Is the player piano roll a digital or analogue medium?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Please advise, giving reasons.

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 01:45 (twenty-one years ago)

http://palimpsest.stanford.edu/byform/mailing-lists/exlibris/2001/01/msg00170.html

scott seward, Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Digital. It's based on stored binary information.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:04 (twenty-one years ago)

These rolls are an interesting precursor to binary data storage, paper
> tape, etc.

Actually, they're analog storage, not digital.

the above is from that link. but what do i know?

scott seward, Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, I could be wrong. I don't know much about player piano scrolls; I thought they simply had holes punched for key down vs. key up (i.e. binary information).

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:09 (twenty-one years ago)

it depends on your definition of digital...using the definition of something operated by the fingers, the piano itself is a digital object!

but of course you mean digital to be 'expressed in numerical form.' But what are numbers? can ones and zeros be expressed by holes and absence-of-holes? That's the way it works for the aluminum in a CD, why not paper?

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:12 (twenty-one years ago)

It's a tough one, isn't it.

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:12 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah im pretty sure it's digital...it's like paper MIDI.

Elliot (Elliot), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:13 (twenty-one years ago)

it's just like a punch tape for early computers = digital.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:30 (twenty-one years ago)

There are different ways an instrument can be analogue or digital, aren't there? I'm not sure how a player piano works exactly, but I presume the sound it makes is totally analogue. The way in which those sounds are triggered may be digital (if it's a note on/note off type system, but there's the question of the granulisation of time (is the paper not essentially infinitely divisible in this sense?)).

Were the cassette tapes used to load 80s computer games an analogue or digital medium?

Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Digital, I think.

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:33 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.uh.edu/engines/epi692.htm


this guy agrees with eyeball kicks, i think.

scott seward, Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:44 (twenty-one years ago)

My scratchy records were analog devices. Player pianos use pure on-off digital logic to store
sound. That was true of the reproducing piano as well. Piano roll companies soon made pianos
that could reproduce a pianist playing. Clark invented a good one in 1912. It was the Q-R-S Music
Company's Marking Piano.


the above is what he says(jesus,how bored am i?)

scott seward, Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Hey scott, are you calling my thread boring?

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:57 (twenty-one years ago)

um, no, not at all. far from it. i've, uh, learned a lot.i've been googling like crazy though when i really should be dusting the ottoman.

scott seward, Tuesday, 9 December 2003 03:05 (twenty-one years ago)

haha!

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 03:05 (twenty-one years ago)

It's conceptually digital (discrete and two-state info) and physically analogue (they rely on a mechanical reading process which, I guess, can have multivariate results).

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 11:25 (twenty-one years ago)

program about this on Radio 4 today, and they got a guy to actually "play" a pianola, distinguished from "reproducing pianos" by the fact that the player can change the tempo very subtly and specifically as the roll goes thru, however he or she wants, and has control over softness and sustain via foot-pedals.. was very cool and spooky, the commentator suggested it was like seeing someone "conduct" the hammers of the piano itself

apparently no piano-roll recording devices were capable of recording dynamics; someone else sat that and made notes about it and added that "control" information to the roll afterwards.

are there chopin rolls? amazing to think that there are "recordings" by him that we can hear

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 16:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I think Eyeball Kicks made a key point in the digital/analog debate. If the element of time is not discrete (and I would guess that it isn't) then the piano roll is analog, no? In a digital medium, the element of time is discretely quantized.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 16:23 (twenty-one years ago)

The fact that it's a "physical" medium is neither here nor there. Every medium is a physical medium - even if you're talking about electrical charges in a memory chip. The issue is whether conceptually the information is stored in an analog or digital form. Although it has some similarities to digital forms (ie., the selection of notes is discrete), the element of time is not discretized; therefore, it is not a digital format.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 16:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm not entirely sure how a player piano works - but seems as though it's being mechanical makes it analog - because the roll doesn't say "note on" or "note off" .. it physically triggers the note that is played, rather than using electrical impulses.

At least that's how I think a player piano works...

