100 albums that sound better on vinyl..

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
100. Portishead - "Dummy"
99. Husker Du - "Warehouse: Songs and Stories"
98. Slint - "Spiderland"

Gas Coin, Monday, 19 January 2004 10:56 (twenty-one years ago)

97. Marvin Gaye - What's Going On?

Llahtuos Kcin (Nick Southall), Monday, 19 January 2004 10:59 (twenty-one years ago)

For the most part I stay quiet on this issue, but my blanket statement is that everything sounds better on vinyl. When CD first debuted, I was shocked at how bad it sounded; not only was it poor tonally, but the music sounded cold, dead, devoid of rhythm or flow. But for the past few years I will concede that not only have CD players gotten better - and good ones have gotten cheaper - but CD mastering technology is at the point where you can actually get almost as much enjoyment out of a CD as an LP, and that's a success in my mind. Plus, while the CD format will never have the tactile or visual appeal of LP, they are convenient to use, so I no longer worry about buying a release on CD.

So to answer the question... despite the excellent bonus tracks and booklet (and despite it being bettyer than it's initial CD release) Rhino's Dusty in Memphis has given a small boost in detail but sounds a bit too bright compared to the LP. Almost on the other side of the coin, Polydor's superb James Brown box Star Time is a textbook example on how to assemble a career retrospective. The tonal quality is outstanding BUT... the now somewhat old mastering technology doesn't quite have the groove and drive that it would had it been done now, and with music that's all about rhythm and groove that's too bad. Still, I don't want to sound negative; they did the best they could at the time.

Sean (Sean), Monday, 19 January 2004 11:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Vinyl elitism is silly. Only old CD re-releases which were badly mastered on CD sound better on vinyl. Nowadays everything sounds better on CD. Having said that, I'll still contribute to the thread...


96. Miles Davis - In a Silent Way

At least the CD version I have isn't well mastered, the vinyl definitely has a crisper sound. There seems to be a new CD version released, I wonder if it's any better.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 19 January 2004 11:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Audiophiles vs vinyl junkies, fite!

Llahtuos Kcin (Nick Southall), Monday, 19 January 2004 11:14 (twenty-one years ago)

The more recent Columbia Legacy reissue of In a Silent Way is superb. I've had the vinyl forever (played on what is arguably the best turntable ever made) and I've got to say that the newer CD issue is excellent, and I will usually put it on over the LP. This is quite a statement for me.

I'll actually go a step further (and I'd wager few here are as devoted to the LP format as I am) and say that this thread topic is kind of a dead issue. Analog will always better digital in some regards, but CD has come so far that it is 'good enough'. I wouldn't have said this several years ago, but there you go.

Sean (Sean), Monday, 19 January 2004 11:20 (twenty-one years ago)

none of them

the surface noise (electricsound), Monday, 19 January 2004 11:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually, I do have a good answer - The CD of There's a Riot Going On is still a disgrace.

Sean (Sean), Monday, 19 January 2004 11:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I entirely respect Sean's opinion on the CD/vinyl issue, coming as he does from a background where (I imagine) he'd experienced genuinely good vinyl playback before encountering the early manifestations of CD. Those of us who grew up with vinyl but whose first taste of anything approaching high fidelity was via CD may have different expectations wrt sound quality.

Sean's suggestion that the Linn LP12 might be the best turntable ever made makes plain his own tastes in audio presentation - even in vinylphile circles, the LP12 divides opinion. Some would say that it doesn't even deserve to mentioned in the same breath as VPI, Kuzma, Michell, etc. There isn't even any agreement on what it gets so wrong/so right.

Anyway, I bow to the greater experience of the man (I certainly don't seek out the best pressings or invest heavily in the format thesedays).

95. Stereolab - Cobra and Phases... (it's a touch richer and smoother and "Blue Milk" is a few minutes longer on the double LP).

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 19 January 2004 11:48 (twenty-one years ago)

The UK/Australian version of There's A Riot Going On, with the original cover (always a good sign) is significantly better than the US version.

Jedmond, Monday, 19 January 2004 11:50 (twenty-one years ago)

94. Trout Mask Replica

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Monday, 19 January 2004 12:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Analog will always better digital in some regards, but CD has come so far that it is 'good enough'.

