Defend the Indefensable: Threads called Defend the Indefensable

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

Is it Rockist and if so can we eat it?

― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Wednesday, 9 July 2003 13:27 (twenty-two years ago)

we'll eat it with noodles. yum yum.

― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 9 July 2003 13:30 (twenty-two years ago)

IndefensIble, by the way.

― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 9 July 2003 13:33 (twenty-two years ago)

I think that's why they're indefensible: No excuse for bad spelliinj.

― dave225 (Dave225), Wednesday, 9 July 2003 13:37 (twenty-two years ago)

bad spelliinj

Sounds like the name of a Punjabi Heavy Metal band.

― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 9 July 2003 13:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Cut and Pasted I admit.

― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Wednesday, 9 July 2003 13:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Maybe it would be more a challenge to "Attack the Well Defended"

― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Wednesday, 9 July 2003 14:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Cut and Pasted I admit.

That's not an admittance - it's a defenca!

― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 9 July 2003 14:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Defenca is a good name for a band.

― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Wednesday, 9 July 2003 14:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Or a bodily function

― dave225 (Dave225), Wednesday, 9 July 2003 14:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Okay. Okay. Enough mocking of others typographical errors.
Who do you think is so "well defended" that attacking them would be challenging for a muso critic

― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Wednesday, 9 July 2003 14:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Tanya Headon to Thread.

― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Wednesday, 9 July 2003 14:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Im not up for attacking anything to tell you the truth.

― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Wednesday, 9 July 2003 14:56 (twenty-two years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.