Did the guy who said he'd make the best of Aphex . . .

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

. . . ever post that? Just wondering. I'd be hard-pressed to come up with mine, what with all the bizarre song titles I don't know.

gusbot (eternal_fields), Monday, 13 October 2003 05:54 (twenty-two years ago)

on a related note, i borrowed a copy of '26 mixes for cash' and, save for saw ii, it's prob my favourite aphex release.

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Monday, 13 October 2003 06:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Someone should put out a 'Gentle Side of Aphex' comp.

oops (Oops), Monday, 13 October 2003 07:12 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm still working on it. Give me time. :)

Andrew (enneff), Monday, 13 October 2003 07:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Someone should put out a 'Gentle Side of Aphex' comp.

Completely no.

Aphex is best when he tries to make pop music, then when he tries to make diamond-hard techno, then when he seems like he's fallen asleep on the volume button.

Jim Robinson (Original Miscreant), Monday, 13 October 2003 16:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Alberto Balsalm just told me you're wrong.

Disco Nihilist (mjt), Monday, 13 October 2003 20:54 (twenty-two years ago)

What's the album he did where he tried his hand at jungle? I really love Aphex best when he uses the super-mega-fast delirious drums but I bought Slected Ambient 85-92 or whatever, and none of that was on there. Anybody know what I should be looking for? (Keep in mind, I know little about electronic music genres, I don't know what jungle is, but when I asked someone about Aphex's lack of fast drums, they said "Try the album he used jungle rhythms on." So, yes.)

David Allen, Monday, 13 October 2003 21:42 (twenty-two years ago)

The Richard D. James Album

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 13 October 2003 21:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Also the Come To Daddy EP

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 13 October 2003 21:48 (twenty-two years ago)

David, you might like Drukqs then. *shudder*

Leee (Leee), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 04:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Come to Daddy is one of the worst things in Mr. James' catalogue. The title tune is a stupid Prodigy bite, and the rest of the tracks are essentially jokes.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 06:05 (twenty-two years ago)

but Flim is one of his best

Keith McD (Keith McD), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 10:27 (twenty-two years ago)

I liked Avril 14

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 10:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Somebody PLEASE post a best-of-Aphex mix. The guy's got like 53 billion records out and it's so hard to keep track of what's truly worth your listening time and what ain't.

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 11:32 (twenty-two years ago)

i care because you do has some brilliant moments. also, girl/boy.

dyson (dyson), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 12:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Alberto Balsam
Flim
Bouncing Bucephalus Ball(s?)
Avril 14
Cock/Ver10
SAWII CD1 Track 3
SAWII CD1 Track 7
Pancake Lizard
Heliosphan
Tamphex
Quino-Phec (as Polygon Window)
4
Girl/Boy Song
Nannou
Ventolin

don't have my cds with me, but those should keep you going till i get home and check.

dog latin, Tuesday, 14 October 2003 12:57 (twenty-two years ago)

I love Drukqs!!!

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 14:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Bouncing Bucephalus Ball(s?)

As I said, "Come to Daddy EP" is full of joke tracks, and this is the jokiest of them all. But if you like self-indulgent experimental electro, why the hell not...

By the way, I had a party last saturday and some bloke offered to buy my copy of the aforementioned EP for six euros - I didn't have to hesitate for one second. Next morning, I bought a delicious pizza with the six euros. That's the best thing I've gotten out've Aphex Twin for years.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 15:12 (twenty-two years ago)

But FLIM.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 15:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Flim flam. I can live without it.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 14 October 2003 15:40 (twenty-two years ago)

Tuomas, without wanting to condescend you, I really don't think you "get" Aphex! The Come To Daddy is jokey in places but it's juxtaposed with the melancholy IZ-US and Flim. BOuncing Bucephalus Ball is incredible - it changed my idea of music.

All the same, here are some more good Aphex Twin tracks:

Milkman
Tidy Turtle
Pancake Lizard
On
Nannou
Ageispolis
Pigeon Street
To Cure A Weakling Child
Fingerbib
Ventolin
Mt Saint Michel + St Micaels Mount
DMX Krew - You Can't Hide Your Love (Aphex Twin Hidden Love Mix)
Next Heap With

dog latin, Tuesday, 14 October 2003 23:35 (twenty-two years ago)

I couldn't bare to do a best of Aphex. Selecting tracks from the ambient LPs would be particularly impossible because every track is so perfect. Maybe a 'best of Aphex that isn't on a classic album' instead?

