-Uploading all of my MP3s to a server (Hotline, FTP, WWW or otherwise) and then re-downloading them.
-Doing the same thing with my foreign shell. (uploading them via ftp and downloading them from a terminal once i've migrated)
-Burning MP3 CDs? I don't know how much the average CD holds, and I don't really have money for a big stack of CDRs. Also, burning them all would get tedious.
-I don't have an iPod.
ALSO. Is there an iTunes clone or other [program of comparable dexterity]?
― Ian Johnson (orion), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 22:30 (twenty-one years ago)
you can get 700megs per cd
― JaXoN (JasonD), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 22:33 (twenty-one years ago)
and i have nearly 20 gig of files, so that's more cds than I can afford, probably. though if i zipped and then put onto CD, it would be easy.
I think they're both equally valid ways, both with advantages and disadvantages. But I'm not sure which one to try.
― Ian Johnson (orion), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 22:36 (twenty-one years ago)
Buy a router. Plug in your old computer's network cable into the router. Plug in your new computer's network cable into the router. Get the IP address of your new machine on the router (probably something like 192.168.1.101). Ftp a tarred or tarzipped copy of your mp3s from your old machine to your new machine.
If you have no further need for the router, return it to the store for a full refund.
― direct_program, Tuesday, 18 November 2003 23:19 (twenty-one years ago)
I forget which terms are loaded when talking about computers, sometimes; sorry for any confusion.
― Ian Johnson (orion), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 23:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 18 November 2003 23:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jazzbo (jmcgaw), Wednesday, 19 November 2003 00:44 (twenty-one years ago)
First off gzip (or bzip2) isn't going to compress your MP3's much at all. You could make one huge tar archive of them or make a few to save the tipe spend creating and tearing down connections between the transfer of each file, but trying to losslessly (gzip, bzip, zip, rar, flac, etc) compress files that are already compressed with a lossy algorithm (mp3, ogg, aac, etc.) will probably result in either files the same size or larger, since there is little to no repition of data.
If you have a spare HDD lying around or enough free space sitting on the end of your current drive you can make a big FAT32 partition, which is readable/writable by both Windows and Linux. I'd keep them on this partition if you are considering switching back to Windows, to avoid having to repeat work, but if you are sticking with linux I'd ditch FAT32 and move to a more modern, efficient, and safe filesystem such as ext3, reiser, xfs, jfs, whatever your distro supports.
As for iTunes, you're in luck. I use a program called Rhythmbox, that I think is wonderful. I've used iTunes and love it as well, and Rhythmbox has a little ways to go, but its moving there quickly and is a pleasure to work with. There's another called Jamboree that's similar, but I don't have a lot of experience with it, and I'm sure there are others.
Feel free to email me with other questions, I'll probably forget to check back on this thread.
― Mike Salmo (salmo), Wednesday, 19 November 2003 02:27 (twenty-one years ago)
So that's a caveat, but I can't remember exactly for what.
― fields of salmon (fieldsofsalmon), Wednesday, 19 November 2003 07:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― mentalist (mentalist), Wednesday, 19 November 2003 09:58 (twenty-one years ago)
i just switched to linux at home, all the popular music playing software seems to suck balls. i had been using foobar. any reccs? anybody use foobnix? cmus looks pretty cool.
― brimstead, Friday, 12 September 2014 04:14 (eleven years ago)
try DeaDBeef. I remember it being foobar-like.
― Zachary Taylor, Friday, 12 September 2014 04:19 (eleven years ago)
thanks i'll check it out
― brimstead, Friday, 12 September 2014 04:21 (eleven years ago)