"60s free jazz is the only jazz i have bothered with"

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
from the matching mole thread:

60s free jazz is the only jazz i have bothered with

This seems to be current college radio/Other Music/etc. orthodoxy, for some reason. Was there a thread abt this already?

-- Amateurist (amateu...), February 10th, 2003.

thom west (thom w), Saturday, 8 November 2003 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)

(cuz if there was a thread it was a while ago and i have no idea what to search for but its an interesting question and i wouldn't mind if anyone linked a hypothetical other thread on the subject but i'd rather this not be one of those threads where someone links the thread and then there's a vaguely bitchy silence kthxbye)

thom west (thom w), Saturday, 8 November 2003 19:34 (twenty-one years ago)

my cd collection stinks of this. definately guilty.

tod (tod), Saturday, 8 November 2003 19:48 (twenty-one years ago)

*cries*

yes I have made that awful post as a result of overreacting (surprise, surprise) to Edd's post in the matching mole thread.

I started listening to the 60s 'free' stuff and quite frankly still listening to quite a few records from that time (as well as other genres). I never actually heard this stuff on the radio but have read bits in mags and tried it out (which is what i do with most music i actually 'discover').

Same with classical music: so far, mostly 20th century.

Its a good way of starting with these genres tho'. Then you can always work back (that's what i tell myself).

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 8 November 2003 20:02 (twenty-one years ago)

60s free jazz is what's been seeing most of the action the last few years (BYG reissues, Atavistic's Unheard Music series), so it's not wholly surprising that the college/indie crowd would find it easy to enter through that door.

BTW, one of the best BYG records, Grachan Moncur III's New Africa, came out on CD this week, as did Archie Shepp's Yasmina, A Black Woman (paired with Poem For Malcolm).

Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Saturday, 8 November 2003 20:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I've seen that shepp record over here for quite a few months.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 8 November 2003 21:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Two other recent BYG CD reissues - 'Live in Paris' by the Art Ensemble, and a Don Cherry 2fer, the title of which I can't remember ('Blue Lake' - something like that)

Yeah, the Shepps have already been issued together on an Italian CD (w/ a shitty non-standard BYG cover) - I think true ownership of most of this BYG material is muddy, to say the least, so diff. companies are reissuing it a kind of scattershot fashion, some on vinyl, some on CD (I wld love CD copies of the Jimmy Lyons and Sunny Murray BYG reissues that I've seen - finally managed to score some ltd ed. CD of 'Monkey Pockie-Boo')

It's not just free jazz that has been welll-served recently, reissue-wise - if you're a keen collector of British jazz, for example, then you can't move for Tubby Hayes, Ken Colyer, Chris Barber, Ronnie Scott, Kenny Ball, Humph etc. etc. reissues - not to mention things like 'Outback' by Mike Osbourne and 'Flare Up' by Harry Beckett finally making it onto disc.

The market for free jazz reissues is still a miniscule part of the miniscule jazzbo market, in the UK. A distributor told me recently that in the UK he had managed to shift a grand total of 65 copies of an important Albert Ayler live release, which is fuckin' pitiful.
Even 'Footprints' by Wayne Shorter - his first ever live alb, his first alb as leader in 8 years, a poll-winning rec in Downbeat and Jazztimes etc. etc. - has only sold abt 30,000 copies WORLDWIDE.

Listening to one type of anything is dud, obv.

Andrew L (Andrew L), Saturday, 8 November 2003 22:32 (twenty-one years ago)

30,000 ain't bad, really

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Saturday, 8 November 2003 22:50 (twenty-one years ago)

actually scrap some of my prev post:

I think its a good way to work back if you like stuff like psych rock, beefheart free jazz won't scare you so muc maybe.

And since a lot of 20th century composition deals with electronics, and if you like techno or whatever then that's a way in to classical.

but of course, once you're in then you can try get into other types of the thing.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 8 November 2003 23:14 (twenty-one years ago)

It makes perfect sense; I experienced this years ago. One can listen to free jazz on a much more visceral emotional level than, say, bebop, which is formally more rigorous. One doesn't necessarily have to think about what chords are underlying an over-the-top 10-minute Coltrane solo, or how an AEoC extravaganza reshapes the blues. People reared on rock and its tangents will be more comfortable with 60s Coltrane, Shepp, Ayler, etc., than with Charlie Parker. I never understand just what Parker is trying to do--I don't get it. You don't need to "get" much of the 60s stuff to enjoy it--much of it is "energy music".

kdjfe, Sunday, 9 November 2003 00:40 (twenty-one years ago)

It's just about the only jazz I HAVEN'T bothered with. It seems to focus exclusively on the mind, and leaves the body to rot.

