Today, BBC: "The Great British Music Debate" 5 hour special

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
today the BBC, on Radio 2 are hosting a 5 hour debate 7pm - 12pm on Radio 2:

"The Great British Music Debate"
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio2/events/greatdebate/

The British music business is in crisis! Sales of singles and albums are falling. So what's the cause and what is the industry doing about it?

Stuart Maconie hosts an evening of programmes looking at the issues facing the industry, including a live debate chaired by Jeremy Vine. Send us your questions and be a part of it.


More info
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio2/events/greatdebate/about.shtml

and Press Release
http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2003/05_may/21/music_debate.shtml

What do you make of this event?

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 10:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Why does the media, debating this question - never realize that they are part of the problem?

The BBC press info/ website - mutters on about "the music industry" [mostly record companies and retail, and threat of piracy] but completely ignores a vital part of the music industry: the role of "the media": [TV, print, radio, or direct forms of media interaction: live music or clubs]

a better question: Is British media failing music listeners and artists?

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 10:43 (twenty-two years ago)

no martian the problem is YOU!!!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Stuart Maconie hosts

from thereon i lost interest, hardy har

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Is British media failing music listeners and artists?

in a way yes, there's too much herd-mentality (ok what are NME saying is cool this week? right lets also hype that up then) and no real risk-taking

when the most exciting refreshing music show on TV is The Whistle test Years then you know there's a problem, but its not necessarily with the industry.

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:21 (twenty-two years ago)

the central disaster i suspect was when nme/mm and radio one stopped being alien antagonists to one another

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:24 (twenty-two years ago)

an example of the media failing music, BBC london axing specialist shows last autumn to be replaced with inane phone in chat shows

http://www.londumb.co.uk/camp2.html

Five specialist music shows have recently been axed, as follows:

Show's lost: Last broadcast

Imran Khan 12 - 3am
(Last broadcast Fri 11/10)

Ross Allen 11pm -2am Sun
(Last broadcast 13/10)

Coldcut 12 - 2am Mon
(Last broadcast 21/10)

Kevin Le Gendre 12 - 2a Tue
(Last broadcast 22/10)

Bob Jones 12 - 2am Thu
(Last broadcast 24/10)

None of these shows had ever been properly publicised or trailed in order to help build an audience.

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Why is the Radio Authority a tooth-less tiger: re the watering down of music programming at Xfm, Jazz fm and Kiss in the past few years?

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:26 (twenty-two years ago)

What do you think of playlists/ programming on Radio 1/ Radio 2/ radio 3/ 6music/ Ixtra/ Kiss100/ Xfm/ Virgin/ other local radio stations?

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:27 (twenty-two years ago)

despite following NME too much, Radio 1 isnt actually too bad at the moment. altho the segregation is bad the evening shows are still good - you've still got Peel etc. plus you can hear Panjabi MC in the daytime via Jo Whiley or Chris Moyles and they seem to be the only station doing that right now - the problem is they wont play anything thats more than 6 months old (which is good if they'd caned it to ridiculous saturation as they often do, but bad if great songs that only got a few plays end up forgotten about completely) unless its in the 90s canon (Verve etc.). XFM can be alright except they insist on playing 'Basket Case' or 'Smells Like The Teen Spirit' more than say ooooh Stereolab in the daytime, and they have confused themselves regarding what is considered 'alternative' and what isnt (i.e. they will play Evanescence but not the new Panjabi MC).

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:46 (twenty-two years ago)

also seems to be very little difference between Radio 1 and 1Xtra from that i can tell

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Think you'll find XFM do play PMC quite a bit, actually...

