*********
Here we go again, but this time with commentary. My personal favorite records of 2003 (which as we all know means the best of 2003) are as follows:
And the winner is.......
1. radiohead, "hail to the thief"
nothing else came close for me this year. at first i thought it was just more of the same, but the more i played it, the more i realized they had perfectly integrated their experimental leanings into the rock format they perfected on "the bends" and "ok computer". Better than "ok computer", you ask? maybe......only time will tell.
The 17 other essential releases of the year are....(in no particular order)
2. grandaddy, "sumday"
pure pop for now people....not as ambitious as "sophtware slump", but more accessible and consistent, and like all great records, it gets better (and more complex) with every listen.
3. guided by voices, "the best of guided by voices: human amusements at hourly rates"
I never include compilation cd's on my list, but this year, i must make an exception. For the uninitiated, this cd makes a persuasive case that, along with Pavement, Wilco, and the Flaming Lips, GBV are one of the best American bands of the last 15 years. Though their individual cd's are wildly inconsistent (with 3-4 exceptions), it would be relatively easy to compile another best of GBV cd with another 32 tracks just as good as the ones on this. In fact, does anyone know the right person at Matador to pitch this idea to? I bet the band would go for it. "the best of GBV vol. 2"? i say, "bring it on!"
4. the thrills, "so much for the city"
the best debut of the year...in my not so humble opinion.
5. bobby bare, jr., "young criminals' starvation league"
the copyright on this says 2002, but I don't think it was actually released until this year. also, i'm not counting it as a debut, because he's recorded two rock albums under the name "bare jr.". regardless, it's the best record by a singer/songwriter I heard all year-- every track is smart, funny, and impossible to get out of your head. one part steve earle, one part smiths/morrissey (his honky tonk cover of "what difference does it make?" is definitive), and according to his own lyrics, two parts pete townshend and black francis (aka frank black). living proof that both rock 'n' roll and country, and especially the two together, will never die.
6. the strokes, "room on fire"
almost exactly the same as the first, but I mean that in a good way....
7. stephen malkmus, "pig lib" (w/bonus cd)
his seventh killer record in a row (counting pavement, of course). not sure there's any precedent for such a spectacularly consistent run. even r.e.m. ruined their perfect streak with record #6 ("green"). you'd have to go back to steely dan or well, the beatles. what really puts this one over the top for me, though, are the first three tracks on the bonus disc (which are as strong as the best three tracks on the album itself). not that the album itself isn't perfectly wonderful....
8. belle & sebastian, "dear catastrophe waitress"
their fifth killer record in a row. not like this is news to anyone.....
9. jon langford & his sadies, "mayors of the moon"
the copyright on this is also 2002, but i know it wasn't available until this year. this is the best album i've heard by the best of the three songwriters from the seminal british band, the mekons. joe strummer meets johnny cash-- and it is every bit as good as that sounds.
10. the libertines, "up the bracket"
"what a wastah, what a fuckin' wastah". the second best debut of the year (although it technically came out in england last year). hope mick jones and these guys continue to work together.
11. mull historical society, "us"
i liked this guy's first record a lot. i love this one. andy partridge meets brian wilson meets badly drawn boy. and he's just getting started.
12. the white stripes, "elephant"
this is truly excellent, and their best album for sure. i would rank it higher on the list but for all the hype and overexposure.
13. beulah, "yoko"
miles kurovsky's answer to wilco's "yankee hotel foxtrot". is it as good? probably not. is it in the same ballpark? definitely. and that's sayin' something.
14. kings of leon, "youth and young manhood"
the third best debut album of the year. tom petty and the strokes in a blender. yum.
15. the shins, "chutes too narrow"
a fine follow-up to their highly addictive debut album, "oh inverted world".
16. blur, "think tank"
better than "13" for sure. come to think of it, better than most of their records.
