Defend the Indefensible: Nick Drake

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
What's to like about this self-conscious fey tuneless non-wonderful freshman year september baloney?

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 13:51 (twenty-one years ago) link

Well, the instrumental break in Northern Sky is quite pretty...er...

harveyw (harveyw), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 14:04 (twenty-one years ago) link

Defend the indefensible: really good sex with someone you love very much.

(translation: wtf with this thread?)

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 14:09 (twenty-one years ago) link

his guitar technique incorporates very intricate fingerpicking style and his tunings (he used about a half dozen primarily) were really inventive (and probably the cause of many a broken string cf. pink moon - top two strings).

sometimes the string arrangements get in the way but they can be very gorgeous at times ("hazy jane 1"). he was not afraid to experiment, even if it did mean falling flat ("poor boy").

concentrating on the richness of bryter layter and the stark desolation of pink moon alone, i find very few faults/missteps on these two records. and he was certainly better than 80% of the accoustic folk rock at the time. his first album is my least favorite; however, it must have caught the ears of both richard thompson and john cale who play on his second record... and their opinions/respect is worth more to me than anyone on ILM frankly.

gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 14:12 (twenty-one years ago) link

lyrics = fair to middling at best, suffering esp from a sore lack of jokes, which are what makes most genuinely sad music affecting (see elvis, dino, hank wms, rod the mod, etc.)

tunage = open mic night snoozefest. intricate fingerpicking + really inventive tunings = noodling.

voice = a sustained exercise in counterfeit timidity

he did have good suits.

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 14:17 (twenty-one years ago) link

wow. That's really quite odd, as I was listening to Nick Drake this very morning.

I'm not sure he fits into the "Defend the Indefensible" category. That's more for people like, ummm...., the Fixx or Sugar Ray or Raffi, Master of the Pan Flute. You may not like Nick Drake, but there's an awful lot of people who do (and not in a "guilty pleasure" sort've way that caters to "Defend the Indefensible" threads).

I've been noticing a lot of Drake-hatred here lately (well, this thread and Chuck Eddy, who believes mop-head metal also-rans Kix are more tuneful than the late Mr.Drake). Personally, while his is definetely 'mood music' (if you're not in the mood for it, you'd best steer well clear of it), I find it pretty strikingly emotive, atmospheric and quite lovely. I can't understand what people could find to hate about it. I can see people tiring of cult of prescient doom that has sprung up around Drake, but I believe his music would still be quite moving even if he hadn't prematurely shuffled off this mortal coil (though that fact does make tracks like "Black Eyed Dog" that much more chilling).

His guitar playing was quite interesting too.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 14:18 (twenty-one years ago) link

(i do like the strings though, good point. sometimes those swirls approach the genius of sondre lerche)

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 14:19 (twenty-one years ago) link

OK Why can't the "Defend the Indefensible" strategy be applied to Indie icons???

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 14:20 (twenty-one years ago) link

Nick Drake is definitely a guilty pleasure of mine. Washed-out Autumn mornings and big overcoats are too.

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 14:23 (twenty-one years ago) link

Fritz: Because the fact that they're icons means that tons of people already defend them! Icons of every genre have built-in defenses due solely to their gigantic fan bases/undeniable influence/inherent longevity/etc. Would a "Defend the Indefensible: The Beatles" thread make any sense, even if you didn't like them? You already KNOW what the defense is; there's no mystery.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 14:25 (twenty-one years ago) link

but nobody's made any defense yet except 'he's like a cool guitar player, man' and 'tons of people like him, don't be a boor' ... what is the defense?

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 14:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

and how is pointing out the "gigantic fan bases/undeniable influence/inherent longevity/etc." of Sugar Ray any different than pointing out the "gigantic fan bases/undeniable influence/inherent longevity/etc." of nick drake?