Um, is there such an thing as "analog" sound nowadays? Even if you play a vinyl, the signal will have to go through the amplifier, which will null any differences except those in mastering.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 19 January 2004 12:05 (twenty-one years ago)

What? Of course, if you play an LP on a good turntable and then run it through a crummy amp you're going to lose any benefit you gained, but we're assuming the whole setup is adequate. Audio amps operate in the anolog domain strictly.

Sean (Sean), Monday, 19 January 2004 12:10 (twenty-one years ago)

It doesn't necessarily have to be something that's technically better on vinyl - it could be a more subjective thing. i.e. What albums do you think sound warmer, more comforting, cosier with the odd crackle in the background. Do albums with a more ramshackle sound lend themselves more to the imperfections inherent in the vinyl format? For example the Black Keys album sounds really good on LP (though I must admit I haven't heard in on CD so I can't include it here.)

Gas Coin, Monday, 19 January 2004 12:15 (twenty-one years ago)

What? Of course, if you play an LP on a good turntable and then run it through a crummy amp you're going to lose any benefit you gained, but we're assuming the whole setup is adequate. Audio amps operate in the anolog domain strictly.

Okay, but what do you mean when you say "analog will always better digital in some regards"? If you play music through an amp, it doesn't matter where the information comes from. Soundwise, CD can have the same information than a vinyl, and more, so I can't see any difference except in mastering. Plus, CDs don't wear out as easily as vinyls - some of my old vinyls sound awful nowadays, especially the high sounds.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 19 January 2004 12:16 (twenty-one years ago)

There are some AV amps out there which will digitise an analogue input, but, yes, it's still purely analogue replay in the main.

Whether the LP was produced entirely in the analogue domain is another matter - the EQ/compression at the cutting stage may have been done within a DAW, the master may have been delivered on a Sony PCM tape, DAT or CD-R, the recording could have been digital. A few still go entirely the analogue route.

(Gas Coin's qualification of this thread's purpose is key).

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 19 January 2004 12:18 (twenty-one years ago)

93. 13th floor elevators - easter everywhere

el sabor de gene (yournullfame), Monday, 19 January 2004 12:21 (twenty-one years ago)

If you play music through an amp, it doesn't matter where the information comes from

This is precisely the thinking that Linn sought to destroy when they debuted the LP12 in 1973. Basically, it's "garbage in, garbage out". Consumer products have evolved to the point where you can walk into a discount store and not walk out with "garbage" but the concept is the same. If you really believe that it doesn't matter where the information comes from, all I can think is that you haven't heard good hifi gear demostrated properly, but since I'm neither an evangelist nor a salesman, I'm not going to attempt to convince you.

Sean (Sean), Monday, 19 January 2004 12:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Of course the sound is better on hifi gear, but the actual information that is on the record doesn't change with your equipment, does it? So a CD can have an exactly as good sound quality (maybe even better) than an LP, if it's mastered right. That was my point from the beginning.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 19 January 2004 12:31 (twenty-one years ago)

The information on the record - microscopic grooves that vibrate a sylus - requires a very high level of mechanical design and build quality. So what you're getting out of a $125 Technics is not what you're getting out of a $3000 VPI, or whatever brand you favor. The information on the record simply cannot be extracted by a cheaper design to the degree that a more expensive design can, and this is one unfortunate aspect of LP playback - all that engineering and parts costs money. Whether or not it's worth it is up to you.

Sean (Sean), Monday, 19 January 2004 12:41 (twenty-one years ago)

I was talking about CDs versus LPs - you can have the same info on a CD than on an LP, so the format itself doesn't affect the sound, only mastering and your equipment.

Whether or not it's worth it is up to you.

Why not have a CD player then, where you don't have to buy an expensive one to get good sound quality? The only reason I have a vinyl player is because there are records which have never been released on CD.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Monday, 19 January 2004 12:46 (twenty-one years ago)

The format does affect the sound quality, but what I was saying earlier, and what I'm agreeing with you on, is that decent sound quality is now more affordable than ever (from CD) and that persuing that last few percentage points is best left for the fanatic, or those with plenty of disposable income.

