I Need the Help of ILM Jazz Fans

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
This is a Coltrane question again, but different from that Harry Pussy one.

How do I put this? Okay, I'm not a jazz fan. I don't really get jazz. I don't know what it means to "get jazz". I don't even know if there's anything to "get".

So, I was at this flea market today and picked up a CD called Blue Train by John Coltrane for 4 bucks (Canadian). On the spine, it says The Ultimate Blue Train. Now, I want to know:

1. Is this record a good entry point into Coltrane's music?

2. What, if anything, do I listen for (and yes, I think I'm aware of the naivety of that question)?

I'm listening, and it's not unpleasant, but nothing's happening in my heart, if that makes sense. Am I missing something, or does this mean jazz just ain't for me?

David A. (Davant), Monday, 7 July 2003 01:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Okay, the second clause in that last question was stupid. Please ignore it.

David A. (Davant), Monday, 7 July 2003 01:56 (twenty-two years ago)

That one's nice enough, not too thrilling. Maybe you should 'Crescent' a go, not ferocious or anything but a bit more adventurous/moving. I have no idea what to listen for, I gave up on that sort of thing ages ago.

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Monday, 7 July 2003 02:03 (twenty-two years ago)

blue train is a great record. I don't know how exactly crescent is more adventurous. it does come at a later point in time after some more things have changed. perhaps compared to the jazz of its day it's less traditional than blue train was in its day, but you have to keep in mind that lots of people reacted negatively to coltrane in that period, so he probably seemed pretty 'adventurous' then too.

david, a common thing people might say here is the stuff about following the chord changes etc. during soloing, but I wonder if you could just focus on the rhythm section, listen to how they play off of one another, and how it fits in with the horns. kind of like listening to hip-hop or house or something.

you might try whistling or humming or singing along with the horns, sometimes the feel of how their parts work that way makes things click for me.

but if you were to say listen to a rolling stones album or something, and you didn't like it, that would by no means mean rock music wasn't for you. so I don't see why your not taking to a single jazz album would mean jazz wasn't for you. you could just poke around and see if there's something else that does it for you.

along the same lines, it could take a lot of listening to get into jazz, not because it's hard or anything, but just the normal getting familiar, even past liking a handful of albums even.

Josh (Josh), Monday, 7 July 2003 02:22 (twenty-two years ago)

why do you want to get into coltrane first, and not someone more slightly less abstract, like monk-round midnight, mingus ah um, etc.

blue train - yeah, that's a good one. ask yourself as you listen, "is this real down-home blues in another form, like bobby bland mixing blues with rock, or hendrix mixing blues with psychedelia? or is this just bluesy? just dark?

if you don't like it at first, but want to, then the best way is simply to put it on as background music about once a week, until you start humming along without thinking about it, or in some other way start to loosely memorize it.

easiest points of entry, for coltrane

if you hate jazz but like pretty music: ellington meets coltrane
spacy, very relaxed: miles-kind of blue
if you are looking for some free jazz: love supreme
if you are looking for something sort of weird yet familiar: one of his comps that includes "my favorite things"
totally catchy, very abstract yet more upbeat than kind of blue: giant steps

mig, Monday, 7 July 2003 02:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Blue Train is an excellent starting point. Just keep listening to it. Let it sink in. You aren't gonna "get" everything the first time you listen to it.Don't force stuff. relax. But at the same time, really listen too.

scott seward, Monday, 7 July 2003 02:32 (twenty-two years ago)

be your zen mind

Josh (Josh), Monday, 7 July 2003 02:41 (twenty-two years ago)

I think it's a good starting point. John is very melodic and easy to follow on his earlier solo records like Blue Train, Giant Steps, and My Favorite Things. They are probably the best place for newbies to start. Unless you really like things funky...then maybe you should just dive in headfirst into Stellar Regions.

When first listening to jazz, paricularly a band with a true "frontman" type leader who showcases his own playing like John, you may be best served to at the beginning of each song try to locate the theme..the centerpiece lick of the song...that the soloist will be playing around with kinda like a classical sonata.

ben welsh (benwelsh), Monday, 7 July 2003 02:44 (twenty-two years ago)

i played jazz all through school starting in junior high, and it took me like years to warm up to giant steps. so hard.

