If provocation is the most important part of rock, then Travis and Coldplay seem to have done better than most

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I mean, for some reason, those two bands have managed to piss off considerably more people than Sex Pistols, Eminem, Public Enemy, Burzum, The Who nor Rolling Stones have ever managed. So there must be something really special about them.

Maybe some people (like dance/hip-hop/metal fans, for instance) feel their possessions are being threatened by a couple of good-mannered and straight-acting bands playing good old fashioned songs with melodies and not a lot of noise, without acting like a bunch of arrogant fucks.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 20 November 2003 01:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I cannot for the life of me understand why everybody hates Coldplay and Travis (at least over in Britain. Here in the US, they seem to be well-loved by most of the pop culture aristocracy, including Chris Rock and the Flaming Lips!). Catchy melodic songs, a nice soothing guitar sound, actual musical talent. What more do you want from a rock band? AT LEAST THEY'RE BETTER THAN PAPA FUCKING ROACH AND CREED AND LIMP FUCKING BIZKIT!!!

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Thursday, 20 November 2003 01:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Geir, when did you mistake ILX for the world at large?

I'd just to give a shoutout to my boyz in Limp Bizkit and Good Charlotte.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 20 November 2003 01:28 (twenty-two years ago)

But Travis, apart from about 2 songs are devestatingly tedious aren't they?

Pete S, Thursday, 20 November 2003 01:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Imagine what they could achieve by posting to newsgroups and discussion boards!

Rockist Scientist, Thursday, 20 November 2003 01:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I hate Ash.

Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 20 November 2003 01:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Travis and Coldplay are hated by considerably more than just ILx. Sure, they are loved by lots too (at least judging from record sales), but what seems to obvious is that those who hate them seem like it is so much more important to speak out their hate for them than those who love other acts do. I mean: Read the readers' letters in mags like Q, NME etc. for instance. It is unbelievable how desperate those who dislike Travis or Coldplay are to tell the world. I mean, I guess most of those people dislike Christina Aguilera and Justin Timberlake as well, so why don't they save some of their venom for them instead?

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 20 November 2003 01:34 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't know a song by either. I know one bands singer is shagging that skinny blonde actress and had the video in the rain on a beach.

I know I haven't heard a song by Travis.

earlnash, Thursday, 20 November 2003 01:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Let's hear it for "straight-acting".

Sean (Sean), Thursday, 20 November 2003 01:39 (twenty-two years ago)

"Straigth-acting" in this case simply means they don't live a typical rock'n'roll life.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 20 November 2003 01:42 (twenty-two years ago)

I mean, I guess most of those people dislike Christina Aguilera and Justin Timberlake as well, so why don't they save some of their venom for them instead?

EXACTLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Thursday, 20 November 2003 01:44 (twenty-two years ago)

I wasn't really interested in either, but Clocks made me rethink Coldplay a bit...that'sa great single. Haven't heard any of their actual albums though.

Matt Helgeson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 20 November 2003 02:08 (twenty-two years ago)

I will say that from what I've heard, alot of indie bands (like the Shins or Ted Leo) do the same thing with a little more spring in their step.

Matt Helgeson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 20 November 2003 02:09 (twenty-two years ago)

So. . . by this definition Michael Bolton is the most REVOLUTIONARY and PROVOCATIVE artist in the history of artistic endeavor, right?

Someone owes me money.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 20 November 2003 02:13 (twenty-two years ago)

'The Scientist' by Coldplay is a great track. Musically, and feeling-wise they've got something incredible going on. I know it's trad and all that, but the quality song-structuring shines thru.

Pete S, Thursday, 20 November 2003 02:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Goddammit "Clocks" did that to me as well, for shame. Just don't tell anyone.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Thursday, 20 November 2003 02:14 (twenty-two years ago)

There's something uniquely dull about Coldplay and Travis. I could listen to Low, Sigur Ros, The Smiths or Catherine Wheel for hours, but somehow Coldplay, Travis, Starsailor et al manage to bore me half to death.

And I'll tell you why - it's SOFT-ROCK. Coldplay aren't the new Radiohead, they're the new bloody Eagles.