Keith McD (Keith McD), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 01:01 (twenty-two years ago)

What about all those obscure Aphex records? Like, has anybody heard GAK? Or the Pac Man one? Or the Analog Bubblebath series??? Are there any greatest-hits-worthy songs on those?

UNRELATED: "Come To Daddy" is one frightening fucking song (Aphex thereby spends four minutes accomplishing what Ozzy Osbourne has been trying to do for his entire shitty 30-year career, and that's scare the living crap out of the listener). I was listening to it earlier today, and that scream that he does is just intense, man.

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 04:07 (twenty-two years ago)

The Analogue Bubblebaths are great - totally essential - except for "5" (the unreleased one), which you can probably do without.

Sam J. (samjeff), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 04:58 (twenty-two years ago)

My "best of" mix will simply be 70 minutes of great Richard D James tunes. I won't be making any exclusionist statements.

Sam, I disagree - I think Analogue Bubblebath "5" is some of his best work.

Flim I can do without, although I used to quite like it.

Melphace 6 from Drukqs is my personal favourite RDJ tune ever.

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 05:15 (twenty-two years ago)

I think jokes are part of Aphex's point! Partly because they are often contrasted with such lovely/serious/menacing work.

Snrub, I agree- "Come to Daddy" is still terrifying! It's genuinely unhinged.

rob geary (rgeary), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 06:26 (twenty-two years ago)

Analogue Bubblebath 3 is pretty good in places, perhaps a little basic/old-fashioned for nowadays, but some of it is darker than even SAWII!
Analogue Bubblebath 4 is also quite good

dog latin, Wednesday, 15 October 2003 08:09 (twenty-two years ago)

No one has mentioned Icct Hedral yet. So I will. Icct Hedral. My own all-time Aphex favourite, closely followed by SAW II CD1 TK3.

Damian (Damian), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 08:41 (twenty-two years ago)

You guys....

Richard D James isn't someone you can half-arsedly research via ILM recommendation, listening to a few supposedly best tracks (its different for everybody, so its ridiculous to approach it that way), reading his AMG bio and moving on, you have to listen to EVERYTHING. If you want to do it another way then you can fuck off, get me?

The starting point obviously is to listen to all of his LPs: Richard D James Album, ...I Care Because You Do, Selected Ambient Works 85-92, Selected Ambient Works Volume 2, Drukqs, 26 Remixes for Cash (thats the order i did, anyway).
Then after that you listen to his EPs, probably starting with the entire Analogue Bubblebath series, then Come to Daddy, Windowlicker, Q-Chastic, Xylem Tube, Donkey Rhubarb, AFX 1&2, On, On Remixes, Didgeridoo, Classics (containing Xylem Tube, The Aphex Twin EP, two Mescalim United remixes, a live Didgeridoo set and Analogue Bubblebath), and Singles. And I haven't even named all of them!

And of course, somewhere in there you fit his work under Polygon Window (Surfing on Sine Waves, anyone care to make commentary on this one? (Andrew, i'm talking to you)), Caustic Window, AFX, Gak etc etc

note 1: Its impossible, and unneccesary to correctly listen to his works chronologically, so don't try

note 2: http://www.discogs.com/artist/Aphex_Twin - good 'old discogs.com has a pretty good discography, but it doesn't have everything (but good enough unless you want to get REALLY fanatical)

note 3: A stupid, yet entertainingly funny quote from discogs.com : Anonymous - Sep 23, 2001
'The Jimi Hendrix of electronic music...except with a tank & a bank, & a lot of facial hair.'

Yea, so basically, don't treat it like any old dispossable shit you'll research and chuck in at the back of your musical knowledge and collection, for christs sake, you jus' gotta do it right!!

Rob McD (Keith McD), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 09:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh yes, and i apoligize if i scared you away...

Rob McD (Keith McD), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 09:20 (twenty-two years ago)

It's guys like you who've ruined listening to electronic music... ;) Nowadays we have to regard it as serious art, and we have to respect the producers as real artists, and we have to search every single track they ever made so we can understand their whole artistic vision, and we have to know everything about the artists background, such as that he writes his tracks while lucid dreaming and that he owns a tank, to fully understand what drives him as an artist...

I say, fuck it!

Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 14:46 (twenty-two years ago)

Basically, in my humble opinion etc etc, Aphex is good enough to dip in at random. Whatever he tries his hand at is at least entertaining -even though the ambient stuff isn't my favourite, its still probably (some of) the best of its type, acres ahead of Autechre and the other Warpy ambient types etc (although that Autechre single where they just made NOIZE for a few minutes is better than Aphex's attempts at the same I reckon).

