Baxendale: C or D?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Following a gig at the Spitz last night.

For my money, they were a perfectly fine popular beat combo.

He's Not Here, Thursday, 2 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think Baxendale are roughly terrible. I am tiring slightly of retro- readings, though y'know, all the great japanese lot till shine. But Baxendale, while admirable anti-macho, try to ape the pop they love, but fail. Pop is aspirational and meritocratic - Baxendale are without ambitions and defeatist cf. Music for Girls, indirectly and somewhat acidentally buying into Girl Weak Boy Strong things. And as for meritocracy, pop is about pushing the extremity of talents, and Baxendale frankly have none, and are approaching music from the punk philosophy of message over form. And Tim's weedy girlish voice irritates the hell out of me.

jamesmichaelward's gonna kill me!

matthew james, Thursday, 2 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

they seem to have a special sort of venom reserved for them by most here but i love them, they're fun.

keith, Thursday, 2 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yes, indeed I am Mr James. You better watch your back in future.

Seeing as half their songs about Tim plotting his revenge against the world, I'm not sure you could call them defeatist. Top Deck seems a pretty damn ambitious song ("And that suffering for your art? Well I'll see you on the Pepsi Chart"). They're pretty anti-retro too (The Nineteen Sixties rages against 60s retroism, The First Robot rages against vocoder-obsessed 80s revivalism whilst acknowledging that they've been guilty of that in the past - but only because they liked that Cher song so much...) And I'd say the influence of current pop/r&b is way stronger than the 80s influence

I don't get the Girl Weak Boy Strong allegation either. "Boy" is often used as shorthand for "boring", "girl" means cool. Strength/weakness doesn't really come into it. And in most of the songs, Senay kicks Tim's ass anyway.

A few of the new songs seem to feature Tim doing his aggressive rapping bit now, so maybe they got fed up with people moaning about the vocals so his voice certainly isn't girly or weedy any more. I was in a club and they were playing Electric Trains and I realised how deep his voice was, but it might have been the club or something.

Any band which can sing moving ballads about All Saints splitting up or rap about the tragedy of being born with the indie gene will automatically get a special place in my heart.

And even if you don't like them, you can hardly say they've got no talent - Tim's lyrics, Senay's voice, Alex's theremin skills...

Yes, they try to ape the pop they love (and they really do love it) and maybe they don't get it quite right but it's the way in which they don't quite get it right that makes them special.

Any way, Stevie and Suicide Ally made a lovely couple...

jamesmichaelward, Thursday, 2 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Seeing as half their songs about Tim plotting his revenge against the world, I'm not sure you could call them defeatist. Top Deck seems a pretty damn ambitious song ("And that suffering for your art? Well I'll see you on the Pepsi Chart").
They sing that, but I don't think they seriously expect to be on the pepsi chart. ANd plotting your revenge against the world is exactly what they mean! As if they've been beaten by it already and are trying to find refuge buy buying into the popular music of a people they're claiming revenge on.. and all this rage about what other people are doing! I hate that. If yuo don't like it don't do it and get on with forging ground of your own.

I don't get the Girl Weak Boy Strong allegation either. "Boy" is often used as shorthand for "boring", "girl" means cool. Strength/weakness doesn't really come into it. And in most of the songs, Senay kicks Tim's ass anyway. I mean buying into it accidentally. By seeking to rage against if they're reinforcing it by buying into this idea of femininity. Plus, a lot of boy stuff that's boring... i really like electronics, stereo systems, the iontricacies of computers and discussing equipment.

And even if you don't like them, you can hardly say they've got no talent - Tim's lyrics, Senay's voice, Alex's theremin skills...
well my point was i find all those aspects of them pretty weak. songs packed with ideas, maybe, but i don't like the words tim picks for them. i can't remember senay's voice either. but really, my problem with them is that they're too focused on other people's music to work out a way to best employ the... esoteric talents they have.

matthew james, Thursday, 2 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm too pissed to muster a coherent argument as to exactly why Baxendale are quite so awful right now, but I must take issue with this comment:

And I'd say the influence of current pop/r&b is way stronger than the 80s influence

Could you justify this with some examples, because I'm really struggling to see how Baxendale are influenced by modern pop at all? To me their cheap tinny sound is a million miles away from the shininess of current R&B/pop.