Sean (Sean), Monday, 19 January 2004 12:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Tuomas, the argument in favour of vinyl is that the fixed amount of information contained on a CD (the analogue waveform represented as 65000+ discrete amplitude levels, 44100 times a second) simply isn't enough to capture every nuance of the studio master; vinyl's microscopic grooves - a continually-varying physical analogue of the music, within the limits imposed by the cutting process and the trackability - supposedly get closer. I don't happen to agree with this, but that's the argument.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 19 January 2004 13:00 (twenty-one years ago)

92. The Beatles - Please Please Me
91. The Moody Blues - Days of Future Passed

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Monday, 19 January 2004 13:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Public Image Ltd. - Metal Box/Second Edition

willem (willem), Monday, 19 January 2004 13:55 (twenty-one years ago)

I never own both CD and LP versions of anything, but I have a hard time believing that the sound of my vinyl copy of Al Green's Call Me could be improved.

Mark (MarkR), Monday, 19 January 2004 14:36 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't think I've preferred the Cds of ANYTHING I've rebought on Lp (or viceversa), actually

Silly Sailor (Andrew Thames), Monday, 19 January 2004 14:43 (twenty-one years ago)

don't people usually mention metal machine music?

toby (tsg20), Monday, 19 January 2004 14:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Lou Reed himself has gone on record saying that the CD version of Metal Machine Music is an abomination.

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Monday, 19 January 2004 15:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Um I couldn't possibly be bothered to figure out the numbering, but John Lennon's Plastic Ono Band certainly sounds better with a bit of crackle.

Kent Burt (lingereffect), Monday, 19 January 2004 15:15 (twenty-one years ago)

The argument against vinyl is of course that these limitations are not relevant in the conditions it's going to be played in (esp the argument against the bitdepth falls flat when you consider the volume at which most music is played) and that any perceived differences are either caused by different mastering or wide differences in the rest of the chain (eg, a $20.000 turntable/amp/speaker setup vs. entry/midlevel quality setups for the CD). The rest is a placebo effect. This was nicely illustrated in a highly amusing article I read ten years ago describing a double blind test between an original cd and another cd containing the same information as the original but artifically degraded to sound like vinyl (crackle, pops, rumble, a little "analogue" distortion filter, and the high frequencies eq'ed up a little) - nearly all listeners preferred the "vinyl" one. Don't get me wrong, vinyl is wonderful - I've got quite a lot of it and it's much more fun to collect, and listening to crackling vinyl does something to your mind that even the best CD can't match but anyone buying it for "objective" quality reasons is seriously deluding himself.

Siegbran (eofor), Monday, 19 January 2004 15:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Plus you have to fucking turn it over!

Llahtuos Kcin (Nick Southall), Monday, 19 January 2004 15:24 (twenty-one years ago)

90. White Stripes, Elephant
89. Funkadelic, Free Your Mind and Your Ass Will Follow
88. Eric B. and Rakim, Follow the Leader*

*I've never heard it on vinyl, but it's a safe assumption that it has to sound better than the k-awful CD "mastering" which makes everything sound tiny and distant and quiet.

nate detritus (natedetritus), Monday, 19 January 2004 15:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Maybe a few people here might know it:

87: Allen Clapp '100% Chance of Rain'

The really wonderful track 'Something strange happens' sounds so much richer on the vinyl version. I think it must have been remastered for the CD release. I seem to remember Rocketship's 'Hey Hey Girl' sounding much better in 7" format then on CD as well.

marianna, Monday, 19 January 2004 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh yeah the fun of collecting it's a HUGE factor, I admit. And the cheapness!

Silly Sailor (Andrew Thames), Monday, 19 January 2004 15:36 (twenty-one years ago)

I think Abbey Road feels a bit too lonely when previewed without evidence of several previous visits.

christoff (christoff), Monday, 19 January 2004 16:27 (twenty-one years ago)

86. jamc - psychocandy

listening to all that squalling noise in CD quality just seems....pointless really

zappi (joni), Monday, 19 January 2004 17:29 (twenty-one years ago)

85. PJ Harvey- 4 Track Demos

I prefer it on vinyl, but I don't know why. It sounds 'better' to me. It's probably completely subjective. Records are just pretty.

Blood and sparkles (bloodandsparkles), Monday, 19 January 2004 17:37 (twenty-one years ago)

I like vinyl more, for any record it seems, but you can't carry vinyl around with you to listen to.