So a music box would also be digital, if a player piano is. (unless that's not how a player piano works.)

dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 16:33 (twenty-one years ago)

no, eyeball kicks is totally OTM. you can slow a music box down (slow down the gears) the same way you slow a turntable down and it slows the music. you can't do that with a CD. and if you did that to the punch cards on an old computer somehow the computer wouldn't compute more slowly, it just wouldn't compute at all.

vahid (vahid), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 16:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Analog/digital has nothing to do with mechanical/electronic distinctions. It has to do with how the information is represented. Digital devices can be mechanical. For instance, the early mechanical adding machines.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 16:40 (twenty-one years ago)

e = mc 2

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 16:40 (twenty-one years ago)

scratch what i said, i'm not sure it makes sense anymore.

vahid (vahid), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 16:43 (twenty-one years ago)

hey an abacus is digital, too, right?

vahid (vahid), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 16:43 (twenty-one years ago)

The difference between a player piano and a digital medium (such as a CD) is not so much that you can play it at a different tempo, but that the distribution of elements in time is continuous.

I think you're right - the abacus is digital.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 16:47 (twenty-one years ago)

So- the world's first digital to analogue convertor was an old Joanna!??!?!?!??!

Cripes!!!!!!!

Old Fart!!! (oldfart_sd), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 17:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Yep, I'll concede the point about non-quantised time distribution of discrete elements in a player piano roll - they remain essentially binary instructions though, don't they?

And someone creating a MIDI file on a keyboard without quantising/looping the results is (before altering pitch/attack/decay/etc) creating something analogous to a player piano roll, yes?

The relationship between the pits and lands on the data surface of a CD (which can be various lengths within various tolerances) and the actual datastream is not all that simple; I tend think of CD as an emphatically digital medium because of its optical reading method.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 17:16 (twenty-one years ago)

As I understand it, a MIDI file (unlike a stream of MIDI data) always contains delta-time information which is digital. "Quantizing" in terms of MIDI usually just means adjusting the delta-times to conform to a given grid. Even without "quantizing" the delta-times are still represented by digital quantities, which are discrete.

I don't deny for a second that there are anomalies, tolerances, imperfections, etc., on the physical surface of a CD and in the physical process of reading it; however, the idealized representation of the data is still digital. This is unlike a piano roll.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 17:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Would a grid of lights with a filter in front of it be analog or digital? (Like a Light Brite, except each light is individual, rather than one light source with a filter in front of it.)

dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 18:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Seems to me that one criteria for a truly digital representation is that it can be deterministically converted from one digital storage medium to another. This is the data-format expression of the Turing machine idea. So despite the digital-like on/off nature of the punch holes, the position of the holes is an analog dimension that has no deterministic reading, and thus player piano rolls remain analog. In order for them to be digital, the time-position of the notes would have to be explicitly and unambiguously encoded on the paper. It would be perfectly possible to establish a new player-piano-roll format that did this, but the existing ones do not.

ara, Tuesday, 9 December 2003 20:19 (twenty-one years ago)

If I write a sequence on my digital music set-up which uses a random number generator to vasry the location of the on/off note position, does it become analogue?

And a related question: if I make an exact print of one piano roll from another piano roll, is the copy a digital one?

A third question: are the early computers which used punch hole technology digital or analogue?

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 20:39 (twenty-one years ago)

What is an analog computer?

Simply, an analog computer is a computing device that has two distinguishing characteristics:

1. Performs operations in a truly parallel manner. Meaning it can perform many calculations all at the same time.
2. And operates using continuous variables. Meaning it uses numbers that that change not in steps, but change in a smooth continuous manner.

By constrast, a digital computer can only perform sequential (one at a time) operations, and operates on discrete (noncontinuous) numbers.

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 20:47 (twenty-one years ago)

no.

no.

digital. (their holes were either on or off and also at a specific position -- the player piano roll could have holes at any interval at all)

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 20:47 (twenty-one years ago)

gygax digital things can be pretty massively parallel.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 20:48 (twenty-one years ago)

If I write a sequence on my digital music set-up which uses a random number generator to vasry the location of the on/off note position, does it become analogue?

i'll take a stab at this one: on a cd you have a certain series of pits and lands. they vary somewhat in position (though within certain tolerances, of course). what is important is that groups of them form binary numbers have values from 0 to 65535 (i think that's right, the values not really important though). the important part is that there are a SET NUMBER of these values FOR EACH SECOND of music. you can vary the location of some note position all you want, but in a 44 khz mp3 (for example) it's going to end up SOMEWHERE in one of 44,000 locations for that second of music. compare this to a player piano or a music box - you can literally make the mark anywhere on the roll, there are (in theory but not practice, of course) an infinite number of possible positions to put a hole in the area of paper that represents one second of music.

vahid (vahid), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 20:51 (twenty-one years ago)

sterling clover:

not according to doug coward's analog computer museum!

gygax! (gygax!), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 20:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Analog/digital and parallel/serial are technically orthogonal dimensions, even if they tend to correspond in practice.

