the shaggs - the movie

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
has anyone heard any more updates about this - apparently tom cruise bought the script rights to the film. there are important questions to be asked:

1. will it deal with the new found allegations of incest within the band?

2. will kate st clair provide the music for the film?

i'm just wanting to talk about the shaggs really - i got into them about five years ago, spent a day listening to the shaggs and teh brady bunch albums and honestly felt more disoriented than the imaginery follow up to loveless that sometimes rings through my head.

specifically,i'm looking for any updates (links would be cool) and experiences about the shaggs - what are your thoughts? when did they hit the 1990s subsconscious - was it when kobain started to name check them?

doom-e, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 08:28 (twenty-two years ago)

I think it was when they were rereleased by Folkways in the early 80's. I think also they got a few namechecks from bands in the 80's like The Raincoats.

A Jandek doco, a Shaggs movie - what a treat for lovers of that kind of thing.

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 08:39 (twenty-two years ago)

I was traumatised by the drawing of Foot-Foot on the album cover. A friend of mine named his cat Foot-Foot. That's about as close as the connection gets.

kate (kate), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 08:42 (twenty-two years ago)

nrbq talked them up alot in the seventies which led to the folkways release which led to 'widespread' revival. someone with nexis access can maybe find the great new yorker article cruise actually optioned. I've never seen anyone write about them in any terms besides the family story, or the 'it's so wrong, it's right' angle, neither of which have much to do with what I'm hearing and how I'm reacting to it. plenty of family acts have interesting backstories, plenty of bands are inept, but there aren't plenty of records like 'philosophy of the world'.

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 08:48 (twenty-two years ago)

I would love to read that article - anybody have a link for me to read?

doom-e, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 08:49 (twenty-two years ago)

the new yorker article was my first intoduction to them

H (Heruy), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 09:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Here's the New Yorker article. A great read.

http://www.susanorlean.com/articles/meet_shaggs.html

Jazzbo (jmcgaw), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 11:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Huh, I just realized that the author of that piece also wrote the book The Orchid Thief, which is at the center of the movie Adaptation. Small world.

Jazzbo (jmcgaw), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 11:40 (twenty-two years ago)

Lester Bangs wrote about them in 1981.

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 11:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Another reason that Lester Bangs should be punched in the face. The first few paragraphs are the some of the most offensive things I've ever read.

Women are the hope for the future of music BECAUSE THEY CANNOT PLAY!!! Wooo!

This sort of thing makes me so angry that I want to throw my monitor across the room. You know what the end result of articles like this is? Bands like Valerie - yeah, no fucking coincidence that the last word of the article is their name.

Articles like this make me wish I was male in a way that menstral periods and being unable to piss in the woods or write my name in the snow never do...

kate (kate), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 11:52 (twenty-two years ago)

when people talk to you kate - is it like being john malkovich whereas you only hear - kate kate kate. kate. kate kate kate. kate?

just a'wonderin'...

; - )

doom-e, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 11:54 (twenty-two years ago)

That's your world that you are describing, Doomie, not mine.

kate (kate), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 11:57 (twenty-two years ago)

OK, let's talk about The Shaggs. It's been a long time since I heard them, but my gut reaction was that I didn't particularly like them. In fact, IIRC, I walked out of the room the first time that I heard them. I swing back and forth on them, sometimes because I am of the opinion that I *should* like them, and sometimes because the kind of people that go on and on about them are the kind of people that make me loathe "outsider" music or punk or whatever and make me want to listen to Britney for 24 hours straight.

I think they're better as a myth than they are as music. But that said, I haven't heard the record in quite some time. I might change my mind on it yet again.

kate (kate), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 12:03 (twenty-two years ago)

And incidentally, Doomie, *YOU* put my name in the question, not me.

kate (kate), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 12:04 (twenty-two years ago)

I still cannot fathom the seeming incongruity of Tom Cruise being involved. Just can't get my head around it.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 12:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually, Alex, it's the odd dynamic of Tom Cruise being involved that sort of adds - the Shaggs-like component to story.

Anybody have any links to the Tom Cruise's option of the story?