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 14:30 (twenty-one years ago) link

Because when he sings "are you just riding a new man / who looks a little like me" it makes me want to cry.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 14:32 (twenty-one years ago) link

Yeah a "J'Accuse" thread category would cause less cognitive dissonance if what's being attempted is an overturning of history's verdict. I totally agree with the notion that one should be prepared to defend the much-defended, though - like someone said on some other thread, "good taste is easy".

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 14:34 (twenty-one years ago) link

I quite like him but no-one would really care that much if he hadn't (allegedly) killed himself - I mean, Roy Harper's still alive and no-one cares about him do they?

Dadaismus (Dada), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 14:50 (twenty-one years ago) link

i guess nick drake seemed a good choice for this category for me anyway because despite the crankiness toward him up top on this thread he's someone i actually feel pretty ambivalent about - i feel as if i should like him much more based on his autumnal overcoatishness (which I generally love as a genre) but i always feel deeply unsatisfied and yawnsome when i actually listen to more than 1 or 2 songs ... so knocking up some dust around him by placing him the indefensible category seemed like a useful strategy in getting to what he's all about...

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 14:53 (twenty-one years ago) link

Some friends of mine performed River Man with vocals and a bass trio. It was very pretty.

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 14:55 (twenty-one years ago) link

Don't hedge Fritz, he's indefensible.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 14:56 (twenty-one years ago) link

but nobody's made any defense yet except 'he's like a cool guitar player, man' and 'tons of people like him, don't be a boor' ... what is the defense?

So basically, no one's made a defense in terms you would accept.

and how is pointing out the "gigantic fan bases/undeniable influence/inherent longevity/etc." of Sugar Ray any different than pointing out the "gigantic fan bases/undeniable influence/inherent longevity/etc." of nick drake?

Besides the fact that Nick Drake's stuff has been around longer than Sugar Ray's there isn't any difference. I'm not sure what you're trying to catch me on here, especially since I wasn't the one who used Sugar Ray as a DtD candidate.

The point is that if there's general critical acclaim for an artist (as there is for BOTH Sugar Ray and Nick Drake), they are not good candidates for a DtD thread because there's already a defense that everyone knows about. The entire premise is "Most people think this musician/band suck(s); tell me why most people are wrong." How does Nick Drake fit into that?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 14:57 (twenty-one years ago) link

He's sure as hell no Napalm Death.

christoff (christoff), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 15:04 (twenty-one years ago) link

no one's made a defense in terms you would accept.

it's not that i don't accept it, it's just that I'm sure people have more to point to than his guitartistry & general well-likedness (& in fairness some people have pointed out lyrics and instrumental breaks & mood stuff that they like - which makes more sense to me)

The entire premise is "Most people think this musician/band suck(s); tell me why most people are wrong." How does Nick Drake fit into that?

fine, how is: 'I think he sucks, tell me why I'm wrong' then? am i allowed to ask that?

since when is general consensus & 'we hold these truths to be self-evident' logic such an important factor to take into consideration on ILM?

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 15:07 (twenty-one years ago) link

there's general critical acclaim for sugar ray??? did i miss class the day that came up?

fact checking cuz, Wednesday, 1 October 2003 15:08 (twenty-one years ago) link

THAT F()CKING LINE IN THE THAT SONG, IT MADE SOUTHALL CRY!!!!!
IT IS A GREAT LINE. ONE OF MANY GREAT LINES

*the defense will now take a 15minute coffee break

kephm, Wednesday, 1 October 2003 15:11 (twenty-one years ago) link

Oh boy. I could go on forever but I won't. No need to, there is nothing not to like about Nick Drake.

- He didn't allow Chris DeBerg to be in his band in high school. Thanks fucking god.

Chris V. (Chris V), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 15:19 (twenty-one years ago) link

fine, how is: 'I think he sucks, tell me why I'm wrong' then? am i allowed to ask that?

No.

since when is general consensus & 'we hold these truths to be self-evident' logic such an important factor to take into consideration on ILM?