Josh (Josh), Monday, 7 July 2003 02:58 (twenty-two years ago)

but then again, mebbe you do just hate jazz, cuz blue train is just so fucking beautiful and not really that hard to grasp. then again, i'm drunk and listening to Gil Evans really really loud.

scott seward, Monday, 7 July 2003 03:03 (twenty-two years ago)

the beginning is so beautiful.

Josh (Josh), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, keep it coming, even the drunk stuff.

but if you were to say listen to a rolling stones album or something, and you didn't like it, that would by no means mean rock music wasn't for you. so I don't see why your not taking to a single jazz album would mean jazz wasn't for you. you could just poke around and see if there's something else that does it for you.

Josh, yeah, that's why I said to ignore that stupid part of my last question. I know it was dumb, for the very reasons you state here. Then again, there's scott:

but then again, mebbe you do just hate jazz, cuz blue train is just so fucking beautiful and not really that hard to grasp.

See? Now I'm just confused. Maybe if I listen to it like blues with more rhythmic variation?

But all of this is helping, even (especially?) the contradictory stuff. Thanks, ILM ;-)

David A. (Davant), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:10 (twenty-two years ago)

also, if you can find 'em (they're out of print right now), the two Roots of Jazz Funk CDs on MVP (came out in '97) are worth picking up--basically '50s and '60s hard bop primers, excellent (if fairly obvious to jazz lovers) track selection, and (the really important part) tunes tunes tunes galore. "Giant Steps" is on Vol. 1. if you want to know more about jazz, it's a pretty great place to start.

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, and mig:

why do you want to get into coltrane first, and not someone more slightly less abstract, like monk-round midnight, mingus ah um, etc.

It was just an impulse buy at a rural flea market. It was in among the old Cult records, etc., and it caught my eye as I've been wondering for a while now why I haven't given jazz a better opportunity in my music-loving life, you know?

(x post: thanks to M Matos, too. I'll look out for those -- money's tight, which is why I jumped at a four dollar CD in the first place, but I imagine the Roots of Jazz Funk CDs are pretty ubiquitous, no?)


Thanks for your tips, by the way.

David A. (Davant), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:18 (twenty-two years ago)

if you hate jazz but like pretty music: ellington meets coltrane

See, I think that's exactly the kind of advice he doesn't need. Jazz and pretty music are NOT mutually exclusive. Jazz can grow on you, and as you learn more about it and understand the language you can learn to appreciate more and more complex stuff, but there's no reason the jazz neophyte should be shy about liking things that are pretty. (See the Lee Konitz thread. He's very pretty.)

My favorite Coltrane albums are the ones that hit me the first time I heard them. I can dig the wilder Impulse! stuff, the stuff that's just, like, a time signature and nothing else, but it's the stuff that hits me in the gut that keeps me coming back.

Maybe Coltrane won't hit you in the gut, but don't give up yet. I think Blue Train might be a bad place to start. It's obstinately dark and bluesy. Crescent was a good recommendation -- "Wise One" is a beautiful song.

My pick? Coltrane's Sound. Recorded during the same session as My Favorite Things, which is my second pick. When he's hot, he's hot, but not insane. And when he's mellow, he's like a new lover. Check out "Central Park West" and then tell me great jazz can't be pretty.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:19 (twenty-two years ago)

not especially ubiquitous, at least as far as I've seen--MVP was some kind of Capitol-EMI subsidiary label that existed for a few minutes and then disappeared. I imagine you'd see them in used and flea market piles on occasion, though, and they're worth looking at. the title, I suspect, threw/throws people off, they think they're fusion comps, but that's not really it at all. (there's a third vol. with a different title I can't quite recall, it's mostly early '70s stuff--Alice Coltrane and Mahavishnu and the like--that didn't look anywhere near as good as the first two.)

also, and this one's really, almost painfully obvious, but A Love Supreme is one of the most immediately great things I've ever heard ever, in any category.

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, there are all different ways to listen to and things to focus in on, and I think it takes a certain amount of time of learning about different elements of the music to be able to fully enjoy hearing them all at the same time. Not to make it sound like hard work or anything, there's just a lot going on if you're not used to hearing it.

Listen to the melody played at the beginning of the tunes. The musicians keep improvising on that melody and the chords underneath it for the rest of the tune. Take the title track...it's a 12 bar blues, played twice in the head. The band keeps playing those 12 bars of chords over and over...try singing the melody repeatedly during the solo section, it might make it easier to hear how the solos are relating to it.

Listen to the bassline and try to hear the chords changing. The bass usually plays the roots of the chords on beat 1 of the bar, just listen to the bass to hear the turnarounds, the tensions and resolutions of the chords.