The Windowlicker EP is my top recommendation, then Girl/Boy, then maybe Come To Daddy mini-album/long EP. But as I said, its that weird messed-up-mid-tempo-almost-*pop*-music stuff that I like the most, so that leads me more to his EPs I think.

Jim Robinson (Original Miscreant), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 17:03 (twenty-two years ago)

In terms of banging jungle type stuff, nothing surpasses when I saw him live at Leeds - he used the sounds from Sweet Dreams Are Made of This in the middle of his million beats per minute set, and his idea of playing 'hits' was using the recognisable sounds from some of his more successful songs - but how's about the one on Drukqs where it goes 'come on you cunt' etc (cock/ver 10) and maybe 'Donkey Rhubarb'.

In terms of a banging, jungly album, I'd try Richrad D James.

P.S. Don't dismiss Drukqs, its one of the best albums of the last few years, it just has a feeling that he's still got all his best songs sitting on his hard drive.

Jim Robinson (Original Miscreant), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 17:05 (twenty-two years ago)

I agree that, for people who are new to Aphex or just casually interested, the Come to Daddy EP may be the best first choice. Especially if you skip the first song (which is great, but it's very different in tone from the rest and tends to annoy people), it's an incredibly strong disc of great tunes.

Sam J. (samjeff), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 17:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Are you for real Rob? *gag*

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 18:22 (twenty-two years ago)

A "best of" Aphex compilation = SAW85-92 and SAWII boxed together.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 15 October 2003 20:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Screw you IDM-jungle sycophants. I hope you choke on an algorithm.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 15 October 2003 20:57 (twenty-two years ago)

You'll be more likely to choke on a pillow...

Jim Robinson (Original Miscreant), Wednesday, 15 October 2003 21:03 (twenty-two years ago)

I think you're being a bit extreme there, Rob. And I think you're wrong about Aphex chronology. It is indeed possible, and very profitable, to listen to RDJ is chronological order. You can get a real sense of his shifting taste and style.

This "best of" I'm compiling ain't easy, I'll say that.

Andrew (enneff), Thursday, 16 October 2003 01:03 (twenty-two years ago)

haha rob you wanker!

Keith McD (Keith McD), Thursday, 16 October 2003 03:45 (twenty-two years ago)

hey!

ruin listening to electronic music? bah is say, bah! Sorry for being a bit of a wank, but come on dude, I can go with accepting the life work of a genius as real art, i'm not afraid to admit that. And no, you don't need to know about the fact that he drives a tank or that he lives in a bank, or any other of the wacky stories of his life like the Lemonheads-remix thing, thats just for fun and for blatant fanaticism - listening to a few, perhaps several of his albums is not. All i was saying was that I think his work is so incredible that its probably worth checking it all out, and if not, then some substantial ammount of it. And no, you don't have to listen to all of his stuff to understand his vision, you're extrapolating unneccesarily, my friend.
If you don't want to accept the fact that his life work is real art, then fine, fuck it - listen to a few of his tracks, think 'oh my, that sound quite nice', then leave it and fuck off with your wak shit ;)

and yea, Andrew, i suppose your right,

Rob McD (Keith McD), Thursday, 16 October 2003 06:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Everybody needs a hero...

oops (Oops), Thursday, 16 October 2003 06:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Of course I'm right. I'm always right.

Andrew (enneff), Thursday, 16 October 2003 08:24 (twenty-two years ago)

bah...

Rob McD (Keith McD), Thursday, 16 October 2003 08:54 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd say the best entry point is 'I care because you do...' (it worked for me). He covers a lot of ground on this and it's in my view his most consistent release.
I'm still trying to get 'Druqks', but fear that I never will..