Richard Tunnicliffe, Thursday, 2 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Matthew: No, I'm sure Baxendale don't expect to be on the Pepsi Chart (well, not for a while yet) though I'd imagine this is more modesty than anything. But I do think they're going to rise above the Water Rats/Spitz/Bull & Gate circuit pretty soon, maybe not to Earl's Court Arena, but maybe the Garage or something.

I don't quite follow your logic that plotting revenge=accepting defeat. Splitting the band (and burying their heads in the sand and going to plant cabbages somewhere in Ireland etc) would be defeat. The Bax ethos seems to be "Ha, you think you got us beat...just you wait" Their revenge is against everyone who's held them down/written them off without giving them a chance/everyone who sneers "Synths=80s"

The thing about Girl Weak Boy Strong I don't get either. There's a difference between buying into something and acknowledging something exists. Is Madonna buying into that idea in What It Feels Like For A Girl? And electronics stuff is Bax-approved boys stuff anyway (see Neato)

I think Tim's lyrics are often spot-on "Does anyone really want a new Pet Shop Boys? I certainly wouldn't given the choice/Don't want to kick Senay out and tour the world/Singing 'This is music for West End Girls'"

But I've always had a soft spot for music about music and songs about songs so maybe none of what bothers you about them is an issue for me.

Richard: Both versions of Electric Trains, Ghetto Fabulous, Walk Like Baxendale, a couple other new tracks that I don't know the names of, Tina Dreams, Solo Records, I Love The Sound Of Dance Music, the intro to the album version of Battery Acid all show the influence of modern pop/r&b/UK Garage. There's probably other, better examples but I'm tired

Oh, and their versions of Say My Name and Mi Chica Latina are slightly influenced by modern pop...

Any way, you can all say what you like about them. Lalala I can't hear you.

jamesmichaelward, Thursday, 2 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I don't quite follow your logic that plotting revenge=accepting defeat.
I mean that their overwhelming preoccupation with the failures of other people's creativity and listening habits, i find it a bit pathetic. Who needs revenge? They have their own quite enthused fanbase.. it's a bit of pointless arrogance to aim beyond that assumine your own music's of more critical worth than whatever crap everyone else has in their ears.

I think Tim's lyrics are often spot-on "Does anyone really want a new Pet Shop Boys? I certainly wouldn't given the choice/Don't want to kick Senay out and tour the world/Singing 'This is music for West End Girls'"
I'm thinking more of shape and sound and rhythm of words. and you know, that's just AABB rhyming, it's not so interetsing. Quite tight, but a load of extraneous words. I like people who play with rhythm and space of words.

I think Daft Punk take a much more interesting approach to tributes to the music they love.taking old methods of production and filtering them through new technology where the Bax just kind of replicate the structure of a bunch of pop records. Though I think where we entrench in details your bound to trump me as you care enough to know the details i don't have any particular interest in.

matthew james, Thursday, 2 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

They have their own quite enthused fanbase.. it's a bit of pointless arrogance to aim beyond that assumine your own music's of more critical worth than whatever crap everyone else has in their ears.

No. Wait. This makes no sense. Weren't you just saying that you didn't like Baxendale because they have no ambition? Now your saying they should be happy with their own "quite enthused" fanbase. You're confusing me.

I think Daft Punk take a much more interesting approach to tributes to the music they love.taking old methods of production and filtering them through new technology where the Bax just kind of replicate the structure of a bunch of pop records

You're doing it again. I thought you were tiring with retro-readings. But now your praising Buggles 2001. I can't keep up.

jamesmichaelward, Thursday, 2 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The problem w/ the Baxendale I've heard is that they never get much beyond "we love pop". OK, that's great, I love pop too - so what? The boy/girl thing is a kind of example of how this goes wrong - boy = boring, girl = cool is dogmatic in a way that pop just isn't, for me. (Not to mention it smacks of desperate lads trying to pull via sensitivity).