Aja (aja), Monday, 19 January 2004 17:41 (twenty-one years ago)

84. white light/white heat - v.u.

lauren (laurenp), Monday, 19 January 2004 18:35 (twenty-one years ago)

any Steely Dan but especially Gaucho.

Gear! (Gear!), Monday, 19 January 2004 18:38 (twenty-one years ago)

83. Marquee Moon by Television (like hearing for the first time)
82. Funhouse by the Stooges

chris besinger (chris besinger), Monday, 19 January 2004 18:41 (twenty-one years ago)

All this talk about objective quality and analog vs. digital ... have you listened to a recording on vinyl and on CD and compared them on the SAME stereo system? I have several albums on both vinyl and CD, and in each case the vinyl sounds FAR better. I don't want to go into details and get off the main subject of this thread, but if you haven't done the comparision, do it, I think you'll be amazed.

"Spiderland" (already named) has the most drastic improvement on vinyl of anything that I own.

81. Joy Division -- Unknown Pleasures
80. MBV -- Loveless (guitars sound very different than the CD, if you worship this album, as most of you likely do, then you must hear it on vinyl someday before you die)
79. Fluxion -- Vibrant Forms II (or anything else on Basic Channel or Chain Reaction)
78. Phillippe Cam -- Balance

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Monday, 19 January 2004 18:43 (twenty-one years ago)

forgot an important one ...

77. VU -- VU and Nico

The vinyl doesn't just sound better, but it's a completely different mix. The album was remixed for CD release in the 80's. The original mix was finally released on CD a couple of years ago, but most of the CD copies out there have the crappy 80's mix.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Monday, 19 January 2004 18:46 (twenty-one years ago)

All records ever sound better on scratched up vinyl played through a turntable stuck on a slightly wrong speed & through a shit amp and busted speakers. They also sound better when you are drunk.

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 19 January 2004 19:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Beatles' "Sgt. Pepper" and "Magical Mystery Tour" sound too clean and have too much space in the stereo imaging in their CD versions. Also, the version of the Buzzcocks' "Singles Going Steady" CD that I have has a remastering job that sucks out a lot of the midrange -- I'm not sure if the 24-song UK version is any better or if there's been a subsequent remastering.

Nom De Plume (Nom De Plume), Monday, 19 January 2004 19:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Lou Reed himself has gone on record saying that the CD version of Metal Machine Music is an abomination.

Has he said this since the reissue came out a few years ago?

76. Rolling Stones Exile on Main Street. First heard it as a first generation Columbia CD (admittedly, not a good way to hear any music), didn't get the fuss. Bought the vinyl on a whim and it all made a lot more sense.

Vic Funk, Monday, 19 January 2004 19:41 (twenty-one years ago)

As a non-audiophile, I often wonder whether there is a different mastering process for albums released on vinyl as opposed to those released on CD. I generally don't buy albums on both, but sometimes pick up albums on vinyl if I already have them downloaded or otherwise available to me in digital format--I like records and vinyl is generally a couple of bucks cheaper where I shop. I have noticed that certain albums sound, at least to my ears, significantly different on vinyl than on cd. Is this likely due to a different mix or simply the differences in the equipment?

75. The Shins "Chutes Too Narrow"
74. The Sea and Cake "One Bedroom"

webcrack (music=crack), Monday, 19 January 2004 19:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Lou Reed himself has gone on record saying that the CD version of Metal Machine Music is an abomination.
Part of the reason is that the vinyl version is "boobytrapped" to skip (into an endless loop) at the very end of the last side. The CD isn't designed to do that.

Lord Custos Omicron (Lord Custos Omicron), Monday, 19 January 2004 20:09 (twenty-one years ago)

have you listened to a recording on vinyl and on CD and compared them on the SAME stereo system?

Yes, sir!

I have several albums on both vinyl and CD, and in each case the vinyl sounds FAR better.

No doubt it does to you. In your system. With those records. But (generally) not to me, with my system and my records. Ok, one off-the-top-of-my-head exception above and here's another (but it's only a 7" single):

73 Cardinal "If You Believe In Christmas Trees" (vs album version)

As a non-audiophile, I often wonder whether there is a different mastering process for albums released on vinyl as opposed to those released on CD.