Listen to how the drums. Listen to the feel of the ride cymbal pattern. Listen to how Philly Joe Jones supports and influence what the soloists do, how he 'comments' on their phrases with the snare drum. Listen to how in 'Blue Train' he plays the hi-hat double time in the middle so that it feels like the tune is in two tempos at once, and how that affects how the soloists play.

Listen to the phrasing of the soloists. Think about the wide-open possibility of being able to play anything at any moment, and how great it is that Lee Morgan plays THAT right THERE (or whatever happens to catch your ear).

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah 'Crescent' just sounds more adventurous to me, and links up w/'A Love Supreme' which came next, I think, and seems a lot less formal and more openly gorgeous. Just to me. I listen to 'Blue Train' all the time, though, it's just it kinda seems to fit more into whatever sense of "jazz tradition" I have, so it's a a little more intimidating in that way, while 'Crescent' just hit me as beautiful (and other things, need to relisten to it soon) from my first listen.

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:28 (twenty-two years ago)

if you find yourself wondering what's going on in the coltrane after a while, as in 'what am I supposed to be hearing?', maybe mingus would be a good thing to try instead - say, 'blues & roots' on atlantic, 'mingus ah um' on columbia, or (yes yes yes this one) 'mingus mingus mingus mingus mingus' on impulse!. on any of those, the soloing might keep closer to the original melody, but totally not, so that the songs as wholes won't seem as nothing-going-on compared to say rock music (not sure what you like). [that is, the mingus might seem less like songs with giant guitar solo sections in the middle that you are presumably only supposed to like if you are a dork or teenager.] but with the advantage that there's bop (more like the style of blue train, that is) hiding in there, so it could start to make some more sense.

Josh (Josh), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:28 (twenty-two years ago)

another good door opener: Lee Morgan, The Sidewinder. my ex who loathed jazz was like, "hey, this is pretty good, who is it?" when I played this in her company. it's pretty straightforward heads (riffs/main melodic lines)-then-solos stuff, but the heads are killer and the soloing keeps you there.

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:31 (twenty-two years ago)

I get you, andrew - just didn't want the older stuff sold short because it is considered less 'revolutionary'.

Josh (Josh), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:32 (twenty-two years ago)

(yes yes yes this one) 'mingus mingus mingus mingus mingus' on impulse!.

Oh! that record. GodDAMN. Have you ever heard such swing? Such sweat? Such... oh, there's aren't the words. It's like a punch in the face, it's so hard. It's fucking amazing.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:33 (twenty-two years ago)

I think jazz is all about learning how to listen. Most people don't grow up listening to jazz, and with any new idiom it takes awhile to absorb the stock rhythms and phrases and to become sensitive to what you do and don't like and to what's innovative and what's not.

I also think it's useful to think of jazz from the perspective of playing popular music that swung and used some improvisation on the melody, i.e. New Orleans jazz, and everything that came after just extended and loosened these parameters, from bebop to free improv.

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, good point, I should say that outside of the mainstream rock/pop that I like, I also dig late 70s punk, 80s Uk post-punk, some hip hop, some Irish and English folk (Planxty, Nick Drake, John Martyn), alt.country (sorry, that's a crap genre name -- y'alternative is worse, though. Americana?), blues, reggae, some electronic.

But keep it coming. I'm scribbling notes here.

I heart ILM.

David A. (Davant), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:38 (twenty-two years ago)

In one sense Blue Train could be considered a good entry point because it's not too challenging formally. And, y'know, it's rilly good. On the other hand, it's not the most immediately representative of what made Coltrane a legend.

Also on the other hand, I think for people who are into rock or electronic music it's almost better to start with more far-out stuff and work backwards. I pretty much started with 70s Miles and now I can dig 30s big-band stuff.

So pick up Ascension. Just kidding. You might never listen to Coltrane again. No, pick up a Love Supreme. Or download the track Chasin' the Trane. You can't really miss what you're supposed to be hearing on that stuff, whether you like it or not.

Ben Williams, Monday, 7 July 2003 03:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Chasin' the Trane

That's exactly the one I meant when I said "just a time signature."

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:41 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm gonna go dl that right now.

David A. (Davant), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Ben Williams' backward-evolution graf OTM, or at least it worked the same way w/me

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, something like Crescent or A Love Supreme might be a better introduction actually, since modal music makes a lot more sense to rock ears than rhythm changes.