oops (Oops), Sunday, 9 November 2003 03:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I guess if you had the number of legs a centipede has then you could dance to it.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 9 November 2003 09:17 (twenty-one years ago)

it was by far the easiest jazz for me to get into; in fact i'm still really into free jazz and miles' 70s albums (which you should really hear, julio). i found the free stuff way easier to engage with than more traditional stuff.

toby (tsg20), Sunday, 9 November 2003 11:26 (twenty-one years ago)

i found it very easy to get into too, and no it does not just deal to the mind, it's some of the only music i can dance to

very more-ish, yet it's finite -- many of those pieces were ideas that didn't need repeating ad absurdum -- so, some of the best free jazz pieces are from the '60s, when everybody was first to the chords and ideas -- free jazz was played by real jazz musos, not rock session even, so they were capable of pulling off some extremes in various new ideas areas, especially when collaborating with other experts -- a lot of "free "jazz" these days is stuck in a career virtuoso holding pattern and many are simple re-hashes of the '60s -- some of those ideas only needed to be done just enough once not be boring, given their position precisely on the edge of excess

my advice, don't get through it too fast, or listen to tracks too quickly -- you will tire of them and not be able to replace them -- get into it gradually, and all the pieces will unfold over time -- because, you _can_ burn-out on that music, because it is the fastest music i've ever heard (and it is great fun and such a breathe of fresh air from 4/4)

george gosset (gegoss), Sunday, 9 November 2003 13:01 (twenty-one years ago)

(oh, i forgot all the '70s stuff i like from chicago, nyc and the uk -- that didn't repeat the '60s ideas, or any others -- but again, many of those '70s successes will never be repeated other than in a less useful/ interesting /new way -- and the '80s and '90s were quite blighted by an industry-led retreat to earlier styles of jazz -- the '70s labels were hit really hard, conservative jazz hit back)

so '60s and '70s jazz are by far the most listenable, but as '84s Metheny/Coleman hinted, maybe an "endangered species".

george gosset (gegoss), Sunday, 9 November 2003 13:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Maybe free jazz is easier to get into because it's different. I think college radio/Other Music like you mention encourages listeners to actively search for new sounds, and imo there's nothing more intense, creative, and "new" sounding than free jazz. It's this idea of searching for the new & weird taken to extremes. Or something.

I got into free jazz thru traditional jazz. The thing I really like early on was the improv aspect, esp. '20s collective improvisation, then on thru Bird, then hard bop etc., so when I got to free jazz, those ideas taken to their logical extreme really got me excited. I feel like I had to "get" jazz before I could "get" free jazz. I know I'm in the minority here. I would say my favorite jazz to listen to now is still early jazz and/or '60s/'70s free-ish stuff that has some restraint like the '60s inside/outside Blue Notes.

Actually, I think Phil recommended the Sam Rivers album Crystals to me on another thread and it's one of the coolest records of any kind I've ever heard. Intensely organized compostitions containing huge loud utter freak-outs. But still, it helped that I heard Rivers's Fuschia Swing Song first.

BTW, one of the best BYG records, Grachan Moncur III's New Africa, came out on CD this week

Can't wait to hear this, the Moncur Mosaic box is freaking amazing.

scott m (mcd), Sunday, 9 November 2003 22:34 (twenty-one years ago)

free jazz : jazz :: idm : dance music

more so than ... :: 20th cent composers : classical

in my opinion.

also, "the only kind of modern art i have bothered with is jackson pollock and stuff like that"

mig, Monday, 10 November 2003 08:37 (twenty-one years ago)

One can listen to free jazz on a much more visceral emotional level than, say, bebop, which is formally more rigorous.

i suspect this is a fallacy. paying attention to changes and voicings etc. does not mitigate against "emotional" involvement (i put this in quotes because i don't even really see the distinction).

and 30,000 is a huge number of records, especially for a jazz record. gosh the record label where i worked briefly would be excited to sell 5,000 copies of a cd.

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 10 November 2003 10:05 (twenty-one years ago)

p.s. does anyone have a copy of shepp's "trouble in mind" cd that they could copy for me?

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 10 November 2003 10:18 (twenty-one years ago)

scott m otm...hey man, don't you owe me a disc?

gaz (gaz), Monday, 10 November 2003 10:47 (twenty-one years ago)

I do! It's finished and ready to go, too.

scott m (mcd), Monday, 10 November 2003 14:50 (twenty-one years ago)

60s free jazz = more obviously connected to the culture of its time than other jazz, or at least in a more appealing way? Bebop was revolutionary too, but perhaps the directness, intensity, and self-conscious radicalism of 'Fire Music' et al has more of a college/hipster appeal.

