Do the fun and pop ever actually need to be put back into (pick a genre)?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Due to a random comment supposedly by Tom (was it really by you?) about how the Darkness should have won the Mercury Prize because they put le fun and le pop back into rock, but let's expand the question a bit here. Does it ever actually leave a genre? Does it ever need to be put back in? Does it say more about how we as individual listeners consider our own personal biases about something or is there an actual 'need' being diagnosed? If we already have plenty of examples to rely on from pasts, recent or distant, then what drives a need to have a newer version to be approved of when others apparently aren't valid on that front?

Personally I think it always begs the question to phrase it like that because somebody's always out there likely something quite gleefully -- one of the things that bugged me a couple of years back when the 'Rock is Back!' articles started surfacing in Rolling Stone and the like was how crassly idiotic and obvious it was to say that it had either gone or wasn't making somebody somewhere happy already. And that complaint of mine itself may be obvious and crass, but still.

Then again, perhaps context really is all. I'm trying to imagine someone seriously saying hip-hop would need the fun and pop put back into it, because if someone did, my head would start hurting. Quite a bit.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 01:50 (twenty-two years ago)

is ilm a genre?

trife (simon_tr), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 01:58 (twenty-two years ago)

it's all about context. Rock Is Back! was really saying Rock That We Like Is Back On MTV! I don't think I could ever think a genre was back or leaving, I just think I've Heard More Great Albums In A Genre Than Usual Recently or I've Heard Less.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 02:00 (twenty-two years ago)

would everyone agree that this is true of classical music ?

trife (simon_tr), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 02:01 (twenty-two years ago)

so this year, personally is about I've Heard More Great Albums By Aggressively Fun Bands With Varying Degrees Of Irony Than Usual!

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 02:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Hip-hop DOES need the fun and pop put back into it, although some might disagree with me when I point to Nelly as the root of all blandness. Some genres were never fun in the way I think 'Tom' is suggesting, but others can have the fun bled out and replaced with po-faced seriousness (certain kinds of rock), or worse, have any invention drained out and replaced with dry genre exercises (check the lousy ballads on the Beyonce record). People who claim that a genre is no longer fun are often using bad methodology or exchanging methodology for nostalgia, but I do genuinely believe that some genres can lose their spark.

Dave M. (rotten03), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 02:04 (twenty-two years ago)

dave who would you suggest is more fun and pop than nelly?!?!?!?!

trife (simon_tr), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 02:06 (twenty-two years ago)

really that sentence is baffling!! 'right now hiphop is really lacking is someone whos been shot nine times, especially since 50 cent blew up'

trife (simon_tr), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 02:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Personally I could use a lot more freaky crazy fun in dance music - rejoicing in weird crazy silliness.

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 02:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I can't see it being the real tom ewing that posted on the BBC website. He wouldnt be so formal to call himself 'Thomas' for a start. Plus defending The darkness? Never!
But we all knew that anyway and it is funny.
Ned, I DARE you to post on the BBC website. Go on...

Raymondo, Wednesday, 10 September 2003 02:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Time has put the pop in my joints, but it's no fun.

Dock Miles (Dock Miles), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 03:13 (twenty-two years ago)

nelly's like a fun and pop placebo (not the band), he looks like the real thing but once digested turns out to be utterly useless. there's a difference between real youthful exuberance and calculated posing to hide an abject lack of talent. same as the difference between Airplane and Hot Shots.

Dave M. (rotten03), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 03:21 (twenty-two years ago)

put it another way, fun and vapidity shouldn't be equated - thinking of this Xgau essay in that book 'Microphone Fiends' where he argues that 60s 'rock' bands took all the fun out of 'rock & roll' by making it into a ritual rather than a show (the smashed guitar, worshipping the lead singer, etc). just because Rock was still brainless didn't make it fun in the same way that rock & roll was.

Dave M. (rotten03), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 03:50 (twenty-two years ago)

When people (or Tom) say that "The Darkness have put the fun and pop back into rock music", I read it as meaning "The Darkness have made it okay for us to assess rock in terms of how pop and fun it is, and for those to be positive critical criteria." It is the speaker's own understanding of the genre which is being blessed with the heightened presence of fun and pop rather than rock itself. But of course whether you're a fan or an NME writer the idea that you should clarify this point seems somewhat counter-intuitive to the spirit of rock.