William Bloody Swygart (mrswygart), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 12:19 (twenty-two years ago)

my mistake, its on their playlist online after all. no Stereolab tho, heh

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 13:41 (twenty-two years ago)

i find xfm / capital radio's playlist to be their problem. i did enjoy iain baker's lock-in programmes where he'd play whatever he wanted. you'd get the euromasters, lee perry, vintage foetus all within a couple of hours.

frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 13:54 (twenty-two years ago)

the british music scene is the best its ever been tho'

ssean, Wednesday, 2 July 2003 14:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Re: iain baker's lock-in programmes

Yes, that is the type of diversity, freshness, ideas and passion for music - i demand from Radio ! [shame that Xfm shuffled the schedules]

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 14:07 (twenty-two years ago)

i disagree, i think its actually been quite constant in terms of quality - certain genres and practices peak and decline, at least in terms of trendiness. that said you could say the industry and practitioners are becoming ever-more 'professional' and treating the art of entertainment as business more cynically.

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 14:09 (twenty-two years ago)

radio's main problem is that they are playing what they think the listener wants to hear as opposed to listening to what the listener wants to hear. alternately, the should have more things like radio 3's mixing it, where i first heard digeridoo by afx on radio, years ago where they play what they want to hear. actually to plug a certain glasgow club's method, they should play what they like when they like and if you like it, fine. if not, switch off. or something

frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 14:23 (twenty-two years ago)

i don't like the music programming/ playlist choices on radio 1, only listen to a select few shows each week.

i find 6music plays too much dull songs rock conservatism.

don't rate Xfm's playlists [far too much conformist alt rock tripe for teenagers] and only listen to a select few shows.

I find Kiss 100 plays dumb pop dance/ boring mainstream hip hop/ drab rnb in the day.. and shunts a few token specialists shows way after midnight.

Virgin /// ghastly trad songs rock station, never listen.

then there are the moronic stations for the masses: heart, capital and their ilk. also don't like the "gold format" commercial stations.

bbc local radio, bbc london does not support specialist music any more.

radio 2 not my bag, far too melodic.

listen to a few specialist on radio 3 (Mixing It, Jazz on 3] but classical is not my bag.

...face upto the facts radio in the UK is mostly rotten.

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 14:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Americans to thread to remind us how lucky we are ;)

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 14:31 (twenty-two years ago)

mark s OTM, I mean I hate to admit this but a capitalist model (NME roxx all MM readers r all gay! Radio One has the secrets of kool, the press is leagues behind! etc) made the British music scene AND its reactions to American & occasional European developments vibrant & exciting & interesting, you had weird by-the-wayside things like Flexipop covering god-knows-what crossections of the public taste just to get a piece of the music-fan's purchasing dollar - what needs to happen is new incredibly ambitious publications with covermount CDs, preferably genre-centric sorts of things

radio, though, must heal itself

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 14:31 (twenty-two years ago)

haha stevem don't crow too much, when i played XFM last fall there were little notifiers everywhere that it was "a Clear Channel company," organize and kick those bastards out right quick or the Beeb is next

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 14:32 (twenty-two years ago)

what is needed for music ... a media revolution !

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 14:36 (twenty-two years ago)

i wonder what martian's bunker looks like?

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 14:41 (twenty-two years ago)

the central disaster i suspect was when nme/mm and radio one stopped being alien antagonists to one another

Absolutely correct.

Key moment: Lamacq taking over the evening slot. "British indie music" killed, stone dead, right there.

Venga, Wednesday, 2 July 2003 15:35 (twenty-two years ago)

it's started ...lord help us it's ...Lammo ...starting the lecture...

DJ Martian (djmartian), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 17:04 (twenty-two years ago)

i don't know what you're talking about stevem, because my experiences in america (never having been out of the country, i consider them to be fairly extensive) have pretty much taught me that it's college radio or shit. actually, here in new orleans, we're lucky enough to also have WWOZ, a jazz station, but even they're sketchy (and play only mardi gras second line shit at least one month every year). we'd be lucky to have a station like XFM.

Felcher (Felcher), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 17:11 (twenty-two years ago)

it's started ...lord help us it's ...Lammo ...starting the lecture...

This confirms existence of 12 ft lizards.