The record is fascinating. You listen to it and the music is played so badly that it gives you a disorienting feeling.

doom-e, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 12:40 (twenty-two years ago)

You listen to it and the music is played so badly that it gives you a disorienting feeling.

And this is different from a thousand demos sitting in a pile underneath my bed, how? I don't understand the fetishisation of incompetence. It irritates me.

If something is so good that it transcends incompetence, that is a different matter. But loving something *because* it is inept seems to me incomprehensible.

kate (kate), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 12:43 (twenty-two years ago)

because the shaggs were trying to approximate the AM pop radio that they loved. there was no such thing as alt.noise.com bands in freemount. by failing to recreate am pop radio, they created something beautiful. there was no cleverness involved. just honesty.

doom-e, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 12:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Go listen to Airport Girl or their ilk, then. That's what they think they're doing.

kate (kate), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 13:00 (twenty-two years ago)

loving something *because* it is inept seems to me incomprehensible.
My boss said "If you're making a movie about a retarded kid, you don't necessarily want a retarded kid to be the actor." (Not an intended jab at Tom Cruise.)

.. But it isn't good because it's incompetently done - it's good because the rhythms are so interesting.. They're a result of incompetence, but interesting nonetheless.

There are plenty of other incompetent bands that totally suck - so I wouldn't say people like the Shaggs because they're incompetent.

dave225 (Dave225), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 13:10 (twenty-two years ago)

What fascinates me about their music is that it's completely out of whack harmonically and rhythmically, yet the two singers are always right together; their music makes perfect sense to them. At the same time, the drummer always sounds like she's playing a completely different song, even though she keeps a fairly steady beat.
I put them on only when I have friends over who want a quick laugh. I certainly don't but into the notion that they're misunderstood avante garde geniuses. And Coltrane they're not.

Jazzbo (jmcgaw), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 13:41 (twenty-two years ago)

they're good for so much more than a quick laugh, though. it's impossible for me not to be touched by the lyrics by this point. and they write great, unusual melodies.

They did what they did quite well, they were not incompetent. Though certainly there are certain things they don't do, when I'm listening to them I don't need those other things because what they offer you can't readily find elsewhere.

jl, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 16:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Cruise may have a dubious record when it comes to what he DOES with the material he options, but he clearly has good taste -- "Open Your Eyes" was great if "Vanilla Sky" wasn't, "The Others" was fun, and he also just picked up the rights to remake "The Eye," a semi-recent and pretty good Japanese horror flick.
And on a strictly ironic level, I would love to see some hot young starlet singing "and the fat peoples want what the skinny peoples got... you can never please / any-bah-ha-dee / in this world!"

Ben Boyer, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 17:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Jazzbo's 1st paragraph is OTM. They are making and thinking about music in a way which is based on the pop normative of the time yet so far away from it. It blows my mind that they are able to play so out of synch with each other and yet completely on the same page as well, it's something other than incompetence.

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 18:28 (twenty-two years ago)

I find that first Shaggs album (Philosophy of the World) to be genuinely disquieting in the same sorta way as No New York, prompting my jaw to hit the ground.....How did this music get made? What sort've troubled minds are responsible? Don't their ears work???, etc.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 20:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Folkways have never had anything to do with the Shaggs. You're thinking of Rounder, probably, as the reissue came out on Red Rooster, an NRBQ affiliated sub-label of Rounder.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 20:42 (twenty-two years ago)

d'oh!

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 21:29 (twenty-two years ago)

he's right; at least I didn't say Shanachie

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 21:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Blounty, I think you're taking the credit for my mistake.

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 21:53 (twenty-two years ago)

but I repeated it!

