― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Friday, 12 December 2003 22:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Friday, 12 December 2003 22:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 12 December 2003 22:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Friday, 12 December 2003 22:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Friday, 12 December 2003 22:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Friday, 12 December 2003 22:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 12 December 2003 22:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Friday, 12 December 2003 22:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 12 December 2003 22:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 12 December 2003 22:32 (twenty-two years ago)
Do cherry bombs actually work?
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Friday, 12 December 2003 22:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― bill stevens (bscrubbins), Friday, 12 December 2003 23:27 (twenty-two years ago)
basically where he goes on and on about the pill popping montage as 'sampling'
― bill stevens (bscrubbins), Friday, 12 December 2003 23:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― adam michel, Friday, 12 December 2003 23:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Friday, 12 December 2003 23:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― adam michel, Friday, 12 December 2003 23:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― James Slone (Freon Trotsky), Friday, 12 December 2003 23:43 (twenty-two years ago)
-- adam michel (adamrt...), December 12th, 2003.
Yeah, that's more like it.
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Saturday, 13 December 2003 00:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― donut bitch (donut), Saturday, 13 December 2003 00:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Saturday, 13 December 2003 00:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Saturday, 13 December 2003 00:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Saturday, 13 December 2003 00:13 (twenty-two years ago)
No, Picabia is more hip-hop.
― Rockist Scientist (rockistscientist), Saturday, 13 December 2003 00:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Rockist Scientist (rockistscientist), Saturday, 13 December 2003 00:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― vahid (vahid), Saturday, 13 December 2003 00:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― vahid (vahid), Saturday, 13 December 2003 01:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Saturday, 13 December 2003 01:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― vahid (vahid), Saturday, 13 December 2003 01:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Saturday, 13 December 2003 04:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d rock (nordicskilla), Saturday, 13 December 2003 06:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― spittle (spittle), Saturday, 13 December 2003 21:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― spittle (spittle), Saturday, 13 December 2003 21:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― fletcher dexter, Saturday, 13 December 2003 23:41 (twenty-two years ago)
"The kinds of film nerds who bitch that "it just ripped off a bunch of old movies" remind me of the crusty rockists who whinge "It's only other peoples' beats! They don't write their own songs!" RZA's influence on the soundtrack aside, though, I'm coming to the conclusion that, much like the way Taxi Driver's porn-theater squalor and dead-end desperation was a visual catalyst for a longstanding tradition of rock and roll nihilism that at this particular time referred to itself as "punk", Kill Bill Vol. 1 takes the best moments of '60s and '70s cinema -- "breaks", if you will -- and freestyles over them. And this is on some severe Paul's Boutique shit right here."
Granted, it's coming from a "C in Intro Film Studies" mindset here, but it felt like Tarantino was reassembling previous loves into a new super-behemoth party-rockin' park jam to me.
― nate detritus (natedetritus), Sunday, 14 December 2003 01:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― nate detritus (natedetritus), Sunday, 14 December 2003 01:26 (twenty-two years ago)
Well, that's pretty much how I did read it. Sorry, perhaps I wasn't clear about that.
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Sunday, 14 December 2003 01:31 (twenty-two years ago)
The pointless recycling of old ideas (sampling), due to a lack of creativity.
I don't think this is true of hip-hop, but I do think it's true of Kill Bill. I really disliked that movie.
― Debito (Debito), Sunday, 14 December 2003 02:01 (twenty-two years ago)
Kill Bill was just stupid.
― Debito (Debito), Sunday, 14 December 2003 02:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott seward, Sunday, 14 December 2003 02:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― d k (d k), Sunday, 14 December 2003 02:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott seward, Sunday, 14 December 2003 03:51 (twenty-two years ago)
most overrated soundtracks ever?
― vahid (vahid), Sunday, 14 December 2003 03:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott seward, Sunday, 14 December 2003 04:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott seward, Sunday, 14 December 2003 04:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― vahid (vahid), Sunday, 14 December 2003 04:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott seward, Sunday, 14 December 2003 04:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― d k (d k), Sunday, 14 December 2003 04:49 (twenty-two years ago)
hee hee, you are a weirdo, but that's cool. the line above is why i won't be arguing with you. have fun on ilm with your cogent blah blah blah, whatever, shit.(i mean why bother?)
― scott seward, Sunday, 14 December 2003 04:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― d k (d k), Sunday, 14 December 2003 05:00 (twenty-two years ago)
As for Tarantino and his *supposed relation* to hip-hop, I don't see much of it at all (if hip-hop WAS only Wu-Tang Clan sampling exploitation films and dusty scores it might make sense, but that's really only the most topical element of the Clan and certainly doesn't apply to most/many/any other hip-hoppers). If anything Tarantino's more like a bar cover band, taking other people's songs and then playing/reinterpreting (ever so slightly) them (often energeticly and sometimes inventively and sometimes badly and ALWAYS with lots of between song banter.) What he does with movies isn't what I would think of as sampling (which cinematically would seem to involve something more along the lines of The Limey using chunks of Poor Cow but on an even much greater level, actually building a whole movie out of a previous movie, rather than just occassionally referencing sequences in flashbacks.)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Sunday, 14 December 2003 05:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― Debito (Debito), Sunday, 14 December 2003 05:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sonny A. (Keiko), Sunday, 14 December 2003 05:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Sunday, 14 December 2003 11:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Sunday, 14 December 2003 11:07 (twenty-two years ago)
1) was just about to masturbate2) was masturbating3) had just finished masturbating4) had just bought the one hip-hop album he was gonna buy that year
― cinniblount (James Blount), Sunday, 14 December 2003 11:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― cinniblount (James Blount), Sunday, 14 December 2003 11:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 14 December 2003 11:55 (twenty-two years ago)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/1365000/images/_1369648_coffin300.jpg
I felt bad about what I had just typed and lost my erection. Geir, don't you have this reflex? The first part anyway?
― DarrensCoq, Sunday, 14 December 2003 12:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― d k (d k), Sunday, 14 December 2003 23:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 14 December 2003 23:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 14 December 2003 23:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Sunday, 14 December 2003 23:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― nate detritus (natedetritus), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― d k (d k), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― nate detritus (natedetritus), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― nate detritus (natedetritus), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― d k (d k), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― nate detritus (natedetritus), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:36 (twenty-two years ago)
I wish this thread was about how great that KABOOM product-placement was instead.
― nate detritus (natedetritus), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt Helgeson (Matt Helgeson), Monday, 15 December 2003 00:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― scott seward, Monday, 15 December 2003 01:15 (twenty-two years ago)