Ignoring the fact that the entire point behind these threads is to go against general consensus, have you not read any ILM posts in the past 18 months?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 15:44 (twenty-one years ago) link

now I'm just confused

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 16:01 (twenty-one years ago) link

since when is general consensus & 'we hold these truths to be self-evident' logic such an important factor to take into consideration on ILM?

It's not an important factor to consider in the context of ILM per se, only in the context of a Defend the Indefensible thread. Maybe you should have worded the thread title differently. In any case, his music is lovely.

Sean (Sean), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 16:33 (twenty-one years ago) link

Ha ha ha, dead man. I piss on your grave, you self-conscious fey tuneless non-wonderful freshman-year wanker.

Bruce Urquhart (Bruce Urquhart), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 16:44 (twenty-one years ago) link

This is a silly thread.

If you hate Nick Drake, you hate little Baby Jesus.

gage o (gage o), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 18:11 (twenty-one years ago) link

Defend the Defensible.

scott m (mcd), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 18:28 (twenty-one years ago) link

This thread should not exist. Nick Drake is my favoritest artist ever. Pink Moon is my favoritest album ever. "Fly," in both its Bryter Layter and Time Of No Reply incarnations, is one of the most beautiful songs I've ever heard.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 1 October 2003 18:39 (twenty-one years ago) link

Fritz, if you will choose to dislike Nick Drake, that's cool. However, it's plain stubbornness not to accept that others will adore the music you may not like. ILM has enough space for both sides. Even better if that person can tell you why/

For my part, I'd first been exposed to Drake through mp3s (Pink Moon came first), which lead to burning a copy of Way Beyond Blue off of friends. The first thing that struck me about his music was that the melodies are soothing to the ear and the nerves after a rough day. The second thing was that his lyrics spoke of pain and loss long before it became fashionable to be a solo songwriter.

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Wednesday, 1 October 2003 18:43 (twenty-one years ago) link

Innersting piece of info: The title Five Leaves Left refers to a little warning message that used to pop up in a pack of Rizla rolling papers when the pack was almost through.

Great Nick Drake songs: Road, Which Will, Northern Sky. WTF is up with this thread? He doesn't need to be defended, he's one of the greats, even without going into the guitar playing.

calstars (calstars), Thursday, 2 October 2003 01:29 (twenty-one years ago) link

i think the fact that he's dead is irrelevant to his commercial renaissance. i don't think anyone who came to know him via VW ads (or whatever) would have had a clue.

the surface noise (electricsound), Thursday, 2 October 2003 01:40 (twenty-one years ago) link

The point is that if there's general critical acclaim for an artist (as there is for BOTH Sugar Ray and Nick Drake)>>>

Zuh?

Gear! (Gear!), Thursday, 2 October 2003 06:28 (twenty-one years ago) link

fritz noone's taking issue with your dislike of nick drake, they're taking issue with your misuse of 'defend the indefensible'. 'defend the indefensible' is for salvaging something or making arguments defending aspects of careers conventionally judged beyond the pale. they'e positive threads. 'defending the indefensible' threads targeted at canonical artists always end up dull dull dull cuz the thread starter has no interest in actually seeing the indefensible defended. 'classic or dud' is the format you're looking for. I realize several people have already said this on this thread but you still haven't heard them so I am repeating it.

cinniblount (James Blount), Thursday, 2 October 2003 06:37 (twenty-one years ago) link

Well "voice = a sustained exercise in counterfeit timidity"

There was no counterfeit timidity about Nick Drake, he was painfully shy and withdrawn according to all accounts. His sister said he had a skin too few (hence the title of a biography). So no counterfeitedness about his timidity at all. Furthermore I've heard recordings of his voice and that's what he sounds like, he has a very posh, gentle, fey accent.

