T/S: the First Six Black Sabbath Albums vs. the First Six Van Halen Albums

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Well?

Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:22 (twenty-two years ago)

In Stairway to Hell, assuming I did my math right (any accountants out there are free to check it, and figure out Led Zep too if they want), Van Halen (who only have five albums in the book -- no Diver Down!) appear to beat Black Sabbath (who have all six in there), 2048 to 1787 anyway. I might disagree with that now, though; I'm not sure.

chuck, Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:41 (twenty-two years ago)

If you were to make a comp of all the best bits from all 6 of the first Van Halen records....
No.
No, I'm sorry...but it would still fall in abject fear before the trundling tank-treads of Paranoid.

Lord Custos Omicron (Lord Custos Omicron), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:43 (twenty-two years ago)

This is a very good question. Black Sabbath appear to win in my brain for now, though. Hmmm...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 20:22 (twenty-two years ago)

>Black Sabbath appear to win in my brain for now

Sabbath are the instinctive choice, but I've been listening to Van Halen for about a week now, and I think they're a lot stronger than people remember them being. They were a singles band, I think (too young to actually remember their initial emergence), whereas Sabbath have always been an album band, therefore Sabbath are seen as more "important." Despite the fact that Roth upended the whole rock-frontman thing by turning it into a vehicle for weird Al Jolsonisms and a wink so constant it became a tic.

Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 20:36 (twenty-two years ago)

For the record, here are the ones in Stairway to Hell, by number:

#12: 1984
#20: Sabotage (which most people underrate, still, I bet)
#27: Paranoid (should MAYBE be higher than the two above)
#90: Van Halen
#102: Fair Warning
#120: Master of Reality (should maybe be higher than Fair Warning)
#123: Women and Children First
#125: Van Halen II
#139: Sabbath Vol. 4 (which should maybe be LOWER; I mean, beyond
"Supernaut," does anybody really give a shit about this thing?)
#419: Black Sabbath (which should be a lot higher, probably)
#488: Sabbath Bloody Sabbath (which still pretty much sucks ass --
in fact, given the choice, I'd probably take Diver Down now.)

Where that leaves us, I still have no idea.

Best song on any of the above, though: "Paranoid," easy.

chuck, Wednesday, 29 October 2003 20:39 (twenty-two years ago)

By Sabbath's debut deserving to be "a lot higher," by the way, I mean a lot higher than #419 in the book, not higher than the albums above it above, except MAYBE Black Sabbath 4.

chuck, Wednesday, 29 October 2003 20:41 (twenty-two years ago)

#20: Sabotage (which most people underrate, still, I bet)

This is actually the one I listen to the most. I never had listened to much Sabbath outside of a couple of songs before I first read Stairway to Hell, and so when I finally got it (after getting most of the others), I wanted to get as good a sense of it as I could. And I seem to have done! "Symptom of the Universe" is just ridiculously good.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 20:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Vol. 4 and Fair Warning are the Sabbath and Van Halen albums I listen to most often, respectively.

Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 20:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, Sab all the way. To me, the highlights on those albums ARE way better than the Van Halen singles (um, Hot for Teacher notwithstanding!).

This thread has made me really want some of those old Sabbath albums that I don't actually own, so it is a good thing.

Jordan (Jordan), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 21:03 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd say Van Halen as I get more pleasure out of their albums as albums. But I feel like I should look over my shoulder for betting against Sabbath.

scott m (mcd), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 21:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Sabbath cuz they are my gods but also cuz i willingly listen to fifth-rate sabbath knock-offs and i can't say the same for van halen. bad sludge beats bad eruption-worshipping. i think. tho, of course, the diamond dave era was a wonderful sight to behold. this also doesn't mean that i hate their imitators or anything, just that i don't listen to them that much (or at all).

scott seward, Wednesday, 29 October 2003 21:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Wait, Scott, who ARE Van Halen's imiatators? I mean, I guess some late '80s hair metal bands, but they never really sound exactly like Van Halen in the way all the great stoner rock bands sound exactly like Sabbath. Which was your point, I guess.

chuck, Wednesday, 29 October 2003 22:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Wait, Scott, who ARE Van Halen's imiatators?