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 10 November 2003 16:05 (twenty-one years ago)

I think you're right, Jordan. Swing/Be Bop might even be your grandparents music, how un-radical is that?

scott m (mcd), Monday, 10 November 2003 16:11 (twenty-one years ago)

more obv connected?! or just connected with a culture present-day hipsters are likely to know more about?

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 10 November 2003 16:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, that's really all I meant by obvious, amateurist.

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 10 November 2003 16:17 (twenty-one years ago)

ok then i totally agree with you i think

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 10 November 2003 16:20 (twenty-one years ago)

free jazz (or at least the idea of it; it's not like i know what i'm talking about) seems not so far from the basic squawky noises already heard in rock; listening to older jazz means getting accustomed to following chord changes and working out what's happening = in some ways more genuinely foreign than the stuff that (apparentlysupposedly) seemed impossibly far-out in the 60s

(i don't think this process is anything to do with 'visceral emotion')

tom west, Monday, 10 November 2003 17:57 (twenty-one years ago)

also they write about it in the wire

tom west, Monday, 10 November 2003 18:00 (twenty-one years ago)

there does seem to be a great divide still b/t who covers free jazz and who covers the rest of it

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 10 November 2003 18:05 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't think that relates to just jazz. some writers will only cover the more 'outsider' rock, say and others write abt more mainstream stuff.

Free jazz is definetely easier if you enjoy 'pychedelic' rock music (and both took off in the 60s).

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 10 November 2003 18:29 (twenty-one years ago)

>there does seem to be a great divide still b/t who covers free jazz and who covers the rest of it

Not true. I cover free jazz, and I write not only for the Wire but also for Jazziz, which is (or was at one point) the best-selling jazz magazine in the US, mostly because they put lots of smoothies on the cover. So mainstream jazz magazines definitely publish pieces on "out" stuff (I've written about Derek Bailey and the Flying Luttenbachers for Jazziz).

Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Monday, 10 November 2003 18:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Two notes: 1. This was when the Luttenbachers were in their "free jazz" period (sax, bass, drums); 2. I'm not talking about reviews, I'm talking about getting features published on those folks.

Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Monday, 10 November 2003 18:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Does Jazziz really outsell JazzTimes and Downbeat? Both of those are better magazines imo (though I haven't read one lately), but maybe more smooth jazz listeners buy magazines than I thought.

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 10 November 2003 18:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Cadence is another that gives equal time to mainstream and "out" (ugh) jazz, in both its reviews and feature interviews.

Broheems (diamond), Monday, 10 November 2003 18:59 (twenty-one years ago)

free jazz is over-represented but what about latin jazz (buena vista social club anyone?) or brazilian jazz (samba/bossanova - maybe the psych/jazz attributes of tropicalia)...?

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 10 November 2003 19:06 (twenty-one years ago)

i dream of a world where I don't have to hear latin jazz every day -- then maybe i can come to terms with it instead having it shoved it into my ears my room mate, the Autistic Wolfboy. my brain melts every time i get home and he's blasting Tito Puente on the stereo, the walls of the house vibrating.

the Bossa Nova, on the other hand -- yummy yum yum, as they say in Hobbiton during the annual pie eating contest..

jack cole (jackcole), Monday, 10 November 2003 19:11 (twenty-one years ago)

well yes, not saying which is better at this point, but the insurgence of 50s-70s latin and brazilian jazz over the last 10 years is definitely equal to the free-jazz revival since the mid-80s, maybe not as underground but as significant.

gygax! (gygax!), Monday, 10 November 2003 19:15 (twenty-one years ago)

i'd probably say the latin jazz resurgance is probably more because it's connected to more people whereas free jazz's audience will always be limited to a certain extent due to its dissonace and improvizational methodologies.

also, always beware the Jazzbo who is a reformed rocker, spitting on rock to uplift the purity of his or her love in a false notion of higher musical forms (see Richard Meltzer).

jack cole (jackcole), Monday, 10 November 2003 19:20 (twenty-one years ago)

that's awesome phil, i mean you writing about free jazz for a mainstream jazz mag

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 10 November 2003 22:52 (twenty-one years ago)

could someone explain the whole byg/actuel thing? were they two seperate labels? are there any discographies? what is going on with the reissues? how can i keep track of them? AMG seems to come up with a new label for each album even if they have been reissued by the same people (who?).

so far i have figured out (going by numbers in left-hand corner on cds):
1. art ensemble - a jackson in your house/message to our folks

2. don cherry – mu part one/mu part two

3. archie shepp – blasé/live at the pan-african festival

4. sun ra – solar myth approach vol 1 and 2

5. dewey redman - tarik

6. gato barbieri/dollar brand – hamba khale! AND anthony
braxton – actuel 15 sess.

