how to stop becoming an ole cynic

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
without question every critic i like gets old and turns into his/her dad/mum.

music is crap these days. its crap. innit crap. not like in...... my day.

how does one go from idealistic to cynic? how does one stop this process?

how can you be critical yet remain in loooorve with the sounds?

how can the sons repeat the sins of the fathers.

gallantseagull, Monday, 26 May 2003 21:53 (twenty-two years ago)

I've always been pretty open-minded about music, but I did go through a cynical fuddyduddy phase a few years ago, where I just hated everything that was coming out and I was only buying back catalog items and reissues and stuff by career artists I already knew I liked. Then one day I got fed up with all those things, too -- and I just gave up music for a few weeks. Stopped buying, stopped listening, stopped writing about it, reading about it, thinking about it. Eventually I eased back in... apprehensively turned on MTV... saw the No Doubt "Hella Good" video... loved it, and the video after it, and even the one after that. I think I'd just crawled a little too far up my own rockist ass; when I emerged, it felt good to see the sunshine again.

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 26 May 2003 22:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Or maybe it was the "Hey Baby" video. The chronology's a little fuzzy.

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 26 May 2003 22:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Jody's right - when I got really cynical about music, I just took a break! Spent three or six months, don't really remember, just not paying much attention. Then one day I got out a Spandau Ballet record and it was like I was hearing music for the first time. As long as I respect what my cynicism is telling me — "too much of anything affects one's ability to enjoy it" — I retain a high ability to enjoy the things I love.

as far as being critical, I think it's overrated, I'm all about unreservedly swooning over the things that have made me swoon & think the word "hater" is one of rap's more profound contributions to language

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Monday, 26 May 2003 22:31 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not very cynical about music right now (just the opposite, for the most part), but I'm facing the conundrum of being cynical about music writing/criticism/appreciation (others and mine). What do I do then? I mean, 'take a break from writing' might not work since I've been hardly doing any at all and the fact that I haven't been is what gets my cynicism and frustration even higher.

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Monday, 26 May 2003 22:35 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd like to add something to this thread, if nobody minds. I was gonna start a thread asking this: do you think that you will ever give up someday? Meaning:stop caring about what's new/hot/hip/happening/pop/on the charts/in the zines? This is called the Meltzer Syndrome, i believe. I've seen it happen to lotsa people i know once they reach a certain age. They retreat into their studies with their classical/jazz/blues/etc records and never see the light of day again.I'm 34 and I can't see any time soon when i won't be turning on MTV2 or picking up a metal mag at the newsstand, and i realize that there are even younger people on here who this might not have even occurred to yet, but i'm curious if anyone is on the cusp or whatever. Maybe it's just a case of people deciding that they have heard enough or that the effort is to great to stay current. I often feel daunted by the endless lists of new stuff i have never heard on ilm. But it doesn't really make me feel like getting out my Mahler box-sets and forgetting all about it. If anything, it makes me more rabid for new sounds. The sad part is, I ain't rich. The good part is, I get still get really excited about stuff.

scott seward, Monday, 26 May 2003 23:03 (twenty-two years ago)

I can easily see myself not giving a shit about new music within the next five years, depending on my social circles and what I end up doing with the rest of my life. Right now going to see live shows and following new stuff is socially important to me as much as it is something I just want to do. If I stopped having such a good group of friends to go see shows with I can definitely see myself quit following new music, too, and everything that goes along with that. I haven't bought a magazine since December, and that was because I really needed something to read.