Stupid, Thursday, 20 November 2003 02:22 (twenty-two years ago)

I'll take the Eagles over Radiohead any day of the week.

Pete S, Thursday, 20 November 2003 02:23 (twenty-two years ago)

What about Glen Frey solo stuff?

Matt Helgeson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 20 November 2003 02:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Coldplay are in fact the new Chicago.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Thursday, 20 November 2003 02:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Nothing wrong with so-called "soft rock" as long as the songs are good enough. They were in the case of Eagles and weren't in the case of the more metal-oriented Journey or Foreigner.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 20 November 2003 02:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Er well i wouldn't know Matt, i'm not actually a fan of the Eagles - but at least, if one adjusts ones settings you can enjoy their better stuff. It's listenable tho smug. You couldn't say that ('cept the smug bit) about Radiohead.

Pete S, Thursday, 20 November 2003 02:36 (twenty-two years ago)

Smuggler's Blues is pretty good. I reminds me of Miami Vice.

Matt Helgeson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 20 November 2003 02:39 (twenty-two years ago)

I think its a bit of a stretch to claim that Travis and Coldplay have pissed off considerably more people than the Sex Pistols, Eminem or Public Enemy. I don't remember any protests against Coldplay or Travis, though that's not a bad idea. Neither group has been banned, censored or arrested (which, again, is not a bad idea).
I don't think Travis and Coldplay are provocateurs; they're just uninteresting..

Christian Rawk (Christian Rawk), Thursday, 20 November 2003 03:17 (twenty-two years ago)

I love A1 steak sauce. I eat it with steak using the steak only as texture.

sewwt (cs appleby), Thursday, 20 November 2003 03:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Right, here we go.

The reason why these two bands get so much hatred is both very minor and petty but also very large and all-encompassing. I'll explain.

Travis and Coldplay represent the last phase of the evolution of what is known as "indie" in Great Britain from one form or another. We all know the story of burgeoning indie, although I doubt we all would agree when it began and who it included etc. Let is leave the minor details about rock history aside. Safe to say that the emergent 80's indie scene was an alternative. It sprang out of a generation who could not identify with the majority of music around which to them was associated firmly with both middle-aged housewives dancing on tables at "Jackies' 50th" and your girlfriends' weasely boss who tried to rape her every Christmas party. More than that it was the soundtrack as the Brixton and Toxteth riots took place, when the US went into Central America, Thatcherism took its grip and all manner of horrible 80's things happened. Remember then that the left was more bolshy and the right more stringent. Things were polarised and it was Level 42 vs. The Cure or whichever bands you want to put into that equation. You get the idea.

So we had an alienated youth with their own culture and identity, however petulant and "I'm-not-going-to-tidy-my-room-because-of-the-poll-tax" it was. And to these people, it meant a lot. Everybodys youth means a lot. Movement after movement happened, each one picking up a little bit more mainstream success, mostly down to larger labels picking up on the fact that this thing was good for making money.

Fast forward a bit and we get to the coming of Oasis. At first, we thought "Great!", another Rosesy guitar band to keep that weasely rapists' favourite records out of the charts. Live Forever gave us the feeling that they had some soul, we thought the swagger and the our-kidness was cute. Then, remember that feeling you got when you first heard Cigarettes and Alcohol? You liked it, but you sensed something wasn't right. You caught yourself dancing in an indie disco with a few blokes doing monkey dances swinging bottles of Becks. Fast forward a couple of years and you're leaving the venue because of a huge swarm of rugby lads bellowing "Champagne Supernova" like pissed up elephants. Then you hear Ocean Colour Scene and The Verve and your face goes bone white. Something is deeply, deeply wrong here. You can't even find the indie disco anymore, just more swarms of rugby lads and DJ's who think throwing in American Pie to round off the night is a good idea.

But at the same time Suede, who you realise are never going to be what you thought they would, are doing well, the Div Com keep you happy, you see nice, fresh things like Bis happening that make you smile . . . but the Riverboat Song is everywhere. New Labour have swept in replacing politics with optimism and its almost illegal to say out loud that you think things are taking a turn for the worst.