7. sunny murray – sunshine/even break: never give a sucker

8. art ensemble – reese and the smooth ones

9. archie shepp – live at antibes 1&2

any since then? what are their numbers? why two different releases with the number 6 as cat #? has any of the alan silva stuff from byg/actuel made it on to a CD?

(sorry if i am derailing this thread!)

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 05:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Aaron, here's a discog:

http://www.jazzdiscography.com/Labels/byg.htm

Broheems (diamond), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 05:24 (twenty-one years ago)

those are the original lp series. apparently the cd reissues aren't following the same chronological order / numbering system. No idea why they would have given Barbieri/Brand and Braxton the same cat #.

Broheems (diamond), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 05:27 (twenty-one years ago)

thanks.. this helps... though i am still confused, but now at least i know what to look for ;-)

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 05:29 (twenty-one years ago)

is "Actuel" part of the label name? is it seperate?

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 05:38 (twenty-one years ago)

BYG was the name of the label, Actuel was a series on the label curated by Claude Delcloo.

hstencil, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 05:40 (twenty-one years ago)

i.e. there are albums on the BYG label that are not in the Actuel series.

hstencil, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 05:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Thanks.. i have been trying to figure that out for a while... so... in the discography linked to above, that is the whole BYG catalog, and some of the records on there are Actuel releases?

as for the original question, even if i do tend to favor 60s jazz, i think it is a rather bland orthodoxy. i got into coltrane because a guy at a record store told me to, and i turned on immediately to it (Live at Birdland), especially the eastern/african feel of "afro blue". i was really surpirsed to discover the orthodoxy after the fact. i wonder if "coltrane and hartman" is allowed into the Wire cannon? its coltrane, but it has VOCALS too! i think its one of the best albums ever released. this reminds me i need to go start a thread...

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 05:44 (twenty-one years ago)

no, what is linked above is just the Actuel series, as far as I can tell. Some of the BYG-only releases were dubious reissues of albums on other labels.

hstencil, Tuesday, 11 November 2003 05:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, and further confusing the issue, there is shit that only came out on BYG-Japan, like the Art Ensemble of Chicago Live 2lp set.

Broheems (diamond), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 05:53 (twenty-one years ago)

ok thanks.

Aaron Grossman (aajjgg), Tuesday, 11 November 2003 05:56 (twenty-one years ago)

anyone got this then? if so, report.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 13 November 2003 18:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Holy shit, I have to get that...

Broheems (diamond), Thursday, 13 November 2003 18:19 (twenty-one years ago)

oh, thurston moore made it as far as a long interview with Kim Hill (in '98 i think) on public radio, all about geraldine vinyl and some neil young connection he was plugging that sounded recorded in new zealand -- i am bitter and twisted about them not coming to the sounth island since 'dirty', as many other alt. bands have been able to do -- i've read reviews of them live -- maybe i should see them in London or NYC, and i might get it, but some of the reviews have been off-putting, as was Murray Street (IMO)

so sonic youth just tease me with the absence of their visceral qualities, practically speaking -- but 'definitive fakes' is too strong -- i should not get 'cranky' in public, yearning for the good old days -- it's my own visceral response to the absence, an absence which seems inconsistent with the touring patterns of many other bands -- audience numbers would not be down for a couple of flash gigs in new zealand

i think trane helping the other guys get contracts is a great thing, and the limited exposure he allowed those guys to get and his inspiration to them is probably for me his principal accomplishment and legacy

the parallels between the limited range of harmonics trane seemed to let's say confine himself to and the sonic youth non-blues tuned guitars alternative subset of guitar playing is probably what motivates me to post stuff like this -- maybe for the sake of the people who like this stuff and do not get bored with it, i should shut up

a jimmy lyons box set would be a great thing

george gosset (gegoss), Friday, 14 November 2003 04:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Fuel 2000 have also recently brought out a CD reish of Cecil Taylor's 'Student Lessons', a fantastic mid-60s quartet alb w/ Jimmy Lyons etc. - this is also claimed to be a BYG alb, but I notice it doesn't feature on that handy 'checklist' that was linked to - was it another one of those Japanese-only BYGS, like the Live in Paris AEOC that Charly have just issued on a dbl disc set? Anyone have a full list of these Japanese albs? (BTW, Fuel also do a single disc equiv of the 3CD Coley/Moore box, inc. a track from the Taylor alb)

Andrew L (Andrew L), Saturday, 15 November 2003 21:10 (twenty-one years ago)

This thread made me buy 'sound' by roscoe mitchell sextet. Its a really wonderful release.

I also downloaded 'Numbers 1 and 2' from that boxset and from the one listen I can't quite see why phil disliked 'sound' and yet likes art ensemble.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 15 November 2003 21:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, as I said above, I had my negative reaction to Sound a few years before hearing anything else by the AEOC. So it may well be time for a re-assessment.

Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Saturday, 15 November 2003 22:32 (twenty-one years ago)

sorry, was a bit lazy to scroll up again.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 15 November 2003 22:35 (twenty-one years ago)

i bought Student Studies on Charly vinyl in 1986, and it forced me to re-think music altogether

the british Black Lion label reissued it as "The Great Paris Concert", but beware, there are two different "Great Paris Concerts", the first or "official" one was on Prestige, a 3lp box set with sam rivers and extensive gary giddins notes

only student studies and two related compositons were recorded by BMG, and they made it to Affinity/ Charly/ Black Lion and now Fuel 2000 -- only called "great paris concert" by Black Lion, Student Studies is an intmate well paced taylor/lyons/silva etc. gig -- a great introdution

it's also a gig that doesn't get stuck in just a few chords or the same old "fire music" free jazz ur-tempo -- it's much more subtle in both departments, beautifully all over the place

george gosset (gegoss), Sunday, 16 November 2003 08:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Andrew,
it might be that people usually do what cecil taylor wants them to do, ie not release this particular bootleg/ BYG. I often think of this student studies as one of my all time favourites from that group. They were doing some stuff then that i think is better than 70% of the Taylor that followed. He may not want it in the catalog ..

this reminded me of another free jazz rock star, ornette. He had another truly whacky soundtrack for a film called "Who's Crazy", which this time he more-successfully opposed reproduction of, so the 2lp on Affinity is all the evidence i have of the existence of another fantastic free jazz 2lp recording by one of the rockstars of free jazz "with BYG"

mark s is the only person i've met who's familiar with this record, so he can confirm its existence if its not on any of those lists

george gosset (gegoss), Sunday, 16 November 2003 12:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Thanks George (and thanks for not pointing out that I got the title of 'Student Studies' wrong!)

'Who's Crazy' is certainly mentioned in the All Music Jazz Guide bk.

Andrew L (Andrew L), Sunday, 16 November 2003 12:51 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't care about the spelling .. The italics were just to remind that there were albums called SS and compositions called ss, and other compsoitions (4 actually, whereas most taylor cds are two compositions). I'm so used to the words that i only read student anywway. I reckon just make sure you hear SS, and if you get the chance, and from mark s and others' opinions, reading about that coleman record CC is much less of a surprise to hearing it, and much easier to do.

i wonder how many people have heard "Who's Crazy" ?

george gosset (gegoss), Sunday, 16 November 2003 15:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Student Studies is, indeed, a killer. You can find that other Taylor concert, with Sam Rivers, under the title Fondation Maeght Nights (Vols. 1, 2 and 3 released separately). A very shady Italian release, on the Jazz View label. CDs are mastered from vinyl, and not pristine vinyl either, but it's good music - Jimmy Lyons, Sam Rivers, and Andrew Cyrille (no bassist). They show up on eBay pretty often.

Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Sunday, 16 November 2003 15:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Inspired by this thread: this past weekend I picked up Tarik, Grachan Moncur III's New Africa and Dave Holland's Conference of the Birds. I've managed to get through the Dave Holland album and the Dewey Redman. Conference of the Birds is nice, but it bugs me a little bit when Braxton and Rivers play flutes (instrumentalists turned multi-instrumentalists c/d?). Overall though, sharp interplay, Dave Holland really drives it. Tarik is amazing; Dewey is on fire, Ed Blackwell is just nasty. Again, Phil, thx for the recommendation, first Crystals, now this. If my head explodes I know who to blame.

scott m (mcd), Monday, 17 November 2003 15:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Who's Crazy? does indeed exist, and I still have my crap uniform black and white cover with big lettering and tiny upper left side photo Affinity reissue wot (as with pretty well all the other Affinity BYG reissues) I bought out of Listen Records in Renfield Street for £3.49.

Marcello Carlin, Monday, 17 November 2003 15:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Got the Art Ensemble's Live In Paris 2CD set this morning. So far, not my favorite thing from their Paris period. Each disc is one long piece, divided into two parts. Disc 2 might be better than Disc 1, because it features Fontella Bass and that's never a bad thing.

Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Monday, 17 November 2003 17:18 (twenty-one years ago)

two weeks pass...
I love reading about this stuff even though I know next to nothing about it, having only listened to some of Coltrane's free stuff. Top 10 free jazz lps for the largely uninitiated?

rw, Tuesday, 2 December 2003 18:55 (twenty-one years ago)

well, i'll take a stab at this only because i'm the definition of "largely uninitiated" ... i don't know that there's anything even approaching a canon. my own taste runs toward "community jazz" or "avant jazz" rather than the really free-blowing "energy music" or the 70s improv axis that takes in your baileys and brotzmanns. somebody (julio?) should really suggest a european ten. well, anyway, here's ten american free jazz albums (fairly unadventurous)...

pharoah sanders izipho zam
don cherry eternal rhythm
sun ra cosmic tones for mental therapy
ornette coleman live at the golden circle
marzette watts marzette and co. ("backdrop for urban revolution!!")
albert ayler lorrach, paris 1966 (this should really be complete impulse 2cd)
eric dolphy out to lunch
sam rivers dimensions and extensions
anthony braxton three compositions... (or "for alto" if you're brave)
cecil taylor unit structures

vahid (vahid), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)

see now, that's a tough errand, rw. my list sucks so bad it makes my head hurt. you're really hobbled if you try to stick to the 60s - most of the exciting stuff seems to happen 70-74.

vahid (vahid), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)

You picked some good ones, vahid. Here are the 10 I'd start folks off with this week (because I'm still in the scooping-up-jewels phase myself, and will likely find stuff in the next few months that either equals or supplants everything I'm about to name):

Pharaoh Sanders, Izipho Zam (good luck finding it on CD, though)
Don Cherry, Eternal Rhythm
Sonny Sharrock, Black Woman
Art Ensemble of Chicago, Reese And The Smooth Ones
Cecil Taylor, Student Studies
Sonny Rollins, Our Man In Jazz
Ornette Coleman, The Shape Of Jazz To Come
John Coltrane, Interstellar Space
Frank Wright, Church Number Nine
Grachan Moncur III, New Africa

Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 19:43 (twenty-one years ago)

OOPS! i forgot to mention: gato barbieri in search of the mystery

vahid (vahid), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 19:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Seems like a pretty good list, vahid. I'll just toss out a few, not sticking to the 60s:

Dave Holland 'Conference of the Birds', for sheer accessibility. I really love the sense it gives of being totally open yet so relaxed.

Mat Maneri 'Sustain' - I just got this one so its on my mind, but it's growing on me. It just has such an eveloping sound, and the solo spots give it a lot of variety.

Art Ensemble of Chicago 'Fanfare for the Warriors' - I think of this one a lot as a reference when it comes to (slightly) larger group free jazz, maybe because I heard it early on, but they did it so well.

Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 19:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, we actually had a thread on this. Julio didn't approve of my conflation of improv and jazz. I might revise my list...

FREE JAZZ: Pick Only Ten

Broheems (diamond), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 20:21 (twenty-one years ago)

'Izipho Zam' is incredibly common on CD in the UK, and can be picked up v. cheaply (Selectadisc in Soho had it on sale for £2.99 a month or so ago, as I think I pointed out to Julio at the time.) It's swings and roundabouts of course - you just never see 'Black Beings' in London, on any format

I picked up the CD reish of 'Reese and the Smooth Ones' by the Art Ensemble today (plus 'Echo' by Dave Burrell - who I last heard on David Murray's utterly gorgeous, but most assuredly not Free, 'Ballads' alb - someone was asking abt Murray? He's fuckin' prolific, lotsa releases on DIW (= ultra-expensive Japanese imports), but I esp. like 'Ming' and 'The Hill' (the former, a large group rec w/ ppl like Butch Morris, the insanely great trombone player George Lewis (NOT the dixieland clarinet player!), Donald and Walter's fave Henry Threadgill; the latter, a trio rec with Richard Davis and Joe Chambers! He's also recorded together w/ Elvin Jones and McCoy Tyner!) Murray has an absolutely creamy tenor sound, incredible chops, an almost too-easy command of jazz history, and can channel the spirit of Albert Ayler as well as Ware when the mood takes him - but there is a large composed element to most of the music I've heard by him, and I don't think he wld consider himself a 'free jazz' musician, whoever/whatever that is - but he's good, no question abt it

Anyway, I can totally see why Duane, on that other thread, picked 'Reese' for his free jazz top ten, man it's got it all!

Andrew L (Andrew L), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 21:15 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't like Murray much, for no reason I can put my finger on.

Echo is a fucking incredible record, and the gig I'm most pissed about missing this week is Burrell with William Parker and Andrew Cyrille at Joe's Pub this past Sunday night. Oh, well.

Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 22:03 (twenty-one years ago)

now ordinarily i hate to adopt that tone of "[...] with their hands-on-approach shows those technology bound new-schoolers [...] how it's REALLY done". like, i hate it when people come on all "xennakis with his physical connection to his circuitry pisses all over autechre's laptop wankery". but i have to say (if only because of their juxtaposition in the actuel box) burrell's Echo absolutely stomps all over Musica Elettronica Viva or any other noise/loop music from the time.

also, doesn't Echo just look fabulously right in italics? Echo. see, like that.

vahid (vahid), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 22:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I'll 2nd Out to Lunch and Conference of the Birds and Unit Structures.

ilm correct me if I'm wrong but I think Ornette's Free Jazz is a good place to start, too (to get the full mo), or Ornette's pre-Free Jazz albums in which he's loosening up a lot, like Shape of Jazz to Come or This is Our Music.

scott m (mcd), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 23:10 (twenty-one years ago)

hi everybodee!

what timing bcz today soulseek gave me a copy of Noah howard's 'the black ark' and that would go in my 'top ten'. Arthur doyle is on top form and is really the driving force behind this. 'mount fuji' is the choiciest cut.

and I also burned a copy of Frank wright/muhammad ali duo ('adieu little world'): this is almost as good as frank lowe/rashied ali duo (both modelled on coltrane's 'interstellar space' of course).

''you just never see 'Black Beings' in London, on any format''

that's by Frank lowe right andrew? I've seen a copy of this in ray's jazz shop on LP recently (1st hand, in their avant garde Lps section). you might want to check this out.

rw- I'd say you should go for frank lowe/rashied ali 'duo exchange' on knitting factory. you've probably heard rashied with coltrane, plus this is cheap (my copy cost 10 quid) and its pretty short (two 15 min tracks).

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 23:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Thanks everyone for the recommendations, especially to Broheems for pointing out the other thread.

Why that specific one Julio? (as opposed all the others listed so far here and on the other thread)

rw, Tuesday, 2 December 2003 23:57 (twenty-one years ago)

rw- apart from the three reasons I listed above its an ideal entry point bcz they seem really well 'tuned' to one another.

The first track has one of the great moments of all time for me, when frank is stop starting riffs from his horn, lyrical one moment, barking the other. I love every note. Actually i'll give this a listen tonight and if i can i'll write some more (but I'm sure many others will go for this one).

Maybe you could try Albert ayler's 'spiritual unity' but you also have gary peacock's bass. A duo might be easier to take in (maybe, I think my first 'free' record was a duo but i can't rememeber who it was now).

broheems- its not that i didn't like you linking it in with free improv on that other thread (i'll need to do another list with some short notes sometime later, it wasn't very good at all). just used the opprotunity to look into diff between the two.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Julio -

I just sent you an e-mail. Look out for that.

Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:38 (twenty-one years ago)

I just downloaded Shepp's For for Trane from iTunes ($4.95!) and it's just the kind of stuff I love. Roswell Rudd steals the show.

scott m (mcd), Thursday, 4 December 2003 18:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Uh, that's Four.

scott m (mcd), Thursday, 4 December 2003 18:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Roswell Rudd ALWAYS steals the show!

Andrew L (Andrew L), Thursday, 4 December 2003 18:59 (twenty-one years ago)

it's nice to see george lewis (trombone/electronics) mentioned. ruling him out as a '70s starter, that's not fair though, as he is just the right amount of revivalism and wacko-future-possibilities for me, and he collaborates with all those other chicago guys still, sporadically.

george gosset (gegoss), Friday, 5 December 2003 07:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Jus' passin' thru:

Pharaoh Sanders, Izipho Zam (good luck finding it on CD, though)

I got this on Friday in Selectadisc in Soho, London for £2.99! I repeat 2 friggin' 99! Be good to your earholes and buy this and also a very good Sun Ra CD which is also £2.99, called "Spaceways". That's all folks.

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 11 December 2003 13:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, if Julio is around, I got a CD by Derek Bailey/ Barre Phillips called "Figuring" in Oxfam in Kentish Town Road for 99p(!) I'm quite liking it, in small doses. You heard this one Julio?

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 11 December 2003 13:45 (twenty-one years ago)

hi again keith,

I haven't heard figuring (but its on incus) but I'll get to it eventually. hope you're well.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 11 December 2003 13:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Selectadisc in Soho is rapidly becoming my favourite record shop - now they have Albert Ayler's "Live in Greenwich Village - The Complete Impulse Recordings" for £4.99. Two CDs, over two hours of blowing - the perfect Xmas gift?

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 12 December 2003 14:30 (twenty-one years ago)

shame I already have it.

I went to selectadisc and picked the pharoah snaders. its a bit uneven but those moments when pharoah is doing histhing and sharrock is doing his thing at the same time really does it for me.

also got some alan silva: luna surface on LP.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 12 December 2003 14:39 (twenty-one years ago)

two weeks pass...
Got Archie Shepp Blase/Pan African Festival on ebay, not something I would have bought had it not been pretty cheap. I like it. Doesn't always succeed in its ambitions, but it's steeped in the blues in a very real way and sounds like I imagine life might have sounded like at the end of the '60s, vaguely hippie-ish, multi-kulti (or at least Pan African [duh]), militant but spiritual, steeped in sexual politics, folksy, free.

scott m (mcd), Monday, 29 December 2003 22:50 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
I think one thing I find overwhelming with jazz is that there are so many things you are supposed to listen to and like, if you like any of it. It's always: oh, you've got to hear badadbadabada. . . But the percentage of jazz I like is always small, so I prefer to just say upfront: I don't really like jazz; I'm not a real jazz fan; I just like some of that stuff they talk about in the Wire, and even a lot of that goes past me. Otherwise it's an avalanche of, oh man, you have to hear Charles Tolliver or Bud Powell or everything Miles Davis has ever recorded.

