how much is my copy of 'ink polaroids of belle and sebastian' worth ?

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

e-bay had it going for 70 quid !! i was lookin for something else and saw it. odd i thought, seeing as i got it originally, 6 years ago, for a fiver. is it worth a lot of money then are not ?
who's the expert ?

― piscesboy, Thursday, 8 January 2004 15:11 (twenty-two years ago)

if it's a bootleg it's worth fuck all, honestly

― the surface noise (electricsound), Thursday, 8 January 2004 22:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, I would suggest that if someone is willing to pay £70 for it, then it's worth money to someone. What was the bidding like - did someone lose out near that price? Stick it on ebay and see what happens.

― ailsa (ailsa), Friday, 9 January 2004 01:34 (twenty-two years ago)

people who buy bootlegs are only a slightly lesser lifeform than those who sell them. both less worth to society than your average amoeba.

― the surface noise (electricsound), Friday, 9 January 2004 01:35 (twenty-two years ago)

It's not a bootleg, it's a book.

― ailsa (ailsa), Friday, 9 January 2004 01:37 (twenty-two years ago)

can somebody shoot me now please? i'm having a bad day

― the surface noise (electricsound), Friday, 9 January 2004 01:37 (twenty-two years ago)

More info here

― ailsa (ailsa), Friday, 9 January 2004 01:39 (twenty-two years ago)

(info on B& S, not on shooting people)

― ailsa (ailsa), Friday, 9 January 2004 01:40 (twenty-two years ago)

the worst was when the b&s fans started posting their own ink polaroids everywhere, aiiee.

― keith m (keithmcl), Friday, 9 January 2004 02:39 (twenty-two years ago)

doug wolk (daver popshots?!) did a good article on b&s at bowlie in the style of ink polaroids that i really like. i like the idea of the ink polaroid but it's all bundled up with b&s and weird indicators of taste and politics i thk now or as you say 'the worst was when b&s fans started posting their own ink polaroids everywhere...'

― cozen (Cozen), Friday, 9 January 2004 02:43 (twenty-two years ago)

i love belle and sebastian but i could never cut it on the sinister list.

― keith m (keithmcl), Friday, 9 January 2004 02:51 (twenty-two years ago)

this whole thread makes me want to sigh

― dean gulberry (deangulberry), Friday, 9 January 2004 02:55 (twenty-two years ago)

sorry

― the surface noise (electricsound), Friday, 9 January 2004 03:33 (twenty-two years ago)

one year passes...

answer to original question = fuck all

― piscesboy, Tuesday, 8 March 2005 18:20 (twenty-one years ago)

roffle

― Darius Rucker Lookalike (deangulberry), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 18:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I dunno if cozen is thinking I'm the one that wrote the "ink polaroids" article (which is flattering but woefully wrong) (I remember that article fondly, though I can't recall anything substantial from it), or he's asking for my guidance (from over a year ago). Anyhoo, I'm pretty sure DW wrote it.

― David R. (popshots75`), Tuesday, 8 March 2005 18:23 (twenty-one years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.