The optimism slowly turns into apathy. You notice that the act you thought the most of that year were a shambling mess from Scotland who'd actually only produced one EP. There seems to be this gaping hole in the middle of your forehead where something should be, but you've forgotten what it is. Right about this time you start sinking deeper and deeper into a black depression as all you see whipping past you at the lights are cars full of either weasely rapists, Jackies' birthday friends or demented rugby lads.

By now we're in the era of Coldplay and Travis. We're not playing anymore. We're digging Head On The Door out of the old box of tapes, finding more exciting new music in Japan, Germany and Holland than at home, almost breaking into tears when we see Peter Buck enchanting "Hi, this is Peter Buck and you're watching the REM sessions on AOL!", we're looking to the new New Order album for hope . . .

And finally we turn on the radio in the middle of a huge emotional crisis and the question asked, "Why does it always rain on me?", seems so piddling, so trifling compared to the harsh, bleak realities of being alive in Britain in 2003 it's ridiculous. You've been through AIDS, the Gulf War, Chechnya on the telly and breakups, breakdowns, deaths, births and tears in the real world and all that seems to matter on the radio is a little bit of drizzle on a hoxton fin.

We've come a long way (baby), and some of us are fucking shocked by how far. Yes, we're looking at our youth through rose-tinted spectacles and forgetting a lot of things, but fuck it, it's OUR youth, we own it, and we can remember it any fucking way we want.

So that's why a certain portion of us are haters. We don't just feel sold-out, we feel powerless to stop this steamroller of blanditude from destroying some stupid teenage ideal we had. It hurts.

And what really hurts is that we know that out there is some meek little unpopular kid and we really wonder what the hell is catering for them as they run home crying and full of anger because the rugby team and the future attendees of Jackies 50th are picking on them at school.

Idealistic? Yes. Misguided? Yes. But lets not forget that people carved words in their arms, hung themselves, shot themselves, overdosed and lost their minds for this. Not anymore. These days people are shagging Gwyneth Paltrow and covering Britney songs on their B-sides. This country is turning into a mass cabaret night with Smirnoff Ice a pound a bottle, and for some of us there is this little 15 year old voice in our heads that won't allow it, lest it call us frauds.

That's why we hate Coldplay. That's why we hate Travis.

Lynskey (Lynskey), Thursday, 20 November 2003 04:05 (twenty-two years ago)

2 things: 1.to paraphrase, it's called growing up. you're not the
first.
2. Bis??!!?!

Patrick Kinghorn, Thursday, 20 November 2003 04:21 (twenty-two years ago)

i hesitate to add my name after one of the weakest geir baits ever, but:

there's a 'string quartet tribute' version of clocks that i'm in love with at the moment. it's a bit like that cod-vivaldi debeers theme, only coldplay...so even more bankrupt and mercilessly effective emotionally.

typo acapulco (gcannon), Thursday, 20 November 2003 04:28 (twenty-two years ago)

God, Bis..........

Where are Bis now?

Patrick Kinghorn, Thursday, 20 November 2003 04:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Jesus H Jackson, this is the problem with this aforementioned blanding out - people can only read one meaning into anything.

Yes, it's about growing up but it's also about social and cultural cha . . I'm wasting my time. Go and stick on a Richard Ashcroft solo album and, for preference, go fuck yourself whilst doing so.

(for the purpose of the inevitable flame-war, I'm off to bed now and I'll be in Manchester tommorow having a meeting with a small part of the music industry that hasn't sucumbed to this wave of asinine filth - ENJOY YOURSELVES!)

Lynskey (Lynskey), Thursday, 20 November 2003 04:33 (twenty-two years ago)

crikey

Patrick Kinghorn, Thursday, 20 November 2003 04:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Bis rocked and popped!

They have unfortunately recently "split-up" and are concentrating on their side-projects. The brothers' 'Dirty Hospital' which is really dirty electro, and Manda Rin and husband's electro-punk 'The Kitchen' project. They are planning to work together under a different moniker in the future because, despite putting out some excellent releases following an impressive artistic development (the damb-squid of the debut album aside), they felt their music wasn't - and possibly never would be - taken seriously because of preconception.

And Coldplay and Travis don't provoke me, but they certainly bore me. Currently residing in the 'Why are they now?" file.