Millar (Millar), Monday, 26 May 2003 23:12 (twenty-two years ago)

As I've sloughed about here and there on both boards, the last year plus has been an extended exercise in/realization of music not being essential or primary or even needed many times anymore for me. I'm not so cynical to say everything sucks, that's ridiculous (and contrary to radical subjectivism as I would see it anyway). But I don't see this period of time as necessarily being a recharge or a building up a new level of desire or whatever again or the like. Right now, I just see it as a necessary letting go, finding a new level of balance where my critical mind is happy to burble on as needed on things (and does, thus CTCL/AMG/FakeJazz etc.) while regarding any attempt to talk about everything, forcing oneself to listen to everything and constantly trying to remind oneself about anything and everything to be extremely viciously self-defeating. Scott's point above about being 'rabid for new sounds' is an extremely good one because that's an understandable fix. But I am content with many of those old sounds because to me their power and attraction...and if you will their addictive strength...remain undiminished -- yet instead of pulling out the old box sets or trashing what is now, I would most often prefer simply to listen to nothing, to contemplate and redirect interests elsewhere. Meltzer turned a self-created birthmark into a scab he endlessly and needlessly picks at where I'd prefer to think I'm okay regarding it just as a part of myself and to think of other things.

Is getting really excited still about things supposed to be a way of keeping young in your mind, I wonder? I'm actually not all that convinced.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 26 May 2003 23:17 (twenty-two years ago)

i think, on some level, people can feel like they have to see this band/hear this record cuz they will feel like they are missing out on something if they don't. that plays into the social aspect that Millar brought up. and i think there can be something quite liberating about saying:the hell with it. i don't care if i miss out. i'll be over here with my jugband records if anyone needs me.

scott seward, Monday, 26 May 2003 23:26 (twenty-two years ago)

I suppose it's the concept of 'missing out' that interests me, though. Is anything actually being missed? Or is it less the content of the music (or whatever artform) than it is the sense of being there at the right time? But in which case, put on "Losing My Edge" and be done with it, I figure. I suppose there's something pure about only chasing that edge, admittedly, and I don't think it is solely down to a social aspect per se (some of the loneliest times I've felt have been in the center of a huge crowd). I'm not trying to pick a fight, rather I'm trying to identify general priorities we might all feel.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 26 May 2003 23:32 (twenty-two years ago)

i think i brought this up somewhere else. i can immerse myself in 60's psych arcana for weeks and never want to come up for air, but on some level i still feel like engaging the world that i live in. the here and now. so for me, it still feels like a sort of retreat from the world to ignore, either passively or actively, the new. whereas someday i may feel like i am just liberating myself from a bunch of crap that i have to wade through to get to the good stuff.

scott seward, Monday, 26 May 2003 23:33 (twenty-two years ago)

being drawn to, excited, captivated by music both "old" and "new": this hasn't ceased (tho' it's rather far from a twenty-five-hours-a-day-eight-days-a-week thing any more)

having fun writing (to be published): that, after ten-plus years, trickled away a coupla years ago

('s only too obvious this is all damn individual)

t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Monday, 26 May 2003 23:35 (twenty-two years ago)

apparently, janet jackson is a huge fan of "Losing My Edge". That's the dfa guys, right? she wants to work with them. see, there i go again.

scott seward, Monday, 26 May 2003 23:36 (twenty-two years ago)

i still feel like engaging the world that i live in. the here and now.

It's an important point -- Josh Kortbein surprised me a bit last year when he said he saw Attack of the Clones not out of any love or interest in the film but to be 'aware' of it, or some similar word, to stay in touch or engage as you described. And certainly music in and of itself is much more immediate and readily dealt with than many other art media -- quicker than fiction, shorter than a play or a movie or a TV show, etc. But is 'engaging' solely a matter of cultural awareness? I'd think not. A retreat to me would be a willful ignorance of matters political, social, moral. I don't think it's a willful cutting off to not be immediately aware of who is top ten this week, but, for instance, I'd find it a grotesque situation (for American citizens, at least) to not be immediately aware of current actions of the US administration, whether you approve of them or not. I may not be 'down with the kids' but I have no particular need to maintain that I am or ever was.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 26 May 2003 23:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, staying 'engaged' has been a big part of my cultural life for quite a while. I don't expect to enjoy things as much as I just want to try and understand and have some connection with the people around me. I fear that if I spend too much time reading and pooping around on the interweb I will end up a scary old hermit (note: this may or may not have already happened regarding 90% of the populace)

Millar (Millar), Monday, 26 May 2003 23:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Simon Reynolds to thread!

