a (mike a), Wednesday, 16 April 2003 14:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lynskey (Lynskey), Wednesday, 16 April 2003 14:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― kephm, Wednesday, 16 April 2003 14:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― kim tortoise, Wednesday, 16 April 2003 15:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Mirov (nick), Wednesday, 16 April 2003 15:19 (twenty-two years ago)
no, not from Zen Arcade to New Day Rising, since that was still on SST.
But from Warehouse: Songs & Stories to Candy Apple Grey
― Andrzej B. (Andrzej B.), Wednesday, 16 April 2003 23:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― chuck, Wednesday, 16 April 2003 23:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― chuck, Wednesday, 16 April 2003 23:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― di smith (lucylurex), Thursday, 17 April 2003 01:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sean (Sean), Thursday, 17 April 2003 02:54 (twenty-two years ago)
And BOTH of them were on Warner Bros.
― paul cox (paul cox), Thursday, 17 April 2003 02:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 17 April 2003 03:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― sundar subramanian (sundar), Thursday, 17 April 2003 03:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 17 April 2003 04:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Colin Meeder (Mert), Thursday, 17 April 2003 08:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― Colin Meeder (Mert), Thursday, 17 April 2003 08:27 (twenty-two years ago)
Sony bought a 50% share in Creation in 1993. I remember Dick Green showing me the contract he'd been working on, it was the size of six copies of the yellow pages. 'This will be good for you, Momus,' Dick said. Shortly afterwards they dropped me and signed Oasis. Whether you think that means their output changed for better or worse is a question of whether you think Momus is better than Oasis.
Personally, I'm always happier on indie labels. The fewer employees a label has, the better it is, in my experience. Today I will be making a sleeve for a compilation of my Creation albums to be released by Analog Baroque, finally returned to us by Sony (who had the rights, but were doing nothing with them). Hostages are being released and returned to their family.
― Momus (Momus), Thursday, 17 April 2003 09:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― kate, Thursday, 17 April 2003 09:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― fortunate hazel (f. hazel), Thursday, 17 April 2003 10:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― suzy (suzy), Thursday, 17 April 2003 10:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 17 April 2003 11:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 17 April 2003 12:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 17 April 2003 13:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Momus (Momus), Thursday, 17 April 2003 16:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 17 April 2003 16:38 (twenty-two years ago)