I make CDRs for people. I assumed they'd last as long as a cassette at least. In fact to be honest, I kind of assumed they'd last forever.
― N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 7 September 2003 09:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Sunday, 7 September 2003 09:54 (twenty-one years ago)
Oh well, I have CDRs that I burnt two months ago that don't work, but I suppose brands matter, and obviously how you store them; since CDRs don't have the protective coating of normal CDs, they obviously stand higher risk of being destroyed.
It'd be awful if the general average was 2 years though, would result in backups upon backups of harddrives.
― Øystein Holm-Olsen (Øystein H-O), Sunday, 7 September 2003 10:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 7 September 2003 11:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― calstars (calstars), Sunday, 7 September 2003 12:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 7 September 2003 12:44 (twenty-one years ago)
My printing of the Beatles' Revolver from '86 looks completely fine. The ink hasn't corroded it, the plastic hasn't melted.
On the other hand, I have some CD-Rs from favorite local artists that are really fragile - I just barely bumped one on the case taking it out and scratched the thin foil that holds all the data ... gah.
I think the answer, heh heh, is to get a DVD-R drive and burn everything to that. You can fit at least ten full CDs on there, I think.
― Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Sunday, 7 September 2003 13:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Sunday, 7 September 2003 14:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― suckah, Sunday, 7 September 2003 14:29 (twenty-one years ago)
I can't stand to lose anything. Now that I think about it, I still have all of the Tom Baker Dr. Who tapes somewhere at my mom's place. Maybe someday I'll want to watch them!
― Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Sunday, 7 September 2003 15:30 (twenty-one years ago)
I think one advantage is that tapes degrade in sound quality, while CDs always sound good - they just start skipping and failing. Also, they're more of a pain in the ass to copy to my computer (and then onto DVD-R, and then Martian holographic memory cube, and then whatever).
― Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Sunday, 7 September 2003 15:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Sunday, 7 September 2003 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Sunday, 7 September 2003 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Sunday, 7 September 2003 15:39 (twenty-one years ago)
I can't decide if it would be more or less poignant if it had been the Eagles' Greatest Hits.
― N. (nickdastoor), Sunday, 7 September 2003 15:42 (twenty-one years ago)
― t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Sunday, 7 September 2003 15:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Sunday, 7 September 2003 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Sunday, 7 September 2003 16:22 (twenty-one years ago)
Just checked the oldest CD-R I have - a Maxell from the summer of '97. Covered in fingerprints and minor scratches, it plays fine.
I don't think I've ever had a CD-R or CD-RW that actually 'went' on me, though I've had CD-RWs written in fixed-packet mode go unreadable, but that's a separate issue (in fact, I've given up on DirectCD, InCD and that lot).
I have one (pressed) CD which is dodgy - the 1990 issue of Pink Moon - which has suffered a bronzing effect associated with poor manufacturing QC by MPO around that time (they used to replace them free if you wrote them a nice letter). Pink Moon still plays perfectly on everything except my old portable.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Sunday, 7 September 2003 21:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Monday, 8 September 2003 00:07 (twenty-one years ago)
None of this is a guarantee of longevity, of course. CD-R (and DVD-R) is a very fragile medium - just take a close look at one, especially if you have one in which the microscopically thin foil/dye layer is peeling off. That's when you realize how unbelievably cheap and shoddy this medium truly is!
For what it's worth, I stick exclusively with the following brands: TDK, Fuji, Philips and Sony (depending on which one I find on sale). These have seldom let me down. (Kodak made very tough and physically superior CD-Rs, but, alas, they got out of the CD-R biz a couple years ago.)
And since I already plugged this on the "computer" thread, I'll repeat. I think MiniDisc is more rugged than CD-R. I have MDs that are 9 years old and none has failed yet. Perhaps Magneto-Optical media are superior to unstable dye-based discs.
― Ian t., Monday, 8 September 2003 02:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 8 September 2003 23:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dock Miles (Dock Miles), Monday, 8 September 2003 23:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Sam J. (samjeff), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 21:41 (twenty-one years ago)
Removing it from jewel case by nearly bending it in half, getting grubby fingerprints on it, jamming it in the CD drawer, dropping it in the cat litter, leaving it out on a window sill in the later afternoon sun = probably accelerating its decline.
Doing the former while avoiding the latter = urgent and key.
There is some suggestion that CD-R's dye layers only have a shelf life of 5-10 years *if unused*.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Thursday, 11 September 2003 06:11 (twenty-one years ago)
- Unused = unplayed or unburned?- Not using -> longer or shorter life?
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 11 September 2003 07:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Thursday, 11 September 2003 07:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 11 September 2003 07:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― mentalist (mentalist), Thursday, 11 September 2003 07:24 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 11 September 2003 07:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― mentalist (mentalist), Thursday, 11 September 2003 07:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 11 September 2003 07:38 (twenty-one years ago)
I guess this means the dye layer is somehow more stable when you've written to it and changed its phase-state. Dunno what this means for the alloy layer in CD-RWs.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Thursday, 11 September 2003 08:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 11 September 2003 08:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― A Nairn (moretap), Thursday, 11 September 2003 18:04 (twenty-one years ago)
How new's yr Discman? My portable CD player (1993 vintage) doesn't play CD-Rs at all. Low reflectivity of CD-R/low laser power of battery-operated device = whirr-whirr-cckk-shhkk-whirr. Newer Discmen are smarter than that now of course.
Actually, my CD portable doesn't play anything since I can't find the AC adaptor. Do anyone know where it might be? I may start a thread.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Thursday, 11 September 2003 21:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― hobo, Wednesday, 3 March 2004 15:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― hmmm, Wednesday, 3 March 2004 16:08 (twenty-one years ago)
FWIW, last week I went through a lot of my CDRs and the oldest, at three years, still read and played fine.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 16:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― (Jon L), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 18:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 18:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 18:54 (twenty-one years ago)
Ned, please record my Mashed Potatoes set at 2x speed... :)
― JP Almeida (JP Almeida), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 19:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 19:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― JP Almeida (JP Almeida), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 19:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 21:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 22:50 (twenty-one years ago)