Baaderist (Fabfunk), Thursday, 16 October 2003 09:02 (twenty-two years ago)

listen to a few of his tracks, think 'oh my, that sound quite nice', then leave it and fuck off with your wak shit ;)

That's exactly what I've done with Aphex. Also, that was what you could do with every electronic music producer before Aphex. But after him, the rockist star/artist cult has entered the realm of electronic music. Of course it isn't necessarily his fault, but he's the emblem of this process. You may call me an old-fashioned idealist, but I happen to like the pre-IDM idea of "it's all about the music and nothing about the artist". So all I need to know is "that track sounds quite nice", and nothing more.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 16 October 2003 12:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Aphex is practically the only one of these acts who draws a lot of attention to himself. This is probably why he is the biggest selling act on walk because it makes his music more accessible to rock-based fans.
This makes Richard D James a great starting point for anyone who wants to get into electronica as there is something for everyone. One could describe him as the Beatles of IDM - very excellent music, very popular but one can get a little sick of his schtick and by the time Druqks came out, I had a big feeling of "here we go again". But once you've got into Aphex, it is by no means necessary to get all his stuff. Try branching out into other acts, starting with albums like Autechre "LP5", Boards of Canada "Geogaddi", Plaid "Rest Proof Clockwork" a bit of Nobukazu Takemura, some bleep techno etc, and I'm sure you'll be more rewarded.

dog latin, Thursday, 16 October 2003 12:43 (twenty-two years ago)

The only thing of his I've ever bought was "Selected Ambient Works 85-92" and it was so pisspoor and weak and bland that I've really been put off ever bothering with him again. I know he must be better than that.

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 16 October 2003 18:05 (twenty-two years ago)

But the first two tracks of Ambient Works 85-92, Dadaismus, you don't find them very magical?

(Grandpa Simpson voice) Back in 1992, it was the fashion of the times to put this CD on at home and share a spliff after a night of pure mentalism jumping up and down to hoover noises (and, inevitably, Aphex's own 'Digeridoo', which was a bit of a rave classic. I remember a confused squad of police shutting down a party to this track, completely and visibly bemused by the bizarreness of the music). If you didn't have 85-92, we didn't come to your house to chill out, simple as that.

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Thursday, 16 October 2003 19:56 (twenty-two years ago)

just to clear this up:

This is probably why he is the biggest selling act on walk because it makes his music more accessible to rock-based fans

walk = warp

heheh - walk records. I was at work and my boss distracted me.

Anyway, I reckon SAW1 is highly overrated - only Heliosphan and Ageispolis manage to truly shine. the rest is okay, but admit it - it's boring and dated to anyone who wasn't into it at the time.

I agree with whoever said I Care Because You Do is his best album.

dog latin, Thursday, 16 October 2003 23:56 (twenty-two years ago)

That's pretty black and white, Tuomas...there can be just as much beauty in Charlie Parker holding a single note, with his sound, as in a blinding run of them, it's just a different kind. Besides, Aphex often creates a great effect by juxtaposing fast, jumbling beats again slowly changing chords, almost a kind of parallax.

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 23 October 2003 14:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, I know it's black and white, it's no the ultimate truth, it's just my opinion on structure in music. But I think the Charlie Parker analogy is wrong: when Bird plays on a tune, all the focus is on his playing, and the drummers and the bassists and the pianists don't try to do all sorts of weird shit beside his playing. To compare Bird to Aphex doesn't work in this discussion, because "sound" in jazz means different thing than "sound" in electronic music.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Thursday, 23 October 2003 14:25 (twenty-one years ago)

But surely the point of Aphex's later work is contrast and juxtaposition - that putting the brutal mentalist drill'n'bass stuff up against this really nice Reynold's-friendly idyllictronic melody, then highlighting the qualities of one side when the other disappears (Girl Boy being the ultimate example). In this way, it's what sets Aphex above Squarepusher or Venetian Snares or whoever.

That says, he really has done it all to death and should really go and try his hand at something else by now, as large swathes of Druckqs would attest to.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 23 October 2003 14:36 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, sorry matt, i was kinda self-servingly distorting your argument..

tuomas, if you're making enemies of complexity of structure and 'beauty' in electronic music, then we gotta agree to disagree.

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Thursday, 23 October 2003 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)

also, the term 'electronic music' here is pretty meaningless.

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Thursday, 23 October 2003 14:49 (twenty-one years ago)

also the terms "complexity of structure" and "beauty"

vahid (vahid), Thursday, 23 October 2003 14:51 (twenty-one years ago)

But I think the Charlie Parker analogy is wrong: when Bird plays on a tune, all the focus is on his playing, and the drummers and the bassists and the pianists don't try to do all sorts of weird shit beside his playing

Maybe not in Bird, but absolutely in say, the 60s Miles quintet w/Tony Williams.

To compare Bird to Aphex doesn't work in this discussion, because "sound" in jazz means different thing than "sound" in electronic music.