Weren't Bulletboys about the only ones? And then not even then?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 22:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Another factor, maybe:

Roth's solo career > Ozzy's solo career, no contest.

chuck, Wednesday, 29 October 2003 22:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Though on the other hand:

Ozzy's TV show > Roth's TV show (which may have never even aired, but his people sent me a videotape of it a couple years ago. Yuck.)

chuck, Wednesday, 29 October 2003 22:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Ah yes, I've heard about that videotape. Something about him pretending he was a sultan in a cave?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 22:45 (twenty-two years ago)

that roth tv show was just unexplainably ... um ... well, just unexlainably unexplainable.

but, no, it never aired. it was just a video that got sent to a million or so critics with no explanation (as if there could have been one) and for no apparent reason.

fact checking cuz, Wednesday, 29 October 2003 22:55 (twenty-two years ago)

Sabbath were shamelessly repeating themselves by the third
album, and Ozzy's voice didn't hold up well after _Paranoid_ -
on the other hand, Aerosmith only averaged 3 good songs per
album. It looks about equal.

squirlplise@hotmail.com, Wednesday, 29 October 2003 22:57 (twenty-two years ago)

"Paranoid", easy? Not so easy when you consider, oh, "Running With the Devil" -- "Paranoid" still wins, but it's a tight race. Also, VH is more versatile -- they could write decent dirge-ballads; Sabbath couldn't ("Little Dreamer" >>>>> "Changes"), and they had great crossover-potential pop hooks; "Dance the Night Away" is so the Raspberries' "Go All The Way" for the Torino Cobra set. They're the closest an American band has come to making another Desolation Boulevard. Special extra credit bonus: Eddie on "Beat It".

But Sabbath is Sabbath. And that is practically unfuckwithable.

Analogy: Sabbath:Bruce Lee::VH:Jackie Chan.

nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 30 October 2003 00:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Sabbath filler is more interesting than Van Halen filler (maybe not, if their shoobedoobop non-metal songs qualify as filler) but Van Halen gold tops Sabbath's. I'm more apt to play VH's debut and Women And Children First over any Sabbath. I dig both but I'm gonna have to go with Van Halen.

Though I totally disagree re: solo careers. "Crazy Train" tops any of Roth's solo shit.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 30 October 2003 00:30 (twenty-two years ago)

But Sabbath is Sabbath. And that is practically unfuckwithable.
Analogy: Sabbath:Bruce Lee::VH:Jackie Chan.
-- nate detritus (n***p*****550...), October 30th, 2003

YES!!!!

Francis Watlington (Francis Watlington), Thursday, 30 October 2003 00:59 (twenty-two years ago)

*has a mildly strange feeling that ILM may, ahem, influence him into buying a Van Halen rekkid some day*

t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Thursday, 30 October 2003 01:25 (twenty-two years ago)

GET THEIR DEBUT, BUDDY. GET IT! IF NOTHING ELSE!

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 30 October 2003 01:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Hmmm... "1984" was Van Halen's Fifth album, wasn't it?

And that one was quite good while Black Sabbath were struggling musically by then.

Hard to pick anyway, considering they are two of my favourite metal acts. Both had a way with being highly melodic that most metal bands don't

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 30 October 2003 01:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Anthony -- thanx for the emphatic recommendation. But it's not exactly like I haven't heard Van Halen's albums. I just don't have any of them. (As opposed to Sab's, of whose I've got half a dozen)

t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Thursday, 30 October 2003 01:47 (twenty-two years ago)

1984 is pretty sucky, actually. A few good singles, some wack pre-Hagar keyboard malarkey and some clumsy art-zep that made Roth wanna go solo. A video comp from that period would do the job much more nicely.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 30 October 2003 01:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Wait, Scott, who ARE Van Halen's imiatators?