It can be utterly different. The vinyl cutting process itself necessitates certain compromises in terms of frequency response and dynamic range, beyond that it's down to the taste of the engineer; CD mastering can be as hands-off as you like (the CD isn't going to object to slabs of sub-bass, sibilant vocals, crazy dynamic swings, huge crescendoes at the end of the album or the fact that you're trying to pack nine minutes onto a single) but typically involves some degree of multi-band compression to tease certain things out of the mix. Many CDs thesedays are brick-wall compressed to "sound good for radio" with a severity that I doubt could be managed on vinyl. This isn't a good thing.

There are plenty of opportunities for the cutting engineer to craft something on the LP version that many listeners would prefer to the 'closer-to-the-master' (or brickwalled-to-buggery) CD version. And they do. Gawd bless 'em.

Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Monday, 19 January 2004 21:43 (twenty-one years ago)

I cannot await the next thread: 100 albums that sound better on shellac than vinyl... ;-)

Roger in Mokum (Roger T), Monday, 23 February 2004 22:59 (twenty-one years ago)

83. Marquee Moon by Television (like hearing for the first time)

This is true. I'm playing a copy that came in the mail today and it just sounds incredible. Much better than the mp3s I had, anyway.

maypang (maypang), Tuesday, 24 February 2004 04:22 (twenty-one years ago)

two months pass...
82. Otis Redding (ANY)
81. Dusty Springfield-Dusty In Memphis
80. John Coltrane-A love Supreme
79. Metallica-Master of Puppets
78. Throbbing Gristle-20 Jazz Funk Hits
77. Bob Marley (any)
76. Minutemen-Double Nickles...

ddb, Monday, 3 May 2004 16:01 (twenty-one years ago)

OOPS..i was looking at maypang's post..

64. Otis Redding (ANY)
63. Dusty Springfield-Dusty In Memphis
62. John Coltrane-A love Supreme
61. Metallica-Master of Puppets
60. Throbbing Gristle-20 Jazz Funk Hits
59. Bob Marley (any)
58. Minutemen-Double Nickles...

ddb, Monday, 3 May 2004 16:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Arthur Doyle, Alabama Feeling. The CD is mastered from a fucked-up LP copy. My mint copy sounds much better.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 3 May 2004 16:06 (twenty-one years ago)

I'll go on record and say Metal Machine Music is an abomination.

Al Green's Call Me, though, rules.

uh (eetface), Monday, 3 May 2004 16:15 (twenty-one years ago)

New Order - Movement. You can't get Hannett's production on the poxy CD version - it's essential to hear this on vinyl.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Monday, 3 May 2004 18:10 (twenty-one years ago)

54. The Who - The Who Sings My Generation. Even the new 2CD "deluxe edition" is abysmal compared to the original 1965 mono LP.

Mr. Snrub (Mr. Snrub), Monday, 3 May 2004 18:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I think Sabbath sound better on vinyl, but then again, that might be cuz I dislike the production on the cds of theirs I have, which came in the later days.

uh (eetface), Monday, 3 May 2004 18:33 (twenty-one years ago)

53. Talking Heads More Songs About Buildings And Food
52. Funkadelic Maggot Brain

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 3 May 2004 18:39 (twenty-one years ago)

51. Set Fire to Flames - Sings Reign Rebuilder
50. Bowie - Low
49. The B-52s - s/t

umop apisdn (umop apisdn), Tuesday, 4 May 2004 02:13 (twenty-one years ago)

48. The entire Rubble series.

Kim Tortoise, Tuesday, 4 May 2004 14:10 (twenty-one years ago)

47. AC/DC - Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap.

No shit.

BlastsOfStatic (BlastsofStatic), Tuesday, 4 May 2004 18:10 (twenty-one years ago)

three weeks pass...
Both Judee Sill records. They sound awkwardly distorted in their respective Rhino reissues.

Salvador Saca (Mr. Xolotl), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 18:27 (twenty-one years ago)

44. Pere Ubu "Dub Housing"
All Fela Kuti

Sean Witzman (trip maker), Wednesday, 26 May 2004 18:31 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
The Specials - More Specials: IMHO The original vinyl sounds way superior to the cd that was released several years later - In fact I'd say that it has to be one of the best examples of HQ vinyl mastering I've ever heard - especially considering the length and bass content it's a surprisingly loud cut too!