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 00:00 (twenty-two years ago)

or christgau to thread. a 50-something who is aware of 50 cent's every move.

scott seward, Tuesday, 27 May 2003 00:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Or, lacking Xgau, me to thread. I didn't like 50 until "21 Questions," which is kinda dope.

I will be giving up reviewing for a while this summer in an attempt to re-appreciate all my stuff, and to actually spend Sat. mornings watching shitty cartoons instead of reviewing shitty (and great) records. And to crawl out of my own ass and to rediscover the love and to get my edge back, etc.

But where the hell will I get all my free stuff? I'm not all $crooge MacDuck over here. The damned paradox..

Neudonym, Tuesday, 27 May 2003 00:15 (twenty-two years ago)

keeping an eye on 50 cents must be of some help making them dollars, speaking theoretically

t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 00:18 (twenty-two years ago)

well - Xgau's ability to stay engaged is part of what makes him so remarkable: it's a symptom, I think, of how sharp his mind is. NB I know lots of people here think Xgau's taste is awful, but his knack for explaining exactly why this or that piece of music does or does not work for him in as few words as possible yet with remarkable precision is the point, not whether he likes the right stuff or not.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 00:18 (twenty-two years ago)

is it a question of energy as well? deciding to take a more historical/historians approach to listening makes sense if you no longer have the time or inclination to search out the new and unusual. in other words, Mozart isn't going anywhere.(this last sentence can be read at least 3 different ways)

scott seward, Tuesday, 27 May 2003 00:35 (twenty-two years ago)

(...and writing practically)

t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 00:40 (twenty-two years ago)

deciding to take a more historical/historians approach to listening makes sense if you no longer have the time or inclination to search out the new and unusual.

Thing is, I'm really fucking tired of hearing about the past already (hey wow yeah those eighties sure were "cheesy") (hey '70s "excess" huh cool beans), but I don't feel like I'm done mining it yet. I'm tired of the present too, but unless I invent a magical time machine I'm shit outta luck in that dept.

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 00:48 (twenty-two years ago)

well, then you haven't reached the point that i'm talking about, JBR. You are still battling. For meaning. For what it all means to you. Um, maybe anyway. I shouldn't actually speak for you.

scott seward, Tuesday, 27 May 2003 00:51 (twenty-two years ago)

i am precariously straddling the line between the old and the new. time is not my problem - money is..

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 00:53 (twenty-two years ago)

I mean, I dunno. Being out of touch isn't the most offensive crime I can think of. Life goes on beyond the realm of pop culture. People who BRAG about being out of touch (I'm not accusing anyone on this thread) are boring and ignorant.

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 00:59 (twenty-two years ago)

good responses. scott i guess i posted this because i'm there to. 32 and for the first time i hear myself saying - its a shite year for music. but is it? or is it me? i don't want to go cynic.

i agree with whoever said staying in touch with the world we live in is important. the older you get the more you've heard but why does that frighten people off the new and into what they are comfortable with?

i will not go gentle into the good night. I actually email simon reynolds directly on this topic and he sent me a really nice reply. i'd paraphrase it but maybe i shouldn't. i think its a good thing simon killed off his unfaves.

the flip side to this is while (and i'm generalising here) the majority seem to go ole and cynic those that are pasionate and ole (ever if there passionately clueless) are really inspiring.

i like the idea of a rest too. i also think the older you get the less you give a crap about hipsterism. yup.

Gallantseagull

gallantseagull, Tuesday, 27 May 2003 01:53 (twenty-two years ago)

I always feel as if I'm mining the past for that one brilliant artist that no one's heard, who's all mine and I don't even know it.

Of course listening to music from the past is an escape. All music is escape, and the further the better I say. I find myself feeling quite the opposite of the others here, when I hear about a new "hot" band like The Rapture or Manitoba, I loathe even the idea of hearing them. Maybe in 20 years, when they're long forgotten, and they're all mine, but not now. I'm too selfish.