i think i just meant the post-eddie guitar wank without the wink and the peroxide jobs without the songs. purty much EVERY hard rock band from the states after VH's debut were coloured, shaped, or awed into some state of suspended adolescence/animation by it. from Slayer on down.so, in a sense, i listen to tons of people who were influenced in some way by van halen. heavy metal guitar would not be the same without them. i guess i just meant in an obvious sense. in the way that Sabbath imitators are easy to peg on first listen.

scott seward, Thursday, 30 October 2003 02:14 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd just like to mention the Bulletboys' "Smooth Up In Ya" for no particularly good reason.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 30 October 2003 02:20 (twenty-two years ago)

I have to go with Sabbath, they practically invented heavy metal.
I'd like to party with Diamond Dave but I wish Ozzy was my dad.

Brandon Welch (Brandon Welch), Thursday, 30 October 2003 02:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Lightning Bolt seems very Van Halen-ish to me. The bass is all "Eruption" and the drums are all the intro to "Hot For Teacher".

Kris (aqueduct), Thursday, 30 October 2003 03:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Analogy: Sabbath:Bruce Lee::VH:Jackie Chan.
More like
Sabbath:Bruce Lee :: Van Halen:Steven Seagal

Lord Custos Omicron (Lord Custos Omicron), Thursday, 30 October 2003 04:01 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd just like to mention the Bulletboys' "Smooth Up In Ya" for no particularly good reason.

Oh, there are plenty of Bulletboys songs which sound like Van Halen, but that's not one of 'em.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Thursday, 30 October 2003 06:07 (twenty-two years ago)

van halen imitators = Damon Che's Thee Speaking Canaries.

jack cole (jackcole), Thursday, 30 October 2003 07:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Bulletboys versh of "Hang on St Christopher"!!! Gtr is Marc Ribot imitation except played on one of those hotrodded Ibanez Iceman and the singer sounds like 'Almost Blue'-era Costello.

Fuck, what a question, ummm...well this looks like a massacre so I'm going to stick up for 'Women & Children First' at least. Although come to think of it 3rd-alb-wise, I think the 'fillers' on 'MoR' were necessary because if it kept up the same intensity as 'Void' and 'After Forever' the whole way, the listener would die. Naw, whoever has so far pointed out the amount of VH filler is OTM, just too goddamn much. I'm not thinking of the instrumentals either, those are the very definition of necessary! I'm thinking of stuff like "Hear About it Later" and "Drop Dead Legs", which sound like Hagar-type songs almost.

dave q, Thursday, 30 October 2003 08:57 (twenty-two years ago)

VH imitators - remember the Snickers commercial where this kid was "keeps me going through long hours of guitar practice!" then it shows him 'tapping' and you're like "Son you're going to be another Chris Farley"

dave q, Thursday, 30 October 2003 09:02 (twenty-two years ago)

Slayer was Van Halen influenced? I'd rather say that they shared a common idol: Judas Priest.

Siegbran (eofor), Thursday, 30 October 2003 09:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Morbid Angel's Trey Azagthoth thanks EVH on liner notes "for making it all possible". I think Chuck Schuldiner worshipped EVH too. (OT I still maintain that "Beat It" is the nadir of both men involved's careers ["Another fuckin' guitar solo" - David Lee Roth, c. 1984])

I think Sab have the edge because even though they were totally sonics-fixated they have more individual songs that work on their own whereas the first six VH albums run like "VH Track: Pts 1-40" or however many there are. As somebody said once re Queen, "They started where they ended and everything in between was the same too"

dave q, Thursday, 30 October 2003 10:23 (twenty-two years ago)

For strong arguments in favour of both Sabbath and Van Halen, it's worthwhile reading their respective 'album of the month' reviews on Julian Cope's www.headheritage.com site. What Mr Cope sorely lacks in musical talent (IMHO), he more than compensates for in writing ability.

Anyway, for me it's Sabbath all the way.

Why is the Ozzy period so consistently seen as being only the first six albums, by the way? (NB: this rule extends as far as my record collection, so I can't comment on the merits or otherwise of Technical Ecstasy and Never Say Die, though I do recall Live At Last not being so hot).