Not to me, it doesn't. I was thinking about this last night, how a large part of jazz is an obsession with sound qua sound (in an acoustic environment of course). Every jazz musicians's personal sound/tone is their distinguishing and most valued trait, and part of the point of the musical environment and instrumention is clarity and space, so that everyone can be heard in their own frequency range. And then there's bending notes, extended techniques, etc. which have always been used for emotional effect.

Basically I was just sitting listening to some Telefon Tel Aviv and then to some jazz, and realizing that both spend comparable amounts of time laboring over their actual tones used, and that it's a big part of the pleasure I get from both.

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 23 October 2003 15:01 (twenty-one years ago)

lemme rephrase that 2nd to last post, actually: i don't think it's that easy to isolate the bits that are doing the emotional work, in aphex or "ignition key" or bangalter. i'd say something about base and superstructure here, but i'd be wrong.

vahid: agreed.

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Thursday, 23 October 2003 15:02 (twenty-one years ago)

I recognise you feel pop-house is unfairly maligned by the mainstream press in favour of more Warpy stuff, but there's no reason to dismiss the latter out of hand. Not liking something because it's critically acclaimed is uber-indie nonsense


I think people are more anxious to read into what they think I'm saying rather than read my posts. It's nothing to do with critical acclaim, there is loads of critically acclaimed dance music I like, which I mentioned at several points on this thread.

Also just because my favourite music is pop house, don't assume that that's all I am aware of. Honestly I sometimes feel I'd be better off not being enthusiastic about what I do like because inevitably it leads to assumptions that one is thick.

Anyway the point I'm making is that this isn't a split between pophouse/warp on my part. Robin earlier raised a good point when he pointed out that I do like Derrick May but don't like Aphex and that this was possibly a double standard.

So yes at some point it comes down to me thinking Derrick May's music does not generally exist outside of clubbing as I know it, whereas Aphex's does. I think the large amount of people now arguing with me aren't willing to accept that my argument or opinion if you like is supported by subsequent records made by Rolando, Carl Craig, Laurent Garnier, or Agoria (to name a few). There is a different school of thought as regards deeper or acclaimed or fuck it INTELLIGENT dance music.

So it's not actually about my own favourite type of music because as much as I love Garnier/Agoria/Rolando, it's clear to anyone from my posts that I am more into Bangalter etc.

It's not about me railing against some pointless press line, it's about pointing out the existence of a whole other idea of IDM, one which, given the arguments against me in the last few posts, people are completely ignorant of, regardless of whether they've heard the artists in question.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 24 October 2003 09:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Keep in mind the whole thing which actually raised this bugbear with me was reading someone lazily slate Garnier in an Agoria review which was next to a Luke Vibert one yadda yadda yadda

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 24 October 2003 10:04 (twenty-one years ago)

And finally if you can see a good reason why any of the above (even Derrick May) are not discussed with the same cliched awe as Aphex and Warp then please let me know.

Oh wait I have one! Cos you can't differentiate them easily in your head from DANCE MUSIC, ew!

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 24 October 2003 10:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Ronan, which particular dance-hataz are you addressing here?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 24 October 2003 10:32 (twenty-one years ago)

It's not necessarily dance hataz is it, sorry if I don't live up to your idea of what Ronan would post in response to that.

It's not necessarily dance hataz, just people who fail to recognise the intellectual value of simplicity or of music which provokes a physical response. Like The Man With The Red Face maybe. Or Knights Of The Jaguar, or Jam The Box, or Quetzal, or Science Fiction, or Nude Photo.

"OR POPHOUSE" WOULD BE BETTER?

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 24 October 2003 10:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Global Communication-The Way, Freeform Five-Perspex Sex (Ewan Pearson Mix), Deep Dish-Future Of The Future, BamBam-Where Is Your Child, Ten City-Right Back To You or Devotion, Mr Fingers-Stars, E-Dancer-Velocity Funk, Kevin Saunderson-Pump The Move, Tyree-Acid Over, Fast Eddie-Acid Thunder, Depeche Mode-Personal Jesus (Francois K Mix)

List goes on and on and on, maybe if more of them made albums they would be more intelligent????????????????

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 24 October 2003 10:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I mean yes, fuck it, this is railing and oldman was right earlier on in some sense. But the schism between "clubland" (hate that phrase) and any act who makes albums is big enough, with Warp it's chasmically big.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 24 October 2003 10:57 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah so a schism can't be a chasm probably but anyway.


another tune for the above list, Aphex Twin-Analogue Bubblebath.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 24 October 2003 10:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Maybe a schasm or a chism - just a suggestion, ignore me (you usually do)

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 24 October 2003 10:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Upthread I wrote "I do, however, agree with Ronan that stuff that's on Warp gets a bit of a free pass in the press and exposure that other electronic or dance music wouldn't do, purely by virtue of being on Warp."

