― Karin Azeergah, Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil, Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― chicken tonight (chicken tonight), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:25 (twenty-one years ago)
At least, Emma sometimes gets me to pretend I am...
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Bob Shaw (Bob Shaw), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sonny A. (Keiko), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― gaz (gaz), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Karin Azeergah, Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:35 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― gabbo giftington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― Lemmy (Ned), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:38 (twenty-one years ago)
xpost: Ronan I kiss you.
― M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― gabbo giftington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― gaz (gaz), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:44 (twenty-one years ago)
there ya go - ILMer in chart hit shocker!
actually, as there were another 9999 people also doing 'backing vocals', chances are there is another ILMer who appeared on the same record.
― stirmonster, Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― gabbo giftington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark p (Mark P), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― gaz (gaz), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 21:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 22:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― gabbo giftington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 22:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 22:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 22:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 22:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― fact checking cuz, Tuesday, 2 September 2003 22:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 22:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― gabbo giftington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 22:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 22:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 22:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 22:41 (twenty-one years ago)
i don't want a review to be coldly objective in the "paper of record" sense. i expect it to reflect the critic's personal opinion/reaction/etc. but i do expect it to last.
the reviews/critiques i can't stand are the ones that seem tossed off in a matter of minutes after listening to the album once or twice and not really thinking about it and not really worrying about whether you, the writer, will still believe what you wrote six months from now. i want the reviews i read to be definitive for the critic who's writing them, and i think the great ones are.
― fact checking cuz, Tuesday, 2 September 2003 22:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― gabbo giftington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 22:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 22:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― gabbo giftington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 22:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Momus (Momus), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 22:47 (twenty-one years ago)
(Rim shot, please ...)
― Chris O'Connor (Chris O'Connor), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 22:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chris O'Connor (Chris O'Connor), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 22:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Tuesday, 2 September 2003 23:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 4 September 2003 22:34 (twenty-one years ago)
Also, so many bad reviews read like pre-fab constructs that were waiting for an album to come along so the reviewer could show off how many ways they'd dreamt up to say "this sucks."
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Thursday, 4 September 2003 23:08 (twenty-one years ago)
...Such a good point I can't possibly augment it with anything of use.
I've made records. Thay were ok at the time. Now they're terrible, after a fashion. "Fashion" is the key to all of this - all reviews should be taken with the requisite pinch of salt, cf when/where/what else was going on musically at that time/who was the writer obsessed with at that point...ie. CONTEXT IS ALL.
― CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Thursday, 4 September 2003 23:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― flower child, Thursday, 4 September 2003 23:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Colin Meeder (Mert), Friday, 5 September 2003 06:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark e (mark e), Friday, 5 September 2003 06:26 (twenty-one years ago)
What if one is (or has been) the musical equivalent of one of those guys who stands outside tube stations with a little trolley trying to sell luke-warm tubes of under-cooked, past-it's-sell-by-date, rancid offal and gristle in buns* to passers by?
* or to put it another way: Live In A Dream / Chaos In USSR by Sub-@ctive (Flexi Disc given away free with Issue 12 of Grinding Halt fanzine, Grinding Halt Records , Cat.: GH001, 1981)
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Friday, 5 September 2003 07:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― cis (cis), Friday, 5 September 2003 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― dave225 (Dave225), Friday, 5 September 2003 15:58 (twenty-one years ago)
Choral singing: the easy way to build a recording resume.
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 5 September 2003 16:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 5 September 2003 16:24 (twenty-one years ago)
However, as my work is neither published nor dictated onto paper/the screen whatsoever, my entire audience consists of the bored fuckers milking their beers waiting for me to shut my bonghole about how much better the new Andrew WK record could've been so they can get back to talking about the upcoming UK basketball season.
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 5 September 2003 19:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 5 September 2003 19:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― hstencil, Friday, 5 September 2003 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Friday, 5 September 2003 20:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 5 September 2003 21:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 5 September 2003 21:08 (twenty-one years ago)
and stir - surely not rush ?tut tut.