17. the minus five, "down wiith wilco"
this is the first scott macaughey record i'd ever heard (he's made around a dozen with the young fresh fellows and minus five). i played it all year and never got bored. i'm now in the process of tracking down the rest of his catalogue.
18. super furry animals, "phantom power"
a solid follow-up to the godlike "rings around the world", but not quite as ambitious or jaw dropping.
Honorable mention this year goes to the following:
outkast, "speakerboxx/the love below" (fantastic record, but it's literally an hour too long)
my morning jacket, "it still moves" (fantastic record that's 10 minutes too long)
the sleepy jackson (really promising australian band the fourth best debut album of the year)
lucinda williams (another really solid record-- probably should be higher on the list, but enough already with the accolades)
the kills, "keep on your mean side" (the fifth best debut of the year-- jesus & mary chain meets the white stripes)
the jayhawks, "rainy day music" (the first half of this record is a stone cold classic-- second half, not so much)
and last but not least, johnny cash, "american IV: the man comes around", not only for his hearbreaking cover of "hurt", but also for his original song, "the man comes around", which i think may be the greatest song he ever wrote, and i'm a huge fan.
Just for fun, here's a list of mediocre records I paid good $$ for by artists who don't normally disappoint or who, at a minimum, are capable of greatness:
paul westerberg, "come feel me tremble" (the first crudball of his career-- he must be drinking again)
neil young, "greendale" (i'm in the minority who thought his last record, "are you passionate?" was a masterpiece with one crappy 9/11 song tacked on for no reason; "greendale" doesn't suck, but it's not special either, as some would have you believe)
joe henry, "tiny voices" (again, doesn't suck-- just impossible to listen to straight through without getting impatient; pacing problem)
joe strummer (none of his solo albums are very good; this is no exception-- sorry joe; r.i.p.)
― Unregistered User (M Specktor), Friday, 12 December 2003 15:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 12 December 2003 15:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huckleberry Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 12 December 2003 15:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Friday, 12 December 2003 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)
This does not make sense in the context of a LIST!
(the only semi-good albums are the ones which didn't make the final cut of 18, haha)
― The Lex (The Lex), Friday, 12 December 2003 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Huckleberry Mann (Horace Mann), Friday, 12 December 2003 15:35 (twenty-one years ago)
DO I belong here on these boards, not being an over-opiniated notjackblackinhifidelity kind a dude?
― mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 12 December 2003 15:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Unregistered User (M Specktor), Friday, 12 December 2003 15:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Friday, 12 December 2003 15:46 (twenty-one years ago)
how does one "destroy" this?
― nothingleft (nothingleft), Friday, 12 December 2003 15:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 12 December 2003 16:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Friday, 12 December 2003 16:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― HRH Queen Kate (kate), Friday, 12 December 2003 16:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Unregistered User, Friday, 12 December 2003 16:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matt Helgeson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 12 December 2003 17:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Friday, 12 December 2003 17:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― ara, Friday, 12 December 2003 19:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dean Gulberry (deangulberry), Friday, 12 December 2003 19:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vinnie (vprabhu), Friday, 12 December 2003 19:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Unregistered's friend, Friday, 12 December 2003 22:49 (twenty-one years ago)
Yeah, that list's actually not so bad. I like most of the albums on it, although they probably wouldn't make my own list, since I'd take care to craft my list to make me seem as cool as possible.
I will say this though:
1) The Malkmus haters out there simply haven't give that record a chance.
2) Bob Pollard need to hang it up.
― dieblucasdie (dieblucasdie), Saturday, 13 December 2003 00:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Saturday, 13 December 2003 00:17 (twenty-one years ago)
It is to me.
― adam michel, Saturday, 13 December 2003 00:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 13 December 2003 00:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Saturday, 13 December 2003 00:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Saturday, 13 December 2003 00:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― Nick Mirov (nick), Saturday, 13 December 2003 01:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― keith m (keithmcl), Saturday, 13 December 2003 02:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 13 December 2003 03:04 (twenty-one years ago)
This record I cannot replace with a better one that came out in 2003, because there was none.