Chewshabadoo (Chewshabadoo), Thursday, 20 November 2003 04:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Lynskey that was brilliant!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 20 November 2003 07:05 (twenty-two years ago)

oh shit!! 'weakest geir baits ever' = i meant geir's initial post! not lynskey's, which is terrific.

typo acapulco (gcannon), Thursday, 20 November 2003 07:14 (twenty-two years ago)

What if you don't really give a shit about the history of brit-pop? Are you free to like Travis?

bnw (bnw), Thursday, 20 November 2003 07:40 (twenty-two years ago)

My, you are such a little firestarter, aren't you?

@d@ml (nordicskilla), Thursday, 20 November 2003 07:56 (twenty-two years ago)

The way I see it, Britpop was a good, good, good, good, good thing.

And I don't buy this stupid rebellion thing at all. ALL music that has ever been supposed to be "rebellious" I have hated. Music is supposed to be nice and pleasant and entertaining, preferrably through good tunes. Music is not supposed to piss people off (other than those who have the misguided idea that that exactly what music is supposed to).

Coldplay and Travis have good tunes. Whoever has good tunes deserves respect. Bury hip-hop and dance instead, as the tunes aren't around in those genres.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 20 November 2003 08:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Geir, have you never, ever found it even just a little bit thrilling when someone does something transgressive, a teeny weeny bit rebellious?

Something which ruffles a few feathers', get's people going, 'oh my, what can they be playing at'. Maybe a little rough at the edges. Perhaps lacking in melody, but made up for by the joie de vivre and the feeling that someone is trying to communicate something important, despite not having the technology, money or skill to produce something slick and well crafted. Something which breaks the rules and hey, maybe pisses a few people off at the same time?

Nah, didn't think so. BTW what do you think of the secret track on The man who, is that a nice song?

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Thursday, 20 November 2003 09:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Geir, your assholeness knows no bounds. Lynskey, though I don't quite agree or understand (being a bit after that generation as it were, but still having two brothers from it), I kiss you.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 November 2003 09:38 (twenty-two years ago)

The thing with Coldplay and Travis is that there's just nothing to love. Nothing to hate either. No handles. No ways in. So why bother?

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 November 2003 09:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Travis and Coldplay sing about things like domestic violence and alienation. Those are depressing topics and I don't wanna fuckin' hear about them.

dave q, Thursday, 20 November 2003 09:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Lynksey, I do understand. And it's all true.

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 20 November 2003 09:58 (twenty-two years ago)

The status quo is very sensitive and after years of attack it will not countenance any more sniping from misfits and malcontents. There are alot of reasonably happy people with families who are sick of being made fun of and they won't take it any more. There is no more place for the 'unpopular kids' Lynskey mentions in this climate. The era of militant well-adjustedness is on us. On the bottom end (like say, here) this takes the form of proudly saying that pop is the only music that matters and anybody who differs is 'sad', and on the top end, this involves the reorganisation of society along the traditional values that were so rudely interrupted by noisy dissatisfied dysfunctionals over the last forty years. Both ends working in harmonic pincer movement to strengthen the center. Poptopia!

dave q, Thursday, 20 November 2003 10:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Are you an unpopular kid? Here, take some Prozac!

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 November 2003 10:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Failing that, take arms against your sea of troubles and in opposing kill them!

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 November 2003 10:26 (twenty-two years ago)

I think I am closer to agreeing with Geir than Lynskey, though I still really hate Coldplay, mainly just cos they're shit and people hold them up as intellectual or clever.

I am fairly sure the unpopular kids of today have loads of music to listen to, it just isn't the same as the music the unpopular kids of 15 years ago listened to, thankfully.

I also think the whole cult of people cutting themselves or hanging themselves is nothing to be praised or even anything very significant, just quite sad.