Mingus is good because he has such a strong blues and New Orleans and big band sensibility, he's always about the gut and the melody and the big picture rather than individual solos.

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:44 (twenty-two years ago)

A RECIPE

1. listen to bitches brew. pretend it is an electronic record
2. go backwards through miles's catalog until you get to the first quintet
3. buy records by the sidemen from miles' band that you like

Josh (Josh), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:48 (twenty-two years ago)

(and yeah, mingus x 5 is fucking fantastic)

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:49 (twenty-two years ago)

1. pretend the first lp is an electronic record. pretend the second one was made by hippies on drugs (ahem)

Josh (Josh), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh! I forgot to mention Live at Birdland. While you're dl-ing long-ass tracks, don't miss "Afro Blue." My God. It's as much Elvin Jones's triumph as anyone's. I'm telling you now -- you've never heard drumming this intense, sustained for this long, ever in your life.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:51 (twenty-two years ago)

I really love Afro Blue too.

There is a wonderful version of it on the new Roy Haynes album, which is really wonderful in general, believe it or not. One of the things about jazz that's cool is that 72 year olds can make great records.

Ben Williams, Monday, 7 July 2003 03:53 (twenty-two years ago)

see also Ellington's Far East Suite.

if you're interested in a good, well-written album guide, the recent Ben Ratliff/New York Times 100 Essential Jazz Albums thingy is a good place to start

M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:53 (twenty-two years ago)

I didn't get around to downloading anything yet (but I'm still noting all suggestions), because the bonus track -- an alternate take of the title track -- just came around again here on my stereo, and for the first time, something tweaked my gut, or heart, or some internal organ (spleen?). This copy has alternate versions of both "Blue Train" and "Lazy Bird", by the way.

Another neophyte question, I'm sure, but most of the bass I hear is plucked, yet earlier I swear I could hear bowed bass. Is that common in jazz?

(I warned you I was a jazz virgin)

Oh, and Josh, I'm on a limited budget here, dude. I can occasionally download, but even that is limited (shared computer -- my usual computer is an older Mac without CD-R).

David A. (Davant), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:54 (twenty-two years ago)

72 year olds can make great records.

If they live that long.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:54 (twenty-two years ago)

it took me a long time to decide "jazz wasn't for me", but that doesn't mean there aren't 20 or so jazz albums i could never live without. there's nothing particularly wrong with being an individualistic tokenist irt a given genre if you're upfront about it.

jess (dubplatestyle), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:57 (twenty-two years ago)

irt?

My first Coltrane purchase. I can't recommend it enough.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 7 July 2003 03:59 (twenty-two years ago)

bowed bass = uncommon, but I would venture to say even less common after say the late 50s?

haha jess, some people never love 20 albums in any one genre. or they do but only in one!

Josh (Josh), Monday, 7 July 2003 04:03 (twenty-two years ago)

jess, is this that dilettante/specialist thing again? ;-)

But, yeah, this is I Love Music, not I Love Jazz. And it's not like loving jazz is some prerequisite for acceptance into the human race or anything. Is it?

This is a bit offtopic, but some of that tokenism is due to ignorance, too. I'm only speaking for myself, but I have a ton of gaps in my musical, um, exposure (for want of a better word), and it used to be that filling in those gaps was hard -- but with ILM, we can just ask a question and sit back and watch as they start to fill in. you know, that's fucking amazing, really?

Heh. Coltrane just gave way in my CD tray to a Neko Case record. Now what the fuck do I do? ;-)

(x post, irt = in regard to?)

David A. (Davant), Monday, 7 July 2003 04:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Kenan is OTM re: Afro-Blue.

Yeah, 99% of all jazz bass playing is plucked, but Paul Chambers would take solos with a bow sometimes. I love Slam Stewart's bow playing, when he would sing his phrases an octave up, and Richard Davis's.

I will also take this opportunity to say--Booker Ervin!!

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 7 July 2003 04:07 (twenty-two years ago)

What about 'The Gentle Side of John Coltrane'? I haven't heard it, but it seems like an entry point for Coltrane if you like 'pretty music' and would be turned off by his more agitated playing.

