― D Aziz (esquire1983), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 19:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― Xii (Xii), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 19:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 19:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― D Aziz (esquire1983), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 19:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mike Taylor (mjt), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 19:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ben Boyer, Tuesday, 1 July 2003 19:40 (twenty-two years ago)
no i just listen to what you hate. i think it is the right thing to do.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 19:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ben Boyer, Tuesday, 1 July 2003 19:43 (twenty-two years ago)
1. v.,n. [From the Usenet group alt.folklore.urban] To utter a posting on Usenet designed to attract predictable responses or flames; or, the post itself. Derives from the phrase "trolling for newbies" which in turn comes from mainstream "trolling", a style of fishing in which one trails bait through a likely spot hoping for a bite. The well-constructed troll is a post that induces lots of newbies and flamers to make themselves look even more clueless than they already do, while subtly conveying to the more savvy and experienced that it is in fact a deliberate troll. If you don't fall for the joke, you get to be in on it. See also YHBT. 2. n. An individual who chronically trolls in sense 1; regularly posts specious arguments, flames or personal attacks to a newsgroup, discussion list, or in email for no other purpose than to annoy someone or disrupt a discussion. Trolls are recognizable by the fact that they have no real interest in learning about the topic at hand - they simply want to utter flame bait. Like the ugly creatures they are named after, they exhibit no redeeming characteristics, and as such, they are recognized as a lower form of life on the net, as in, "Oh, ignore him, he's just a troll." Compare kook. 3. n. [Berkeley] Computer lab monitor. A popular campus job for CS students. Duties include helping newbies and ensuring that lab policies are followed. Probably so-called because it involves lurking in dark cavelike corners.
Some people claim that the troll (sense 1) is properly a narrower category than flame bait, that a troll is categorized by containing some assertion that is wrong but not overtly controversial. See also Troll-O-Meter.
The use of `troll' in either sense is a live metaphor that readily produces elaborations and combining forms. For example, one not infrequently sees the warning "Do not feed the troll" as part of a followup to troll postings.
-- The Jargon File
― Jon Williams (ex machina), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 19:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jon Williams (ex machina), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 19:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― chaki (chaki), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 20:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― 0 (esquire1983), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 20:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― ssean, Tuesday, 1 July 2003 20:28 (twenty-two years ago)
v. of troll 1, n. [ of the group alt.folklore.urban of the USENET ] to express to affix on the USENET projected to attract answers predictable or flames; or, the proper post. Drift of the phrase "that trolling for newbies" that it comes in turn of it mainstream "that trolling", a style to fish in which one drags bait through a probable point that bite waits for one. Troll well-constructed is a post that induces lots of newbies and of flamers if to make the look exactly more clueless of that already, to subtly to make to know to more savvy and experienced that is in fact one troll deliberated. If you not to fall for the joke, you start to be inside in it. He also sees YHBT. 2. n. A chronic individual that trolls in direction 1; specious, personal flames or attacks to a newsgroup affix arguments regularly, it lists of the quarrel, or in the email for none another purpose of that it stops annoying somebody or disrupt a quarrel. Trolls is recognizable for the fact that does not have no real interest in the learning on the topic in the hand - they simply want to express bait of the flame. As the ugly creatures they are nominated after, they do not show no characteristic redeeming, and as such, they are recognized as a lower form of the life in the net, as inside, "Oh, ignore it, it are right one troll." It compares kook. 3, monitor of the laboratory of the computer of the n. [ Berkeley ]. A popular work of the campus for students of the CS. The duties include newbies of aid and to make sure of that the politics of the laboratory are followed. Probably so-called because it involves lurking in dark cantos of cavelike.
Claim some peoples who troll (direction 1) is correctly a narrower category of the one than bait of the flame, that one one troll is categorized contends some affirmation that is missed but not overtly controversa. It also sees Troll-O-Medidor.
The use of troll of ` ' in one or another direction is a metaphor living creature that elaborations produces readily and forms to combine. For the example, one sees not infrequent that the acknowledgment "does not feed troll" as the one part followup to postings of troll.
