It is therefore worth pausing to remember—as it is in any context, really—that this is a Top 40 climate in which Christina Aguilera reached an under-10 demographic by repeatedly demanding that you rub her the right way. Which was, from any point of view, a more horrifying lyric than anything Phair has ever written, given that, since Aguilera also made it clear that her heart was saying "no," it was basically an exhortation to date-rape.
Please confirm for me that Mim's the one totally and completely misreading this lyric: surely the idea was that as much as Christina's body was tempting her to put out, her heart wasn't, and the guy in question was going to need to take his time and "rub her the right way" to build up the appropriate levels of trust and comfort?
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 30 June 2003 13:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― di smith (lucylurex), Monday, 30 June 2003 13:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 30 June 2003 14:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 30 June 2003 14:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 30 June 2003 14:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 30 June 2003 14:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Monday, 30 June 2003 14:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott seward, Monday, 30 June 2003 14:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 30 June 2003 15:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lee G (Lee G), Monday, 30 June 2003 15:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mr. Diamond (diamond), Monday, 30 June 2003 15:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 30 June 2003 15:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― TMFTML (TMFTML), Monday, 30 June 2003 15:39 (twenty-two years ago)
haha all the editors that post to this bitch to thread!
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 30 June 2003 15:44 (twenty-two years ago)
I think there's a deeper thing here, actually. Songs for the teen-girl demographic spend a lot of time trying to capture the push/pull wariness of teen-girl sexuality, which is exactly what this song is about: body says yes, heart says maybe not; assertion to guy that basically says "respect me" and "I'm into it but I want to be treated like it's magic"; all the normal wariness of wanting to be a part of a sexual world but being daunted by the danger of winding up feeling heartbroken or disrespected or used, but since song can be fantasy this one's about taking control of all that wariness. This totally sells to plenty of early-teen girls, and it totally should: it's basically a picture of the hero who's confidently confronting all of your hesitations about the sexuality you're about to encounter.
And that's, like, a big lesson to be giving -- I mean, painting a picture for impressionable young people of how love and sex are going to work? -- so I understand the desire to be hyper-critical, to always poke holes in the always-insufficient picture that's being drawn. But there comes a point where it's not even about criticism anymore -- it's about critics or parents or whomever trying to blow up the singer's authority to even draw that picture in the first place, accurate or inaccurate as it may be. I was sort of put off by this song interpretation because it struck me as a cheap-shot of exactly that sort -- stop Aguilera from telling the kids what life's like because surely she's wrong (and yet in this instance I'd say she's hit the nail pretty much right on the head).
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 30 June 2003 16:08 (twenty-two years ago)
*If* you want to be with me, *then* you have to pay the price, rub me the right way, make a big impression, etc. --> the paying and the rubbing and the big impression are prior temporally and causally to the state of "being with me" --> the paying and the rubbing and the big impression != being with the Christina character --> paying/rubbing/impression != sex w/Christina character unless you think someone can have sex (or sexplay) with the Christina character and yet not be with her (perhaps via sexual ESP or action-at-a-distance).
In other words, she's saying "yeah, I'm horny and lonely, but nobody round here has that broad appeal, and I'm not going to have sex until I find someone who does."
She's a bottle that has to be rubbed to release what's inside; but the other person is licking their lips -- genderwise, this song is confused, maybe.
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Monday, 30 June 2003 16:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 30 June 2003 16:41 (twenty-two years ago)
An "exhortation to date rape," though? How peculiar. I thought I'd heard every version possible of the old "she was asking for it" but this one has an interesting way of trying to add some new shades of gray to what I'd thought was a rather black and white issue. The girl's actually, like, involved w/this guy (date) and then somehow saying she wants this to happen without going so far as to say it.. but basically, she IS saying it? I feel like I've taken too much trouble in attempting overanalyze one sentence of an article, but my point is, um, rape is serious, so casual references to it kind of exasperate me.
― daria g (daria g), Monday, 30 June 2003 16:58 (twenty-two years ago)
Daria, that "singing to herself" is like even more the teenaginess of it -- you know there was a young sector of her listeners at that point who were like "yeah, you gotta rub me the right way!" even though they were years from anyone trying to rub them, period. I.e. it's a pre-emptive bedroom declaration -- to the girl in the mirror -- of what it's gonna be like, how her standards are gonna work, etc. This is why I find the date-rape line so weird, cause at bottom the song really is a pretty parent-friendly line about sexuality: "despite bodily temptation I'm not going anywhere unless you treat me right."
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 30 June 2003 17:31 (twenty-two years ago)
Also, another way to look at this song is that it's a penis singing to the dude that it's attached to.
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 30 June 2003 17:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 30 June 2003 17:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 30 June 2003 17:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 30 June 2003 17:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 30 June 2003 18:03 (twenty-two years ago)
by the way, am I the only one noticing that she's calling the record Liz Phair and maybe seeing a parallel to Bob Dylan calling his 1970 piss-off-the-faithful album Self Portrait?
― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 30 June 2003 18:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 30 June 2003 18:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Hammy (hammy), Monday, 30 June 2003 18:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― TMFTML (TMFTML), Monday, 30 June 2003 18:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 30 June 2003 18:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 30 June 2003 18:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― TMFTML (TMFTML), Monday, 30 June 2003 18:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 30 June 2003 19:02 (twenty-two years ago)
http://mediaservice.photoisland.com/auction/Jun/20036305507074908049884.jpg
― Kingfish (Kingfish), Monday, 30 June 2003 19:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Brock K. (Brock K.), Monday, 30 June 2003 20:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― King Kobra (King Kobra), Monday, 30 June 2003 21:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 30 June 2003 21:35 (twenty-two years ago)