(just looked at the track listing for that and it doesn't include 'Naima', one of my favorite tunes in any genre)

oops (Oops), Monday, 7 July 2003 04:39 (twenty-two years ago)

I would say that entry point should be coltrane with johnny hartman, but a) I've never heard 'ballads', and b) not quite a normal coltrane record even for being pretty

Josh (Josh), Monday, 7 July 2003 04:48 (twenty-two years ago)

If I may expand on "Afro Blue":

Elvin Jones is unholy. The first 3 minutes of this track are impressive, and the next three preternatural, particularly at the end of the Tyner piano break where he turns big, lush chords into bludgeoning instruments, and then Jones begins hitting the bass drum with an urgency that would make Alex van Halen go pale and leave the room, and then Coltrane comes in screaming. It's a cinematic moment, a fight scene, or a race war maybe.

But it's in the remaining six minutes of the track that Jones becomes godlike, or more accurately, Satanlike. His intensity takes on an odd new character through its sheer persistence. The rest of the band plays on, and eventually even wind down, but not Jones. He's man on a bloody mission. He becomes sinister. His motives become questionable -- why is he playing this hard? Is he posessed? Does he want to hurt us?

Thrilling.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 7 July 2003 04:51 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, Elvin makes me cry there, knowing that I will never ever be that good on the drums.

oops (Oops), Monday, 7 July 2003 04:56 (twenty-two years ago)

'The Gentle Side of John Coltrane'

Gentle Coltrane makes less sense without hot Coltrane. The give-and-take of the albums is essential to understanding.

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 7 July 2003 04:56 (twenty-two years ago)

And maybe that's why I don't care for Blue Train so much -- it's too much the same color throughout. (Guess which color.)

Kenan Hebert (kenan), Monday, 7 July 2003 04:59 (twenty-two years ago)

Like an alien who's never seen the sunrise, this thread has been the equivalent of watching a planet's star edging slowly above the horizon for the first time evah.

Thanks all.

David A. (Davant), Monday, 7 July 2003 05:50 (twenty-two years ago)

"Blue Train" probably isn't a great place to start for the jazz neophyte, even though the title track is a pretty immediate minor blues. But that's followed by "Moment's Notice", called that because Paul Chambers (bass) took one look at the chart and said "I hope you don't expect me to play these changes at a moment's notice". It's stretching the bebop harmonic tradition, though still not as far as "Giant Steps" or "Countdown". It took me much longer to appreciate these albums than the modal stuff Coltrane did later, in fact I think they are less immediately accessible than reputedly more "difficult" music like early Ornette Coleman or Peter Brotzmann.

If you are trying to get a taste for jazz I'd recommend some mainly modal albums like:

Blues and the Abstract Truth - Oliver Nelson
The Real McCoy - McCoy Tyner
Something Else - Cannonball Adderley (a Miles Davis record in all but name, and his most accessible work).
Maiden Voyage - Herbie Hancock
Speak No Evil - Wayne Shorter
My Favourite Things - Coltrane

These are all accessible but also classics that will stand repeated listening for years to come. Alternatively you could start with some more recent trio jazz with more of a rock sensibility in the rhythm section - "These Are the Vistas" by The Bad Plus or "Stange Place for Snow" by Esbjorn Svensson. These get dissed as jazz for people who don't like jazz but Reid Anderson (bassist and main composer for TBP) and ES are both major jazz talents IMO so ignore the snobs and give them a listen. If you like it you will want to go deeper.

ArfArf, Monday, 7 July 2003 10:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Haha!

I found nice copies of (Black) Arthur Blythe's Bush Baby and Sphere's Flight Path, neither of which has been on CD in America (I believe). Together, they cost me about 12 bucks.

If Timi Yuro would be still alive, most other singers could shut up, Friday, 9 March 2007 01:44 (eighteen years ago)

Is this the right thread to post this article about Michael Brecker ?
http://www.allaboutjazz.com/php/article.php?id=24869

Dimension 5ive, Friday, 9 March 2007 02:00 (eighteen years ago)

i think most audiophile-directed angst is caused by people who listen to music on their stereo too soft (this doesn't apply to anyone using headphones). the one thing that's going to make e. jones on "afro blue" sound better and that doesn't cost anything is to turn it up a bit on your hi-fi and quit reading the Times while you're listening to it (though i do suggest keeping your hands occupied...eat a sandwich, jerk off, or play a soltaire game if necessary, just keep your mind free)

killa bee, Friday, 9 March 2007 02:08 (eighteen years ago)

eat a sandwich, jerk off, or play a soltaire game if necessary, just keep your mind free

This is the best advice ever given by anyone ever.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 9 March 2007 02:45 (eighteen years ago)

That's the real reason why us audiophiles hate problematic modern remastering jobs. They make it so much less rewarding and more headache-inducing to turn the volume up.

factor, Friday, 9 March 2007 04:43 (eighteen years ago)

I hate to turn this into just an audiophile question thread, but I always find mp3s from my laptop sound worse through my stereo with my headphone to RCA adapter than CDs in my CD player do, even when using 192k mp3s. Is there a reasons for this, and is there a better way to do it?