-- The Rasp Of The Jargon
― ssean, Tuesday, 1 July 2003 20:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 21:30 (twenty-two years ago)
Why don't you? If you're gonna senselessly bash people (not even the bands involved so much as their audience), then at least give us some reasons why. I like them because I think Black Dice's music was amazingly violent, noisy hardcore that's about as artistically valid as any other hardcore. As for their more recent stuff, it's ambient that doesn't lull me to sleep.
Lightning Bolt are the best live band on the planet right now, they're incredibly precise/inventive musicians, and they can write some great grooves and melodies; if you've only heard the first Lightning Bolt album, your impression of them is sorely out of date. That album I could see a person easily dismissing as boring.
― Ian Johnson, Tuesday, 1 July 2003 22:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― daria g (daria g), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 23:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jon Williams (ex machina), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 05:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― D Aziz (esquire1983), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 06:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― your null fame (yournullfame), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 06:52 (twenty-two years ago)
as far as I'm concerned I only heard black dice live and it wasn't life changing and i'm not buying a rec from them. lighting bolt: i enjoyed 30 secs of a track of theirs i heard and i prob will buy something.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 07:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jon Williams (ex machina), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 10:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― daria g (daria g), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 15:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 15:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tom Breihan (Tom Breihan), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 15:52 (twenty-two years ago)
Doesn't every band think this about themselves?
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 15:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 15:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― ssean, Wednesday, 2 July 2003 15:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 16:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 16:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 16:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 16:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 16:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― ssean, Wednesday, 2 July 2003 16:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― chaki (chaki), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 16:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― dleone (dleone), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 16:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― ssean, Wednesday, 2 July 2003 16:17 (twenty-two years ago)
Bias rules; music criticism without bias is boring as shit.
― Ian Johnson (orion), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 17:13 (twenty-two years ago)
I've been doing this thing lately where I'm only really interested in hearing things that are gleaming, shiny, and fucking harsh. Mostly I've been listening to like 50 Cent, Baltimore club music, Black Eyes, Gold Chains, Justin Timberlake, and Clipse. I think Lightning Bolt fits in really well with that. And I'd rather hear them at this particular moment than just about any other rock band. Is that clear enough?
― Tom Breihan (Tom Breihan), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 19:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ben Boyer, Wednesday, 2 July 2003 19:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tom Breihan (Tom Breihan), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 19:53 (twenty-two years ago)
Y'know, I heard Black Dice is actually just George Clinton in combat fatigues.
― Nordicskillz (Nordicskillz), Thursday, 3 July 2003 17:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Hurlothrumbo (hurlothrumbo), Thursday, 3 July 2003 17:28 (twenty-two years ago)
he guy who paints a canvas all white and sells it for a million bucks
Fuck you! Robert Ryman is AMAZING!
― I know, right?, Sunday, 10 June 2007 18:43 (eighteen years ago)
1) If you've ever seen Lightning Bolt Rush live and you still question their following, there is nothing that will ever move you.
― Lawrence the Looter, Monday, 11 June 2007 01:49 (eighteen years ago)
the sonic equivalent of the guy who paints a canvas all white and sells it for a million bucks
You had better not be talking about Robert Ryman!!
Anyone who does not think Skeleton is incredibly beautiful, we can be friends sure, but I just don't get you.
― I know, right?, Tuesday, 25 December 2007 23:30 (seventeen years ago)
Ha! That was my first reaction too.
― mehlt, Tuesday, 25 December 2007 23:36 (seventeen years ago)
He's definitely top five painter of all time for me!
Black Dice kick ass too!
Yay!
― I know, right?, Tuesday, 25 December 2007 23:39 (seventeen years ago)
Oh my. I've done this before.
― I know, right?, Tuesday, 25 December 2007 23:40 (seventeen years ago)
Disregard.
These bands don't really have that much in common.
― filthy dylan, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 07:33 (seventeen years ago)
maybe not in sound but in media-perception circa whenever this thread was started yeah they do
― lucas pine, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 07:58 (seventeen years ago)
A few years ago a friend from college made me a great tape with both Lightning Bolt's Ride the Skies and Black Dice's untitled hardcore record on it, among a few others by similar bands. I still totally dig those, but their subsequent stuff made me go a bit 'ehh'.
