Funniest Metallica Piece Ever Written

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
by "Colin in San Diego" (whoever that is):

Choir Boy Frustration

So this madness all started with the MTV Icon: Metallica special, which is basically a big jerk off session with numetallers spewing their load over the “influence” of Metallica on their music, and, indeed, ALL LIFE AS WE KNOW IT! Groups like Staind, Korn, etc. all played covers of old Metallica songs, mostly from the fucking “black album” (because only PUSSIES do “s/t” albums!) if that’s any indication as to how fucking CLUELESS the collective jackanapes partaking in this sick circle jerk were. Interjected between these pornographic displays were montages of video footage frankensteined together and narrated VH1 Behind The Music style so as to tell the story of Metallica, told backwards and chronologically. All I managed to see was the “we’ve been working on this new album, St. Anger” part of the Metallica story, as I promptly changed the channel after Avril Lavigne’s performance of “Give Me Feul” (the only reason I was watching to begin with, ‘cause I mean, c’mon, if you’re gonna do a bad Metallica song you might as well go all the way to Reload, and yes I’m talking to you Staind, you “Nothing Else Matters” covering faggots!) which thankfully they scheduled early in the program.
At some point within the day I was, uh, DOING SOME RESEARCH on Allmusic.com, and they had a feature piece on Metallica’s St. Anger, which of course I had to read. There it was; two seeds of hype planted within 24 hours. Now anyone who knows me knows that I’m not only susceptible to hype (how many other GUYS do you know dumb enough to actually OWN a Strokes LP?), but will go as far as to PRAISE hype as being one of the only truly important aspects of the modern pop group. That being said, I should have known right there that I was done for in regards to St. Anger.

Father Perturbation

With St. Anger’s hype machine working overtime inside my brain, I was gratified to say the least when I finally saw the video to the album’s single “St. Anger”.
The video is a fucking GEM, lemme tell ‘ya. Metallica are playing at San Quintin, and in between the band playing the single to a bunch of entertainment staved prisoners (Pick one of two of the following useless parenthetical interjections: a) talk about a CAPTIVE AUDIENCE! Gua-hu-hu OR b) “hmmm, should I get gang raped in woodshop or go and see the filming of the new Metallica video?”) there’re these short skits of minorities committing crimes and going to prison which resemble all those straight-to-video gang themed films that were so popular when Boyz In The Hood first came out.
As if Metallica finally tapping into the oft-neglected “incarcerated gang member” demographic isn’t good enough, the song, St. Anger is one of the biggest pieces of shit you’ll EVER hear on any airwaves. My jaw dropped when I first heard how AWFUL the thing sounded. I mean, I honestly can’t recall the last time I heard a single from a “Major Artist” like Metallica with such shitty production! Even the cable access Christian video shows would blush at the not-even-demo-worthy sound quality. Needless to say, “St. Anger”, and thus St. Anger were now weighing HEAVILY on my mind.

Bishop Anger to Rook Rage

My friend Matt sympathized with my now-obsessive morbid curiosity regarding St. Anger, both the song and the album. I mean, how the fuck did this thing get on the air? How the fuck did they release the album on Elektra? It’s like they put the goddamn thing out, and OOPS, “hey Bob (Rock, the fucking producer of this disasterpiece), uh, you forgot to mix the album!” And as bad as the production is, “St. Anger” is one of the most downright BIZARRE songs, musically, to get airplay since Justin Timberlake’s (or should I say Pharrell Williams and Chad Hugo’s) “Like I Love You”. First of all, even the radio edit is long for contemporary airplay standards, and juxtaposed to the Creed-esque lite-numetal parts are these sorta fast pseudo-blast beat death metal parts. Then during those numetal parts, the new bass player guy Robert Trujillo (we assume; super vague liner notes meant to disguise the fact that Bob Rock played bass and co-wrote the album don’t say who does what specifically on the album) does these guttural Biohazard-esque back up vocals which sound utterly PREPOSTEROUS next to Hetfield’s sung out crooning. Add the constant PLONG PLONG PLONG of the drums that sound like fucking ANVILS, and you’ve got a strange little ditty polluting the cable music video channels during a summer of great songs/videos by Beyonce, AFI, The Ataris, Joe Budden, etc.