M Carty (mj_c), Thursday, 30 October 2003 11:38 (twenty-two years ago)

That is to say, I quite imagine that the real black sabbath magic is only really present on the first six, but I'm still curious if anyone thinks TE and NSD have anything going for them.

The song sung by Bill Ward on the Sabbath Story Volume One comes from one of those two albums though, doesn't it? If that's in any way indicative, then all becomes clear!

M Carty (mj_c), Thursday, 30 October 2003 11:40 (twenty-two years ago)

'Live at Last' is great. "You spend your days...gettin' high...oooooaaaugghhh...trippin' all the time!" 'TE' and 'NSD' have three or four good songs between them, although they (both) have the best cover art of anything mentioned here ('cept 'Fair Warning')"You Won't Change Me" and "Dirty Women" are the TE ones, forget the 'NSD' ones

dave q, Thursday, 30 October 2003 11:43 (twenty-two years ago)

What was the Bill Ward-sung song? Were it possible to delete a track from a DVD, that's one I would destroy.

How can you hate on the cover art of the first Black Sabbath album, by the way (if only by omission)?

M Carty (mj_c), Thursday, 30 October 2003 11:47 (twenty-two years ago)

. As Slayer axman Kerry King noted, “Eddie Van Halen
and Randy Rhoads were my heroes because I grew up when those guys were at their best.


i don't just make this shit up! well, some times i do.

scott seward, Thursday, 30 October 2003 11:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Dave = one of greatest frontmen ever, even better than Ozzy (yes, it's true - come on.)
First 6 VH records = First 2 VH records. I.e. aside from a few great songs on the later records, they could have stopped at VHII.
Black Sabbath = great to mythical proportions & never had Michael Anthony sing backup.

dave225 (Dave225), Thursday, 30 October 2003 12:50 (twenty-two years ago)

I've seen a video of a live version which is on the Black Sabbath Story Volume I DVD. I don't think I'd want to watch that particular song a second time, mind you, so I can't remember how sprinstinian he might have looked!

M Carty (mj_c), Thursday, 30 October 2003 13:10 (twenty-two years ago)

Randy Rhoads were my heroes because I grew up when those guys were at their best.

Yeah, Randy Rhoads sure went downhill after he, um, right nevermind.

(god I have to get some more Sabbath albums)

Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 30 October 2003 14:52 (twenty-two years ago)

"Behind the Wall of Sleep" kills "Feel Your Love."

Ian Christe (Ian Christe), Friday, 31 October 2003 02:46 (twenty-two years ago)

one year passes...
Been listening to the first six VH albums one per day at work and I still have to say in terms of a choice Sabbath in general but I will say this for VH:

* having listened to all these albums far less (1984 was the only one I had while growing up), a lot of their stuff is a lot more weirdly unexpected to my mind these days -- am listening to Diver Down today and was thoroughly and pleasantly surprised by "Secrets," which is almost a Hall and Oates parallel world hit (from the exact same time frame) in ways. "Little Guitars" has something about it that reminds me of Telekon-era Gary Numan! And there's something on Fair Warning that's sorta reggae, yes? Sabbath were all over the place too, mind you, to their credit. Maybe the triangulation point is Queen or something.

* more bands should be more relaxed and open about doing covers of all sorts on their albums rather than having to worry about being 'original' the whole damn time -- only a couple of total hypergenrefucks perhaps ("Happy Trails" f'r instance, but imagine if they actually had Beach Boys-style harmonies), they were mostly dedicated to a very Sixties post-British Invasion style of covers and revamps (some Motown, some blues, some oldies) suited for a garage band circa 1966, but generally speaking were able to translate into a cusp-of-eighties glossworld.

* the albums are all blessedly short! For all that EVH is seen/criticized in corners as being an excuse for guitarwankaroo nearly everyone of these albums barely crests the thirty-minute mark.

* David Lee Roth, whattaguy. He sounds like he's out to have a enjoyably ridiculous time whenever he opens his mouth, and he delivers!