Hurting 2, Friday, 9 March 2007 17:56 (eighteen years ago)

Haha "Is there a reasons"

Hurting 2, Friday, 9 March 2007 18:00 (eighteen years ago)

My refusal to become a true audiophile stems in part from a slight discomfort with technology.

Hurting 2, Friday, 9 March 2007 18:00 (eighteen years ago)

Oh jeez i can answer that - mp3s at 192 are imperfect copies of cd tracks dude!

deej, Friday, 9 March 2007 18:29 (eighteen years ago)

they take up so much less space because you're losing part of the sound quality

deej, Friday, 9 March 2007 18:29 (eighteen years ago)

When you play something from your laptop, you're going from your laptop's piece of shit DAC (digital-to-analog converter) to your laptop's piece of shit output jack (which was intended to power small headphones, not to transmit line-level connections) to the line input stage of your stereo, which I'm guessing is also relatively low-end since you called it a "stereo" and not an integrated amp or a preamp, implying you have an all-in-one box. By the time the sound makes it to the stereo's amp section and gets spit out to the speakers it has already been crappitized several times.

When you play a CD, you're going straight from your stereo's internal DAC (which is likely somewhat better than the one in your laptop) to the stereo's analog output stage with minimal fuss in between. It's a cleaner, shorter and better signal path.

factor, Friday, 9 March 2007 18:40 (eighteen years ago)

Lest we forget the inevitably noise introduced into the signal from within the laptop itself.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 9 March 2007 18:44 (eighteen years ago)

*inevitable, obv

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 9 March 2007 18:50 (eighteen years ago)

You guys are making me never want to listen to songs on my laptop again...

battle, Friday, 9 March 2007 18:53 (eighteen years ago)

i would recommend sending me your laptop.

deej, Friday, 9 March 2007 18:56 (eighteen years ago)

I mean, I did it for months. It's totally serviceable, it's just that when you know higher quality is available (by burning FLACs, for example), why not go with clarity?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 9 March 2007 18:57 (eighteen years ago)

I am currently doing what was mentioned upthread, going out the headphones jack into the back of what's basically a glorified boombox, all this is making me want to go for some serious upgrades.

battle, Friday, 9 March 2007 18:59 (eighteen years ago)

It likely has very little to do with MP3 compression. Audio compression codecs have a bad rap due to the awfulness of circa-late-90's MP3 encoders and the unreliability of illegal downloads, many of which have been transcoded between one or more formats by idiots who think you can improve the quality by upconverting 128 to 256. But when YOU are in total control of a music track's "path" from CD original to compressed file, you can do some pretty amazing things with small data rates. These codecs have come a very, very long way in the past decade, and a good MP3 encoder should be able to achieve transparency (to reach a point where you can no longer detect the compression) at 192.

I did a test once, comparing 128 AAC, 192 MP3 and uncompressed AIFF with three tracks, each representing a different type of music. All three were tracks I ripped myself, from CD's I own. I turned it into a self-blind test by making the filenames identical and randomizing the list so I had no clue which was which, and I attempted to identify the uncompressed AIFF files. I detected very subtle tonal differences between the files but they weren't differences that pointed to any of them being clearly better or worse. I took my picks and failed all three times.

Then again, I've downloaded some 320kbps MP3's that sound like balls on my face. Control is key.

factor, Friday, 9 March 2007 18:59 (eighteen years ago)

...my point being that in the overwhelming majority of cases (though there are exceptions), the degradation of sound from using crap gear will far outweigh the degradation of 192kbps MP3 compression.

factor, Friday, 9 March 2007 19:11 (eighteen years ago)

Also, jazz music is good and fun to talk about. Eh?

factor, Friday, 9 March 2007 19:13 (eighteen years ago)

I've gotta write a paper on jazz (it can even be tangenital "social history" type stuff). The number of potential topics is mind-boggling. Nothing too serious, no primary research needed or anything. As a stab in the dark I'm thinking free jazz + black power, but I wondered if anybody had suggestions.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 9 March 2007 19:27 (eighteen years ago)

What kind of class is this for???