I can't shake the feeling Lynskey's post is just "in my day things were different" for the mid to late 20 year old and attitudes like that shaft "the kids" and this generation more than a thousand Chris Martins.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 20 November 2003 11:50 (twenty-two years ago)

(not least because they make no provision for this generation having a brain)

Anyone consider the possibility that people really are happier now? Without raping the unpopular kid of their bands either, there must be millions of albums out there for him/her too.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 20 November 2003 11:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Anyone consider the possibility that people really are happier now

I know your mood altering drug of choice isn't prescription, Ronan, but lots of peoples' are. And 'choice' doesn't really come into it.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 November 2003 11:55 (twenty-two years ago)

That's not really what I'm asking, are you saying Coldplay are only popular because everyone is on Prozac?

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 20 November 2003 11:58 (twenty-two years ago)

I wouldn't be surprised.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 November 2003 11:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Even if their debut album.....

Jerry Dammers was white


Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 20 November 2003 14:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Specials and Culture Club, yeah. Most of UB40's best music was written by black Jamaicans during the 70s or 60s. One of extremely few acts out there that were always better at coverversions than original composisions.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 20 November 2003 14:55 (twenty-two years ago)

(I wonder when Dadaismus will scan back over the thread and realize he's being just as blinkered, dogmatic, reactionary and thick as he's accusing Geir of being?)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 20 November 2003 14:56 (twenty-two years ago)

In-fucking-sane.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 November 2003 14:57 (twenty-two years ago)

(I wonder when Dadaismus will scan back over the thread and realize he's being just as blinkered, dogmatic, reactionary and thick as he's accusing Geir of being?)

Where exactly?

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:00 (twenty-two years ago)

"I disagree with Geir and I can't change his mind; he must be a racist or autistic! Let me quote him out of context and project all sorts of negative, sinister motives on him to bolster my right-thinking point of view!"

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:02 (twenty-two years ago)

every time you insinuate that Geir is racist when it strikes me that he isn't as has been demonstrated on more than one occasion and with more than one example.

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:03 (twenty-two years ago)

He's not racist, just in-fucking-sane. The autistic one I wont comment on (because I think it was me who first levelled the accusation, albeit half-jokingly).

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:04 (twenty-two years ago)

I would really love it if people on this board could keep the threads Geir starts on the subjects he asks about rather than Geir.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:05 (twenty-two years ago)

I seriously want to move to this Geir Universe where hip-hop fans stay children eternally, don't get have to get jobs (such as TEACHING jobs a la ilxor Texas Sam or Lexington's own DJ Mizzla), where the composition of original melodies is not just frowned upon but hunted down and killed, etc. And then rock the mic!

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:05 (twenty-two years ago)

he's not even insane Nick it's just a radically different point of view

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:06 (twenty-two years ago)

"I would really love it if people on this board could keep the threads Geir starts on the subjects he asks about rather than Geir."

Thread loses way after 200+ posts shock

DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:08 (twenty-two years ago)

it's not like he's the only one w/some cranky music-theory here (i shd state that i disagree w/justabout everything geir thinks w/r/t music, and about the only thing i like that he does is prog rock, and even then i think/hope i like it for totally different reasons)

(nb - lynksey's post upthread = proof that he is among the best here imo)

Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I have never actually said that Geir was either racist OR autistic. I don't quite understand where exactly you get the notion that I am in anyway annoyed by the fact that "I disagree with Geir and I can't change his mind" - I really couldn't care less. I'm only annoyed with Geir when he says things that are actively offensive, which he unfortunately does occasionally. Yeah, "quoting out of context", nice one. Anyway, fuck it Dan, I'm fed up with this petty nit-picking crap that goes on in here - enjoy it, I'm outta here permanently.

Dadaismus (Dada), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:09 (twenty-two years ago)

He's not insane, just mistaken. See, a 'melody' is that which is created by variations in pitch resulting from a series of different 'notes' being generated. If an acoustic instrument is being used then no two notes are alike, and even if the instrument is electronic the temporal order of the notes will cause them to 'sound' different. Therefore, every bit of music ever created is automatically 'melodic', it is only those with a very limited hearing spectrum who don't notice.

dave q, Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:10 (twenty-two years ago)

ha ha it didn't even take me to the x-post screen on that one

As for provocation, rock music, and Coldplay/Travis's supposed ability to "piss off considerably more people than Sex Pistols, Eminem, Public Enemy" etc., I think people might show more ire towards these bands because a great many fans of music like to be excited by music, they like to be surprised, and if there's anything these bands DON'T have in their music, that would excitement and surprises. And the thought that they piss off more people than all these folks mentioned really did make me laugh out loud, as I don't recall people ever PROTESTING AGAINST albums being sold/concert performances coming to town, when it's in regards to these bands.