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Saturday, 13 December 2003 03:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― poopyshiiter (cs appleby), Sunday, 14 December 2003 08:23 (twenty-one years ago)
This seems OTM to me. I mean, I have several friends who do this same sort of thing, and I'm always conscious of their musical blind spots (my friend Brian, for all his self-assured opinions about music, often seems like he gets most of his info from Entertainment Weekly) -- but whatever. I think it probably comes into focus more when you actually know the person for a while, and their tastes and inclinations start to come off as self-parody, and you start to wonder, "Dude, would it kill you to listen to some hip-hop???" But not knowing this guy, I don't really care.
― jaymc (jaymc), Sunday, 14 December 2003 10:17 (twenty-one years ago)
But yeah, the fact that the guy is superenthusiastic and obviously really loves the music goes a long way for me. I'm much more forgiving of people with narrow tastes if they happen to be really superenthusiastic about what they do love.
― Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Sunday, 14 December 2003 23:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Sunday, 14 December 2003 23:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― adam michel (adam michel), Sunday, 14 December 2003 23:39 (twenty-one years ago)
The list is a bit narrow. But everything that I've heard on it (except the Radiohead) would make my year-end list.
― Will (will), Sunday, 14 December 2003 23:51 (twenty-one years ago)
What is it about hip-hop that you makes it so special you require everybody to listen to it?
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:39 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:40 (twenty-one years ago)
this album is so boring and derivative.
― MerkinMuffley (MerkinMuffley), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:41 (twenty-one years ago)
er, ned this is by a million miles the weirdest thing you've ever said!
― the surface noise (electricsound), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― DarrensCoq, Monday, 15 December 2003 01:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:21 (twenty-one years ago)
Ned, I can't believe you really believe this is true.
(People sometimes lose their rational faculties while arguing with Geir.)
― Rockist Scientist (rockistscientist), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:22 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott m (mcd), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:26 (twenty-one years ago)
I think of it this way, Rockist -- in terms of public attention and coverage, it's pretty damn hard in popular music terms to NOT hear hip-hop, and as we all know the majority of folks who listen to music are content to do so as something enjoyable in life rather than the raison d'etre that defines most of us here, with our own particular focuses and fetishes. Obviously at the same time there are a lot of shades and differences between extremes but I'm thinking if I asked most people my age or younger what they regularly listened to and/or what songs they really liked this year, hip-hop would be a very common thread, as common as other things and possibly more so. And there's neither anything wrong or surprising about that.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:29 (twenty-one years ago)
I think virtually no one who does this has actually heard enough of what's going on across the globe to make speak authoritatively on it (obviously including myself). It's interesting that while people complain about "best album" lists that aren't even considering entire regions of the world, some "best album of 2003" lists are acceptable, even though the people who made them didn't come close to making an exhaustive investigation. Some of the lists that people on ILM put together may take in a much broader range of genres and cultures than a Rolling Stone best album list, but I don't think they come close to really being based on an exhaustive over.
x-post w/ Ned:
I'm thinking if I asked most people my age or younger
Right, but there are a fair number of people my age and older who don't enjoy it. I don't think they should be exclused from "pretty much everyone," or whatever the exact phrase was.
in popular music terms
Right, but don't forget the people who don't listen to popular music (to the extent that they can avoid it).
I'm thinking if I asked most people my age or younger what they regularly listened to and/or what songs they really liked this year, hip-hop would be a very common thread, as common as other things and possibly more so. And there's neither anything wrong or surprising about that.
That's understood.
― Rockist Scientist (rockistscientist), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:46 (twenty-one years ago)
(The poor guy who made this list even described it as his "personal favorites," making no claim to exhaustively surveying pop music.)
I think Geir's question is a good one:
― Rockist Scientist (rockistscientist), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rockist Scientist (rockistscientist), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:51 (twenty-one years ago)
And, btw. particularly in album terms, "dadrock" is pretty popular too. Does that mean that every ILM regular is supposed to have at least a couple "dadrock" albums in his 2003 list?