The analog-ness of a paper-roll's representation of time is not its resolution, it's that it isn't internally calibrated.

One simple distinction is that digital data can be read and written at different, and varying, speeds, whereas analog information can only be reproduced accurately if it is read at the same speed it was written. (This isn't completely general, but it's true for audio at least.)

If you want an early mechanical medium very similar to the piano roll that actually did store digital information, look up the Jacquard Loom. It too represents data with physical holes, but the key difference is that in weaving the unit of progress is the shuttle throw, not time, and the Loom encoded its data by throw.

ara, Tuesday, 9 December 2003 22:03 (twenty-one years ago)

this thread is mindbending! good work colin!

vahid (vahid), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 22:11 (twenty-one years ago)

thanks Vahid! You know what bent my mind most? The idea that an abacus is a digital processor.

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 23:13 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought these definitions might assist, although it’s evident both words have changed their meaning with the coming of the electrical age. They’re from the Hyperdictionary: http://www.hyperdictionary.com/

------------------------------------

DIGITAL - DEFINITIONS

Webster's 1913 Dictionary

Definition: \Dig"i*tal\, a. [L. digitals.]
Of or performance to the fingers, or to digits; done with the
fingers; as, digital compression; digital examination.


Computing Dictionary

Definition: A description of data which is stored or transmitted as a sequence of discrete symbols from a finite set, most commonly this means binary data represented using electronic or electromagnetic signals.


ANALOGUE - DEFINITIONS

Webster's 1913 Dictionary

Definition: \An"a*logue\ (?; 115), n. [F. ?, fr. Gr. ?.]
1. That which is analogous to, or corresponds with, some
other thing.

The vexatious tyranny of the individual despot meets
its analogue in the insolent tyranny of the many.
--I. Taylor.

2. (Philol.) A word in one language corresponding with one in
another; an analogous term; as, the Latin ``pater'' is the
analogue of the English ``father.''

3. (Nat. Hist.)
(a) An organ which is equivalent in its functions to a
different organ in another species or group, or even
in the same group; as, the gill of a fish is the
analogue of a lung in a quadruped, although the two
are not of like structural relations.
(b) A species in one genus or group having its characters
parallel, one by one, with those of another group.
(c) A species or genus in one country closely related to a
species of the same genus, or a genus of the same
group, in another: such species are often called
representative species, and such genera,
representative genera. --Dana.




Computing Dictionary

Definition: (US: "analog") A description of a continuously variable signal or a circuit or device designed to handle such signals. The opposite is "discrete" or "digital".

Analogue circuits are much harder to design and analyse than digital ones because the designer must take into account effects such as the gain, linearity and power handling of components, the resistance, capacitance and inductance of PCB tracks, wires and connectors, interference between signals, power supply stability and more. A digital circuit design, especially for high switching speeds, must also take these factors into account if it is to work reliably, but they are usually less critical because most digital components will function correctly within a range of parameters whereas such variations will corrupt the outputs of an analogue circuit.


colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 23:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Of or performance to the fingers, or to digits; done with the
fingers

So a piano roll is digital!

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 23:25 (twenty-one years ago)

So is onanism, according to this definition.

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 23:32 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
http://www.williamgaddis.org/critinterpessays/secrethistoryaa.shtml

jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 05:35 (nineteen years ago)

Interesting thread but I think a player piano roll is obviously a digital device.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 06:21 (nineteen years ago)

i did too ("ha! the FOOLS!") until i read vahid's argument about the infinite number of possible positions for a hole in the piano roll.

Lukas (lukas), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 06:34 (nineteen years ago)

I suppose it's analog in time but digital in pitch.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 06:38 (nineteen years ago)

It's also digital in volume, and very low resolution digital at that (a simple on/off).

