Destroy This List

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
OK, so I have an unbearably smug friend who ends every year with a list so conservative it makes Mojo's look like The Wire's. Don't ask me how one could be smug with such parochial leanings, but it happens. The task here is simple: replace every record on this list with a better one that came out in '03. Provide rationale if you can (and I know you can.) It'd be too easy simply to tear this guy and/or his choices to pieces. I myself am so sorely tempted, but were I to begin, where would I stop? (And he's a nice guy, despite sounding like such an absolute bozo. I've reproduced his list, with commentary from his e-mail, below. Names have been omitted to protect the guilty, but I swear the guy ain't Geir. Otherwise you'd never know it...)

*********


Here we go again, but this time with commentary.  My
personal favorite records of 2003 (which as we all know means
the best of 2003) are as follows:

And the winner is.......

1.  radiohead, "hail to the thief"

nothing else came close for me this year. at first i thought it
was just more of the same, but the more i played it, the more i
realized they had perfectly integrated their experimental
leanings into the rock format they perfected on
"the bends" and "ok computer".  Better than "ok
computer", you ask?  maybe......only time will tell.

The 17 other essential releases of the year are....(in no particular order)

2.  grandaddy, "sumday"

pure pop for now people....not as ambitious as
"sophtware slump", but more accessible and consistent,
and like all great records, it gets better (and more
complex) with every listen.

3.  guided by voices, "the best of guided by voices:
human amusements at hourly rates"

I never include compilation cd's on my list, but this
year, i must make an exception.  For the uninitiated,
this cd makes a persuasive case that, along with
Pavement, Wilco, and the Flaming Lips, GBV are one of
the best American bands of the last 15 years.  Though
their individual cd's are wildly inconsistent (with 3-4
exceptions), it would be relatively easy to compile
another best of GBV cd with another 32 tracks just
as good as the ones on this.  In fact, does anyone
know the right person at Matador to pitch this idea
to?  I bet the band would go for it.  "the best of GBV
vol. 2"?  i say, "bring it on!"

4.  the thrills, "so much for the city"

the best debut of the year...in my not so humble opinion.

5.  bobby bare, jr., "young criminals' starvation league"

the copyright on this says 2002, but I don't think it was actually
released until this year.  also, i'm not counting it as
a debut, because he's recorded two rock albums under the name
"bare jr.".  regardless, it's the best record by a
singer/songwriter I heard all year-- every track is
smart, funny, and impossible to get out of your head.
one part steve earle, one part smiths/morrissey (his
honky tonk cover of "what difference does it make?" is
definitive), and according to his own lyrics, two
parts pete townshend and black francis (aka frank
black).  living proof that both rock 'n' roll and
country, and especially the two together, will never
die.

6.  the strokes, "room on fire"

almost exactly the same as the first, but I mean that
in a good way....

7.  stephen malkmus, "pig lib" (w/bonus cd)

his seventh killer record in a row (counting pavement,
of course).  not sure there's any precedent for such a
spectacularly consistent run.  even r.e.m. ruined
their perfect streak with record #6 ("green").  you'd
have to go back to steely dan or well, the beatles.
what really puts this one over the top for me, though,
are the first three tracks on the bonus disc (which
are as strong as the best three tracks on the album
itself).  not that the album itself isn't perfectly
wonderful....

8.  belle & sebastian, "dear catastrophe waitress"

their fifth killer record in a row.  not like
this is news to anyone.....

9.  jon langford & his sadies, "mayors of the moon"

the copyright on this is also 2002, but i know it
wasn't available until this year.  this is the best
album i've heard by the best of the three songwriters
from the seminal british band, the mekons.  joe
strummer meets johnny cash-- and it is every bit as
good as that sounds.

10.  the libertines, "up the bracket"

"what a wastah, what a fuckin' wastah".  the second
best debut of the year (although it technically came
out in england last year).  hope mick jones and these
guys continue to work together.

11.  mull historical society, "us"

i liked this guy's first record a lot.  i love this
one.  andy partridge meets brian wilson meets badly
drawn boy.  and he's just getting started.

12.  the white stripes, "elephant"

this is truly excellent, and their best album for
sure.  i would rank it higher on the list but for all
the hype and overexposure.