The wider issue raised by Baxendale, though, is what do you do if you want to emulate some of the sounds and ideas of modern pop but you don't have a big budget? Richard says B'dale are 'tinny' but do they have any choice??

Daft Punk feel utterly 2001 to me, whereas Baxendale...Baxendale feel like a working through of some Pop Theory for Beginners Textbook. I'm probably too harsh on them and I've heard very little of them but the idea of them doesn't appeal.

Tom, Friday, 3 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

No. Wait. This makes no sense. Weren't you just saying that you didn't like Baxendale because they have no ambition? Now your saying they should be happy with their own "quite enthused" fanbase. You're confusing me.
i don't think the two statement are necassarily contradictory. any it wasn't that i didn't like them for their ambition - i was saying that they're are trying to be pop, for which the main creative force is ambition. i was also saying they're a minority interest indie group, whatever forms they're aping, they're from an indie world for indie kids unshamed of their love of mainstream pop.

You're doing it again. I thought you were tiring with retro- readings. But now your praising Buggles 2001. I can't keep up.
just meant for a while it's all i listened to. that wasn't a critical statement, just my current listenign habits. and i like buggles, what i was suggesting was that daft punk take a more interesting approach re. the minute detail, the way they wring quite genuine emotion from desperately hackneyed cliches lyrically.

matthew james, Friday, 3 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The wider issue raised by Baxendale, though, is what do you do if you want to emulate some of the sounds and ideas of modern pop but you don't have a big budget? Richard says B'dale are 'tinny' but do they have any choice??

I think that they do. Making music electronically is relatively cheap. Just think of all the hardcore stuff done on bedroom level tech during the early nineties and all the powerbook folks operating today. And Aphex's super shiny Polygon Window stuff was done at home on a low budget as well. Admittedly, these aren't the poppiest of genres, but in terms of technical complexity and level of polish Cex manages to get a lot closer to Timbaland and co than Baxendale do. Even my flatmate manages to make stuff that sounds less tinny than Baxendale using a four track, a PC and a few secondhand cheap casio keyboards.

Richard Tunnicliffe, Friday, 3 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

To chip in with a non-analyical viewpoint, I don't much care about their records, but they are excellent, truly exhilarating live.

Nick, Friday, 3 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i have never heard Baxendale. do they sound like a cross between Helen Love and John Sims (the band not the actor)?

gareth, Friday, 3 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Nick- damn, you took my answer.

Their records do sound wimpy, annoying and tinny, yeah. But live they just exude (Hi)energy, and I find it impossible to not find them a little charming.

But to compare them to the late John Sims is just pap. They're nowhere near as good and nor do they sound anything like them. The Helen Love thing's about right, though.

emil.y, Friday, 3 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The wider issue raised by Baxendale, though, is what do you do if you want to emulate some of the sounds and ideas of modern pop but you don't have a big budget? Richard says B'dale are 'tinny' but do they have any choice??

This is a good point, I don't think the tinnyness is really deliberate. If it was, why do they keep reworking all their songs all the time? Each time, the songs get fuller and smoother

Baxendale feel like a working through of some Pop Theory for Beginners Textbook

Don't say that, they'll use it as part of their slideshows...

jamesmichaelward, Friday, 3 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

All I can say is this.

What the world needs now, is boy cheerleaders, sweet boy cheerleaders.

That's the only thing that there's just too little of.

Dickon Edwards, Saturday, 4 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i have their records and do not find they sound overly tinny, but then concerns for production have never had any real place in my life. i find that the words are probably the central focus, tim gets a bit wordy and quite enthusiastically so, liner notes go on for ages, but that is their connection to their audience i believe, the music is the accompaniment(as it should be). daft punk on the other hand are more general practitioners, less keyed in to any specific mindset and i find them tiring after a few listens. ghetto fabulous is great entertainment.

keith, Saturday, 4 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

dickon! another celebrity lurker outed!