Venga, Wednesday, 2 July 2003 17:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Nice use of Parlophone in Lamacq's piece, neatly sidestepping their parent company recently giving £80m to Robbie.

(and an aside - didn't Coldplay release 'Shiver' on Parlophone a while before they came up withe risible 'Yello'?)

dial, Wednesday, 2 July 2003 17:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Felcher thats what i meant when i said we're lucky in the UK to have the 'range' we do. part of me agress with DJ Martian but i barely listen to radio as it is and if i wanted to i could use the BBC Radio streaming archive and probably find enough there to keep me happy for a while given the range of more specialist shows on offer.

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 17:56 (twenty-two years ago)

whatever 'the problem' is, remind me, why is it a 'problem'

dave q, Wednesday, 2 July 2003 18:04 (twenty-two years ago)

now, when robbie falls out of favour, what will his severance pay be? if mariah carey's pay-off was indirectly responsible for the loss of 1800 jobs at emi, then surely more jobs for the chop ? not a bad deal he's got. £80 million for a six album deal, two of which will be greatest hits ones.

frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 18:21 (twenty-two years ago)

'five hours devoted to the BURNING issues' ha ha ha ha ha! WE DON'T NEED NO WATER

dave q, Wednesday, 2 July 2003 18:25 (twenty-two years ago)

robbie's five remaining albums in the deal (assuming 'Escapology' was the first)

1 b-sides comp
2 new swing/covers album
3 a-sides comp/live comp
4 new album
5 ultimate greatest hits

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 20:34 (twenty-two years ago)

The EMI guy sounded rather pissed off when the Williams contract was brought up...

dial, Wednesday, 2 July 2003 21:32 (twenty-two years ago)

what did he say?

dave q, Thursday, 3 July 2003 06:42 (twenty-two years ago)

The Great British Music Debate

Part 1

Two negatives make a positive, but two positives don’t make a negative.

Yeah, right.

The point at which I go irretrievably insane. No way back.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 3 July 2003 07:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Loved the blog entry Nick.

The only question worth asking - what would be better, to see the entire industry and EVERYTHING connected with it 'collapse', or to see e.i.&.E.c.w.i 'destroyed'? Though I'd settle for either

dave q, Thursday, 3 July 2003 07:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Nick, did you have the misfortune to listen to the [NO] talent showacase - in full. i.e 5 new artists were played and they were all awful.

DJ Martian (djmartian), Thursday, 3 July 2003 10:03 (twenty-two years ago)

just read the blog !

DJ Martian (djmartian), Thursday, 3 July 2003 10:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Not quite, just got the first three in entirety and the second half of the fifth one; was driving back from Emma's house during the fourth one. Fucking horrendous.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 3 July 2003 10:07 (twenty-two years ago)

not a bad deal he's got. £80 million for a six album deal, two of which will be greatest hits ones.

I'd be HIGHLY surprised if that's a fixed sum. Usually those figures are a percentage x estimated sales (and optimistic expectations = high figure = big headlines = self-fulfilling prophecy).

Siegbran (eofor), Thursday, 3 July 2003 10:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Nick i was the BBC chatroom for my sins, it was not your typical radio 2 audience: there were radio 1 fans in, 6 music listeners, mixing it fans, rock fans, dance fans

Most agreed that the acts were awful, great minds think alike

1. i had down as a James clone [Clarksevile] SNAP
2. I correctly identified a Texas clone [Speedway] SNAP
3. boring singer songwriter [Peppercorn]
4. cabaret circuit performer boring MOR slop [Rob Reynolds]
5. AOR female vox - Sheryl Crowe clone [Emma Holland]

they are linked here in a slightly different order

[NO] TALENT SHOWCASE
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio2/events/greatdebate/band_showcase.shtml

DJ Martian (djmartian), Thursday, 3 July 2003 10:25 (twenty-two years ago)

"Usually those figures are a percentage x estimated sales (and optimistic expectations = high figure = big headlines = self-fulfilling prophecy).
"
well from what i'm aware of the deal includes £10m up front, £15m on completion of the first record and £55m for the remaining three records.

not a bad deal.
now, if only he was talented musically. . .

frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:06 (twenty-two years ago)

now, if only he was talented musically. . .

he'd still be rubbish, and probably even more egotistical and idolised than he already is so just be glad he's a sub-mediocre schmuck!