13.  beulah, "yoko"

miles kurovsky's answer to wilco's "yankee hotel
foxtrot".  is it as good?  probably not.  is it in the
same ballpark?  definitely.  and that's sayin'
something.

14.  kings of leon, "youth and young manhood"

the third best debut album of the year.  tom petty
and the strokes in a blender.  yum.

15.  the shins, "chutes too narrow"

a fine follow-up to their highly addictive debut
album, "oh inverted world".

16.  blur, "think tank"

better than "13" for sure.  come to think of it, better than
most of their records.

17.  the minus five, "down wiith wilco"

this is the first scott macaughey record i'd ever
heard (he's made around a dozen with the young fresh
fellows and minus five).  i played it all year and
never got bored.  i'm now in the process of tracking
down the rest of his catalogue.

18.  super furry animals, "phantom power"

a solid follow-up to the godlike "rings around the
world", but not quite as ambitious or jaw dropping.


Honorable mention this year goes to the following:

outkast, "speakerboxx/the love below" (fantastic
record, but it's literally an hour too long)

my morning jacket, "it still moves" (fantastic record
that's 10 minutes too long)

the sleepy jackson (really promising australian band
the fourth best debut album of the year)

lucinda williams (another really solid record--
probably should be higher on the list, but enough
already with the accolades)

the kills, "keep on your mean side" (the fifth best
debut of the year-- jesus & mary chain meets the white stripes)

the jayhawks, "rainy day music" (the first half of
this record is a stone cold classic-- second half, not
so much)

and last but not least, johnny cash, "american IV:
the man comes around", not only for his hearbreaking
cover of "hurt", but also for his original song, "the
man comes around", which i think may be the greatest
song he ever wrote, and i'm a huge fan.


Just for fun, here's a list of mediocre records I paid
good $$ for by artists who don't normally disappoint
or who, at a minimum, are capable of greatness:

paul westerberg, "come feel me tremble" (the first crudball of his career-- he must be drinking again)

neil young, "greendale" (i'm in the minority who thought his last record, "are you passionate?" was a
masterpiece with one crappy 9/11 song tacked on for no reason; "greendale" doesn't suck, but it's not
special either, as some would have you believe)

joe henry, "tiny voices" (again, doesn't suck-- just impossible to listen to straight through without
getting impatient; pacing problem)

joe strummer (none of his solo albums are very good; this is no exception-- sorry joe; r.i.p.)

Unregistered User (M Specktor), Friday, 12 December 2003 15:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Rock is dead, revivalist rock is necrophilia. There, that destroys the whole list.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 12 December 2003 15:32 (twenty-one years ago)

15.  the shins, "chutes too narrow"

a fine follow-up to their highly addictive debut
album, "oh inverted world".

Huckleberry Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 12 December 2003 15:33 (twenty-one years ago)

It seems a bit mean to lay into a list by someone who doesn't post here and isn't (I assume) publishing it for money or anything.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Friday, 12 December 2003 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)

last but not least

This does not make sense in the context of a LIST!

(the only semi-good albums are the ones which didn't make the final cut of 18, haha)

The Lex (The Lex), Friday, 12 December 2003 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)

did American IV come out in 03? I thought it was a fall 02 release?

Huckleberry Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 12 December 2003 15:35 (twenty-one years ago)

If those are the ones he likes, I have no problem.

DO I belong here on these boards, not being an over-opiniated notjackblackinhifidelity kind a dude?

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 12 December 2003 15:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Tico--I guess it is a little mean, but the guy does this every year with the gusto of Charlie Brown charging the football. He *wants* to be spanked, as it were. Besides which, I guess I'm looking less to rout the guy than to provide an articulate alternative. (I'm looking to those here for assistance, not that I entirely lack ideas.) Nor do I think all these records are atrocious, per se...but you line them all up that way and you have a diet of melba toast. Ugh.