Saint Anger: Prologue

After days of watching video channels for long periods at a time WAITING for the “St. Anger” video, which (big surprise) NEVER gets played, I had to admit to myself that I had officially infatuated myself with this song to the point where I would need to procure a copy of my own. I e-mailed a friend of mine, Derek, who works at a record store, and sent me a copy gratis. According to him the CD/DVD set had sat in the used bin at $8.99 for over a month. After the package arrived, the CD just sat idle for few days. I was too intimidated to play it. I mean, I was delving into pretty shady territory even having something like a new Metallica album in my house, let alone my CD player. I mean, what if I listened to this thing long enough and it actually GREW on me? Trust me; it’s happened to worse records before, and what if the album was SO bad that I couldn’t even listen to it? Did I really want to have to admit defeat at the hands of St. Anger? Yet I could never be defeated if I never challenged the album by listening to it. The album was staring me down, and it seemed to me that I had absolutely NOTHING to gain from listening to the thing. But I knew deep down that this unsettling obsession with their god awful single would never truly die unless I took this bull/shit by the horns and *ahem* LISTENED TO THE FUCK OUT OF IT. Little did I suspect the deeper philosophical implications of the endeavor that lied before me…

St. Anger

Normally for an album of this magnitude, I would break the thing down on a track by track analysis, and give a background of the band’s career up until the album in question, but I’ll refrain from doing such in this case for the following reasons, one; NOBODY CARES, two; I certainly don’t care, Three; I honestly don’t enjoy listening to the album enough to do so, and finally; if I were to minutely pick apart all the errors in this album I could fill fucking ENCYCLOPEDEAS.
The production is what’ll really strike the average listener. In an attempt to return to the stripped down and “raw” sound that producer/surrogate bass player/general douche bag Bob Rock ironically enough KILLED on Metallica’s s/t album from ’91, Bob decided it would be best if he just didn’t mix the album and made all the equipment just sound like shit. I mean, if it was in fact Lars’ idea to have the snare sound like a giant cell-phone tower being struck with a hammer two blocks away while the kick in contrast sounds like it’s being played TWO FEET AWAY FROM YOUR EARS, then it was certainly Bob’s duty to put his contender for Douche of The Universe in check. The truly incredible part is that the listener NEVER gets used to the abysmal drum sound, despite its persistent plonging (and you KNOW something’s bad when it invents a new verb!) throughout St. Anger. “Hey, why should I make the drum levels sound different when the parts of the song change? Can’t you see I’m busy committing CAREER FUCKING SUICIDE ovah heah?” spake the Rock.
The guitars are not only tuned way low, but mixed super quiet, so needless to say the bass is completely obscured in the non-mix. All you can hear is DRUMS, and VOCALS, which is fucking ABSURD because, as the cover of the CD indicates, THIS IS A FUCKING METALLICA ALBUM, and maybe it’s just me, but when you buy a FUCKING METALLICA ALBUM, you’re supposed to be able to hear the FUCKING GUITARS!!! What’s more is that, as you may have guessed, the drums and vocals are the worst fucking part! Completely ignoring Hetfield’s now-AWFUL pseudo (or is it post?)-Vedder et al. vocal style, the way which the vocals were actually recorded on the CD make them sound even WORSE, if one can imagine! Take the legitimately laughable vocal build on the opening cut “Frantic”; with each repetition of the chant “Frantic, tick-tick-tick-tick-tick-tick-tock” Hetfield’s voice goes an octave higher and higher than he’s comfortable singing, so that by the end of his ranting Hetfield’s voice sounds as pubescent as his core audience. What’s more is that on closer examination, namely by watching the accompanying DVD of the rehearsals for St. Anger where Hetfield’s vocal build DOESN’T crack like a 13 year old Phil Anselmo, it seems that Bob was the one egging him on to go for those high notes.
I mean, did anyone see A Year and a Half in the Life of Metallica? Remember watching Bob twisting James’s arm to get every minute detail right for the vocal delivery on Metallica? Well, what the fuck was he doing this time? I guess he must have been too busy writing and playing bass on this piece of shit to worry about whether or not James could his a single note right. Just listen to the Bobcat Goldthwaitisms of “The Unnamed Feeling”, the G.I. Joe-cum-Hulk Hogan and The Wrestling Boot Band backup vox on “St. Anger” or the ejaculatory crooning on “Invisible Kid”, or James’ voice cracking during the dramatic yell during “All within My Hands” and tell me someone wasn’t asleep at the fucking wheel.
Beyond vocal technique, though, there’re just some blatant flaws in the way Bob recorded the vocals. Again, they’re WAY too high in the mix, smothering everything else save for the abysmal drums. Also, for an album trying to sound so dirty musically, the vocals are way too clean and crisp, a stark contrast to the distorted beyond belief sound of the guitars. The most unforgivable act of Rockdom, however, is not catching the frequent microphone popping of the “T’s” on “Sweat Amber”. Not only does the last “T” in “How sweet does it get?” CLEARLY pop, but the line repeats something like eight goddamn times in the song, and what’s more is that Bob puts reverb on the syllable in question, each pop another nail in the coffin of Bob’s career.
But you know, as much fun as it is to ridicule Bob for the amount of cocaine that’s somehow been rerouted to his eardrum, making him a deaf and an utterly incompetent producer, there’s not enough smoke and mirrors in the world to make the songwriting on St. Anger sound anywhere in the universe of good.
Okay, so the riffs; they’re lazy, period. And what’s worse is that you can just tell the band has so much goddamn confidence that these fucking sub-teenage-numetal riffs will just tear the listeners head into frenzy. I mean, there are VERY few instances on this album of one riff going straight into another, there’s just buildup, BUILD UP B-U-I-L-D-U-P and THEN!!!! Nothing. Not a damn thing. Just another weak four-chord riff they nabbed off the cutting floor of Linkin Park’s last album.
Lyrically, it can only be expected to be written at a 6th grade reading level, with the emotional development of the writer not going too far out of that age range, but these guys must have been some pretty fucking stupid 6th graders, man! Some random excerpts; “Shoot me again/I ain’t dead yet”, “Can’t you help me be uncrazy?”, “Kill, kill, kill, kill”, and of course, one of the most baffling lyric to get actual radio airplay in a LONG time “I’m madly in anger with you.” Jeezis, I’ve heard of attempting to sound intellectual, and I’ve heard of pseudo-intellectual, but these guys must be TRYING to sound pseudo-intellectual. Like, ain’t these cats something like a half a fucking century old a piece? And they’re still wrestling with thesauruses to voice their “pain”? Christ, I hope if I ever get to this state of living off of fumes of nostalgia for my youth my retrogressive trip won’t be so fucking SQUARE sounding as these assholes.
And now, ladies and gentlemen, the ace up my sleeve, the nail in this termite-infested coffin; this (again) fucking METTALICA ALBUM contains-are y’all ready-NOT ONE GOD DAMNED MOTHERFUCKING GUITAR SOLO! That’s right, the band with Kirk fucking Hammitt, Lars Ulrich, and both of their small dicks, huge egos, and over-compensatory tactics contains ZERO guitar solos. I mean, this has to be, aside from aforementioned career suicide, a sign of the apocalypse or something. Not one guitar solo! Let it sink in for a second…75 minutes, 11 trax, meaning the average song length is ‘round 7 minutes, and within none of these 7 minute drowning scenes does there appear one solo of any kind. How do they fucking fill the time you ask? BY REPEATING EACH POORLY WRITTEN RIFF UNTILL YOU WANT TO MURDER YOURSELF! So like I said, as laughable as Bob Rock’s production is, there is just no saving a seven minute (never mind the occasional nine minute pummeling) solo-less song.