There will probably come a day when music is a lot less important to me then it is now . . . but I don't think it will ever go away. Maybe once the emptiness that music fills is replaced by a wife and kids, I wont hunger for it like I do now, but it's always nice to hear a tune and fly away in my mind.

David Allen, Tuesday, 27 May 2003 02:10 (twenty-two years ago)

i also think the older you get the less you give a crap about hipsterism.

That's for dang sure.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 02:13 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not a music critic, ahem, and I've responded to similar things here before, but anyway, I'm 37 (to say it for the second time today) and I've definitely seen myself become less concerned with keeping up with things musically. To some extent ILM has reversed that a bit. I still enjoy knowing what's new, and some of it is simply that I enjoy being a little ahead of the average person (though in most musical areas I am very much behind the average ILMer). Like right now I am thinking of exploring reggaeton, because it's newish, I kind of like it, and it could be a "cool" thing to know about. At the same time, part of me thinks those are mostly silly motivations.

I still am very interested in hearing things I haven't heard before, but as I've said before, I don't care much whether they are new or old. Still, I guess there is something nice about seeing that things are changing. As someone somewhere else said recently: I don't want to get to the point of only listening to music by dead people.

For me the biggest social connection to music comes with salsa dancing. As long as I keep going out salsa dancing, and as long as the form doesn't dry up totally, I will be hearing new things. Two Saturdays ago, I saw Andy Montanez perform live. He is an old timer in salsa. There was nothing particularly ground-breaking about the music he was performing. He put on a hell of a show, incredibly energetic, lots of improvising. He had a good portion of their audience on their feet throughout his set. Questions of new and old really didn't come up for me while I was dancing during his show. It's corny to say, but I was simply in the now. The killer timbale solo toward the end of the last song: in the now.

Of course, there's no denying that fashion changes, and however present moment my experience of that show was, this style of music could largely die away, because it may just sound too old-fashioned at some point.

And yes, when it comes to current pop, outside of Latin forms of pop (and even there, I'm pretty conservative), there's almost nothing that really inspires me. There are some more marginal, experimental, type things which sometimes draw me in though.

Also, as Ned sort of said, there are other things to do. I always kind of like those writers who say in interviews, "Why do you want me to write books all the time? There are other things to do, too." For the most part I'm not doing those other things, but I could imagine getting busier in various ways that would make music less important to me, or at least keep me from spending so much time on it. (Also, following Ned, maybe I should spend more time reading those copies of the Nation that are accumulating in my livingroom, and less time HERE.)

scott seward tricked into buying the latest issue of Muzik earlier today. ;)

Rockist Scientist, Tuesday, 27 May 2003 02:35 (twenty-two years ago)

(I think not dancing any more would make me feel older than not paying much attention to music anymore.)

Rockist Scientist, Tuesday, 27 May 2003 02:41 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't know if becoming an ole cynic is such a bad
thing, as long as you're not belligerent or dogmatic
about it. I can respect an attitude of "this may be
good but I'm not qualified to judge." And there's
something embarassing about old farts on NPR
saying (imagine a perfectly measured Ivy League
accent) "yes, that Marshall Mathers record was quite
excellent. I enjoyed it very much."

squirl plise (Squirrel_Police), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 02:45 (twenty-two years ago)

jeez, now i feel like i'm depressing people or something. and for the second time today i feel like apologizing to rockist! but that wasn't my intention! i swear. perhaps i have felt a suble sea change in myself that sees me slipping toward a more comfortable zone of casual listening and maybe it scares me a little. i don't shop for records like i used to. i have the wife and kid and all the wonderful changes that that brings. not only that, but my reprobate past of stinky philadelphia living that has been my life since i was 19! is also coming to an end, as me and my baby and baby makes 3 are moving soon to an island-an actual desert island where i will take more than 10 or 1 or 5 favorite albums-and where the living is easy and where it's easy to forget the whole wide world. we will see how engaged i feel about T.A.T.U.'s latest exploits with the surf lapping at my heels. I joke with my lovely Maria that i am "retiring" and it feels like that in a way and in a way that feels really good! We shall see. I'm optimistic. and i am somewhat incorrigible. i am mod and i am rocker. and i contain multitudes. didn't someone quote frost? well, i can quote whitman. wait, that is whitman, right?