Unregistered User (M Specktor), Friday, 12 December 2003 15:45 (twenty-one years ago)

His list isn't very good, but you sound like an absolute cock

DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Friday, 12 December 2003 15:46 (twenty-one years ago)

My personal favorite records of 2003.....


how does one "destroy" this?

nothingleft (nothingleft), Friday, 12 December 2003 15:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I like some of the albums quite a lot, some I don't. It's just an opinion although mailing all your mates with your top ten records seems a little creepy for some reason.

dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 12 December 2003 16:33 (twenty-one years ago)

but posting it here on these boards is an invite to discussion ...

mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 12 December 2003 16:38 (twenty-one years ago)

(BTW, If you want to be anonymous, it helps to log out, "Unregistered"!!)

HRH Queen Kate (kate), Friday, 12 December 2003 16:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Right...thanks Kate. Besides, which, well I reckon I've already come off more obnoxiously than I meant to. (Howdy, DJ.) Perhaps I'm list weary (as the wise man once said, "lists are a form of cultural hysteria,") perhaps a little rubbed raw by the approach. ("personal favorite...which we all know means the best.") Really I was just curious what else--besides my own, probably not less parochial notions--one might suggest to this guy or someone else? JackBlackish or otherwise.

Unregistered User, Friday, 12 December 2003 16:54 (twenty-one years ago)

yes, for making a list of records that he liked to listen to this year, your friend should be drawn and quartered.

Matt Helgeson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 12 December 2003 17:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Righto, um well he should listen to The Locust a lot, they're fuckin aces.

DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Friday, 12 December 2003 17:02 (twenty-one years ago)

This list is not even a tenth as smug and pathetic as you are for calling it parochial and asking ILM to help you slag it. Let's have at your fucking list, if you're so much better than this one.

ara, Friday, 12 December 2003 19:01 (twenty-one years ago)

KILLER

Dean Gulberry (deangulberry), Friday, 12 December 2003 19:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't when people say "no best-ofs" then include one anyway because "it's so good!!!". Best ofs are usually great! Other than that, it's a personal list, etc. see everyone above me's comments.

Vinnie (vprabhu), Friday, 12 December 2003 19:11 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't know what I'm more offended by, you posting my list to this list or your assumption that I couldn't possibly see it here. Dick.

Unregistered's friend, Friday, 12 December 2003 22:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Fight! Fight!

Yeah, that list's actually not so bad. I like most of the albums on it, although they probably wouldn't make my own list, since I'd take care to craft my list to make me seem as cool as possible.

I will say this though:

1) The Malkmus haters out there simply haven't give that record a chance.

2) Bob Pollard need to hang it up.

dieblucasdie (dieblucasdie), Saturday, 13 December 2003 00:15 (twenty-one years ago)

I love Malkmus and I hate that record. And Bob Pollard needed to hang it up in 1984 (not a typo)

M Matos (M Matos), Saturday, 13 December 2003 00:17 (twenty-one years ago)

8. belle & sebastian, "dear catastrophe waitress"

their fifth killer record in a row. not like
this is news to anyone.....


It is to me.

adam michel, Saturday, 13 December 2003 00:34 (twenty-one years ago)

I want to start using the line "in my not-so-humble opinion." But only in public so I can flutter my eyelids while grinning after I say it.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 13 December 2003 00:38 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm not crazy about everything on that list, but I'm always happy to see Pollard and Malkmus get some love.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Saturday, 13 December 2003 00:40 (twenty-one years ago)

And also: what's the point of picking on this guy? He's pretty humble, and he's just talking about his favorite records in a pretty earnest and enthusiastic way. Why mock him just because he's only really into rock music? It's as though he's mocking non-rock music or anything.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Saturday, 13 December 2003 00:43 (twenty-one years ago)

It's a decent list. Predictable, but decent. He likes his pop orchestrated and his rock garagey. I'd be interested to see how he'd rate the New Pornographers, Ted Leo, the Natural History, Enon, Rufus Wainwright, or the Decemberists.

Nick Mirov (nick), Saturday, 13 December 2003 01:05 (twenty-one years ago)

it's funny how people fall in line.

keith m (keithmcl), Saturday, 13 December 2003 02:33 (twenty-one years ago)

From the first 4-5 albums, it seemed this guy had excellent taste. :-)

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 13 December 2003 03:04 (twenty-one years ago)

18. super furry animals, "phantom power"

This record I cannot replace with a better one that came out in 2003, because there was none.

