Madonna Gets Hers

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/eo/20030421/en_music_eo/11656&e=4

Ha-ha.

― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 22 April 2003 15:45 (twenty-two years ago)

creepy.

― s woods, Tuesday, 22 April 2003 15:48 (twenty-two years ago)

what isn't clear is how an album that say, mojo
had at least a month ago jusging from their review
took all that time to *finally* get bootleg'd.
espec. considering how early radiohead's came by illegally.
what it tells you is how unfashionable madonna is.
at least with the net-friendly.

what's also worth pondering, is why it is that
mags like 'word' (front cover :
you're going to love blur when you hear their new record)
persist in treating people like computer illiterates.
we've *heard* the bloody thing already !!

― piscesboy, Tuesday, 22 April 2003 16:06 (twenty-two years ago)

I guess the fact the Am-Life wasn't available until Madge herself put fakers of it up, proves that nobody wants to know...

― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 22 April 2003 16:09 (twenty-two years ago)

This is the best news I've heard all day. I lost a lot of respect for Madonna after she put all of the fake copies on the web. This combined with her assinine interviews as of late (is she continually on the brink of tears?) shows she's a bit clueless. I want to admire the anti-war stance but she's expressing herself in such stupid ways.

― theodore fogelsanger, Tuesday, 22 April 2003 17:23 (twenty-two years ago)

sooooooo fucking RIGHTEOUS!!!! :)

― maria b (maria b), Tuesday, 22 April 2003 20:23 (twenty-two years ago)

i wouldve applauded Madonna (thank god i refrained from putting Madge THIS time) if rather than just saying 'fuck off!' to the downloaders she'd overlaid an intelligent and thoughtful message explaining why those downloading the album were naughty - something like 'C'mon people I got two kids to feed and they're are all outta Pradamani cravats and ivory backscratchers - gimme a break' that kinda thing

― stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 22 April 2003 21:48 (twenty-two years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.