These sort of statements only work when the band/style in question has an impact or potential impact on the way that music is discussed. The success of The Darkness on a critical and commercial level forces the usual critical gatekeepers to search for alternate criteria by which to assess this music, because by all their usual criteria this band should be an abject failure critically *and* commercially. When, say, the NME has used "fun and pop" as positive criteria, it has been in limited and circumscribed ways; at the very least the NME getting behind The Darkness forces a temporary modification and expansion of the different types of "fun and pop" they are prepared to sanction.

For this reason the statement wouldn't work if you were to say "my local live cover band have put the fun/pop back into rock!" because your local live cover band don't have a measurable impact on rock's understanding of itself. Likewise it wouldn't work to say "Chingy has put the fun and pop back into hip hop!" because fun and pop are values which the predominant critical discourse surrounding (non-indie) hip hop is already comfortable with.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 03:56 (twenty-two years ago)

How do the Darkness differ from Avril, Blink 182, The Strokes, Green Day, Sum 41 etc etc etc in that aspect? Surely pop never left rock in the first place? Or, indeed, fun. Miccio is OTM.

Of course, with the exception of the Strokes, the above bands are about as credible as my arse, and there are many MANY snide pops at The Darkness already emerging especially in the NME, pretty much all arising from the poppiness of the music.* Just today the Metro described ver Darkness as a "joke rock band" (although I accept that the falsetto and leotard may play a role in this).

The NME review said something along the lines of "they'll probably be little more than an amusing footnote in musical history", which is fine by me. But rock music isn't SUPPOSED, in rockcrit discourse, to be plastic and disposable in the way that dance or pop or hip-hop are allowed to be, and many critics are uncomfortable when it is.

*Alright there's the fact that Justin won't give em an interview as well.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 08:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Also, I have a problem with this very restrictive use of 'fun' - it implies that the only way something can really be fun is to be big and brightly coloured and wacky and crazy and all that, when of course going to a White Stripes or Radiohead gig is just as much fun as a Darkness gig, albeit in a different way.

Imagine saying 'Fatboy Slim and Bentley Rhythm Ace bought the fun back into dance music and clubbing'... you'd be laughed at. Like going to drum and bass nights is a fucking academic pursuit or something.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 08:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Unlike The Darkness, nobody nominated Avril or Green Day etc for the Mercury Prize. Pop-punk is recognized by very few critics, whereas somebody seems to be taking The Darkness seriously, thus threatening to alter the discourse around their genre to include pop and fun as positive virtues.

Dave M. (rotten03), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 08:40 (twenty-two years ago)

(It was a fake Tom Ewing. I wuv the Darkness though. The fun never left for me so w/o reading the thread I'd say the answer is "no".)

(I like it when good jokes (The Darkness, Dizzee) are beating bad jokes ("Hail To The Thief") or no jokes (Coldplay) in the charts though.)

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 08:40 (twenty-two years ago)

would everyone agree that this is true of classical music ?

When I was in middle school, classical music was something dry and joyless that the school forced on us in the name of culture. I suspect a lot of people still hold a similar attitude. Since then I've been able to find fun in classical music, although the Official Guardians of Culture don't make that easy.

I hate Wynton Marsalis because I believe he is trying to turn traditional jazz into something similarly sterile, canonized, and joyless.

j.lu (j.lu), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 15:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Jazz could use a bit more fun and pop. Maybe.

I was thinking the other day about how the Bad Plus and the Dave Holland Quintet are two of the best jazz groups today, but the Bad Plus is way more accessible to non-jazz heads. The DH5 is great for, you know, musicians interacting at a ridiculously high level and all, but the Bad Plus has a lot more going on in terms of humor, awareness of the cultural landscape and making an effort to interface with people's ideas of what jazz is. It's so easy for jazz musicians to try to include ideas of pop in their music in a pretty trite way (see John Scofield, every jazz musicians 'groove' record, etc.), I wish more would make it interesting.

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 15:53 (twenty-two years ago)

A lot of the death metal I'm listening to now doesn't have that sense of light-hearted whimsy I've come to expect.