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 13 December 2003 03:12 (twenty-one years ago)

tragic list of 2003. The list started at 60 mph and went to zero...fast.

poopyshiiter (cs appleby), Sunday, 14 December 2003 08:23 (twenty-one years ago)

And also: what's the point of picking on this guy? He's pretty humble, and he's just talking about his favorite records in a pretty earnest and enthusiastic way. Why mock him just because he's only really into rock music? It's [not] as though he's mocking non-rock music or anything.

This seems OTM to me. I mean, I have several friends who do this same sort of thing, and I'm always conscious of their musical blind spots (my friend Brian, for all his self-assured opinions about music, often seems like he gets most of his info from Entertainment Weekly) -- but whatever. I think it probably comes into focus more when you actually know the person for a while, and their tastes and inclinations start to come off as self-parody, and you start to wonder, "Dude, would it kill you to listen to some hip-hop???" But not knowing this guy, I don't really care.

jaymc (jaymc), Sunday, 14 December 2003 10:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Thanks for adding in that [not], jaymc. I hate when I leave out key words when typing quickly...

But yeah, the fact that the guy is superenthusiastic and obviously really loves the music goes a long way for me. I'm much more forgiving of people with narrow tastes if they happen to be really superenthusiastic about what they do love.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Sunday, 14 December 2003 23:01 (twenty-one years ago)

the only thing about his list that's even remotely offensive to me is his bigging up the sleepy fucking jackson

the surface noise (electricsound), Sunday, 14 December 2003 23:03 (twenty-one years ago)

it would kill me to listen to some hip hop. i don't know.

adam michel (adam michel), Sunday, 14 December 2003 23:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Good to see the Bobby Bare, Jr. record get some love. It's been criminally overlooked. Though the only song I skip over is the one he references (lyrics about Townsend and Black Francis).

The list is a bit narrow. But everything that I've heard on it (except the Radiohead) would make my year-end list.

Will (will), Sunday, 14 December 2003 23:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Why do you guys more or less require people to listen to hip-hop. Why exactly hip-hop, I mean? Why not Banghra, Polish free jazz, Russian balalaika orchestras, Burmese monks singing, Juju, Impressionist Classical music, orchestral music from the medieval age, ritual Japanese drumming?

What is it about hip-hop that you makes it so special you require everybody to listen to it?

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Uh, because most everyone already is?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:40 (twenty-one years ago)

>>the thrills, "so much for the city"
>>the best debut of the year...in my not so humble opinion.

this album is so boring and derivative.

MerkinMuffley (MerkinMuffley), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Uh, because most everyone already is?

er, ned this is by a million miles the weirdest thing you've ever said!

the surface noise (electricsound), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Not necessarily. Geir's expressing surprise over a perceived 'requirement' to listen to hip-hop without apparently acknowledging its widespread popularity (which his examples throw into sharp relief).

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:56 (twenty-one years ago)

i get that, it's just that i think the fact that most people are is not necessarily any good reason in and of itself.

the surface noise (electricsound), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:57 (twenty-one years ago)

It makes discussion and appreciation of it much more logical to see, though. Think of it also this way -- for all the contortion going on with Outkast on the board, for instance, the fact remains that a song like "Hey Ya" is more likely than many other songs to be cited as a listening pleasure of the year, whether one self-identifies as a hip-hop fan or not. But that's just one example, in that any number of pop hits that are hip-hop (and in America that's obv. an overwhelming amount) can also fit into that category.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, what Ned said. Hip-hop's cultural ubiquitousness makes its absence from someone's lexicon a bit suspect on reflex by now. It's like talking enthusiastically about the process of watching TV while denying the importance of remote controls. By all means, you don't HAVE to like hip-hop if it's not your style, but when attempting to speak authoritatively in a general way about music, ignoring/denouncing hip-hop wholelsale is like hinting to me I shouldn't really trust your awareness of what the fuck's going on. Like when I see Geir unfailingly mistime/misplace every meant-to-be-witty comment on this board, music-based of not, I kind of feel validated in taking this stance.