St. Anger: Epilogue

So what was I talking about way back when I alluded to some deeper philosophical lesson St. Anger has to teach us? Well listen, obviously this is a shitty CD right? I mean, anyone in their right mind wouldn’t even need to hear a Metallica album released in 2003 to guess that it’s gonna fucking suck ass. But regardless, here I am typing up this ungodly dissection of this bloated corpse of an asphyxiated child found in the city river, and whereas any rational human being would just look at this thing whose stomach is swollen with polluted city water, whose blue blood radiates through his or her (as the sex has at this point become utterly indeterminable) thin skin and say “that’s one dead-ass motherfucker”, here I gotta sit and say “yeah, but look at how fucking dead the thing is! I’m gonna go and write about the extent of which this poor fucker’s dead. Man, I can’t help thinking about how fucking dead this motherfucker is, blah, blah, blah.” The question thus changes from “what the fuck was Metallica thinking?” to “what the fuck am I thinking caring about what Metallica was thinking?”
Like, what am I lacking inside myself where I gotta be not only drawn to the failure of strangers, but put in HOURS of energy in an attempt to better inform other strangers about the degree to which these poor schmucks who I’ve never met, and with whom I have no emotional engagement with, fucked up. I mean, it’s not like I’m getting paid for this shit, like I HAVE to write about shitty contemporary rock albums in order to pay my rent; this is FUN for me! And what does it say about you the reader who can sit through an approximately 3,000 word diatribe about an album which, most likely, you knew was bad before you even stumbled across this harpooned Loch Ness Monster? What is the BIG picture here?

