Should this be the term for the musical equivalent of what "jumping the shark" means for a television show?
thoughts, please....
― Matt Helgeson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 21:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 21:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt Helgeson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 21:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 21:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 01:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 01:40 (twenty-two years ago)
Wow, I forgot how great that album cover is.
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 01:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 01:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 02:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 02:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 02:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 04:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mike Taylor (mjt), Thursday, 11 September 2003 00:01 (twenty-two years ago)
1) "Saving the Gorilla" as impossible Kiekegaardian-absurd chance for redemption from past self-sabotage. The upshot being you can only save the gorilla if you've already jumped the shark. Possible subrequirement: that the shark-jump have occurred in the context of a well-along fade, such that the fact of the shark-jump is cloaked in obscurity. This could make the true gorilla-save still more rarefied--a redemption whose necessity is only generally recognized in the moment of redemption.
2) "Saving the Gorilla" as last-second, God-opens-a-crack-in-reality chance to avoid jumping the shark, manifested in the very moment the jump begins. Though already committed to fatal forward movement, some unknown agency provides a sudden lateral option--the literal to metaphoric vision of a gorilla to save (and thus save onself).
The second theory rests largely on our memory of Happy Days. If we're right--and the actual shark-jump wasn't completed until the second half of the two-part episode--this would mean, had Arthur Winkler been afforded such mercy, part two would've begun, inexplicably, with a relieved Fonz hanging out with a gorilla (and perhaps a similarly relieved Adam Ant), recapping the missing frames a la the finale of the Python "Cycling Tour" episode.
"Well, they'll never believe how we got out of that one!
― brian nemtusak (sanlazaro), Thursday, 11 September 2003 02:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― brian nemtusak (sanlazaro), Thursday, 11 September 2003 02:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 11 September 2003 20:29 (twenty-two years ago)