Still, George Smith was right elsewhere recently, the rhythm section really isn't all that -- and compared to Butler and Ward? GIDOUDDAHERE.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 11 March 2005 15:57 (twenty-one years ago)

VH were a great pop band. that's something a lot of the wankers ignored amidst their noodling.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 11 March 2005 16:17 (twenty-one years ago)

That's because the noodling tends to distract from the pop? I sorta had Ned's epiphany (based solely around the radio singles), but, sheesh, Eddie, just, I dunno, play one chord or something. (Like I know what I'm talking about.)

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 11 March 2005 16:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Not much of a fan of Eddie but he most certainly plays chords, generally with the impact of a mortar shell on the early albums. He's excellent on rhythm, really taking the concussion/percussion potential in timbre, tone and attack to the maximum.

George Smith, Friday, 11 March 2005 16:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Maybe what bugs me is that Eddie's rhythms clash w/ his bro & bass buddy, & they're not ably complementing his skills - it seems like they're just a little bit off sometimes (like in "Little Guitars", tho I'd have to listen to it again to speak on it more specifically). I blame the totally superfluous 2nd bass drum.

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 11 March 2005 16:46 (twenty-one years ago)

That's because the drummer follows the guitar player and the bass player is left to hang out in the air in Van Halen. Hardly anyone can pull off this crippled approach to rock and roll but it worked for van Halen. On the first few albums this didn't matter so much, since except for Anthony's intros, the bass wasn't mixed high at all.

There's no pocket that the bassist and drummer reside together in with van Halen. The band still manages to groove -- but not in a trad way -- because Eddie can groove rhythmically.

George Smith, Friday, 11 March 2005 16:51 (twenty-one years ago)

George, I was about to bring up the solo from 'Hot For Teacher' as an example of a place where Mike and Alex are in a groove away from Eddie, but on second thought that's not really the case, as Eddie plays so fast and hits so many notes that he's always right there with them. BTW, that solo is INCREDIBLE.

57 7th (calstars), Friday, 11 March 2005 17:09 (twenty-one years ago)

I'll pick Sabbath, but yeah, VH does indeed have many bits of gold here and there. You could make one killer cdr from their first 6 album which would have to include:

Hang 'Em High
Unchained
Atomic Punk
Drop Dead Legs
So This Is Love
Beautiful Girls
You're No Good

And the hate for Diver Down has always made me sad.

darin (darin), Friday, 11 March 2005 17:57 (twenty-one years ago)

yEAH, Eddie's triple time twiddly switchback riff drives "Hot for Teacher" backed up by the double bass. Y&T did a pretty good spoof of it on one their "Contagious" album. Of course, Geffen probably wanted them to sincerely song like Van Halen although you could hear Meniketti laughing. It was a good contrast in styles, because Menikette was a blues-based player and Y&T definitely had an in the pocket rhythm section.

George Smith, Friday, 11 March 2005 22:31 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
AAARRRRGHHHHHH why are you guys doing this?????? Art for arts sake.......why compare Da Vinci to Michalangelo? Mozart to Vivaldi? Jolie to Zeta-Jones? You can't rate these guys on a scale, they are all f@#*ing good. Som epeople love their stuff, some cant stand a bar of it. It all rocks differnt for different people

Madashellandnotgoingtotakeitanymore, Saturday, 29 April 2006 10:38 (nineteen years ago)

Wait, Scott, who ARE Van Halen's imiatators?

Anyone else remember Roxy Blue "Rob the Cradle"? It was a total "Hot For Teacher" rip-off iirc. Played on Headbanger's Ball in 1992.
"Rob the craaaaaaaaaaaaaaaduhle! Awll night lawng!"
Heh.

AaronHz (AaronHz), Saturday, 29 April 2006 10:58 (nineteen years ago)

Madashellandnotgoingtotakeitanymore

For a second I thought that said "Me'Shell NdegéOcello"

AaronHz (AaronHz), Saturday, 29 April 2006 11:02 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.