Pope Anger
The thing is I’m not even a fan of Metallica’s old shit. “Those who can’t Slayer, Metallica” I’ve said on more than one occasion. What is it, then, about St. Anger that keeps drawing me back in? I guess it’s analogous to slowing down on the freeway when you see a car wreck, but a part of me tells me there must be a little something more to it than that.
On many separate occasions since acquiring my copy of St. Anger I’ve had friends of mine with similar music tastes request to hear the album when they come over, one even submitting himself to a screening of the bonus DVD IN HIS OWN HOUSE nonetheless. Another poor soul even purchased the motherfucker ON VINYL! In both cases the post-St.Anger experience seemed to parallel the pre-album hype induced madness which I was stricken with not to long ago, the gist of which is, in a phrase; “this fucking thing is SO bad it won’t get out of my head!”
Say what you will about St.Anger, it definitely demands one’s attention, which, if I’m not mistaken, is a working definition of (*gulp*) ART! It also fits the definition of another word which begins with “A”, ATROCITY, and no album comes to mind in recent years which fits both of the bills so appropriately as St.Anger. If Lou Reed had heard this shit back in ’75, I’m sure Metal Machine Music would have sounded a helluva lot different. Now quit gawking and drive, you’re holding up traffic.

chuck, Friday, 26 September 2003 16:55 (twenty-one years ago)

metal mike saunders sez colin is "(a guy in san diego i know..in fact his friend was the founder of the now gargantuan www.hilaryfan.com with its behemoth message board/functions.)? either way, i wonder what the chances of this piece making next year's da capo book are...

chuck, Friday, 26 September 2003 17:04 (twenty-one years ago)

This is one of the greatest things I've ever read.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 26 September 2003 17:53 (twenty-one years ago)

it must be funny cuz i read the whole thing. you usually have to pay me to read something that long about metallica.

scott seward, Friday, 26 September 2003 18:04 (twenty-one years ago)

THIS is the kind of passion that all journalism needs. You'd think the writer was having a fucking cardiac arrest and yet continued to write through it. I fucking love anger.

Jeanne Fury (Jeanne Fury), Friday, 26 September 2003 18:11 (twenty-one years ago)

>>I fucking love anger.<<

And so do Metallica!!! Oh, wait....

chuck, Friday, 26 September 2003 18:35 (twenty-one years ago)

This piece rocks harder and conveys more white-knuckle anger than anything those farts have recorded since ...And Justice For All.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 26 September 2003 18:36 (twenty-one years ago)

This is so beautiful. I'm choked up.

Blood and sparkles (bloodandsparkles), Friday, 26 September 2003 19:04 (twenty-one years ago)

teehee

Felcher (Felcher), Friday, 26 September 2003 19:11 (twenty-one years ago)

This article is remarkably similar in style to someone who posts on the NME boards.

Burchill, Friday, 26 September 2003 19:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Complete and utter classic.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 26 September 2003 19:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Is it possible that Metallica (and Bob Rock) KNEW that this album sounded shitty but decided it to release it that way anyway? Think about it. Remember how visibly outraged Metallica has been about this whole file-sharing craze. Perhaps releasing a shitty-sounding album is their way of taking revenge on the Napsterites. Some music industry observers have speculated that the only way that bands can continue to make a profit in the age of file-sharing is to make their money from touring rather than from album sales. So perhaps releasing a shitty-sounding record is just a way to say, Look we have a bunch of new songs, but if you want to hear them done right, you'll have to come to our concerts. So the album just becomes a teaser for the concert - kind of like those free RealAudio samples on Amazon.com - and everyone knows that free samples aren't supposed to sound as good as the real thing. So they get to laugh at the poor KaZaA users who download crappy sounding MP3s of their songs, and laugh all the way to the bank when their fans are forced to come out to the shows if they want to hear the songs with decent sound. Or maybe they're just more spiteful than any of us realize, and would rather sabotage their own album than give any file-sharers the satisfaction of downloading a CD quality album for free.

o. nate (onate), Friday, 26 September 2003 20:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Seeing as a bunch of people will still BUY the album, that strikes me as being one of the dumbest anti-sharing strategies possible (which of course means that that's exactly what they were thinking).