That's it. I AGREE WITH YOU on this point. I also agree with you 100% on the albums thing. I just think that using the snobbery of the press or indeed the fans as a stick to beat the label, the artists or the music itself with is wrong.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 24 October 2003 11:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I wish I'd heard the Agoria and Vibert records as well, and not just for the purpose of this debate.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 24 October 2003 11:15 (twenty-one years ago)

It's not necessarily using it as a stick to beat the label with, I accept I just can't bring myself to be fair to it, so yeah that's wrong but I won't apologise for it either. I do think alot of Warp stuff, not all, exists in a world of its own independent of dance music and I guess this vindicates and damns the hacks who are snobby about it simultaneously.

This is almost verbatim the same as the CoFlo/Def Jux vs Jigga etc debates except with dance music.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 24 October 2003 11:20 (twenty-one years ago)

It's not necessarily dance hataz, just people who fail to recognise the intellectual value of simplicity or of music which provokes a physical response.

Er, is this aimed at me?

Otherwise, Matt DC is on the money.

Ricardo (RickyT), Friday, 24 October 2003 11:35 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't think Warp is/was so far removed from the rest of dance music, though.

A lot of Aphex comes out of acid--look at something like Surfing on Sine Waves, it's really not far from the bleep stuff Warp started with. And things like Didgeridoo were considered part of hardcore at the time.

And then most of the first series of IDM they did, stuff like B12, was slavishly imitating Detroit (the problem here was not that it was different from "proper dance," but that it was cowered by influence--too worshipful of tradition).

And the general critique of Warp for making fun of "proper dance music" is not such a slam-dunk either, as many people have tried to argue on this thread--appropriations of say jungle can as easily be read as simply filtering it through a different sensibility as mocking it (of course, we could argue that that sensibility is juvenile and emotionally stunted, but that's a different critique...) (though even there, isn't childishness something we're supposed to celebrate about hardcore? why not here?)

The thing is, Ronan, that your take on Warp is basically no different from the take of the people you are criticizing--which is ultimately based on marketing. You hate the label for the same reasons they love it.

old man, Friday, 24 October 2003 11:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Ricky, not "aimed" at anyone, Matt asked a question and I answered it.

Old man, you may be right but do any non Warp DJs actually play Warp records?

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 24 October 2003 13:09 (twenty-one years ago)

I have no idea. I doubt many of them do. But Warp is hardly the only label in the world making dance music that you can't really dance to.

old man, Friday, 24 October 2003 13:14 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost

you'd be hard pressed to argue that the warp records of today has any real engagement w contemporary dance music. or w my record collection. even the lfo record is essentially ardkore nostalgia, innit?

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Friday, 24 October 2003 13:19 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't really listen to Warp anymore! I agree, it's fairly irrelevant now. Which is why this argument is so dated ;)

old man, Friday, 24 October 2003 13:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Not about whether you can dance to it though, about connection with clubs is what I meant.

Yeah it is dated but so what! The funny truth is that one of my favourite singles of the year was released on Warp. And I love the LFO record too. Though on the contrary Mitch I'd imagine Freak is getting played everywhere, mind you there's no club here lately so I can't be sure. So maybe Warp now is trying go back to the club scene, didn't they start some new offshoot label for this purpose tho?

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 24 October 2003 13:36 (twenty-one years ago)

how is warp irrelevant now¿ i still buy their records and enjoy the music.

dyson (dyson), Friday, 24 October 2003 13:45 (twenty-one years ago)

i still think 'freak' is great btw and i was gonna use it as an example of warp stuff getting play outside of warpland, except clubland here definitely wouldn't play it, and i'm too tired to make two arguments at once.

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Friday, 24 October 2003 13:46 (twenty-one years ago)

loads of warp records get played by dance djs and are listened to by people who also listen to "proper" dance music,i think i've said this before but different music has different purposes,warp is for when someone's been mixing house/techno for hours and it gets to 10 the next morning and everyone is sitting around flaked out smoking joints and drinking and someone will put on a warp cd because it suits that time of the night,which is in my opinion as much a part of a dance music based night out as any other...
its not like there is a choice between dance music and warp that you have to make,different types of music exist for different reasons...

robin (robin), Friday, 24 October 2003 13:55 (twenty-one years ago)

I love the way "10 the next morning" is "that time of night".

