http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/issues/2004-01-01/music.html/1/index.html
― Chris O'Connor (Chris O'Connor), Thursday, 1 January 2004 00:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 1 January 2004 00:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Steve Kiviat (Steve K), Saturday, 3 January 2004 03:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 3 January 2004 03:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Saturday, 3 January 2004 03:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 3 January 2004 03:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Saturday, 3 January 2004 03:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 3 January 2004 03:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Saturday, 3 January 2004 03:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Saturday, 3 January 2004 03:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 3 January 2004 03:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Saturday, 3 January 2004 03:28 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Saturday, 3 January 2004 03:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Saturday, 3 January 2004 03:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Saturday, 3 January 2004 03:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Saturday, 3 January 2004 03:37 (twenty-one years ago)
Yet another explanation of why us proactive editors say "fuck you" to traditional top 10-20 exercises. They always run the risk of making your section look stupid or shallow.
― Chris O., Saturday, 3 January 2004 10:05 (twenty-one years ago)
I like your year end thing Chris. I think that route is the best way to go for year end summaries. Straight essays never seem to do it for me.
― don weiner, Saturday, 3 January 2004 12:28 (twenty-one years ago)