― Aaron W (Aaron W), Thursday, 5 June 2003 13:13 (twenty-two years ago)
"the most important American rock band of the 90s." ROTFL!
― kate, Thursday, 5 June 2003 13:16 (twenty-two years ago)
Most bands that aren't selling shit anymore do.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 5 June 2003 13:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Thursday, 5 June 2003 14:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Thursday, 5 June 2003 14:17 (twenty-two years ago)
Hilarious stuff indeed.
― Nicole (Nicole), Thursday, 5 June 2003 14:18 (twenty-two years ago)
oh OF COURSE they were mixed up with those guys. Like, Ekoostic Hookah TOTALLY looks like Pearl Jam did back then, so naturally they must be connected.
― Kingfish (Kingfish), Thursday, 5 June 2003 14:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 5 June 2003 14:25 (twenty-two years ago)
(I've mentioned Spin Doctors twice in one day now, this is very worrying)
― kate, Thursday, 5 June 2003 14:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― Aaron W (Aaron W), Thursday, 5 June 2003 14:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 5 June 2003 14:36 (twenty-two years ago)
He also makes a reference to the Grateful Dead and Phish at the end....
I'd lump PJ and the GD in the same area.For their fans and image, if not the music.
― mei (mei), Thursday, 5 June 2003 17:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Thursday, 5 June 2003 17:13 (twenty-two years ago)
and he's probably referring to the fact that there are so many live bootlegs, and the change-the-set-list-every-night thing, rather than the music itself
― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 5 June 2003 17:57 (twenty-two years ago)
as for "important," hmmm. I wouldn't be so quick to dismiss that out of hand, simply for the fact that Vedder's vocal style can still be heard all over the fucking radio in one form or other, usually not his own--Creed, Staind, a few others. I'd say they were and remain extremely influential, so while other bands vie for that title, PJ are certainly a contender.
― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 5 June 2003 18:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Thursday, 5 June 2003 18:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sam J. (samjeff), Thursday, 5 June 2003 18:04 (twenty-two years ago)
I actually like Pearl Jam's more recent records than their first ones.
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Thursday, 5 June 2003 18:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 5 June 2003 18:15 (twenty-two years ago)
i never owned ten. i might be the only d00d in my demographic not to.
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Thursday, 5 June 2003 18:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 5 June 2003 18:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Thursday, 5 June 2003 18:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 5 June 2003 18:31 (twenty-two years ago)
nickalicious are you lili taylor?
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Thursday, 5 June 2003 18:31 (twenty-two years ago)
(and I'm not lili taylor, but I was like totally obsessed with her between the ages of 17 and 21...TOTALLY)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 5 June 2003 18:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― dleone (dleone), Thursday, 5 June 2003 18:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― fact checking cuz, Thursday, 5 June 2003 18:38 (twenty-two years ago)
fcc: if that's the case, then why haven't they been leaping to mottola's imprint?
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Thursday, 5 June 2003 18:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 5 June 2003 18:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― dleone (dleone), Thursday, 5 June 2003 18:43 (twenty-two years ago)
what imprint? he doesn't have one yet, does he?
but even if he did, it's possible that the artists who were loyal to him would use the opportunity to just get the hell out and reassess where they're at and what they can do. it would be an obvious time for a change. maybe some will wind up with him somewhere down the road, maybe they won't.
― fact checking cuz, Thursday, 5 June 2003 19:15 (twenty-two years ago)
The Motolla angle I hadn't considered, but it's worth thinking about. Still, losing Ozzy (whose backcatalogue's really the most valuable thing -- his last record did not sell all that well) and Wyclef isn't that big of a deal...
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Thursday, 5 June 2003 19:22 (twenty-two years ago)
(fcc, r u ssa?)
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Thursday, 5 June 2003 19:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 5 June 2003 19:35 (twenty-two years ago)
i believe the root of ozzy's departure is in sony's less-than-great treatment of his daughter's budding career. or so i have read.
but even if all the individual reasons are different, i find it intereresting and not coincidental that a bunch of A-listers are walking away from one, and only one, company at this exact moment.
― fact checking cuz, Thursday, 5 June 2003 19:38 (twenty-two years ago)
yeah, kelly was part of the ozzy deal, but i suspect that she might've been some sort of pork (apologies to kelly) tossed into a new contract for her pops.
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Thursday, 5 June 2003 19:41 (twenty-two years ago)