DarrensCoq, Monday, 15 December 2003 01:08 (twenty-one years ago)

ok darren's clarification gets the point across to me so i'm happy now

the surface noise (electricsound), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:11 (twenty-one years ago)

I guess I'm not quite so sharp on the point as DarrensCoq, I just prefer to think that inasmuch as hip-hop as defined has as much musical variety and capacity for going different directions as any other genre -- allowing for the fact that genres are ill-defined by their very nature, as Chuck Eddy often notes implicitly -- that it's sorta surprising that there wouldn't be something to like somewhere in any particular year from a hip-hop source. If it came down to a rejection of hip-hop in its entirety or a rejection of those who aren't listening to 'real' hip-hop because a song is too successful/different/scoring with the 'wrong' audience -- well, both stances are problematic, so aim for the better way. Most of those who like "Hey Ya," f'r instance, are doubtless untroubled by whether or not it's a betrayal of Outkast's promise (and most who like "Crazy in Love" probably couldn't care if Jay-Z is on autopilot or not and etc.). But anyway, Jim is now happy so rah.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Billions of flies can't go wrong, eat shit!

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:19 (twenty-one years ago)

you go first

the surface noise (electricsound), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:21 (twenty-one years ago)

But don't billions of flies like melody too?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Uh, because most everyone already is?

Ned, I can't believe you really believe this is true.

(People sometimes lose their rational faculties while arguing with Geir.)

Rockist Scientist (rockistscientist), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Billions of flies sometimes eat other stuff than shit too :-)

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Maybe the guy just didn't find any hip hop records (aside from Outkast) that he actually likes. My favorite albums are hardly ever hip hop albums, but my singles list is mostly hip hop.

scott m (mcd), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Ned, I can't believe you really believe this is true.

I think of it this way, Rockist -- in terms of public attention and coverage, it's pretty damn hard in popular music terms to NOT hear hip-hop, and as we all know the majority of folks who listen to music are content to do so as something enjoyable in life rather than the raison d'etre that defines most of us here, with our own particular focuses and fetishes. Obviously at the same time there are a lot of shades and differences between extremes but I'm thinking if I asked most people my age or younger what they regularly listened to and/or what songs they really liked this year, hip-hop would be a very common thread, as common as other things and possibly more so. And there's neither anything wrong or surprising about that.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:29 (twenty-one years ago)

but when attempting to speak authoritatively in a general way about music

I think virtually no one who does this has actually heard enough of what's going on across the globe to make speak authoritatively on it (obviously including myself). It's interesting that while people complain about "best album" lists that aren't even considering entire regions of the world, some "best album of 2003" lists are acceptable, even though the people who made them didn't come close to making an exhaustive investigation. Some of the lists that people on ILM put together may take in a much broader range of genres and cultures than a Rolling Stone best album list, but I don't think they come close to really being based on an exhaustive over.

x-post w/ Ned:

I'm thinking if I asked most people my age or younger

Right, but there are a fair number of people my age and older who don't enjoy it. I don't think they should be exclused from "pretty much everyone," or whatever the exact phrase was.

in popular music terms

Right, but don't forget the people who don't listen to popular music (to the extent that they can avoid it).

I'm thinking if I asked most people my age or younger what they regularly listened to and/or what songs they really liked this year, hip-hop would be a very common thread, as common as other things and possibly more so. And there's neither anything wrong or surprising about that.

That's understood.

Rockist Scientist (rockistscientist), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:46 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm just annoyed that your "most everyone" appears to exclude a lot of people my age and over, plus people who pay no attention to pop music.

(The poor guy who made this list even described it as his "personal favorites," making no claim to exhaustively surveying pop music.)

I think Geir's question is a good one:

What is it about hip-hop that you makes it so special you require everybody to listen to it?

Rockist Scientist (rockistscientist), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:50 (twenty-one years ago)

So hip-hop is very popular? And? . . .

Rockist Scientist (rockistscientist), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Stock/Aitken/Waterman were very popular in the late 80s, but I don't think that any music writers would require everybody to have a least a couple Stock/Aitken/Waterman productions in their "Best of the year" lists just because they were popular.

And, btw. particularly in album terms, "dadrock" is pretty popular too. Does that mean that every ILM regular is supposed to have at least a couple "dadrock" albums in his 2003 list?