Jordan, Friday, 9 March 2007 19:32 (eighteen years ago)

History of Jazz

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 9 March 2007 20:19 (eighteen years ago)

okay now i'm super into a love supreme and kind of blue!

i guess those are kind of "boring" canon albums but damn i really like them. i can see why everyone likes them so much.

i have coltrane - "live at the village vanguard - the master takes" coming in the mail soon....excited to hear that....

so far, my experience w/jazz has been super positive.

M@tt He1ges0n, Friday, 9 March 2007 20:22 (eighteen years ago)

A++ would nod head again

Jordan, Friday, 9 March 2007 20:27 (eighteen years ago)

I'm thinking free jazz + black power, but I wondered if anybody had suggestions.

get one copy aforementioned "As Serious As Your Life" - pretty definitive text for that kind of stuff

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 9 March 2007 20:31 (eighteen years ago)

I could never get bored of 'Kind of Blue'. Hearing something like the first stirrings of "All Blues" still gives me a thrill.

Stormy Davis, Friday, 9 March 2007 20:35 (eighteen years ago)

I was into "Giant Steps" for years before "Love Supreme" did anything for me at all. I distinctly remember the first time I listened to it (hi as a kite, fwiw) scrunching up my nose and being bored. I love it now, predictably.

Stormy OTM about "All Blues," too.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 9 March 2007 20:39 (eighteen years ago)

giant steps was, like, a threatening rumor to budding jazz musicians back back then then and I heard more about its reputation than i had heard of the actual song for quite awhile.

My strongest memory of jazz discovery was for "Haitian Fight Song"

deej, Friday, 9 March 2007 20:52 (eighteen years ago)

When I first heard Giant Steps I didn't get the hype, it just sounded like straight-ahead to me. My ear couldn't really distinguish between Giant Steps changes and bebop changes.

Love Supreme on the other hand sounded totally different and visceral, all the grooves and solos on that record are so slamming.

Jordan, Friday, 9 March 2007 21:33 (eighteen years ago)

xpost re: Haitian Fight Song--that was a big one for me too. It was like--Mingus was doing this kind of stuff in the '50s?! Kind of turned my head around.

tylerw, Friday, 9 March 2007 21:36 (eighteen years ago)

it can even be tangenital "social history" type stuff


See if you can spot the best word ever in that quote.

Noodle Vague, Friday, 9 March 2007 21:36 (eighteen years ago)

3x Haitian Fight Song (the version on Mingus Mingus etc.). Before that, Buddy Rich records.

Jordan, Friday, 9 March 2007 21:43 (eighteen years ago)

hmmm I don't think I've ever heard this Haitian Fight Song...

Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 9 March 2007 21:46 (eighteen years ago)

hmmm I don't think I've ever heard this Haitian Fight Song...


A curable disease.

factor, Friday, 9 March 2007 21:49 (eighteen years ago)

IIBS!!!

deej, Friday, 9 March 2007 21:50 (eighteen years ago)

I'm still in the process of discovering most of the jazz canon; only recently (in the last couple months or so) did I hear A Love Supreme for the first time, and I haven't really come around to it yet. I think I kinda understand what they're trying to do, but the whole spiritual aspect of it just seems so demure compared to something like Karma.

bernard snowy, Friday, 9 March 2007 21:52 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah, II B.S., it murders the original.

Jordan, Friday, 9 March 2007 21:53 (eighteen years ago)

it does but it feels like cheating to give it the advantage; wasn't it like 10 years between them?

deej, Friday, 9 March 2007 21:54 (eighteen years ago)

When I first heard Giant Steps I didn't get the hype, it just sounded like straight-ahead to me. My ear couldn't really distinguish between Giant Steps changes and bebop changes.

See my first exposure to it was from a guitar mag, a whole in-depth lesson on playing the changes. I borrowed my dad's copy to try to follow along with the chord chart (didn't really know how to read tempo markers) and my mind was destroyed. It's still one of my favorite records ever, still above and beyond the rest of Trane's catalog even if I love Love & Meditations & Interstellar Space these days.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Friday, 9 March 2007 22:04 (eighteen years ago)

it does but it feels like cheating to give it the advantage; wasn't it like 10 years between them?

REEEEEEE-MIX!

