something about it really, really annoys me. Not just the stuff about the 'head worring about the strokes/white stripes. Admitedly i've not heard the record so that should make it difficult for me to comment on the review but its the caught in a trap thing that really irks me. The thing I like about Radiohead is they aren't taking a backward step and saying oh you know that experimenting thing we did (which wasnt really that experimental unless your steven wells) we disown it now we are going to rock out!.
views on the review from those that have heard the record appreciated.
― gallantseagull, Thursday, 8 May 2003 23:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Adam A. (Keiko), Thursday, 8 May 2003 23:44 (twenty-two years ago)
(re: Kid A & Amnesiac) "If you play those two records now, you're immediately drawn to the moments where the band are at their most conventional."
Um, no.
― Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 9 May 2003 00:08 (twenty-two years ago)
Far as i'm concerned, the album's great. I'm not too worried about what NME thinks. And i'm using 'thinks' in the loosest possible manner.
― Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Friday, 9 May 2003 00:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― russ t, Friday, 9 May 2003 08:38 (twenty-two years ago)
Anyone who thinks that the "rock" songs were the best moments on Kid A/Amnesiac is not someone whose viewpoint I find valid enough to pay attention to.
Boring and predictable and says acres about the prejudices and shortcomings of the reviewer and almost nothing about the album or the band.
― kate, Friday, 9 May 2003 08:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Friday, 9 May 2003 09:55 (twenty-two years ago)
"It's ironic that 'Hail To The Thief' emerges at a time when the fashion once more is for a more primitive musical experience. Both The Strokes and The White Stripes have shown that a pared-down emotional rawness can be both commercially and critically successful. Once again, Radiohead find themselves an anachronism but this time not in a particularly positive way. They feel cumbersome and self-important besides these younger groups"
and yes, i think many found the experimental pieces on the last two albums to be the real triumph, not the old-school radiohead ones. oh well, enough potshots at an easy target for now, i have study to do.
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Friday, 9 May 2003 10:05 (twenty-two years ago)
I think he may be onto something, in a roundabout cultural way, with the part that Kilian quotes, in that I'd say the Strokes and White Stripes et al and the way NME has sold them has given rise to an attitude that emotional or serious music is for wankers.
I doubt Radiohead give a fuck about "these younger groups" but I imagine alot of former fans might now see them as cumbersome and self important.
FWIW I think Idioteque is the best thing they've ever done.
― Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 9 May 2003 10:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 9 May 2003 10:21 (twenty-two years ago)
true, i'd only say 4 tracks off kid a (at most) could be said to sound like these acts. perhaps former radiohead fans have moved over to the garage rock crowd a bit, but it still seems a bit silly to criticise the album for not being straight-up rock.
i.e. is every review of an experimental album going to include a passage which says "this album is cumbersome when set against the white stripes"? (to be fair, they probably only drew this comparison because radiohead is competing sales-wise with them, and competing for the affections of the same people.)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Friday, 9 May 2003 10:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Friday, 9 May 2003 10:42 (twenty-two years ago)
In answer to your question Kilian, I reckon in the NME, yes!
― Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 9 May 2003 10:48 (twenty-two years ago)
replace 'a bit' for 'for evah'.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 9 May 2003 10:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 9 May 2003 10:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Friday, 9 May 2003 10:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Friday, 9 May 2003 10:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 9 May 2003 10:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Melissa W (Melissa W), Friday, 9 May 2003 10:57 (twenty-two years ago)
to be fair to my friends at the nme. they did give it 7 out of 10. but it was the tenor and tone of the review that shat me tearless. whoever said before the bit about them wanting another ok computer/bends record 5 years later is sad. me i would have felt betrayed if they went garage rock. its nice to see principles even if they are self important and deluded. wellok maybe not all the time.
― gallantseagull, Friday, 9 May 2003 10:57 (twenty-two years ago)
melissa, I was being flippant as usual. sorry.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 9 May 2003 13:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott m (mcd), Friday, 9 May 2003 13:19 (twenty-two years ago)
You can smell the desperation in their sweat, man.
― Matt Maxwell (Matt M.), Friday, 9 May 2003 15:50 (twenty-two years ago)