― frenchbloke (frenchbloke), Friday, 5 September 2003 21:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― jl (Jon L), Friday, 5 September 2003 21:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 5 September 2003 21:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― gabbo giftington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 5 September 2003 21:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― J (Jay), Friday, 5 September 2003 21:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― gabbo giftington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 5 September 2003 21:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― J (Jay), Friday, 5 September 2003 22:02 (twenty-one years ago)
it's tacky but pitchfork's leading the way, they seem to produce a third of their copy this way...
>They are spreading LIES, so you must correct them!
all I'm saying is, it's often the case that musicians rarely have anything to do with the final shape of their press releases, which are vile by definition. not to say they shouldn't be held accountable for the people they've chosen to represent them. but some (young) critics seem to read the press release as a transparent extension of artistic intent, it's just a mistake.
I'm just reacting to a bad review that pretty much read (and quoted from) a ludicrous, hyperbolic press release as if it were something I'd written, or even approved. So pay my thin-skinned self no mind.
― jl (Jon L), Friday, 5 September 2003 22:03 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.er3.com/73dart/73.dart.jpg
man, I miss that car..
― Mr. Diamond (diamond), Friday, 5 September 2003 22:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― gabbo giftington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 5 September 2003 22:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― gabbo giftington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 5 September 2003 22:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 5 September 2003 22:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Friday, 5 September 2003 22:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 5 September 2003 22:23 (twenty-one years ago)
but i have no compunction going out of my way to attempt to deflate show-biz here or anywhere else, as i see whole industries mounted on dross within the music biz -- the artistic freedoms that were flowing between artist and mass consumer from the mid '60s on seem to me to have been deliberately squashed by the industry ever since -- so i feel there's much less honest art going across commercial music stations these days for instance
"things ain't what they used to be" for me i suppose -- the entertainment industry has ruined what i felt was integrity in popular music -- yeah, i couldn't be a critic, i'd be too harsh, and perusing most music would be like a day job to me
(i have not been recorded, but that's due to practical concerns, in that i'm semi-proficient enough musically to hear the sameness and get bored but not up to scratch enough to assemble and record music i think would not be -- music listening has soured my interest in music making itself is my ostentatious excuse)
(and there are plenty of exceptions to my dislike for music of course, but that sort of music is the exception, of course)
― george gosset (gegoss), Saturday, 6 September 2003 04:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Saturday, 6 September 2003 07:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― trife (simon_tr), Saturday, 6 September 2003 07:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― gabbo giftington (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 6 September 2003 07:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tom (Groke), Saturday, 6 September 2003 07:35 (twenty-one years ago)
Of course, in the New World Order I neither buy records nor sample any more. I 'think music' and the likeminded 'hear my thougts' thanks to the Sliverspin Harmony Nexus.
― Momus (Momus), Saturday, 6 September 2003 08:44 (twenty-one years ago)
win-win!!
― mark s (mark s), Saturday, 6 September 2003 09:31 (twenty-one years ago)
I would dig up my old "How do you handle bad criticism" thread if I could find it.
I've just made another record. I will preserve myself from ever having to read another bad review of it by never ever letting any more members of the press have a copy of this one. That's my plan and I'm sticking to it.
― kate (kate), Saturday, 6 September 2003 15:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Monday, 8 September 2003 14:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 8 September 2003 14:59 (twenty-one years ago)
were they reviewed in the wire keith? ;)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 8 September 2003 15:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Monday, 8 September 2003 15:09 (twenty-one years ago)
You are leaving out the local metal fans that just want to find new some method of making crank in their kitchen sink and hate anything that doesn't sound like hate.
― earlnash, Monday, 8 September 2003 15:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― dave q, Monday, 8 September 2003 15:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Monday, 8 September 2003 22:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― kate (kate), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 20:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 20:31 (twenty-one years ago)