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 06:40 (nineteen years ago)

The implications of saying that a non-electronic device is digital are manifold, and very interesting.

moley (moley), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 06:42 (nineteen years ago)

Why? Electronic devices can be analog. It's not an electronic/mechanical distinction as already mentioned upthread.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 06:48 (nineteen years ago)

I think another important point is that while the timing may be analog, the pitches are stored as data which can be easily transferred from one medium to another. In other words you can basically look at a piano roll, figure out the pitches being played (though admittedly not the timing) and write them down as a score or program them into a computer. The same cannot be said for the constantly fluctuating voltage on an analog tape or the groove cut into a record.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 06:56 (nineteen years ago)

I suppose it's analog in time but digital in pitch. [...] It's also digital in volume

This about sums it up I guess. (Due to part 2 of the above, the piano would then in itself be digital in pitch, at least given that the volume is digital (thus enabling us to ignore shifts in pitch due to hitting velocity), as opposed to e.g. a violin.)

Red herrings include:
i) "stored as number" – this can also be done in an analog device, the distinction is surely rather that of discrete vs continuous.
ii) "binary" – wouldn't be any less digital if computers worked in e.g. base three (with low-level voltage states positive-negative-zero).

The Vintner's Lipogram (OleM), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 19:52 (nineteen years ago)

(Due to part 2 of the above, the piano would then in itself be digital in pitch, at least given that the volume is digital (thus enabling us to ignore shifts in pitch due to hitting velocity), as opposed to e.g. a violin.)

I guess so, I was pondering that as well. This is perhaps why there can be a player piano but not for example a player violin. A player violin would have to either divide a single string into steps (discrete values) and only allow certain notes to be played or it would have to be able to continuously slide up and down a string which would make it analog.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 19:57 (nineteen years ago)

until i read vahid's argument about the infinite number of possible positions for a hole in the piano roll.

OTM.

Some of the stuff upthread is so wrong and dumb.

xpost:

One could envision encoding methods that could do a good, but not perfect job of making a player violin by recording string position at a very fine time/space slicing interval.

GET EQUIPPED WITH BUBBLE LEAD (ex machina), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 20:01 (nineteen years ago)

One could envision encoding methods that could do a good, but not perfect job of making a player violin by recording string position at a very fine time/space slicing interval.

But regardless of how fine the slicing intervals were, wouldn't the slicing of a length of string into discrete steps essentially make it digital? I guess I'm basically arguing that a fretted guitar neck is digital!

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 20:05 (nineteen years ago)

walter did you read upthread? player piano rolls included information that controlled volume and sustain. it couldn't be "recorded" on the first go-round, but it was added to the roll later by someone taking notes on the original performance on which the roll was based.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 20:06 (nineteen years ago)

Yes, I read that but I thought there were two different types of player pianos, one with dynamics and one without. Maybe not.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 20:09 (nineteen years ago)

no, they both had dynamics. but with one (the player piano) they and the sustain were preset - they played the same each time. with the pianola, the tempo, sustain and dynamics were all adjustable on the fly, so you actually sat down and "played" the pianola, which took patience and practice to learn how to do.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 20:11 (nineteen years ago)

i.e. you pushed levers with your knees and stuff

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 20:12 (nineteen years ago)

if a robot could play a violin, would it be analogue??

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 20:12 (nineteen years ago)

wot, the curtians?

detoxyDancer (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 20:13 (nineteen years ago)

Oh I see, the pianola vs. the reproducing piano. So how were the dynamics recording on the reproducing piano roll? Were they somehow coninuously variable or were they quantized into discrete steps? It seems that if the dynamics were stored as punched holes it would have to be the latter.

big xpost

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 20:13 (nineteen years ago)

Walter you were arguing: "This is perhaps why there can be a player piano but not for example a player violin."

GET EQUIPPED WITH BUBBLE LEAD (ex machina), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 20:14 (nineteen years ago)

i haff 1 0 idea

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 20:15 (nineteen years ago)

Walter you were arguing: "This is perhaps why there can be a player piano but not for example a player violin."

There was another sentence after that. It seems like if you're arguing that piano roll technology was capable of recording musical pitches in an analog manner you would have to demonstrate how it would be possible to use a punched paper system to record a continuously variable tone from an instrument like a violin.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 20:18 (nineteen years ago)

This is kind of an interesting article. Some of his definitions may be imprecise from a computer science point of view (or not, I don't know) but I think the overall concepts he's talking about make sense.

http://sonic-arts.org/darreg/dar12.htm

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 20:31 (nineteen years ago)

However, in a sense the timing portion of a digital wave-file on a computer is also infinitely variable - because of "overclocking". Ie., if the clock speed of the CPU speeds up or slows down, then the playback speed would also be affected proportionally. So the that time is discretely represented in the file format doesn't mean that in reality the playback will occur on that idealized discrete grid. So perhaps the distance from a piano roll to a digital sound format is not as great in reality as it is in theory.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 21:05 (nineteen years ago)

Everyone here is dumb. Why do I even bother talking to you people!