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:32 (twenty-two years ago)

the thing that really gets me is that emi, in particular, harp on about losing money & dwindling sales.

so, £25 million so far on the williams (if the deal details are correct) and the mariah carey pay-off was ourageous as well. £20 odd million for mute records.

that's a hell of a lot.

and to think of the music they could have spent it on

frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Interesting DJ Martian that the chatroom audience wasn't Radio 2 types, becasue the program itself was so unbelievably Radio 2 it hurt. I didn't know whether to break stuff or cry, such a wasted opportunity.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 3 July 2003 12:00 (twenty-two years ago)

i don't think martian's assumptions abt music are much different from those of the fabled "radio two" planner: it's just that the polarity's switched

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 3 July 2003 12:04 (twenty-two years ago)

If EMI want to sign a contract like that, whatever, it's their money. What's truly unforgiveable is Q mag giving that fuckstick yet another cover. I will never even thumb through that shitrag in a supermarket again, let alone buy it. Why doesn't every music rag in the country combine into one and call itself 'Slurp'?

dave q, Thursday, 3 July 2003 12:05 (twenty-two years ago)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/music/3036246.stm


Paul Weller bemoaned the lack of investment in bands
Nearly 70% of the thousands of listeners who tuned in to BBC Radio 2's Great Music Debate said they thought the single would not survive.
The interactive debate on the future of the music industry lasted for five hours, with live discussions and documentaries about the troubled state of the recording business in the UK.

Singers Paul Weller and David Gray were among contributors to the debate - staged to discuss why CD sales had dropped and what could be done to regenerate the industry.

Listeners voted on the evening's central question - whether the single could survive.

More than two out of three listeners - a total of 69% - believed it would not last. Only 31% said it would.

If the first album doesn't sell a million, you don't always get the chance to make a second one

Paul Weller

Last year, album sales fell by 4%, while music sales dropped by 13% in the first quarter of 2003.

Contributors blamed a number of factors, including the trend towards music inspired by TV talent search programmes such as Popstars.

Use of the internet to obtain tracks for free had also contributed to the slump, they suggested.

And they pointed to disproportionately high prices for singles compared with albums.

The emergence of dance culture was also singled out, with a trend towards clubbing among young consumers rather than album and single buying.


Beverley Knight said some chart-toppers were "mediocre"
Complaints were raised saying that the major record labels were not willing to invest enough in new acts.

Former The Jam frontman Weller said: "Unfortunately these days if you don't get a hit single, or the first album doesn't sell a million, you don't always get the chance to make a second one.

"A band may not make the best album first time but you don't know what they are going to make down the line. It could be fantastic."

Singer Beverley Knight said some songs were topping the charts that no-one could name or even remember.

"Back in the day the chances were that unless it was a novelty record, it was a really good song," she said.

Free music today will mean no music tomorrow,

BPI executive chairman Peter Jamieson

"It's hard to sit at home and watch bands you know have been put together by a TV show. It's mediocrity dressed up as greatness."

In a separate speech to the UK music industry's ruling body, the British Phonographic Industry (BPI), executive chairman Peter Jamieson called on members to embrace new technology.

But he warned that online music pirates must not be allowed to thrive at the expense of artists and the record industry.

"Free music today will mean no music tomorrow," he said.

"We all need to co-operate in a move to authorisation of all internet music. Anarchy cannot rule."


Never actually heard clubbing being blamed for youngsters not buying singles & albums before. Though many in the retail industry say most singles are sold to under 18 year old girls. Not as much by older male/females.