So there's a start of a defence. At least a knocking down of one teh straw men raised.

mentalist (mentalist), Thursday, 2 October 2003 06:48 (twenty-one years ago) link

I dunno cinniblount, I've always taken DTI threads to mean 'There is no way you can convince me that this lot are any good but I'd like to see you try', at least that's how I've read them when I've started ones (Beautiful South, Reef). Fritz' thread can be seen as a howl of impotent rage against a world so cock-eyed as to have put an artist he hates so much in this gilded 'beyond reproach' category.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 2 October 2003 07:14 (twenty-one years ago) link

But justthe DTI thread title suggests that the artist in question, or his or her body of work, is inexcusable or without justification. With some of the recent spate of DTI threads, namely the Nick Drake and the Joy Division, the artist, like it or not, has some merit, which renders it, in my mind, a rather pointless exercise.

Bruce Urquhart (Bruce Urquhart), Thursday, 2 October 2003 08:17 (twenty-one years ago) link

I just noticed the Dylan DTI, which continues this trend.

Bruce Urquhart (Bruce Urquhart), Thursday, 2 October 2003 08:19 (twenty-one years ago) link

i discovered nick drake around 1979 when fruit tree (only with the three studio albums) was released the first time and when listening to it i always had the feeling that he sang to me, about my life. for a long time i didn't meet anybody who had ever heard of nick drake. that was part of the fascination, that he was virtually unknown, my private songwriter god. therefore i will do fuck all to convince anybody of the greatness of his music. he is already famous enough now and i almost think too many people have discovered him by now ;-)

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Thursday, 2 October 2003 08:36 (twenty-one years ago) link

i think the fact that he's dead is irrelevant to his commercial renaissance

Yeah, right

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 2 October 2003 10:49 (twenty-one years ago) link

i'd like to see some statistics on this. i had (and already adored) two of his albums before i knew he was dead.

the surface noise (electricsound), Thursday, 2 October 2003 10:52 (twenty-one years ago) link

I think Nick Drake's genius lies in his delivery of his lyrics, in the way he says them so gently not as if he's accusing anyone, or he's angry at anything, but that this is just the way things are. Things are sad, but like the soft guitar cords or whatever - beautiful as well. He seems to me like the perfect example of someone who's completely defeated, who's given up, but still sits back and sees the beauty of things. And that emotion perhaps is one that a lot of people can identify with.

His best album, I'd say, is easily Bryter Layter because the sad/beautiful characteristics within both the lyrics and the music are strongest and most pronounced there. "What will happen in the morning when the world it gets so crowded that you can't look out the window in the morning?" is one of my favorite lyrics ever, though perhaps it sounds a bit silly on paper.

j c, Thursday, 2 October 2003 11:42 (twenty-one years ago) link

I like his music, his guitar playing, tho I'm less keen on his voice. As for his lyrics - well I've never really payed too much attention to them. He is certainly not any kind of "genius".

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 2 October 2003 11:47 (twenty-one years ago) link

ANybody seen the film "A Skin Too Few", I'm dying to see it but apparently its caught in some legal mess.

Chris V. (Chris V), Thursday, 2 October 2003 13:59 (twenty-one years ago) link

'defending the indefensible' threads targeted at canonical artists always end up dull dull dull cuz the thread starter has no interest in actually seeing the indefensible defended.

sorry people feel that way - but i am in fact interested in just that... and lots of people have done so with panache.

i can tell people are irked, but i still think its a worthwhile discussion to have. "good taste" is subjective anyway so I don't see how 'indefensible' is more offensive when applied to card-carrying canon-fodder than it is to artists that are generally seen as having no worth.


Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Thursday, 2 October 2003 14:16 (twenty-one years ago) link

i mean i liked what blount wrote but i still disagree that this is a "misuse" of anything...

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Thursday, 2 October 2003 14:18 (twenty-one years ago) link

(but I don't need to change anyone's mind on this, nor do i expect to)

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Thursday, 2 October 2003 14:22 (twenty-one years ago) link

...and since when was Nick Drake a "canonical artist" in the sense of a Beatles or a Bob Dylan or a Duke Ellington?