G M, Monday, 16 January 2006 11:46 (nineteen years ago)

Anything on SST?

I went through my grandpa's old records a while ago and saved a few before my grandma cleared them out, one of them was Love - Forever Changes, which sounded way better than the (original issue) CD I had, but I don't know how it compares to the CD remaster.

I guess that's number 42.

Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Monday, 16 January 2006 12:19 (nineteen years ago)

41. David Bowie - Lodger
40. Mogwai - No Education = No Future

tissp! (the impossible shortest specia), Monday, 16 January 2006 12:29 (nineteen years ago)

Black Sabbath - Black Sabbath
Gong - You
Cardiacs - Seaside

Dr Greyhound (Dr Greyhound), Monday, 16 January 2006 12:33 (nineteen years ago)

two weeks pass...
36. Talk Talk - The Colour of Spring

jackl (jackl), Saturday, 4 February 2006 20:36 (nineteen years ago)

35. New Order - Brotherhood (intentially sequenced for vinyl, one rock side, one electronic side, plus the needle scratch to end the album makes this an essential vinyl listening experience...oh, no State of the Nation tacked on either)

biz, Saturday, 4 February 2006 20:50 (nineteen years ago)

34. The Jesus & Mary Chain - Psychocandy
for full spectrum hisssssssss and crackkkkkkle

omutante (omutante), Saturday, 4 February 2006 23:08 (nineteen years ago)

sorry, forgot JAMC's at 86. So scratch my #34 entry...instead:
34. Flying Saucer Attack - Mirror
again with the hisssss trailssssss, plus most un-FSA mondo psych artwork that's perfect for gatefold (maybe a sub-thread is albums that look better on LP, first one that comes to mind is certainly The Deviants' Ptoof!)

omutante (omutante), Saturday, 4 February 2006 23:30 (nineteen years ago)

"maybe a sub-thread is albums that look better on LP"

all of them.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 4 February 2006 23:35 (nineteen years ago)

"36. Talk Talk - The Colour of Spring"

you know what? i'm a vinyl freak, but this sounds great on vinyl AND cd. all of their albums do. colour of spring was one of the first CDs i ever bought and it set me up for some serious disappointment when i expected the same great sound from future purchases.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 4 February 2006 23:40 (nineteen years ago)

No. 70 Transformer - Lou Reed is a good call. My sister bought this on RCA Dynaflex (i think? What happened to that format?) - a super lightweight vinyl - around 1973. It still sounds terrific.

Bob Six (bobbysix), Saturday, 4 February 2006 23:53 (nineteen years ago)

Scott, you might be right. To be honest, I haven't heard the CD version in a long time. It's funny though, because my experience with TCOS was exactly the opposite of yours - it was one of the first albums I heard on vinyl, and I've been chasing that kind of quality ever since.

Anyway, I prefer the vinyl version, but that may have more to do with memories and attentiveness when listening than with the actual quality.

jackl (jackl), Sunday, 5 February 2006 00:29 (nineteen years ago)

35. Dr. John : Gris Gris

cnwb (cnwb), Sunday, 5 February 2006 10:35 (nineteen years ago)

"maybe a sub-thread is albums that look better on LP"
all of them.

-- scott seward (skotro...), February 4th, 2006 6:35 PM. (scott seward)

Naw, Black Dice records look like ass on vinyl

senseiDancer (sexyDancer), Sunday, 5 February 2006 15:08 (nineteen years ago)

Boy, the numbering on this thread is all kinds of fucked up. I'm just adding three more entries.

David Van Tieghem, These Things Happen. Van Tieghem's very lossy-sounding self-release of this on CD was a big letdown. A clean copy of the Warner Bros. original will provide far more punch and range. Plus, the opening bars sound good with a little bit of surface noise on 'em.

XTC, English Settlement. I don't post this as a matter of personal opinion, but it seems to be widely held in XTC lore that the original American vinyl pressing of this, in particular, has the best fidelity of any released version. I haven't kept up on the argument since the most recent brace of remastered editions, though.

Joni Mitchell, Hejira. This is a nostalgia pick. I first got the album on vinyl as a kid, and I still prefer listening to my old copy that way. Again, something to do with that extra presence: the hum of preamp, the spit of surface flaws.

