By Jim HarringtonSpecial to The Examiner
It's not hard to understand how John Vanderslice was once able to deceive the country with perhaps the greatest media hoax in indie-rock history....http://www.examiner.com/ex_files/default.jsp?story=X0502VANDERw
― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Sunday, 1 June 2003 18:03 (twenty-one years ago) link
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Sunday, 1 June 2003 19:14 (twenty-one years ago) link
― mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Sunday, 1 June 2003 19:58 (twenty-one years ago) link
― King Kobra (King Kobra), Sunday, 1 June 2003 21:27 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Sunday, 1 June 2003 21:32 (twenty-one years ago) link
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Sunday, 1 June 2003 22:55 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 1 June 2003 23:43 (twenty-one years ago) link
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Sunday, 1 June 2003 23:54 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Nick Mirov (nick), Monday, 2 June 2003 00:24 (twenty-one years ago) link
Yep.
I was just thinking about this hoax yesterday-- so, that's weird-- and wondering if, perhaps, JV wasn't so much interested in actually creating a controversy (and scoring publicity) but instead just working a bit of post-modern performance art, fit for the age of celebrity: how does one, whose existence wouldn't normally cross paths with the richest man on earth (for example), avail himself to such a person?
― Vek (vek), Monday, 2 June 2003 03:35 (twenty-one years ago) link
― dave q, Monday, 2 June 2003 09:25 (twenty-one years ago) link
― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Monday, 2 June 2003 13:39 (twenty-one years ago) link