matthew james, Saturday, 4 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

three weeks pass...
I can see most people's point on this page but I think that most of you are searching too deep. Considering that Tim produces (and sometimes engineers) most of the recordings himself on equipment that I, as a professional sound engineer, would find difficult to work with I think they've done pretty well. They have built up a considerable fanbase by themselves with little 'industry' help through hard work and talent. Unlike the Pet Shop Boys who they are so often compared to, Tim actually makes all their backing tracks personally rather than paying programmers to do it for him. I think that people who say they are too retro are missing the point; Baxendale is not just a hyped rehash of the recent past(think Travis, Stereophonics, Muse, Starsailor...)the music has a distinct individuality that is conspicuously absent today (and they don't buy their own records to get them in the charts). Don't miss the point people! Anyone who can write/perform/produce/engineer/mix their own songs at the moment is worth a listen. And if they can fill up a gig that's even better. I don't think that music can progress in an era where bands buy fans.

Sorry for the rant, hope you understand my opinion.

Dan, Saturday, 25 August 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

three years pass...
Massive Michael Mayer remix ahead! Would I be correct in assuming that Baxendale is an underachieving Britsh indie pop band? I had never head of them before. What is the background for "I Built This City and its Kompakt connection?

JoB (JoB), Saturday, 23 July 2005 12:27 (twenty years ago)

If you scroll midway down this self-pitying screed, you can find some background on the group and this song.

http://www.freakytrigger.co.uk/passing.html

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Saturday, 23 July 2005 13:05 (twenty years ago)

I always loved that article Jerry although i've never heard a note of Baxendale in my life.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Saturday, 23 July 2005 13:18 (twenty years ago)

"I Built This City" is tremendous, Tim! You'd love it. Very Human League with "Left To My Own Devices"-esque talkie bit.

The song has been around for a while, but the single's coming out soon. The version you're most likely to come across is the Kashpoint Radio Edit, but there's a 12" mix that goes for 5:20, and "a mildly hilarious booty-esque mix by a white r'n'b PSB fan from Hamburg" that I think I have in my gmail somewhere.

edward o (edwardo), Saturday, 23 July 2005 13:34 (twenty years ago)

ooooo, could you possibly YSI both those mixes?

william, it was really nothing (superpopelectro), Saturday, 23 July 2005 16:44 (twenty years ago)

i saw them live once, and i think i gave (or sold?) nabisco my baxendale cd. i think they are boring. the girl is cute of course.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Saturday, 23 July 2005 17:24 (twenty years ago)

The Kashpoint mix of "I Built This City" is amazing. Somehow the Mayer mix manages to screw it up and it sounds kind of dorky, almost.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Saturday, 23 July 2005 19:21 (twenty years ago)

Yeah was about to ask for a link to Jerry's old article, I really liked that one too, remembered it after hearing Baxendale properly recently.

Ronan (Ronan), Saturday, 23 July 2005 21:31 (twenty years ago)

Appears the handy HTML version of this has lapsed. I had it local, don't know how dated the version is.

http://www.perfectsoundforever.com/ilmrg.html

I may go through and update this later today, unless it's just somewhere else now. In which case, please direct me.

Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Sunday, 24 July 2005 13:19 (twenty years ago)

The curious thing is that quite apart from the curious rehabilitation of Baxendale via M.Mayer, their sort of revivalist 80s indie electropop seems to receiving a more widespread... revival, if the interest in the Flying Matchstick Men is anything to go by.

Alba (Alba), Sunday, 24 July 2005 13:24 (twenty years ago)

If anyone is interested, older Baxendale songs to look out for include:

*'Music for girls' (early defining anthem, shonky bedroom disco, defining popism in opposition to Britpop beerboys)

* 'Top Deck' ("do you prefer to sit on the top deck or the bottom deck? Baxendale think they have their priorities pretty straight on this one" says the soppy robot, while the band make the doomed proclamation "we'll see you in the Pepsi charts!")