Bruce Urquhart (Bruce Urquhart), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 16:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Now that's the kind of death metal spirit I can love in my fellow man!

t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 16:29 (twenty-two years ago)

The fun and pop *definitely* need to be put back into post-rock.

cis (cis), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 17:42 (twenty-two years ago)

The retro thrash movement (Gehennah, Goddess of Desire, etc) of the mid 90s did try to put good oldfashioned fun (drinking beer, puking on the sidewalk, beating up posers, as you do) back into extreme metal.

http://www.gehennah.com/king_of_the_sidewalk_big.jpg

Siegbran (eofor), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 18:37 (twenty-two years ago)

And really, if you don't grin reading the title of Destruction's new album (Metal Discharge), there's something wrong with you. "I'm discharging metal, Doctor; should I be worried?"

Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 19:22 (twenty-two years ago)

"How do the Darkness differ from Avril, Blink 182, The Strokes, Green Day, Sum 41 etc etc etc in that aspect? Surely pop never left rock in the first place? Or, indeed, fun. Miccio is OTM."

They differ from Sum 41 b/c The Darkness's fanbase obliges NME to cover them seriously. They differ from The Strokes because they are sillier than The Strokes. Anytime someone turns up with a (subjectively perceived) higher dose of a certain quality (in this case silliness), critics championing that act pretend that hitherto we'd been suffering from a critical shortage of that quality.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Thursday, 11 September 2003 03:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Destruction is still making records?

sundar subramanian (sundar), Thursday, 11 September 2003 04:03 (twenty-two years ago)

BTW I love Radiohead but "fun" isn't the first word I'd use to describe them.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Thursday, 11 September 2003 04:08 (twenty-two years ago)

what the fuck's the Darkness?

Al (sitcom), Thursday, 11 September 2003 04:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm tempted to make a reference to Ortho Stice, but really, is it a British band or something?

Al (sitcom), Thursday, 11 September 2003 04:10 (twenty-two years ago)

it's what you should light a candle for instead of curse

the surface noise (electricsound), Thursday, 11 September 2003 04:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Me never heard the Darkness either.

Fun humorous GOOD SICK death metal = Pungent Stench "Been caught Buttering". Nobody else ever wrote a song like "Happy Re-Birthday", about carving up your own mom and crawling through the cavity. Then there's "Splatterday Night Fever", "Shrunken and Mummified Bitch", and SICK BIZARRE DEFACED CREATION!

sucka (sucka), Thursday, 11 September 2003 04:19 (twenty-two years ago)

The 'fun'niest thing about the Darkness is their name, because they're the whitest band who ever existed

dave q, Thursday, 11 September 2003 09:52 (twenty-two years ago)

I got a new wallet. It came free in the current issue of Popworld (No. 5). It says "POP" "GARAGE" "HIP HOP" and "R & B" on it. It seems pretty clear that these genres are fun and pop. So maybe the fun and pop need to be put back into all the genres unmentioned by my new wallet. If that's what those genres want; I mean maybe they just want to be left alone. Maybe they need to be allowed to grow mold and spores in their lightless antechambers.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 11 September 2003 10:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh there's a new Popworld? Smart!

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 11 September 2003 10:58 (twenty-two years ago)

It's got an interview with Evanescence where she says she wants to learn how to be a great cook!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 11 September 2003 11:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Evanescensce are not fun.

Actually, there's a point. I want the fun and pop injected back into GOTH. Go for it, goth-popkids!

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 11 September 2003 12:17 (twenty-two years ago)

One of my friends has made that his mission, Matt. Hence,

The Gothsicles

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 11 September 2003 12:46 (twenty-two years ago)

i played a show with the gothsicles once.pretty funny

juiceboxxx (juiceboxxx), Friday, 12 September 2003 03:02 (twenty-two years ago)

I think free jazz has loads of fun and pop, people always involuntarily laugh out loud when I play them certain tracks (or indeed, when I play it in public sometimes). I don't know any other music that actually makes people laugh.

Dave M. (rotten03), Friday, 12 September 2003 03:47 (twenty-two years ago)

What genres should Momus put the pun and fop into?

Tom (Groke), Friday, 12 September 2003 07:11 (twenty-two years ago)

i think he's done more than enough of that already

the surface noise (electricsound), Friday, 12 September 2003 07:13 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.