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 2 October 2003 14:27 (twenty-one years ago) link

"cello song" has one of the most impressive guitar lines in an era when it was still cool to know how to play an instrument. just absolutely stunning

reggie (qualmsley), Sunday, 10 January 2016 20:51 (eight years ago) link

JCLC otm

His right thumb on "Road" is like something inhuman

welltris (crüt), Sunday, 10 January 2016 20:58 (eight years ago) link

I always wanted to learn River Man as its slightly less manic, picking-wise, but th as that's one where the rhythm is the challenge.

Hammer Smashed Bagels, Sunday, 10 January 2016 21:37 (eight years ago) link

boy the first 20 to 40 posts in this thread are a super fun read

alpine static, Sunday, 10 January 2016 22:08 (eight years ago) link

I always wanted to learn River Man as its slightly less manic, picking-wise, but th as that's one where the rhythm is the challenge.

You should try it as it's definitely doable, and that's coming from a rather mediocre guitar player. The guitar part itself isn't too hard, singing over that rhythm is another story but I'm 80% there I think. It kinda does my head in after a while though.

moans and feedback (Dinsdale), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 20:22 (eight years ago) link

He was a singular force on the guitar. I love his music although it's the sort of thing that I want in limited doses. And I'd guess that his revival in the 90s with that Volkswagen commercial probably has a lot to do with why Bon Iver and a million lesser Bon Ivers exist. But no fault of his.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 21:22 (eight years ago) link

yeah even though drake's voice could be characterized as wispy, the super-structured guitar work kinda works in contrast to that, which I think a lot of his followers miss.

tylerw, Wednesday, 20 January 2016 21:24 (eight years ago) link

stripped down nick drake is my favorite nick drake... pink moon/peel session/demos/etc. probably because i just love hearing his guitar so much

global tetrahedron, Wednesday, 20 January 2016 21:27 (eight years ago) link

the fact he tracked most of his stuff guitar & vox live at the same time is so amazing

Amira, Queen of Creativity (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 20 January 2016 21:59 (eight years ago) link

sorta surprised that peel session release didn't get more buzz -- think it might be the best "unreleased" thing that's come out! and probably the closest to hearing what a live nick drake gig would've sounded like.

tylerw, Wednesday, 20 January 2016 22:07 (eight years ago) link

Probably because it was priced insanely.

Mark G, Thursday, 21 January 2016 12:51 (eight years ago) link

haha, well yeah, but it's on youtube and available through illicit channels. wonder if they will release it in a more sensible format...

tylerw, Thursday, 21 January 2016 18:11 (eight years ago) link

some of it is on spotify (i guess i don't know how many track there are)

Amira, Queen of Creativity (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 21 January 2016 18:23 (eight years ago) link

I never knew he'd done any Peel sessions.

The Return of the Thin White Pope (Tom D.), Thursday, 21 January 2016 18:24 (eight years ago) link

oh lol it's on amazon mp3 for $5
worth it!

tylerw, Thursday, 21 January 2016 18:25 (eight years ago) link

xp there had been a lo-fi snippet of it floating around for a while, but they found a much better source and put it out as an EP along w/ a really expensive book.

tylerw, Thursday, 21 January 2016 18:25 (eight years ago) link

OnkyoMusic/SevenDigital has it available as FLAC downloads as well, if FLAC is your thing. They're delightfully fuzzy versions, I love them.

erry red flag (f. hazel), Thursday, 21 January 2016 18:46 (eight years ago) link

it's kind of embarrassing to admit that i actually was slightly obsessed with nick drake a really long time ago. in retrospect, it probably wasn't a good thing, because a big part of the music i was writing at that time ended up sounding like his stuff. and i never did like the "copycats"; e.g., bon iver, etc. i don't see them as copycats, though, because their music always felt different.

are the peel session tracks that different from the stuff on time of no reply and made to love magic?