To me, anything Lightning Bolt has done since Ride the Skies comes off as too monotonous. And I can identify with criticism of their live shows -- that their 'screw the stage let's play on the floor' schtick crosses the line into indie snobbery (if you're not at the front row you can't see a fucking thing -- lame). Their DVD thing is great fun, though.
I mostly lost interest in Black Dice, too, when they abandoned hardcore. Although I love 'Endless Happiness' from their first DFA album. But they were kinda shite when I saw them live; I expected to be moved, but wasn't even nudged.
― MacDara, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 14:42 (seventeen years ago)
I liked the Mindflayer stuff much more than Lightning Bolt. Black Dice was great when I saw them live a few months ago. For some reason I always thought they were the pretentious "Artists" to Wolf Eyes AC/DC lovin' party time noise makers, but no they were actually a lot of fun.
― filthy dylan, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 15:50 (seventeen years ago)
I kindof think of it so: Wolf Eyes=Rock Black Dice=Pop, comparatively.
― I know, right?, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 15:52 (seventeen years ago)
Mebbe it's just cos I love Black Dice and I've never really gotten into Wolf Eyes.
― I know, right?, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 16:06 (seventeen years ago)
Have you seen Wolf Eyes live? They are the most fun ever.
― filthy dylan, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 16:34 (seventeen years ago)
Seen none of them live. Only came close to getting to see Lightning Bolt once.
I would like a lot to see Black Dice live. That Live Loop on Creature Comforts is so kickass.
― I know, right?, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 16:36 (seventeen years ago)
Black Dice were superb live. Lovely super great stuff. Gone off 'em a bit though. The last record wasn't quite up to 'Broken Ear..' standards for me.
― Mister Craig, Wednesday, 26 December 2007 17:26 (seventeen years ago)
Black Dice>Lightning Bolt>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>all other music
― I know, right?, Thursday, 7 August 2008 19:14 (seventeen years ago)
sorry, I'm listening to hypermagic mountain
i actually agree with that.
― funny farm, Thursday, 7 August 2008 19:27 (seventeen years ago)
I know, right?
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, 7 August 2008 19:29 (seventeen years ago)
seriously, its too late to change the name now, but can we just stop doing that please?
― I know, right?, Thursday, 7 August 2008 19:31 (seventeen years ago)
that their 'screw the stage let's play on the floor' schtick crosses the line into indie snobbery
a lot of bands in providence do this, and I don't think it's snobbery at all. maybe it seems that way cuz lightning bolt are playing much bigger places now and it's having the opposite of its intended effect, but playing on the floor eliminates the stage as an artificial barrier between the band and the audience. playing on the floor puts the musicians on your level, makes the show seem like a house party. last time I saw the white mice they not only were on the floor, the drummer got up and pulled the front rows right into the middle of the band. PVD=LOVE
― Edward III, Thursday, 7 August 2008 20:10 (seventeen years ago)
I don't like all his stuff, but the way Dan Deacon gets in a crowd is MAGICAL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-G3BLU5UW8.
― skygreenleopard, Friday, 8 August 2008 04:09 (seventeen years ago)
???
― I know, right?, Friday, 8 August 2008 10:57 (seventeen years ago)
CAPTAIN CAVEMAN!!!
― I know, right?, Friday, 8 August 2008 11:07 (seventeen years ago)
I should've clarified - I was posting re: bands and artists that don't play on a stage and get on the floor
― skygreenleopard, Friday, 8 August 2008 19:21 (seventeen years ago)
magical.
― cutty, Friday, 8 August 2008 19:29 (seventeen years ago)
i meant, "magical"
i love love love black dice but can't stand lightning bolt at all. is this unusual? anyone else with me on this?
― stephen, Saturday, 9 August 2008 16:31 (seventeen years ago)
they're pretty dissimilar bands, i wouldn't get yourself worked up over it.
― ian, Saturday, 9 August 2008 16:50 (seventeen years ago)
They are similar to the point that they are both brilliant, from here their similarities diverge somewhat
― I know, right?, Saturday, 9 August 2008 20:19 (seventeen years ago)
seriously, its too late to change the name now, but can we just stop doing that please?-- I know, right?
-- I know, right?
― contenderizer, Saturday, 9 August 2008 23:34 (seventeen years ago)