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 21:59 (twenty-two years ago)

actually kate i can totally see how yr. reading of the article works but i think bangs was making a slightly more subtle point that he thinks women (in today's division of gender roles etc) tend to have less need to prove "chops" to no particular end and that music's better when its not burdened by dick-measuring.

i don't know how i feel about that more subtle point and it still disturbs me somewhat.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 12 June 2003 00:53 (twenty-two years ago)

they are "bad" in a way that no one else has ever been "bad" -- their incompetence with tempos and chords aside, there is a musical coherence to the albums that wouldn't be evident in any old recording of your basic incompetent teenage musicians.

of course this raises interesting issues about the constraints placed on creativity by standards of competence etc. but, well, it's not THAT interesting. bangs's article aside i don't image that the shaggs have really changed anyone's vision of music or the world in some drastic sense, though they have given me a lot of pleasure. so a fluke then.... a rather tragic one, though, once you read the new yorker piece and know the background.

i wonder whether any movie based on that article--which was a great article, but failed to quite communicate the unique and alluring (to many) nature of the music--would make the music incidental and the family drama central. that would be hollywood fashion. i think putting the music front and center and the family drama around that, would be more daring and interesting.

amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 12 June 2003 02:51 (twenty-two years ago)

or hey, how about if the movie were in-its-own-way as incompetent as the music itself was? (nb I have never heard the Shaggs and am not in any hurry to)

M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 12 June 2003 07:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Matos you're no longer one of my top favorite critics/writers. Still one of the good ones, but you definitely earned some big time demerits with that idiotic comment.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 12 June 2003 08:00 (twenty-two years ago)

matos: that would be impossible to pull off b/c you can't will incompetence!

amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 12 June 2003 12:12 (twenty-two years ago)

where's Doris Wishman when you need her?

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 12 June 2003 16:52 (twenty-two years ago)

dead.

Jody Beth Rosen (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 12 June 2003 16:59 (twenty-two years ago)

where's McG when you need him?

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 12 June 2003 17:19 (twenty-two years ago)

three years pass...
bump

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Monday, 11 September 2006 06:44 (nineteen years ago)

never to ro-o-oam!!

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Monday, 11 September 2006 06:44 (nineteen years ago)

Los t recordings

Run Ruud Run (Ken L), Monday, 11 September 2006 09:59 (nineteen years ago)

two years pass...

ever?

Mark G, Friday, 4 September 2009 15:49 (sixteen years ago)

one year passes...

http://www.avclub.com/articles/dakota-and-elle-fanning-reportedly-considering-doi,52709/

According to an exclusive report from Vulture, the Fanning sisters, Dakota and Elle, are considering teaming up to play two-thirds of infamous sibling rock band The Shaggs in a biopic. Beloved by record store clerks looking to annoy their customers, championed by fans like Kurt Cobain, NRBQ, and Frank Zappa (who famously called them “better than the Beatles”), The Shaggs were comprised of four New Hampshire sisters under the Svengali direction of their father, Austin Wiggin, who pulled his daughters out of school and forced them to submit to daily music education, all because a palm reader once told his mother that her son would sire a famous girl group.
The Shaggs’ resulting sole album, 1969’s Philosophy Of The World, was beyond primitive, something like the sound of a lost civilization who’d discovered guitars, drums, and a Monkees album in the jungle, then attempted to cut their own record about an hour later. Naturally, Philosophy Of The World came to be regarded as a proto-punk landmark, its charmingly determined ineptitude and astounding, absolute shunning of all musical convention—though completely accidental—making it a touchstone for all bands predicated on not giving a shit.
A biopic has actually been in the making for over a decade now under the direction of Katherine Dieckmann, a former creator of music videos for groups like R.E.M. and Throwing Muses and director on The Adventures Of Pete And Pete, and the person who recently helmed the Uma Thurman pic Motherhood (which was its own example of determined ineptitude). Shaggs fans probably shouldn’t get too excited yet: There’s been no official announcement of production, and of course, it seems odd that Dakota Fanning would want to star in yet another proto-punk rock biopic so soon after The Runaways. (Not to mention that both Fannings would need to pack on some serious pounds to properly portray the hefty Wiggin sisters.) But hopefully this rumor—as well as the upcoming off-Broadway musical The Shaggs: Philosophy Of The World debuting this summer—will finally spur someone to get rolling on this wonderfully awful story after all these years.

Du Musst Calamari Werden (Phil D.), Friday, 4 March 2011 17:56 (fourteen years ago)

(Not to mention that both Fannings would need to pack on some serious pounds to properly portray the hefty Wiggin sisters.)

Has any film ever struggled with the idea of needing to portray fat people as actually fat?

Apart from "Shallow Hal", obv.

Mark G, Monday, 7 March 2011 09:51 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.