GET EQUIPPED WITH BUBBLE LEAD (ex machina), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 21:16 (nineteen years ago)

The implications of saying that a non-electronic device is digital are manifold, and very interesting.
-- moley (dominakto...), December 6th, 2005.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Why? Electronic devices can be analog. It's not an electronic/mechanical distinction as already mentioned upthread.


Well yes, that is why it's interesting. It seems to teeter on the edge of saying that almost any process has a digital component. For example, a chemical reaction that depends on a threshold is digital. It may be that any effect that depends on a threshold being reached is digital in nature. This would include electrochemical reactions like synapse firing patterns.

Did the word 'digital' originally refer to fingers? Ie, it's digital if you can count it with your fingers, ie, discretely. So: a bunch of grapes can be said to be digital, insofar as it is a cluster of discrete events which may be counted.

moley, Tuesday, 6 December 2005 21:29 (nineteen years ago)

YOU ARE SO STUPID

GET EQUIPPED WITH BUBBLE LEAD (ex machina), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 21:30 (nineteen years ago)

So: a bunch of grapes can be said to be digital, insofar as it is a cluster of discrete events which may be counted.

No, if you counted the number of grapes you would have a digit but the grapes themselves are not digital. That's highlights the major problem with people in this thread trying to define things as "being digital" or analog when the "thing" in question is actually a complex system that may be a mixture of digital and analog processes.

For example "if a robot could play a violin, would it be analogue??" is meaningless on its own. Is the robot controlled through analog control voltages or a digital computer? If it's a digital robot playing the violin we wouldn't say that the whole thing is "digital." But if the control data (the piano roll) was a MIDI signal then we could say that portion of the violin playing robot was digital.

The same applies to the question "Were the cassette tapes used to load 80s computer games an analogue or digital medium?" The cassette tape is obviously an analog medium being used to store digital data that has been encoded into an analog signal. Likewise a player piano takes an instrument that uses a digital series of pitches and stores those pitches digitally while storing the player's timing in an analog manner. So it's a hybrid device and can't be accurately said to "be analog" or "be digital."

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 21:39 (nineteen years ago)

yeah i think you can't meaningfully talk about analog/digital outside of signals + data. a robot playing a violin isn't a signal or data.

vahid (vahid), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 21:44 (nineteen years ago)

I AM SO STUPID

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 21:44 (nineteen years ago)

a robot playing a violin isn't a signal or data.

http://img.stern.de/_content/51/06/510692/robot8_311.284046692607.jpg

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 21:46 (nineteen years ago)

oh shit. I AM SO DUMB

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 21:47 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.startrek.com/imageuploads/200303/tng-171-data-plays-violin-duri/240x320.jpg

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 21:47 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.startrek.com/imageuploads/200303/tng-171-data-plays-violin-duri/240x320.jpg

GET EQUIPPED WITH BUBBLE LEAD (ex machina), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 21:47 (nineteen years ago)

THIS IS THE WORLD'S SMALLEST VIOLIN, BEING PLAYED BY A ROBOT, FOR YOU.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 21:48 (nineteen years ago)

I AM SO BORED

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 21:51 (nineteen years ago)

101!

jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 21:52 (nineteen years ago)

Well, a bunch of grapes could be considered a digital storage medium if the number of grapes was used as a means of conveying information. For instance say you were a spy in ancient Rome, and your means of communicating to your handlers was to leave a bunch of grapes lying in a conspicuous location. Then, say there was a code, such that 3 grapes meant "Attack at dawn" or 4 grapes meant "We are discovered". In that case the bunch of grapes could be perceived as a digital medium.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 21:56 (nineteen years ago)

Let's move onto firmer ground. Music boxes = analog!

nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 21:59 (nineteen years ago)

Could you then make digital wine?
xpost

walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 6 December 2005 21:59 (nineteen years ago)

two years pass...

i saw a real pianola this weekend and got to touch it! it was broken, tho :/

Tracer Hand, Monday, 11 February 2008 15:04 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.