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:56 (twenty-one years ago)

((Yeah but Geir comparing an group to an entire genre isn't very convincing, and "dad rock" is not as big a genre as hip-hop, so again, not the best comparison. At least I think it's not as big. Honestly, I'm not sure what counts as "dad rock."))

Rockist Scientist, Monday, 15 December 2003 01:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Another example: on my 500 albums I'm pretty sure I want thread, someone posted: you should want more hip-hop (though that might have just been a joke).

Rockist Scientist, Monday, 15 December 2003 02:05 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm just annoyed that your "most everyone" appears to exclude a lot of people my age and over, plus people who pay no attention to pop music.

Agreed, an overstatement -- and the worst thing would be to assume that to not be au courant with everything about hip-hop means you might as well go home (an attitude a touch prevalent on this board that I've never been fond of -- it doesn't work for saying that about rock or soul or country or whatever, it shouldn't apply there either). I am trying to argue more for a middle ground (that might itself be a bit of a strawman in turn) for a hypothetical 'general listener' that likes what's being heard and played in a mainstream sense, the much mocked 12 CD listener who presumably also tunes into all the mainstream stations and watches MTV etc.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 02:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Let me also note that the context in which I said, "Would it kill you to listen to some hip-hop?" was a hypothetical friend whose tastes were becoming amusingly predictable. I certainly don't expect most people to like or listen to hip-hop -- but I will admit that I've good-naturedly egged on close friends of mine who seem stuck in an all-indie mindset.

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 15 December 2003 02:29 (twenty-one years ago)

and "dad rock" is not as big a genre as hip-hop

Not right now. 20 years ago it was. In fact a lot bigger. And it may be again in 20 years. Since when did trends become important anyway?

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 15 December 2003 02:29 (twenty-one years ago)

"Big" as in the range of music it encompasses.

man, Monday, 15 December 2003 02:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Ned, of course a lot of pop fans don't like the pop they are supposed to like. The same friend who was telling me last night how much she likes Dave Matthews's love songs seems to like hip-hop*, listens to Interpol and White Stripes, and loves salsa (and is one of my favorite dance partners). She's almost like the "12-CD person" but she digs a little too deeply for that. To me, her taste in music is very cool, but that's based largely on the fact that we like so many of the same salsa tunes.

(I hope this makes sense. It's not a retort to anything you just said, but more of a vague continuation of it.)

*Actually, when someone put on some Lauryn Hill toward the end of the party last night, when my friends and I were getting ready to leave, the only people moving to it were the person who put it on, my salsa friend, and me. I wanted to get back on the livingroom dance floor and start dancing, but we seemed to be on our way out.

Rockist Scientist, Monday, 15 December 2003 02:59 (twenty-one years ago)

I hope this makes sense.

No, perfect sense -- that's exactly the kind of person I'm talking about!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 03:00 (twenty-one years ago)

This thread is interesting (or got that way, quickly). It has finally put the finger on why I dont often read ILM. The whole deification of hiphop/rap here is bizarre. It leaves me thinking I must be living on another planet or too old or totally out of touch because I dont like any (AAAANNNYYYY) hip hop.

Well ok no, I lie, I liked that one Snoop Dogg song for its chorus.

But when TMBG did the guest programming on rage last year and they played loads of missy, Jay-Z (I think), P.Diddy and so on I was thinking "who the hell are these bands" and god I felt stupid. I also really dont like much of it, mind you my reasons why will have been done to death here by others so I'll not bother.

Rockist you've made an excellent point here.

Of course, I havent been able to avoid hearing hiphop - and keep in mind I NEVER listen to the radio - but I wouldnt know Jay-Z from Outkast from a bar of soap.

D'you know, Ive never heard "Hey Ya" or "In Da Club"?

Whats that make me?

(waits for Jim to make smartarse reply ;P)

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 15 December 2003 03:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Ned, But she even went to Cuba, motivated primarily by her love of the music and dance, I think, so she has a little bit of her own specialist tendencies. But yeah, she's someone who has a lot less trouble than I do finding things she likes in pop music or in indie rock. (Though I think she's right: Supernatural has more than just a couple good songs on it.)

xpost, Trayce:

Thanks, I can't take all the credit though.