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 15 December 2003 01:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rockist Scientist, Monday, 15 December 2003 01:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rockist Scientist, Monday, 15 December 2003 02:05 (twenty-one years ago)
Agreed, an overstatement -- and the worst thing would be to assume that to not be au courant with everything about hip-hop means you might as well go home (an attitude a touch prevalent on this board that I've never been fond of -- it doesn't work for saying that about rock or soul or country or whatever, it shouldn't apply there either). I am trying to argue more for a middle ground (that might itself be a bit of a strawman in turn) for a hypothetical 'general listener' that likes what's being heard and played in a mainstream sense, the much mocked 12 CD listener who presumably also tunes into all the mainstream stations and watches MTV etc.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 02:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 15 December 2003 02:29 (twenty-one years ago)
Not right now. 20 years ago it was. In fact a lot bigger. And it may be again in 20 years. Since when did trends become important anyway?
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Monday, 15 December 2003 02:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― man, Monday, 15 December 2003 02:54 (twenty-one years ago)
(I hope this makes sense. It's not a retort to anything you just said, but more of a vague continuation of it.)
*Actually, when someone put on some Lauryn Hill toward the end of the party last night, when my friends and I were getting ready to leave, the only people moving to it were the person who put it on, my salsa friend, and me. I wanted to get back on the livingroom dance floor and start dancing, but we seemed to be on our way out.
― Rockist Scientist, Monday, 15 December 2003 02:59 (twenty-one years ago)
No, perfect sense -- that's exactly the kind of person I'm talking about!
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 03:00 (twenty-one years ago)
Well ok no, I lie, I liked that one Snoop Dogg song for its chorus.
But when TMBG did the guest programming on rage last year and they played loads of missy, Jay-Z (I think), P.Diddy and so on I was thinking "who the hell are these bands" and god I felt stupid. I also really dont like much of it, mind you my reasons why will have been done to death here by others so I'll not bother.
Rockist you've made an excellent point here.
Of course, I havent been able to avoid hearing hiphop - and keep in mind I NEVER listen to the radio - but I wouldnt know Jay-Z from Outkast from a bar of soap.
D'you know, Ive never heard "Hey Ya" or "In Da Club"?
Whats that make me?
(waits for Jim to make smartarse reply ;P)
― Trayce (trayce), Monday, 15 December 2003 03:18 (twenty-one years ago)
xpost, Trayce:
Thanks, I can't take all the credit though.
― Rockist Scientist, Monday, 15 December 2003 03:23 (twenty-one years ago)
For which she is paying a hefty fine to our dog ass government. :(
― Rockist Scientist, Monday, 15 December 2003 03:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― the surface noise (electricsound), Monday, 15 December 2003 03:30 (twenty-one years ago)
Its like... I dont get the fuss over eminem and missy (tho at least she does some interesting shit with samples).
I do love other kinds of dance/electro stuff though. I guess Ive never tried to hunt out genres, I just get hit with a song and go "hey thats great". And, as I seem to recall posting on one of my first ever posts on ILM, these days that "woah" thing rarely ever happens. Pity.
― Trayce (trayce), Monday, 15 December 2003 03:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rockist Scientist, Monday, 15 December 2003 03:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 03:44 (twenty-one years ago)
The only thing that could possibly make me absolutely write off the possibility of liking some new hip-hop is having people shove it down my throat (not that I think *you* are doing that).
― Rockist Scientist, Monday, 15 December 2003 03:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 03:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― dlp9001, Monday, 15 December 2003 04:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rockist Scientist, Monday, 15 December 2003 04:55 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 04:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rockist Scientist, Monday, 15 December 2003 04:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rockist Scientist, Monday, 15 December 2003 04:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Rockist Scientist, Monday, 15 December 2003 04:59 (twenty-one years ago)