scott seward, Tuesday, 27 May 2003 02:56 (twenty-two years ago)

i don't think there is anything embarressing about an ole critic saying they love marshall mathhers lp. IF they really love it. And its a big if. IF they are paying lipservice then yeah.

but i've got friend who got into house music late (say 34) and who initally when i saw him full on about it i was kinda embarressed about it but the more i thought about it. the less embarressed i was. here was someone so passionate about music that convention (all the pretty young things at clubs), not having the right clothes or any of that didn't make a damn. he didn't care he was clueless when he went out he just loved that music. i found it magnificent.

gallantseagull, Tuesday, 27 May 2003 03:04 (twenty-two years ago)

He was 34 and into house music?????? Wow, that's so ancient!!!!! Like, almost as old as the people who make it, even!!!

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 05:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Hey, that's nothing - I know someone who's 39 and into techno! It's a bit embarassing. His name is Jeff Mills.

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 05:40 (twenty-two years ago)

But maybe it's cynical to LIKE pop music! Everyone knows teenagers are more cynical than adults, whose hearts are softened by having children. Maybe adults can no longer pretend that they don't despise Bob Dylan for being mean, or Gwen Stefani for dressing scantily, or Clay Aitken for being Gay Straightkin. That last one is just a joke.

cow cow (m-ry-nn), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 07:19 (twenty-two years ago)

I've been wondering about this same thing myself -- will I ever not be interested? I'm 33, and already a lot of my friends (the non-music-obsessive ones) have happily settled into paying no attention at all to current music. Many of them have their 100 or 200 CDs, all released between 1960-1993 (with the odd Sinatra or Billie Holiday or Hank Williams CD sneaking in at the back end, and maybe a Moby or Sheryl Crow disc from the last 10 years). And they're happy enough, so good for them. Some people have suggested that whenever I have kids, I'll stop paying attention or looking for new music, because I just won't have time. I don't buy that, but I guess I'll find out.

One thing that keeps it fresh for me is that I go through phases, without ever really meaning to. I'll get way into classic country for a few months, and barely put on a hip-hop album. Then I'll get into a big pop mode, and listen to nothing but top 40 for a few weeks. Etc. Having a DSL line, of course, has accelerated those trends -- I can do two days of immersive Afropop study, followed by a week of 2-step, and so on. Given the progression of the technology, I'm not anticipating a drop-off in either my interest or consumption any time soon. I mean, hell, I've still got most of the bop and post-bop jazz eras to work my way through. There's no danger of running out of music.

JesseFox (JesseFox), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Definitely no danger. The urge to listen all the time, though, that's what fluctuates.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:28 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm just in it for cheap thrills. I imagine I'll get tired of pop whatevah around the same time I get tired of ice cream or baseball or sex ie. never.

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:33 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm still getting off on the total-immersion effect, but I'd be lying if I said I do it all the time. Right now I'm working on a lengthy project based around one album (w/room to expound on others in brief as well, yay), and I find myself really missing the whole being-engaged-w/lots-of-stuff thing right now--every so often I'll throw something new I haven't heard on, or something I only know a little, and think "DAMN I wish I could write about this instead of doing this other thing." I think when it's finished I'll be jumping headfirst back into freelancing w/a lot of relish, and I don't think that would be the case were it not for my basically being away from it for awhile.

As for the larger question, I think the key (or one of the keys) is keeping in mind that things change and that's fine; that music goes through quality cycles but you can always find shitloads of good stuff at any given time if you try to look; that someday I won't care to the degree that I do now, and it won't be anybody's fault. try and keep a Zen attitude about it; wish I had a more exciting way of putting it, but there you go.