Jordan, Friday, 9 March 2007 22:08 (eighteen years ago)

Not quite 10 years between them but I disagree that one "murders" the other. Haitian Fight Song is more about swagger and II B.S. is more about fury. They are for different kinds of days.

factor, Friday, 9 March 2007 22:48 (eighteen years ago)

Fuck yeah, IIBS! - Are we (deej, Jordan, and me) all in our mid-late 20s? I remember Mingus Mingus Mingus was one of the first albums I bought - I think it must have been pushed as a big reissue around when I got into jazz because I remember discovering it on a listening station at Barnes and Noble. I think I remember getting Freddie Hubbard - Hub Cap on the same trip in fact - ah, the memories.

As for the laptop thing, yeah, I know roughly why it sounds like crap going from headphone jack to stereo, I just want to know if there's another option.

Hurting 2, Saturday, 10 March 2007 00:39 (eighteen years ago)

I just got a Stellar Regions digipak off ebay. It has alternate takes of: Stellar Regions, Sun Star and Tranesonic. I don't know anything else about it.
What's the general concensus on this cd?

Drooone, Saturday, 10 March 2007 03:28 (eighteen years ago)

Obv I mean in an audiophiley kind of way..

Drooone, Saturday, 10 March 2007 03:54 (eighteen years ago)

"As a stab in the dark I'm thinking free jazz + black power, but I wondered if anybody had suggestions."

free jazz black power, but only if you know French. I read a review of this years ago and it doesn't appear to have been translated.

From what I remember, "As Seroius as Your Life" doesn't really deal with that aspect of it as much. There is more on this from Frank Kofsky and LeRoi Jones.

xyzzzz__, Saturday, 10 March 2007 10:11 (eighteen years ago)

Kofsky was sort of a white cheerleader for Black Power, the kind of journalist who'd try to get a fairly-apolitical person like Trane to Say Sum'n Revolutionary. But I remember liking him nonetheless.

There's also Jones/Baraka's Black Music and Raise Race Rays Raze, the latter being general essays that make for good background for understanding the transformation (in the former) of a beat poet and jazz writer into... Amiri Baraka. But he's just one person, and do you (Hoos) have time to read two books for this thang?

For "free jazz + black power", I'd recommend (though I'm only halfway through reading it) The Dark Tree, a history of Horace Tapscott's UGMA/UGMAA. It touches upon the racial politics of post-WWII LA, and how that helped to shape the collective consciousness-raising of the musicians, visual artists, and writers in the Watts and Central Avenue areas. Comes with a free CD as well, though I haven't had a chance to listen to it yet.

mark 0, Saturday, 10 March 2007 12:33 (eighteen years ago)

Thanks for the help, dudes.

xyzzz, I've seen the Carles book and goddamn if it doesn't look like exactly what I'm after. Trouble is, predictably, I don't read French.

That stuff definitely looks helpful Mark, I'll make certain I check out The Dark Tree and read up on some Kofsky. As for the Baraka books, you're right that they may be a little overboard for the sake of a quick paper, but they look like good reads nonetheless (I'm into the topic as a matter of course anyway).

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 10 March 2007 14:59 (eighteen years ago)

Re: Stellar Regions, to my knowledge the Impulse catalog has only really been reissued once on CD, in 1995, and I've liked all I've heard. Haven't heard this particular disc but I'm sure there's no cause for concern.

Re: improving sound from a laptop, the first step would be to bypass the laptop's audio hardware with a USB sound card, such as this one on the low end. You could then run a cable straight from the output jack on the card to the inputs of your stereo, putting you at the mercy of the analog section of the sound card which is probably much better than your laptop's but still not that good.

Or better yet, if you got a card that's equipped with a digital output (like the one I linked), you could connect the sound card to an outboard DAC via an optical cable and let the dedicated box handle all the conversion from bits to sound. [link This]http://www.amazon.com/Monster-Cable-Cruncher-Digital-Converter/dp/B00004Y3TH] is a popular DAC among budget audiophiles because of its routine $50-60 price on eBay.

Of course, the next step is to upgrade the stereo itself. Another subject altogether.

factor, Saturday, 10 March 2007 18:14 (eighteen years ago)

By the way, fuck this forum and its 1994 Usenet feature set. Can't edit my syntax mistake? What the fuck is up with that?

http://www.amazon.com/Monster-Cable-Cruncher-Digital-Converter/dp/B00004Y3TH

Copy and paste.

factor, Saturday, 10 March 2007 18:18 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.