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 26 September 2003 20:44 (twenty-one years ago)

aside from being kinda long for somebody who claims not to give a rat's ass, this is pretty hilarious.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 26 September 2003 20:49 (twenty-one years ago)

that strikes me as being one of the dumbest anti-sharing strategies possible (which of course means that that's exactly what they were thinking)

Yeah, it's probably not the smartest strategy to piss off the fans who care enough to buy the album - but maybe their reasoning was clouded by their, you know, anger.

o. nate (onate), Friday, 26 September 2003 20:55 (twenty-one years ago)

“Those who can’t Slayer, Metallica”


PLEASE tell me that i can buy this t-shirt somewhere!

scott seward, Friday, 26 September 2003 21:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Does the "faggots" comment re staind bother anyone else?

scott, Friday, 26 September 2003 21:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, something about this isn't really as great as it should be. I appreciate detailed and eviscerating claw-sharpening in general, the guy has it in spades, but even so.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 26 September 2003 21:50 (twenty-one years ago)

and this isn't the same scott as scott seward. to differentiate, I'll call myself....Albert Cheese from now on.

scott, Friday, 26 September 2003 21:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, something about this isn't really as great as it should be. I appreciate detailed and eviscerating claw-sharpening in general, the guy has it in spades, but even so.
-- Ned Raggett (ne...), September 26th, 2003.

Dammit Ned, who are you to criticize criticisms? You try critcizing and THEN maybe you can critique!

David Allen, Saturday, 27 September 2003 04:15 (twenty-one years ago)

is that a joke?

cinniblount (James Blount), Saturday, 27 September 2003 04:38 (twenty-one years ago)

this is funny as hell but I was a little disappointed to find out it wasn't something from Metal Sludge

cinniblount (James Blount), Saturday, 27 September 2003 04:38 (twenty-one years ago)

is that a joke?

I don't even know anymore.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 27 September 2003 06:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I have learned not a thing. I laughed not once. My eyes glazed over frequently.

J (Jay), Saturday, 27 September 2003 12:39 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm glad I'm not the ONLY person with the tendency to overuse words in all-caps.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 27 September 2003 16:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Eh, I'm not feeling this as far as humor goes. Looks like something I'd write when I was 19, except the Strokes and ensuing boring Strokes-mockery weren't around in '96. If I have to imagine it being read with the voice of Master Shake from Aqua Teen Hunger Force to get a chuckle out of it, it's not the funniest anything ever written. This could be..

The weird thing is, it's a pretty good overview of the pitfalls of shitty production.

nate detritus (natedetritus), Saturday, 27 September 2003 18:37 (twenty-one years ago)

um, nope.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 27 September 2003 18:45 (twenty-one years ago)

nate, i couldn't even read that thing you provided a link to. that's the difference for me. but it does look like a 19 year old probably wrote it. which isn't a bad thing really. i scanned it until i got to the part about how people used to get beat up for liking Ozzy!! hah! i seem to remember Ozzy fans providing most of the beatings once upon a time.

scott seward, Saturday, 27 September 2003 19:15 (twenty-one years ago)

What's funny to me isn't the content per se, it's the combination of vitriol and sense of bafflement (is that a word?) with which they're spewed.

Jeanne Fury (Jeanne Fury), Saturday, 27 September 2003 19:56 (twenty-one years ago)

I wish more rock criticism looked like it was written by a 19 yr old


Jeanne very otm vitriol/bafflement tango (this piece isn't about st. anger as much as it's about 'why the fuck do I keep listening to this album?')

cinniblount (James Blount), Saturday, 27 September 2003 20:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm so dying to hear this thing and this review is OTM about why.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 27 September 2003 20:13 (twenty-one years ago)

The drum sound really is the only thing that is interesting about the album. The rest is a fascinating trainwreck at best, or a headache inducing bore at worst. Much more obvious than with some of their peers, Metallica always had glaring shortcomings in almost every area but somehow their once famous quality control kept it all tolerable, even charismatic.

But the thing I can't really understand is how, anno 2003, anyone can still be THIS desillusioned by a new Metallica album. I mean, after thirteen years and five deceptions in a row (and that's only counting the albums), what the hell can you expect? And it's not as if they're the only ones sinking to ever lower depths: Slayer and Megadeth have also been reduced to pitiful embarrasments of their former selves. And to think that THEIR major predecessors (Iron Maiden, Motorhead, AC/DC, Judas Priest, Venom) can still record fine albums in the 90s and 00s.

Siegbran (eofor), Saturday, 27 September 2003 20:43 (twenty-one years ago)

one month passes...
"listened to the fuck out of it" is hanle y worthy.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 19 November 2003 04:11 (twenty-one years ago)

The only good rock writers are the ones that sound like they're ninteen years old. You know, Mark Prindle, Playlouder, and now this guy. This is fucking great. IF YOU CAN'T SLAYER, METALLICA!!

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Wednesday, 19 November 2003 04:47 (twenty-one years ago)

This guy's better than all of 'em

nate detritus (natedetritus), Wednesday, 19 November 2003 05:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Did you see the movie reviews?

Girolamo Savonarola, Wednesday, 19 November 2003 06:22 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.