Myke. (Myke Weiskopf), Sunday, 5 February 2006 15:55 (nineteen years ago)

You just set yourself up:

http://www.sisterray.co.uk/images/Black-Dice-Broken-Ear-Record-336388.jpg

naus (Robert T), Sunday, 5 February 2006 16:17 (nineteen years ago)

Add to the list:

Elvis Costello - This Year's Model

Morrissey - You Are The Quarry. I listened to a friend's CD version on my system and then bought it on vinyl; my copy sounds slightly warmer and richer. My system isn't exactly audiophile, either; I've got a Sony tuner/amplifier and a Bang and Olufsen turntable with Bose speakers.

Albums that come out on vinyl should include access codes that would allow the purchaser to download mp3s from the label's website, so album tracks could be put on iPods.

webcrack (music=crack), Sunday, 5 February 2006 17:48 (nineteen years ago)

Albums that come out on vinyl should include access codes that would allow the purchaser to download mp3s from the label's website, so album tracks could be put on iPods.

Merge records are doing that now, or planning to.

..., Sunday, 5 February 2006 18:30 (nineteen years ago)

John Cage: 4.33 (on vinyl, at least something is going on)

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Sunday, 5 February 2006 19:25 (nineteen years ago)

RCA Dynaflex was an abomination. They rank amongst the worst vinyl pressings by a major label - and this from a company that introduced "Living Stereo". I avoid them at all costs. Sometimes you don't have a choice though.

Brooker Buckingham (Brooker B), Sunday, 5 February 2006 19:32 (nineteen years ago)

dinosaur jr. - bug & yer living...

maybe the remaster/reissue changed that though. i haven't heard 'em.

Special Agent Gene Krupa (orion), Sunday, 5 February 2006 19:45 (nineteen years ago)

The Fall - Hex Enduction Hour

You have to get up and flip the record over to hear the other half of 'Winter', thereby encapsulating the entire Fall experience.

S- (sgh), Monday, 6 February 2006 04:19 (nineteen years ago)

two months pass...
ICU - Chotto Matte a Moment!

spread over four sides of vinyl, it kicks the CD into a cocked hat.

Duke Dubuque (Duke Dubuque), Wednesday, 26 April 2006 11:22 (nineteen years ago)

shirley collins - the power of the true love knot

electro-acoustic lycanthrope (orion), Wednesday, 26 April 2006 20:03 (nineteen years ago)

Low - Secret Name

that's so taylrr (ken taylrr), Wednesday, 26 April 2006 20:06 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

Nirvana - Bleach

Reatards Unite, Monday, 3 September 2007 01:28 (seventeen years ago)

Japan - Tin Drum

Trayce, Monday, 3 September 2007 01:30 (seventeen years ago)

Joanna Newsom - Ys
The strings just sound more lively. Also the packaging alone is worth it.

Bus Driver Stu, Friday, 7 September 2007 20:00 (seventeen years ago)

Harry Pussy, in general

sexyDancer, Friday, 7 September 2007 21:11 (seventeen years ago)

Jackson C. Frank

oscar, Friday, 7 September 2007 21:13 (seventeen years ago)

Ummm. Doesn't everything sound better on vinyl?

First album that came to mind, however, was First And Last And Always by the Sisters of Mercy.

Alex in NYC, Friday, 7 September 2007 23:41 (seventeen years ago)

i just got unknown pleasures on vinyl. wow it's so much better.

also pretty much any black sabbath.

M@tt He1ges0n, Friday, 7 September 2007 23:45 (seventeen years ago)

five years pass...

Guns n' Roses - Appetite For Destruction
Scritti Politti - Cupid & Psyche '85

Supposed Former ILM Lurker (WeWantMiles), Monday, 19 August 2013 12:24 (eleven years ago)

I'm generally a fan of digital audio. However, while I've never heard the CD, Band of Gypsys sounds gorgeous on vinyl, even on my second-rate turntable, in a way that I can't imagine translating to digital. I also like Zep IV more on vinyl. Tend to agree about Unknown Pleasures.

EveningStar (Sund4r), Monday, 19 August 2013 19:35 (eleven years ago)

my friend doug recorded that band of gypsys album. when he was working for wally heider and doing the mobile sound for wally.

scott seward, Monday, 19 August 2013 19:38 (eleven years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.