F♯ A♯ (∞), Thursday, 21 January 2016 21:06 (eight years ago) link

there's a flute on cello song.

tylerw, Thursday, 21 January 2016 21:14 (eight years ago) link

I just wish he'd lived long enough to do the music for the Watership Down movie.

erry red flag (f. hazel), Thursday, 21 January 2016 21:27 (eight years ago) link

what's embarrassing about that

global tetrahedron, Thursday, 21 January 2016 21:37 (eight years ago) link

Three of the Peel session tracks are previously unreleased, yes. Cello Song, Bryter Layter, and River Man. The other two have turned up on bootlegs and possibly compilations before?

erry red flag (f. hazel), Thursday, 21 January 2016 21:41 (eight years ago) link

don't think they were ever officially released ever before, and the things on bootlegs were fragmentary and in cruddier sound quality iirc...

tylerw, Thursday, 21 January 2016 21:45 (eight years ago) link

i have time of no reply and made to love magic, and i thought river man and cello song were on there, but i could be wrong. i've not listened to them in ages

F♯ A♯ (∞), Thursday, 21 January 2016 22:08 (eight years ago) link

i just listened to the peel session tracks. i hadn't realised it was more of a collector's item.

lovely hearing the music either way, though

F♯ A♯ (∞), Thursday, 21 January 2016 22:24 (eight years ago) link

yeah, not on either of those previous comps (though river man is pretty similar on made to love magic).

tylerw, Thursday, 21 January 2016 22:25 (eight years ago) link

yeah, like you say, the biggest difference is the flute on cello song. possibly the best track on there? i guess i'll play some nd while i work now!

F♯ A♯ (∞), Thursday, 21 January 2016 22:28 (eight years ago) link

Amira, Queen of Creativity (upper mississippi sh@kedown)
Posted: January 20, 2016 at 4:59:09 PM
the fact he tracked most of his stuff guitar & vox live at the same time is so amazing

River man was recorded guitar and vox AND string orchestra live at the same time!

major tom's cabin (Jon not Jon), Thursday, 21 January 2016 22:30 (eight years ago) link

the only circulating peel stuff before this release was a 4 minute off-air excerpt with a minute of "time of no reply" and a couple minutes of "three hours".

diana krallice (rushomancy), Thursday, 21 January 2016 22:42 (eight years ago) link

there's a piece in a recent paris review that deals w/ nick by brian cullman

I tried to tell Nick how much I liked his album. It was later that week, we were in the kitchen at John and Beverly's, drinking tea, and there was silence everywhere. I mentioned a few songs, "Cello Song" and "River Man" and "Saturday Sun," and he nodded and stared at the table. After a few minutes, he started fumbling through his coat pockets. There was a smell of mint and tobacco, maybe cloves, and he was pulling out scraps of paper, guitar picks, rolling papers, and such. He looked up.
"Do you like chocolate?" he asked. He held an unopened bar of Cadbury's Dairy Milk Chocolate.

My performance at Cousins was forgettable. Nick's was memorable mostly for its awkwardness. Sitting on a small wooden chair, the kind favored in most third grade classrooms, he seemed to shrink, to recede further and further away from the microphone, as if we were all looking through the wrong end of a telescope. He hunched over a small mahogany guitar, a parlor guitar, and began fingerpicking with the ease and elegance and grace of the playing on his album, though he pulled the guitar tightly into himself, hugging it as he played, and the sound was distant and muffled and indistinct, as if he'd found a way to get up and walk out into the hallway and close the door on us while he sat there on the stage.
He began singing "Thoughts of Mary Jane," and you could hear the sound of the buttons on his jacket hitting the guitar, the sound of the chair creaking, and midway through, just as it seemed like he was getting warmed up and settling into the performance, he changed directions, changed songs. No one could tell if he'd forgotten the chords or lost the words or simply grown bored and decided to move on. He settled into a rolling guitar figure, beautiful and stuttered and strangely uplifting, and he began singing the opening lines to a new song, new to me at least:
Do you curse where you come from?
Do you swear in the night?
And then he would look away, even further away, and begin the pattern once again and continue the same words until they sprawled into a chant, slurred and strange and hypnotic:
Do you curse where you come from?
Do you swear in the night?
The words seemed a challenge, a prayer and a whispered threat all at once, a quiet British voodoo sung to an unseen moon and an all-too-present dark:
Do you curse where you come from?
Do you swear in the night?
You couldn't watch. But you couldn't look away. And then it was over. I don't remember if there was any applause, but I know that there were no celebratory drinks, there was no after party; the audience simply drifted off into their own version of the night.