I guess this could be true of lots of genres though. It always seems like more of an issue for me with jazz. I almost want to keep my minimal jazz interests secret around real jazz heads, because otherwise they'll be expecting me to nod in agreement about the great ones (who I'm willing to concede probably are or were genuinely great, without necessarily enjoying them).

RS, Saturday, 26 February 2005 21:29 (twenty years ago)

Wow, I'm glad I got to see this thread. That George Gossett is quite a character. I think he might truely possess the rarest opinions I have ever heard.

I do feel a quiet tinge of sadness at all the people who say free jazz is the only jazz they find accessible. Not so much in an elitist way; more that I feel like I have a musical language I can't share with a lot of other people who love music.

Straight ahead jazz benefits from some minimal training -- learning to follow the chord progressions, etc. Once I learned to follow it, I really found/continue to find it incredibly fulfilling. I think it's unfortunate that the pervasive attitude today, even among people with very complex musical tastes, seems to be that music shouldn't have any requisite knowledge for enjoyment.

Hurting (Hurting), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 07:25 (twenty years ago)

I have only read a few posts on this thread but i get the pic. Ive have tried 2 dig free jazz. I have listened 2 it and i have tried 2 c wat i cud not c in it, what i was missing, wat i didnt get. I like avant-garde jazz because it is definitley different from free jazz. The only thing i have managed 2 appreciate is Coltranes' Interstellar space. But i think there is mass confusion about free jazz. This will prob b the most controversial post on this thread! I have come 2 the conclusion (prob temporarily after conversing with many people) that free jazz is just noise! There is no way it is anything else but an experiment that caught on. All u guys like free jazz prob just because alot of the jazz masters turned on 2 it but hey, wasnt the 60's the decade when drug use rocketed? I think free jazz was just jazz musicians experimenting while off their heads! I still experience dis-illusionment about this subject but i cud not sit on the fence any longer. I had 2 choose a side. Coltrane was a heroin addict remember! Heresey i may hear u cry but, i love Coltrane, but u cant seriously tell me u prefer him 2 make a noise rather than what he is playin on Blue train?
I used 2 b a musician myself and i understand the frustration that chord changes can cause but free jazz is just silly.....noise!(?)

Morg, Tuesday, 1 March 2005 08:48 (twenty years ago)

DNFTT

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 1 March 2005 11:23 (twenty years ago)

I don't want to pollute the Grant Green thread (which I'm glad exists) with my negativity, but I've been thinking about jazz guitar lately, amd I really can't stand most straightahead jazz guitar playing that I've heard. It's all so. . . so. . . so. . . jazzy.

RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Wednesday, 2 March 2005 03:24 (twenty years ago)

Now that I know a bit more about non-free jazz, I appreciate the free stuff all the more.

Ian John50n (orion), Wednesday, 2 March 2005 03:37 (twenty years ago)

free jazz : jazz :: idm : dance music
more so than ... :: 20th cent composers : classical

in my opinion.

also, "the only kind of modern art i have bothered with is jackson pollock and stuff like that"

-- mig (later_wittgenstei...), November 10th, 2003.

(hey mig where are you?)

Is that really true if you include minimalists or (as kyle gann class them) post-minimalist composers. those guys do seem to bridge the gap.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 2 March 2005 12:34 (twenty years ago)

One would imagine that Ornette's Free Jazz, with its cover print of Pollock's White Light, would be right up his street then.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 2 March 2005 13:24 (twenty years ago)

five years pass...

you just never see 'Black Beings' in London, on any format

Bought it from a remainder cd shop connected to a Dublin bookshop about 10 years back, fierce record.Dunno about London or how rare an occasion me finding that in Dublin was. Was a great cd shop, shame its not a focus there any more. But then Chapters isn't where it was nor in 3 separate premises. Was a very rewarding trawl spending a couple hours going through both of their cd shop premises.

Stevolende, Friday, 11 February 2011 20:13 (fourteen years ago)

Re: the title: I get where people are coming from, but part of the enjoyment of 'rule breaking' music comes from understanding what rules they're breaking, and why. This is what makes free jazz jazz after all, and not free rock, or whatever.

Féile Kuti (ecuador_with_a_c), Saturday, 12 February 2011 07:32 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.