Tam, Thursday, 3 July 2003 14:01 (twenty-two years ago)

anybody want to suggest a web-compliant UK radio that this out-of-the-loop new zealander could listen to while on the web in order to take my 60%dross/40%interesting chances ?

george gosset (gegoss), Thursday, 3 July 2003 14:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I've heard this 'in our day bands could make more than one album' for so long now that I don't believe it anymore, or that it was true ever

dave q, Thursday, 3 July 2003 14:15 (twenty-two years ago)

singles in their traditional form may soon have expired as a desirable product. digital file transfer/transaction to replace them for the most part. this is called progress. you will however still be able to walk into record shops and buy singles for the foreseeable future. the charts will not be affected signifcantly, tho they may have to start incorporating radio airplay, tv coverage and possibly even no. of downloads more into their compilation data. this is unlikely to mean the nature of the charts or their content altering noticeably, as long as they do it fairly.


Contributors blamed a number of factors, including the trend towards music inspired by TV talent search programmes such as Popstars.

this despite sales of HearSay, Will Young and Girls Aloud's first singles being among the biggest of the year.


Use of the internet to obtain tracks for free had also contributed to the slump, they suggested.

i'm still inclined to believe the number of people who don't buy what they would've bought had they not been able to download it for free is relatively small.


And they pointed to disproportionately high prices for singles compared with albums.

DVD singles are also a waste of money and media. if i buy a DVD i expect it to be full to capacity with content.


The emergence of dance culture was also singled out, with a trend towards clubbing among young consumers rather than album and single buying.

makes no real sense - number of people clubbing has been constant for 20 years?


"A band may not make the best album first time but you don't know what they are going to make down the line. It could be fantastic."

so let them go on the dole, work hard and make that fantastic album, THEN we'll discuss payment.


Singer Beverley Knight said some songs were topping the charts that no-one could name or even remember.

what was that song she did again? heh, i agree though (Name all four of B*Witched's number one singles this instant...)


"Back in the day the chances were that unless it was a novelty record, it was a really good song," she said.

not really true.

Free music today will mean no music tomorrow,

you mean 'no music INDUSTRY'

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 3 July 2003 14:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Weller blasts record labels
And The Modfather reckons that if The Jam were starting off now, they'd be dropped. Of course, some might say that if that had happened to The Style Council, the world might be a better place...
2003-07-03 15:53:00

PAUL WELLER has branded record labels as "scum" and said that if THE JAM had emerged today, they might never have made it.

Weller's comments came during a debate about the state of the music industry organised by BBC Radio 2. The Modfather said: ""Unfortunately these days if you don't get a hit single, or your first album doesn't sell one point whatever million, you don't get a chance to make your second one.

"I wonder whether The Jam would have got on to 'All Mod Cons' - we would have probably been dropped by then, as the first two records didn't sell that well."

http://www.nme.com/news/105492.htm

Bradley, Thursday, 3 July 2003 14:35 (twenty-two years ago)

interesting that the BPI guy is so hostile to TV talent-contest pop: confirmation of my guess that TVTCPs = site of very intense tussle over who gets to be "gatekeeper of quality" in re popular music

(actually of this is abt dimensions of that tussle: not that anyone addressed this, of course)

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 3 July 2003 14:59 (twenty-two years ago)

ALL of this is abt dimensions...

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 3 July 2003 15:00 (twenty-two years ago)

six years pass...

I'm watching this as a kinda group thing among ppl on a chatroom but hellfuckme it's the worst of all ever

always changing, always the same (acoleuthic), Saturday, 5 June 2010 21:36 (fifteen years ago)

Mark Ronson just claimed that Led Zeppelin were responsible for hip-hop

always changing, always the same (acoleuthic), Saturday, 5 June 2010 21:44 (fifteen years ago)

I stopped watching this.

Mark Ronson: "Led Zep were responsible for hip-hop" (acoleuthic), Saturday, 5 June 2010 22:27 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.