Obviously its still 'night' until you go to bed even if you don't do so for two days as we've discussed before.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Friday, 24 October 2003 13:58 (twenty-one years ago)

fair enough Robin but to me your last sentence would be slightly different, ie different types of music exist for any reason, I don't know what we listen to at that time of night/morning, I think probably the same thing we listen to at 4 or 5 or whatever.


(btw to sidetrack, are you going to DEAF? I am going to the Winter Party, please I am not a scumbag)

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 24 October 2003 14:04 (twenty-one years ago)

(i'll hopefully be able to get the money to go on sunday night,i'd like to see technasia and rob hood....)

what i mean about different types of music is that there is no opposition between warp and dance music,as far as i can see,in that a lot of people listen to both,and while there are no doubt people who would listen to warp instead of dance music and would dismiss normal dance music i'd say most people who are into warp would also listen to house or techno or drum 'n' bass...
ie electronic music made for dancing and electronic music not specifically intended for dancing are not (or don't have to be) mutually exclusive...

robin (robin), Friday, 24 October 2003 14:12 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd love to see both of those aswell actually, I could have gone for free Saturday but can't afford Sunday and will probably be shattered after tomorrow. I am dreading the Point Depot really, but the music should be good, mainly want to see Garnier.

I'm not sure about the Warp thing really, I suppose I'm coming from the point of view of someone who feels there is enough stuff for all moods in house and techno, I've yet to take an interest in downtempo stuff specifically so as I say I don't really understand the idea.

Not that I listen to bangers the whole time, I don't know it's hard to explain, I never thought about it like that but I am fairly sure I just listen to stuff randomly enough.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 24 October 2003 14:48 (twenty-one years ago)

i like both (IDM and DM) at different times, yes.

dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 24 October 2003 15:09 (twenty-one years ago)

"intelligent dance music" : dance music :: appels : oranges

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Friday, 24 October 2003 18:28 (twenty-one years ago)

intelligent dance music : dance music :: appels : apples

Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 24 October 2003 18:29 (twenty-one years ago)


IDM - the most vile way of describing a form of music coined

Same goes for Electronica...

I think it says a lot about the current scene when you understand that Digerdoo was a huge tune on the hardcore scene in the early 90s. In that context you couldn't get away with drill n bass nonsense and crappy experimentation because as Thoumas alludes to dance music hadn't been tainted with the rockist idea of 12"'s and white labels being produced by "artists"

Drukgs sounds a lot better pitched down at -8 or -6

blue, Friday, 24 October 2003 21:31 (twenty-one years ago)

For the record, I don't think either Digeridoo or Analogue Bubblebath actually came out on Warp. D'oh!

Matt DC (Matt DC), Saturday, 25 October 2003 13:30 (twenty-one years ago)

I have been avoiding this thread for a while now, and I am seeing some huge holes that people are totally missing.

Re: RDJ as media personality.

You probably don't remember this, but there was a time when RDJ was GOD! I mean RDJ was the most important man in the fucking universe, you thought it, your dad thought it, and every last music journalist made it a point to make sure you did not forget it. I don’t care how big of a Detroit fascist you are (and I was the biggest one this board has ever witnessed!) you knew RDJ was the dope shit, you knew, your dad knew, and every last person who knew anything about electronic music knew it. That is cool and the gang, because if you don't like Aphex you are an idiot. RDJ is definitely one of the top 5 most important producers of the last decade and Blue Calyx alone is better than your entire record collection. But what do you do if you are just some kid from Cornwall who happened to make the best records and everybody and their brother could not stop talking about what a GENIUS you are??????? Could you imagine what it would be like for people to earnestly call you the new Mozart (I totally stole this very astute observation from Bruce Gilbert's invisible jukebox interview from wire!)???? God, that is a head fuck if I have ever seen one! Of course he acted like an ass and drove a tank, how could you possible take it seriously and not be completely creatively paralyzed?

Re IDM is not dance music

This whole Warp artist on one side and floortrax on the other is a complete load of cobblers. Everybody I knew in the 90's that had even marginal interest in dance music liked Aphex. And this is not like 99, this is like 94. Like Colin so rightly said, if you didn't have the SAW records we were not coming over after the party. The only reason you have such polarization right now is because of the indie invasion of the late 90's(which was a case of people who would have made boring guitar records coming in to flood the market with boring computer records which made the whole idea seem lame, stupid, and played out) and the declining fortunes of both genres of music. Back in the day that delineation did not exist, Kenny Larkin put out records on Warp. You could totally bang floortrax in your car or at the gig or while cleaning the house, and chill to Polygon Window or Beaumont Hannett at night.