Rockist Scientist, Monday, 15 December 2003 03:23 (twenty-one years ago)

she even went to Cuba

For which she is paying a hefty fine to our dog ass government. :(

Rockist Scientist, Monday, 15 December 2003 03:25 (twenty-one years ago)

trayce i've heard both and neither made any more or less impression than 99% of what i hear on the radio really

the surface noise (electricsound), Monday, 15 December 2003 03:30 (twenty-one years ago)

I figured as much (about the songs not your opinion of them, obv)

Its like... I dont get the fuss over eminem and missy (tho at least she does some interesting shit with samples).

I do love other kinds of dance/electro stuff though. I guess Ive never tried to hunt out genres, I just get hit with a song and go "hey thats great". And, as I seem to recall posting on one of my first ever posts on ILM, these days that "woah" thing rarely ever happens. Pity.

Trayce (trayce), Monday, 15 December 2003 03:33 (twenty-one years ago)

My response to hip-hop is more ambivalent than that (which is complicated by my having listened to a lot of it at one point), but I just resent the assumption that I ought to be listening to it, that I must find some hip-hop I like, etc.

Rockist Scientist, Monday, 15 December 2003 03:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, I figure this, Rockist -- that one Britney tune that caught your ear was pleasant enough for you, yeah? Even though it's not the type of thing you'd normally listen to -- there could be some hip-hop out there which fits that bill to. I don't think anyone's saying you HAVE to find it but you could well stumble across it and why not?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 03:44 (twenty-one years ago)

B-b-but I didn't say I liked it a lot, just that it was okay, and I was curious about it. I think I could like it though.

The only thing that could possibly make me absolutely write off the possibility of liking some new hip-hop is having people shove it down my throat (not that I think *you* are doing that).

Rockist Scientist, Monday, 15 December 2003 03:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Rah! Anyway, that kind of unsubtle like-or-die approach is indeed crap, and claiming one's moral superiority via what one listens to is a mug's game. But we wanted to go back to where this thread sparked up today, liking/being aware of/knowing hip-hop is compared to a lot of other musics pretty damn easy or straightforward. Geir's incredulous surprise is on the one hand understandable ("Stop lecturing me about what I should like!" -- given my own lurv for things like the Smashing Pumpkins, an approach I find sympathy with!) but on the other hand pointless in that its popularity and attractiveness bespeaks a widespread love.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 03:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually, for me it's been very difficult to be aware of hip-hop. I know where to hear the stuff that tops the charts (which I rarely like), and I hear a ton in my neighborhood, and there used to be a bunch on Brooklyn public access when I had cable, but for the most part I only seem to encounter crap. I like the Viktor Vaughn album a lot, but had to sift through way too much to find it. What is the hip-hop equivilant of (using old examples here) option/magnet/chickfactor/popwatch/youcoulddoworse/second skin/mark prindle/etc. anyway?? Cause it's sure not pitchfork.

dlp9001, Monday, 15 December 2003 04:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, Ned, I am on record saying moderately positive things about Outkast. (But see, it's damned if you do and damned if you don't.) In fact, it's very funny. There is another music forum that I chose voluntary exile from after a former draconian moderator returned, and I was lurking lately and saw that the resident hip-hop basher had started a positive thread about Outkast (who I had mentioned a long while back as being someone in hip-hop he might actually like, or at least see some value in). So he's now there saying they are at least more interesting that 99% of what's out there, and so forth, but he doesn't consider them hip-hop (which neither do some hip-hop extremists, it seems).

Rockist Scientist, Monday, 15 December 2003 04:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Yay the bemusing world of categorization!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 04:56 (twenty-one years ago)

But ultimately, after listening to Staknonia and the hits collection that came out after that, I still didn't find myself wanting to own either of those CDs. But yes, very close.

Rockist Scientist, Monday, 15 December 2003 04:56 (twenty-one years ago)

The hip-hop haters and the hip-hop Taliban agree that Outkast aren't "real" hip-hop (the haters, because they like them; and the Taliban because the haters like them, or something like that).

Rockist Scientist, Monday, 15 December 2003 04:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I definitely will look into this Britney Spears too, if the library gets her latest CD. (I am not into pouty blondes with boob jobs though.)

Rockist Scientist, Monday, 15 December 2003 04:59 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.