― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 9 May 2003 03:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 9 May 2003 03:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 9 May 2003 03:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Friday, 9 May 2003 03:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Friday, 9 May 2003 03:14 (twenty-two years ago)
OH GOD THE LOVE-HATE LUST RELATIONSHIP CONTINUES, PT. 437...
― Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 9 May 2003 03:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 9 May 2003 03:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― paul cox (paul cox), Friday, 9 May 2003 03:24 (twenty-two years ago)
Okay, step back... deep breath.
So, what does everyone think about the new Blur album? Isn't it the fattest turd you've ever heard?
Damn! I did it again!
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 9 May 2003 03:28 (twenty-two years ago)
Funny, I wasn't interested at all before I heard this...
― Sean (Sean), Friday, 9 May 2003 03:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― paul cox (paul cox), Friday, 9 May 2003 03:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 9 May 2003 03:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Friday, 9 May 2003 03:45 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm by no means anti-"old" Blur, but "new" Blur is so much more to my liking.
― paul cox (paul cox), Friday, 9 May 2003 03:50 (twenty-two years ago)
http://www.kuci.org/~brianm/ile/alexei.jpg
― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 9 May 2003 04:15 (twenty-two years ago)
http://www.internetweekly.org/images/Kojak.jpg
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 9 May 2003 04:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― gallantseagull, Friday, 9 May 2003 04:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 9 May 2003 04:35 (twenty-two years ago)
*Errr, does the fact that the Rapture opened up for them excuse the fact that I went to see Blur play live? Umm... How about the fact that I walked out after four songs...? No?
― flightsatdusk (flightsatdusk), Friday, 9 May 2003 04:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― flightsatdusk (flightsatdusk), Friday, 9 May 2003 04:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 9 May 2003 04:51 (twenty-two years ago)
Whatever it was that kept me interested is now gone. I don't want to say that "what kept me interested" was necessarily Graham, because I always thought the basslines were the best thing about Blur. But... there used to be a tension, a balance - you'd be listening to schaltzy bubblegum pop, and then there would be this weird twist and this horrible noise would intrude and make it wonderful. But now it's like the twist no longer happens.
Blur are now worse than merely bad - they are predictable and dull where they used to intrigue.
― kate, Friday, 9 May 2003 08:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― JP Almeida (JP Almeida), Friday, 9 May 2003 08:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Friday, 9 May 2003 08:39 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm expecting the little weird textural bits that act like a hook in my brain, and I didn't hear them. Then again, my experience of the album was hearing it in full in a record shop. But even before I was aware of what it was, my reaction was "ugh, this isn't very good, what is this supposed to be? It sounds like bad Blur."
― kate, Friday, 9 May 2003 08:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― JP Almeida (JP Almeida), Friday, 9 May 2003 09:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Friday, 9 May 2003 09:49 (twenty-two years ago)
first impressions? quite good, actually. i enjoyed the single quite a bit, damon's singing seems to have improved with age. it seems a lot more *tastefully* done than 13. The production on that album was way too busy, this one sounds a lot more relaxed, and the better for it.
of course, the other 8 or so tracks i haven't heard could change my opinion drastically...
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Friday, 9 May 2003 10:11 (twenty-two years ago)
love it. really. apart from crazy beat which is truely distasteful. actually did norman cook produce anything else on it? i hope he didnt get paid much for that effort.
i'm not sure about da-mons rabbitin on in the first track either. kind of ruins it for me. except for the shoutin bit. he's a world class shouter is da-mon.
word.
― gallantseagull, Friday, 9 May 2003 10:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 9 May 2003 13:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 9 May 2003 13:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 9 May 2003 13:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Friday, 9 May 2003 13:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Friday, 9 May 2003 13:49 (twenty-two years ago)
as for this album, i like it quite a lot. i had little to no interest in picking up 13; perhaps that might change, but i never really got around to it. my favourite song is the hidden track, but i enjoy all of it, and "Battery in your Leg" is so gorgeous. the elegiac and simple but oh-so-catchy repeated descending guitar line grabs me every time. a reminder that Graham with the band was great, yes---but they're capable of pulling something quite good off without him, as well. which surprises me---i never thought he was the sole driving force of the band, but i didn't think it'd be as good without him, either. and instead, i honestly think this is better than a lot of things they've put out. i don't dislike old Blur (cettainly not), but it's been interesting to see how they've changed over time.