M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 27 May 2003 14:56 (twenty-two years ago)


it's hard to be the old person at shows. that can lead to some distress i think.

i think it can lead to feeling rejected by the scene you're into.

reminds me of that onion about a punk 20-something wrecking on sum 41 not being as good as green day. take that idea and imagine what someone who lived through the scene in the late 70's and you must think kids are fuckin crazy these days.

seeing your youth replicated over and over has got to leave you working harder to say or feel good things.

if you can get away from the age thing, i think survival is there in moderation like others have said. thousands and thousands of bands... there's bound to be something smile-inducing.

m.

msp, Tuesday, 27 May 2003 15:43 (twenty-two years ago)

(I like the fact that the salsa dancing scene includes people who are older than me!.* I think this is due to a couple things: (1) it attracts serious dancers, and is not primarily a pick-up scene (although serious dancers like to have sex too) and (2) because it is an ongoing expression of Latino identity (or of specific Latino identities, really), age tends to be less important. Of course, I'm not Latino, but I think that older gringos still benefit from the fact that older Latinos are welcome. I realize this latter only applies in areas where there are Latinos to begin with, and might not be releveant in Finland or wherever else people are doing this dance.)

Rockist Scientist, Tuesday, 27 May 2003 16:20 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm there right now and I'm only 33. I saw my favourite band ever on Friday night, and I was actually slightly bored through most of the performance. If even your favourite band ever can't raise a sparkle of interest, it's time to step back and do something else for a while.

kate, Wednesday, 28 May 2003 08:29 (twenty-two years ago)

(dilettantism vs fanaticism) vs (immersion vs seclusion)

dave q, Wednesday, 28 May 2003 09:04 (twenty-two years ago)

'People who BRAG about being out of touch (I'm not accusing anyone on this thread) are boring and ignorant'

Heh. Here's my attempt to justify this behavior, when people ask me a sequence of questions and I say "I dunno" after every single one I start worrying that I appear either dopey or contemptuous, like I can't be bothered to answer them, so if I come up with an initial declaration of total ignorance and add an edge of hostility to it it'll add to the credibility of said declaration, and also make it look like I'm a bit over-sensitive about it thus still diplomatically granting the other person the upper hand so to speak, in the end avoiding alot of trouble later. Also, I haven't purchased or rented a book, magazine, CD, DVD or video in four months. Beat that.

dave q, Wednesday, 28 May 2003 09:11 (twenty-two years ago)

What's your favourite band ever Kate?

Try taking a break from _thinking_ too much about music for a bit. Put on only stuff you enjoy and take it off if you stop enjoying it. Go to less gigs and enjoy each more - make them an event.

Listen obsessively to one or two albums rather than fleetingly to many.

All that can be hard, especially if you feel you have to write about music when actually listening to the stuff can become a chore.

mei (mei), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 09:50 (twenty-two years ago)

OK, they weren't my favourite band ever, because that would be Spacemen3, but it was my Favourite Band That Are Still Together And Releasing Albums That I Love which would be: The Dandy Warhols.

Many elements conspired to make the night not enjoyable, not just the overlong and slightly pretentious performance. But that *sparkle* is really gone. And the only way to love music again is just not to listen to it.

It's weird because I went to something which I *though* was going to be boring and pretentious the next night (it was billed as avante guarde contemporary dance - which meant it wasn't dance at all) and it was playful and fun and enjoyable. Probably because I didn't have any expectations of it. Dunno. I really need a break from music. All aspects of it. Or rather, all aspects of the music industry.

kate, Wednesday, 28 May 2003 09:58 (twenty-two years ago)

''i agree with whoever said staying in touch with the world we live in is important''

by buying a 'new' record and posting on a message board abt it is 'engaging' is it?!

I think its important to be a cynic. you have to have a certain amount of it. There's too much crap released: you need it! And if that means that you stop buying mags bcz you think its a load of shit or you don't care to listen to something that everyone is bcz you saw something (a picture of a band, fer instance) that doesn't 'look' right then that's a good thing in my book. or If you listen to a 'new' sound five years after it first hits the 'street' so what?