Re artists in electronic music:

Don't you ever get bored? The division is recent and artificial. In the 90's we needed Autechre as much as we needed Cristian Vogel and Jesper Dhalbeck. We needed dudes to get artistical because there were so many boundaries to cross at the time. For all you cats who have the nuts of the progeny of Wolfgang Voight on your chin you need to remember that when that cat's records broke he was seen as being every bit as artistical as any Warp backed auteur. There was a time when RDJ records were like shocking brand new worlds, that was before there were a thousand IDM producers making entire microgenres out of just one of RDJ's hyperprism gimmicks.

So yeah anyway, RDJ is a genius, and yeah that guy upthread was right you should get as much as you can of his because it is QUALITY AND SO SO CHOICE, and you are fucking up if you sleep on it. And you asshats can call me a rockist all you like, cuz I am going to fly to that backwater you call home and smack your mother with my copy of Songs For My Father by Anthony Shakir on your front porch! Because I was raving when you still thought June of 44 was the shit! HAHAHAHAHAHAH

This is my second pot of tea tonight and I OWN EVERY LAST ONE OF YOU!

WAAAARRRRGGGHHHHHQ!!!!!

Disco Nihilist (mjt), Saturday, 25 October 2003 22:08 (twenty-one years ago)

He's right you know. (Especially about the Aphex is god bit, I think I was hearing that everywhere I went when it came to talking to the electronically aware folks around 93/94.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 26 October 2003 02:59 (twenty-one years ago)

There was a time when RDJ records were like shocking brand new worlds, that was before there were a thousand IDM producers making entire microgenres out of just one of RDJ's hyperprism gimmicks.

Though a bit of your rhetoric does sound like the ramblings of yon exemplary elitist (see upthread). This bit I could not agree with more.
Before catchphrases like Microhouse, Electroclash and Glitchcore became household names, Aphex had been making them. But the cool thing about it is he never held himself down to one style. The day the bottom dropped out of IDM was the day these little subgenres started getting invented. Artists started popping up out of nowhere making records out their bedrooms that all sounded the same. The only difference between them and Aphex was that RDJ has never been a one-trick-poney and for me, that is half the appeal. With every release up to Druqks it would be a case of "what the fuck is he going to hit me with this time?" and that's why sometimes it could sound, yes, a little pretentious. But I'd rather hear the Come To Daddy EP than someone who specialises in Techglitch Microdrill exclusively - what's the fucking point??!

IDM, Electronica, whatever you call it, died it's real death for me when Druqks came out and ruined an illusion of what Aphex Twin was all about. It's not a bad album, but like so many others, I am still disappointed by the long wait and the way the album opposes no new musical ideas, giving free reign to the geekazoids who claim to make decent electronica.

dog latin, Sunday, 26 October 2003 04:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Disco Nihilist is so OTM it hurts.

Andrew (enneff), Sunday, 26 October 2003 06:03 (twenty-one years ago)

two years pass...
The Hangable Auto Bulp EP was reissued today. In lieu of this news, you still should get everything Aphex has ever done but pay special attention to this one. People will still be listening to it ten thousand years from now.

John Hutchison (John Hutchison), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 00:12 (nineteen years ago)

i'll be surprised if Hangable Autobulb sells anything at all for some reason. it's great, but it's been around so long most people who want it will have got it by some means or another.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 00:26 (nineteen years ago)

arched maid via rdj is probably the best song he has ever done.

cutty (mcutt), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 00:27 (nineteen years ago)

can i just say how much i miss mike taylor.

strongo hulkington's ghost (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 00:30 (nineteen years ago)

I bought this a few days ago. I particularly like Laughable Butane Bob and Every Day, but I don't think I'll be listening to it 10,000 years from now.

Lingbertt, Tuesday, 1 November 2005 02:27 (nineteen years ago)

I bought a copy in the hopes that the ultimate sales figures will spur RDJ to release all the stuff he keeps in his archive that he thinks is too precious for anyone else to hear.

JohnHutchison, Tuesday, 1 November 2005 02:31 (nineteen years ago)

You know what it's going to sound like though.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 1 November 2005 14:32 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.