― janni (janni), Friday, 9 May 2003 13:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Friday, 9 May 2003 13:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 9 May 2003 14:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 9 May 2003 14:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 9 May 2003 14:15 (twenty-two years ago)
Ned: what songs would you lose? i can see where it might stand to lose a few to being b-sides to singles or something, but my problem is that my opinion on which to lose seems to change regularly depending on what mood i'm in. "Ambulance" kinda lost me at first, but after it builds up it's such a good intro track that i began to feel it was fairly indispensible to the feel of the album. "Crazy Beat" should probably be a single off on its own and not even be on the album, although it doesn't really bother me (except in thinking about how often i'm going to have it drilled into my head via radio waves when it's picked up and put on Incessant Airplay here in much the same way as "Song 2" was). "On the Way to the Club" slept off a bit and then grew on me. there's a few other instances as well...a couple could probably easily be trimmed, but i'm not entirely sure which ones. :)
― janni (janni), Friday, 9 May 2003 14:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― s.r.w. (s.r.w.), Friday, 9 May 2003 14:32 (twenty-two years ago)
Whichever one was another attempt at A Loud Brawling Rock Song Oh Yeah We're Down With the Kids, for a start -- "Crazy Beat," I think.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 9 May 2003 14:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Friday, 9 May 2003 14:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Calum, Friday, 9 May 2003 15:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― M Specktor (M Specktor), Friday, 9 May 2003 15:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Poppy (poppy), Sunday, 11 May 2003 03:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:10 (twenty-two years ago)
The Fatboy tracks need to go, and the album isn't very tight, and some of the songs seem half-written, and too dependent on texture and production, but "Ambulance" is great, and the album as a whole no longer offends me. I just had to get over the idea that it's a Blur album.
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:14 (twenty-two years ago)
So far I really like it though.
― Ferg (Ferg), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:40 (twenty-two years ago)
I like it. I'm getting a lot of the aforementioned sense that I SHOULD hate it though. I don't like the Gorillaz-y ones, or that sax solo on Jets, or some of the vocals (but the ones on Out of Time and On My Way To The Club are great), but other than that I think I enjoy pretty much the whole thing. I'm just wondering if at some point I'm suddenly going to shudder and go 'hang on, what was I THINKING?'
― Ferg (Ferg), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:53 (twenty-two years ago)
The beginning and end of the album are much much better than the middle -- a sure sign of not having ehough viable material, but being DETERMINED to make a cohesive album anyway. No luck, but nice try.
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Saturday, 24 May 2003 18:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ferg (Ferg), Saturday, 24 May 2003 19:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Evan (Evan), Sunday, 25 May 2003 07:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Sunday, 25 May 2003 08:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ferg (Ferg), Sunday, 25 May 2003 14:42 (twenty-two years ago)
http://www.ratatatat.blogspot.com
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Sunday, 25 May 2003 23:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 25 May 2003 23:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Sunday, 25 May 2003 23:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Sunday, 25 May 2003 23:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― weasel diesel (K1l14n), Sunday, 25 May 2003 23:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― David Allen, Sunday, 25 May 2003 23:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― robin (robin), Monday, 26 May 2003 01:46 (twenty-two years ago)
against all odds. they've made a great rekid.
― gallantseagull, Monday, 26 May 2003 02:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Fabrice (Fabfunk), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 09:01 (twenty-two years ago)
Annoying trash is still annoying trash. Nobody gets points for trying new things if those new things sound horrible.
― Nicole (Nicole), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 11:34 (twenty-two years ago)
Hieroglyphs.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 12:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 13:04 (twenty-two years ago)