I think excitement is overated.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 10:04 (twenty-two years ago)

I love Julio. I think excitement is underrated.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 10:26 (twenty-two years ago)

you love me and yet you disagree :-(

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 10:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Ok. You've gotta be a cynic to avoid being duped; when I bought my flash hi-fi four years ago I thought I'd lost my ability to tell if I liked summat or not, cos everything sounded so good on it. It took the Gay Dad album to reassure me; it sounded good, nice production and that, but I could still tell it was shite. So we're in agreement there.

I just got two old Mouse On Mars albums, and I'm well into it, even though they're like 7 and five years old or summat; I'm not excited because it's now, I'm excited because it's cool and makes me want to skip. Kinda miffed cos I missed 'em for so long, but pleased I've got here now. So, um, we do agree, I just like skipping more.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 28 May 2003 10:45 (twenty-two years ago)

< not a critic />


i would blame the toys...if i were jaded

despite what lou rude said, ~my life~ wasnt saved by rock and roll. at least not back in 1990, when i was 16 , bazck when it was all supposed to be(well, not really) magic*teenage wonder years. rock and roll almost killed me in a few ways. there were more problems then anyways-right. so NOW i want rock n roll to save me. thing is, it never will, its not supposed to.
i grew up on college radio, no mtv and being a general weirdo.. this is what saved me in a sense, or at least what put me where i am now: content, still on the prowl & not a music burnout.

not having dsl (mega toy) has prevented my burnout. i have dl 56k mp3s since 2000 and they have their power/success plenty of times & other times i end up with a beta band track that puts me to sleep or my computer doesnt wanna load soulseek whtvr/

i make a bit more money compared to 5, 10 years ago but i still cant afford to overdo it either , this is good ~ i barely keep the quest alive , but i dont have to put up with oversaturation~there is nothing worse than 3 brand new cds at my desk that i have no interest in., espc. if i already like the band.

& then ill got to a show and not feel the sparkle* like kate said. the other night when i was a bit too drunk at a show that was a bit too boring ,

obsession vs acts of obsession

i am also the old guy at the show some nights ( i am 29 ) but i look like i am 22 usually. saved again. i ask myself if i will be going to shows in 10 years and i really dont have an answer. this is the line of energy/fear i press. but i dont think about it at all.

i started taking out cds from the library. it is a good thing so far.. the whole procedure of going in and flipping thru cds in a shelf, & having a limited amount of time to listen & return them is satisfying , but maybe i am just a bit over excited about this new library relationship& my fling with the library cds will end before september .

~ so if i was completely jaded id blame my pc for my cynicism~ which i may be doing soon enough, as righ t now i am trying to decide if i want a to buy a new pair of headphones or a used ipod/mp3 player/recorder, & i need a new stereo and a new DAT, but if i get an ipod i may explode/die with joy/boredom...maybe i will just fix the arm on my record player.

kephm, Thursday, 29 May 2003 00:25 (twenty-two years ago)

i guess what i am saying is i am as passionate about music as i ever was but i just dont consume it nearly as much/enough as i could and i have no idea why i and this is a good thing

ke[hm, Thursday, 29 May 2003 00:29 (twenty-two years ago)

two years pass...
i remember this thread! i still like new stuff and new sounds and i haven't retreated to the world of old jugband records either. maybe someday. reviewing new shiny metal records every month helps keep me fit.

scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 24 May 2006 02:43 (nineteen years ago)

Fit and working again! Oh wait that's old. Good thread, actually, lots of different voices and perspectives. I'm out of my self-described funk up above and a lot less concerned about that there bleeding edge, which I think is somewhere off to my left at about 60 degrees up.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 24 May 2006 02:50 (nineteen years ago)

two years pass...

Gay Straightkin

slecked, Tuesday, 8 July 2008 07:17 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.