And dave q ON! THE! MONEY!

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:11 (twenty-two years ago)

The thing is, Dan, that Geir is so blinkered and certain in his opinions that his threads can never really evolve into any kind of debate or exchange of ideas. As soon as anyone raises an opinion which Geir does not agree with he starts spurting his standard responses - "music is meant to be melodic", "music isn't about rebellion", etcetera - to which there simply is no answer. It reminds me of debating the existence of God with devout believers - after a point there is the ceiling of belief after which debate is not possible. Geir's ceiling seems to be particularly low.

I do feel weird talking about you in the third person, Geir, but you seem to invite it. I'd like to know why precisely you are so strong in your convictions and so negative when it comes to taking on board other people's opinions.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:13 (twenty-two years ago)

''enjoy it, I'm outta here permanently''

see you next week keith.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:14 (twenty-two years ago)

It reminds me of debating the existence of God with devout believers - after a point there is the ceiling of belief after which debate is not possible. Geir's ceiling seems to be particularly low.

this would actually seem to be true - but Orbital are the common ground :)

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:16 (twenty-two years ago)

In fact, by my correct line of reasoning, the Britpop bands are the LEAST melodic examples of pop music, due to the way they repetitiously use simplistic and fragmentary 'phrases' in place of actual melodies, as if 'sampling' the most easily digestible bits of European classical musical and bastardising them - a practice which should be seen as extremely offensive by anyone who cares about the melodic complexity of that latter particular artistic form.

dave q, Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Indeed. Which shames me...

X-post - I love dave q.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:18 (twenty-two years ago)

this is undoubtedly true nick, but he's not the only one like that by any means, yet there are iirc tens of threads basically ripping on him. It's not as if he's even rude or anything, the only time he's ever got snarky is when someone's called him a nazi. I just don't get it, I'd like to think it's something more than just the fact that his opinions/tastes are s.th. like 180 degrees away from the mainstream here. It drives me up the bloody wall, actually, that prolific though he is, there often seems to be more verbiage dissing him than there is actually from him.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:19 (twenty-two years ago)

(Why is melody extra-musical content, Dave?)

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:19 (twenty-two years ago)

(x-post)

(julio wins)

(again)

Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:19 (twenty-two years ago)

dave q otm again again.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:20 (twenty-two years ago)

A melody requires some kind of climax. Where there isn't climax there isn't really melody, just notes. A bunch of notes put together doesn't necessarily create a melody, they have to have something to them, a feeling of development, and, again, climax.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:21 (twenty-two years ago)

If provocation is the most important part of rock criticism, then Geir seems to have done better than most

Keith Harris (kharris1128), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:21 (twenty-two years ago)

So is this all about orgasm then Geir?

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:22 (twenty-two years ago)

And if it is could you happily wank the climaxes out of yourself and listen to funk?

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:22 (twenty-two years ago)

The retreat from melody coincided with the unfortunate ascendance of the Beatles. Pre-60s, music students were schooled in the great works of the Western canon - afterwards, the simplistic nursery-rhyme reductionism of Lennon/McCartney's rudimentary ditties were upheld as compositional standards, greatly accelerating mainstream culture's decline into musical primitivism.

dave q, Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:23 (twenty-two years ago)

(funk is good for fukcing to, but even better is genesis haha)

Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:24 (twenty-two years ago)

Geir claiming that nursery-rhymes are works of genius while insisting that music should be as complex and arty as possible, always puzzle me, too.

man, Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Dave Q! I LOVE YOU!

Seriously, I would imagine someone looking for climactic melodic complexity would be more of a Sun Ra or Monk or Parliament-Funkadelic fan or something.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:25 (twenty-two years ago)

"Eine Kleine Nachtmusik" (although still a masterpiece) is indeed a lot more nursery-rhyme-like melodically and harmonically than "Yesterday" or "Michelle". More complex in form, certainly, but it took late 19th century Romantic composers to reach a level of harmonical complexity not quite achieved in by McCartney.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:26 (twenty-two years ago)

And all because Macca couldn't sing proper, eh? Fucking nuts, eh?