tylerw, Thursday, 21 January 2016 22:46 (eight years ago) link

jeepers

global tetrahedron, Friday, 22 January 2016 01:30 (eight years ago) link

seven years pass...

anybody read the new bio?

J Edgar Noothgrush (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Tuesday, 26 December 2023 14:26 (eleven months ago) link

I buy these rolls of bags to collect my dog’s dogshit. When I get toward the end of the roll there’s a “three bags left” warning

Circus Au Lait (flamboyant goon tie included), Tuesday, 26 December 2023 14:50 (eleven months ago) link

! had no idea there was one

Nick Drake: The Life is the only biography of Nick to be written with the blessing and involvement of his sister and estate. Drawing on copious original research and new interviews with his family, friends, and musical collaborators, as well as deeply personal archive material unavailable to previous writers—including his father’s diaries, his essays, and private correspondence—this is the most comprehensive and authoritative account possible of Nick’s short and enigmatic life.

i'm sold. i was just listening to Five Leaves Left last week.

Ghidorah, the three-headed Explorah (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 26 December 2023 16:32 (eleven months ago) link

Also cited: his father’s diarrhea

calstars, Tuesday, 26 December 2023 16:43 (eleven months ago) link

the fuck?

Ghidorah, the three-headed Explorah (Neanderthal), Tuesday, 26 December 2023 16:54 (eleven months ago) link

Inspiration can come from anywhere.

The Italian Yob (Tom D.), Tuesday, 26 December 2023 17:09 (eleven months ago) link

Day Is Done... and so is my digestive system

vodkaitamin effrtvescent (calzino), Tuesday, 26 December 2023 17:16 (eleven months ago) link

Pink Moon

Circus Au Lait (flamboyant goon tie included), Tuesday, 26 December 2023 17:42 (eleven months ago) link

Time at the Urologist’s Has Told Me

calstars, Tuesday, 26 December 2023 17:58 (eleven months ago) link

Man in a shed

Mark G, Tuesday, 26 December 2023 18:12 (eleven months ago) link

Black-Eyed Bog

1980 Jackanory spinoff (Matt #2), Tuesday, 26 December 2023 18:12 (eleven months ago) link

Things Behind Yer Mum

Circus Au Lait (flamboyant goon tie included), Tuesday, 26 December 2023 18:37 (eleven months ago) link

River Man

assert (matttkkkk), Tuesday, 26 December 2023 19:11 (eleven months ago) link

Five Leaves (Of Bog Roll) Left

1980 Jackanory spinoff (Matt #2), Tuesday, 26 December 2023 19:21 (eleven months ago) link

fantastic work everybody, we can be proud today

J Edgar Noothgrush (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Tuesday, 26 December 2023 22:21 (eleven months ago) link

keeping in spirit with the horrible first post of the thread and indeed, the absurd notion that Nick Drake is in any way indefensible.

I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Wednesday, 27 December 2023 01:55 (eleven months ago) link

eleven months pass...

brilliant cover here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Wc2eBue0SU

Flávio Tris - From The Morning

corrs unplugged, Wednesday, 11 December 2024 11:46 (one week ago) link

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTPBGXJ4HWA

Maresn3st, Wednesday, 11 December 2024 15:26 (one week ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.