* 'The 1960s' (very funny bitter song about the girl you fancy going out with a Creation records bore: "He's taking you back to the nineteen sixties / Back to his flat at the end of my street / A million miles away from the modern world today / He'll play you records that were made before you were born / He'll say that all of these new kids have got it wrong / He'll take you out all day
Wandering round the antique shops / The smell of mothballs and crackling records is all he's got")

* 'I love the sound of dance music (parts I and II)' (epic late nite post-club car ride: Jonathan Richman meets the PSBs)

* 'Hanging out with her' (the best here-comes-the-summer song of the 1990s - key line: "we could break into our old school and lie on the tennis courts, listening to the Boards of Canada")

* 'Me and my piano' (Belle and Sebastian meet DC Thompson comics, features a synthesiser constructed from "some broken toasters and a really long extension lead")

* 'Tina dreams' (funny throwaway single about fancying members of S-Club 7)

* 'Ghetto Fabulous' (great defiant diatribe, sampling 'Dog on Wheels' and bemoaning the fact that Tim isn't going out with one of TLC)

* 'Your body needs my sugar' (the first Bax-single to sound properly pop - Rachel Stevens should cover it now)

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Sunday, 24 July 2005 15:45 (twenty years ago)

*'Music for girls' (early defining anthem, shonky bedroom disco, defining popism in opposition to Britpop beerboys)

i once thought this was clever, now it seems a bit 'protest too much'...

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Sunday, 24 July 2005 19:51 (twenty years ago)

I haven't listened to them for yonks and yonks but I want to and that they're still going and maybe even kinda making half making it means loads and loads to me, loads.

They should release Heat Activated at some point.

Gravel Puzzleworth (Gregory Henry), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 05:10 (twenty years ago)

I realised last night (when digging through boxes of MDs with which to amuse my houseguests) that I have a five- or six-year-old live recording of Baxendale at the Betsey Trotwood. I didn't play it cos I prefer to think of them in the abstract - a product of JtN's imagination.

Alexander's Festival Hall though = actually brilliant, I think. (I should make the effort and see him/them sometime).

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 08:08 (twenty years ago)

Mike, I believe I have an autographed copy of Hanging Out With Her from that very night!

Mädchen (Madchen), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 08:57 (twenty years ago)

I was there!

(and have a copy of that MD as a souvenir. Wasn't it a Baxendale/Clientele/Pinefox triple header?)

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 09:09 (twenty years ago)

Cor, heady days. Alba: it may have been, the 'tele and the 'fox are probably on another disc. (As part of the general nostalgiafest, I also unearthed a terrific photo of you, Madchen, from a May 2000 picnic; I shall scan and email...)

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 09:11 (twenty years ago)

I thought I had never heard any Baxendale before the MMayer remix of 'we built this city' (which I recognised because I remembered the lyrics from JtN's article!), but the more I read this thread the more I'm convinced I must have heard 'em. 'Music for girls' at the very least.

spontine (cis), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 09:27 (twenty years ago)

Ooh, is that the one where I'm wearing a white polo neck with red trim? Please send it to namesurname@gmail.com (that's my name and surname, not just namesurname). Thanks!

Mädchen (Madchen), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 11:11 (twenty years ago)

Yes, it is! Actually, there are two - one which suggests the photographer is a dirty old man, and one which doesn't.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 11:23 (twenty years ago)

You're not that old.

Mädchen (Madchen), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 11:38 (twenty years ago)

(I have never forgotten that picture because it truly is the best one of me ever taken, ever)

Mädchen (Madchen), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 11:39 (twenty years ago)

You're not that old.

Bless you. Me and the "bloody peasant" in Monty Python and the Holy Grail...

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 13:57 (twenty years ago)

Was Mädchen implying that you were that dirty, I wonder?

Alba (Alba), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 19:10 (twenty years ago)

Thanks Mike! I can't work out which one is the dirty one. Gosh I look different.

Mädchen (Madchen), Thursday, 28 July 2005 07:09 (twenty years ago)

You're quite right - nothing dirty at all. It's just that one is a little...frontal. One or two people have had a Sid James reaction to this picture, implying some salacious camerawork on my part. Which is an Outrageous Slur.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Thursday, 28 July 2005 08:32 (twenty years ago)

I think it's just that I have a front. That's nobody's fault except God's.

Mädchen (Madchen), Thursday, 28 July 2005 08:38 (twenty years ago)

Praise Him!

And....back to Baxendale!

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Thursday, 28 July 2005 08:46 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.