― roger adultery (roger adultery), Sunday, 7 December 2003 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― mei (mei), Sunday, 7 December 2003 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Johnny Badlees (crispssssss), Sunday, 7 December 2003 19:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Smizek, Sunday, 7 December 2003 20:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Sunday, 7 December 2003 20:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― scottjames23 (worrysome-man), Sunday, 7 December 2003 20:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Sunday, 7 December 2003 22:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Aja (aja), Sunday, 7 December 2003 22:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ian Christe (Ian Christe), Monday, 8 December 2003 06:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 8 December 2003 07:37 (twenty-one years ago)
The problem is, this is a Project and not a Band. Each guest contributes vocals and their instrument (mostly bass, except for Wino) and Grohl fills everything else in himself. Thus, no organic musical locking-in takes place, and you wind up with something fairly sterile, even while it holds to all the usual strategies of "heavy" music. Not good.
― Phil Freeman (Phil Freeman), Monday, 8 December 2003 13:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 8 December 2003 13:23 (twenty-one years ago)
When I do my shopping, I know that scholarly-ness is always the sign of quality.
― George Smith, Monday, 8 December 2003 17:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― dleone (dleone), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 21:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― M Deeds, Tuesday, 10 February 2004 21:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― dleone (dleone), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 21:56 (twenty-one years ago)