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:27 (twenty-two years ago)

What's so harmonically nursery-rhyme-like about it?

man, Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Taking sides - accidentally doing something complicated and impressive without realising at all vs deliberately doing something simple?

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:28 (twenty-two years ago)

on some other thread in the past geir claimed that genesis were better than yes b/c they had less extraneous musical wanking (or suchlike) and genesis were more melody-orientated (see, I do keep track of some of this stuff)

Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:28 (twenty-two years ago)

which kind of proves that i like prog rock for difft reasons to geir.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:28 (twenty-two years ago)

More precicely Genesis were better than Yes because their music was more pre-composed and left less up to improvisation.

That being said, I love both bands.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:29 (twenty-two years ago)

man: The basic musical hooks of "Eine Kleine Nachtmusik" (even most of its movement) are mainly I-IV-V-based. Of course, as part of the development of the piece, there are certain visits to other keys and chords, or it would have been boring and never survived.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Unlike this thread

DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Thursday, 20 November 2003 15:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Fucking hell. This thread is EXHAUSTING.

But fantastic.

Lynskey, Geir, Dave Q, Julio, Tom, Stevem and many others, you've just cheered up my day no end. Thanks!

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Thursday, 20 November 2003 17:17 (twenty-two years ago)

The notion that something so all-encompassing, ancient, and universal as MUSIC should adhere to such a strict set of criteria as to only cater to one particular audience, to fulfill only one of the many things MUSIC can do for the human being/universe, not to mention a stubborn willful ignorance with regards to any music which doesn't fall in line with certain structural criteria, makes it VERY difficult to be willing to have a discussion with the particular notion-holder.

Nickalicious otm. But both Lynskey and Geir could be accused of breaking this rule.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 20 November 2003 19:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Still in Manc. Back tommorow. Sleep well kids, I've got a fucking torrent of bile brewing. Live in fear.

Lynskey (Lynskey), Friday, 21 November 2003 00:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Ooh, the anticipation.

Nick H, Friday, 21 November 2003 00:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Reasons why I despise Geir:

1. He would not pass the Turing Test.

2. Anxiety that I neither so to batter him down.

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Friday, 21 November 2003 00:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Ok, I've got a spare 5 mins in between plotting the end of this bitter, soulless planet and working out the actualities of my release schedule. All will be expanded upon tommorow, when I'm not so drunk and in the midst of said plottings.

I've enjoyed what people have said, I'm slightly annoyed I didn't see more people jumping on the cause of "not being a tosser". Some of Geir's comments amuse me - I love the climax thing, I was thinking of throwing in the DJ Shadow quote about music being about orgasm and revolution somewhere in the middle of my rant. Lovely doctrine.

Basically I want to clear up a few things about what I posted for the benefit of those out there that are misguided lambs. The "We" used throughout is used as a counterpoint to what is essentially a highly personal story. It's dead clever. Glad to see you spotted it, serf. For those utterly clueless, the point of the story wasn't the increasing age of the protagonist, it was the awful decline. I also apologise to those outside Britain, it was a very British story.

I'm in love with the pissy-liberal bit which starts trying to bring the Hitlershop into things. OOOOOO! Offensive thing! Burn it! Make some leaflets! We MUST make a minor scale fanzine movement against this terror!

Most of the other useful points I could make are useless Geir-correctors. If you're in, you're in, if you ain't, you ain't. If anyone wants to come on in, then drop me a line. I realise I'm twatting my head against a bullshit consensus-reality Scandanavian here. If you want a better world, let me know, my email is always open and our energy will beat these fuckers down. Between us we have the tools and the talent to make it happen. Let's get it on.

See you tommorow for more fun and games, I've had a great night. Mucho Boozo

P

Lynskey (Lynskey), Friday, 21 November 2003 00:49 (twenty-two years ago)

That was typically evasive.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 21 November 2003 19:58 (twenty-two years ago)

two months pass...
this was fun!

omg, Friday, 30 January 2004 14:31 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.