Can we rehabilitate The Adverts?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed

Just been to see a TV Smith show. He was pretty entertaining, did a few old Adverts tunes with lots of charming and avuncular between-song anecdotes.

He did a few new songs which were great too, somewhere between John Otway and Phil Ochs, and still had that characteristic "joy of word-play" feel.

But the audience was very small and the folks there were mainly for the punk nostalgia-without-much-in-the-way-of-quality-control (35 year olds with Oi tshirts???)

I'm not slamming punk nostalgia (or any other genre nostalgia) but I always categorised The Adverts in with The Buzzcocks, Wire, Penetration... The bands that had a bit more to offer and can still be appreciated, and not lumped in with Menace, The Drones, Eater and all the second divison pulp fodder that briefly emerged in 1977, made one 'fun at the time' single and thankfully submerged soon after.

Anyone agree / disagree?

ps should this be a classic or dud question?

Alexander Blair, Sunday, 30 September 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Kind of agree and disagree! To me they're mid-way between the two categories you've defined. Buzzcocks and Wire are streets ahead of The Adverts and Penetration, who in turn would be well ahead of say, Slaughter and the Dogs or Eater. That's not to say that the one 'fun at the time single' some of those 3rd div drongos released isn't still fantastic fun once in a while.

Dr. C, Monday, 1 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"no guarantee the stimulus will be perceived the same way" is one of the greatest lines evah in a popsong ('Gary Gilmore's Eyes'): first LP = very good indeed; second i haf never heard, tho at the time all seemed to agree it was useless (same deal with penetration, i feel).

mark s, Monday, 1 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I've only heard three of their songs (their one album is impossible to find here), but on that limited basis I'd have to say CLASSIC beyond doubt. Gary Gilmore's Eyes is the best serial killer song I can think of (better than the Manics' Patrick Bateman because it doesn't last two minutes too long) and One Chord Wonders is simply magnificent. Their lyrics were quite excellent as well.

It's really annoying that the whole UK punk scene has been reduced to the Pistols and the Clash. Who I like, but you can only hear those two albums so many times, yknow?

Justyn Dillingham, Monday, 1 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I very nearly went to see TV Smith the other week but I chickened out because I thought the audience would be like you described and I wasn't quite sure how well I'd go down in a roomfull of "35 year olds in Oi T-shirts" (I'm more of a suit and tie boy myself). So yeah, I chickened out and ended up going to the pub with my brother (though as it turned out that wasn't a great idea either - blimmin Fulham types: enough braying already!)

Do I have a point? Don't think so. Oh well

jamesmichaelward, Monday, 1 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I prefer both the Adverts and Eater to most other British punk until Oi! got big. They're both so bubblegum. Weren't the Adverts really old and Eater really young?

Kris, Monday, 1 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Search -- "Bored Teenagers." Worra great song. And the whole first album is one of John Leckie's earliest productions, bizarrely enough.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 2 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

seven years pass...

wow, is this really the only Adverts thread?

Anyone heard this new bootleg LP with "raw" versions of the 2nd LP songs? Saw it in a store the other day and was curious.

sleeve, Monday, 15 June 2009 15:08 (sixteen years ago)

Kind of aghast at the title - rehabilitate? "Crossing The Red Sea" is an absolute classic, and they had a terrific run of hit singles.

Soukesian, Monday, 15 June 2009 15:15 (sixteen years ago)

crossing the red sea pretty much stands up to any fucking orig era UK punk album ever made IMO.

Bitchtime Producto (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 15 June 2009 15:16 (sixteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LKG2rG-s29M

Soukesian, Monday, 15 June 2009 15:20 (sixteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8SqkYzzGI0&feature=related

Soukesian, Monday, 15 June 2009 15:22 (sixteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PFkSGbd3okA&feature=related

Soukesian, Monday, 15 June 2009 15:23 (sixteen years ago)

Rehabilitate that!

Soukesian, Monday, 15 June 2009 15:26 (sixteen years ago)

haha hell yeah!

sleeve, Monday, 15 June 2009 15:28 (sixteen years ago)

100% old school punk, served with a sneer! I haven't heard those raw mixes, but I really want to now.

Soukesian, Monday, 15 June 2009 15:32 (sixteen years ago)

? "Crossing The Red Sea" is an absolute classic, and they had a terrific run of hit singles.

crossing the red sea pretty much stands up to any fucking orig era UK punk album ever made IMO.

damn right!

pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Monday, 15 June 2009 16:35 (sixteen years ago)

why the casual dislike of Eater on this thread, for that matter?

Neotropical pygmy squirrel, Monday, 15 June 2009 16:49 (sixteen years ago)

Eater have long been music crit go-to band for disparaging 2nd div UK punk. See also the Lurkers.

Colonel Poo, Monday, 15 June 2009 16:50 (sixteen years ago)

Not just critics

They'd like to buy the O Level single
or 'Read about Seymour'
But they're not pressed in red
So they buy The Lurkers instead

Posters that beg the Question: What the Hell were You THINKING? (Noodle Vague), Monday, 15 June 2009 16:54 (sixteen years ago)

Pretty sure whichever Lurkers single the Part Time Punks were buying was better than the O Level. Swell Maps, though, that's a different story.

Colonel Poo, Monday, 15 June 2009 17:03 (sixteen years ago)

There is a tendency to dismiss any punk-era band that went in for the whole chains, rips and safety pins look.

I'm not about to defend every dodgy punk 7" issued in the late 70's, but you miss out on a lot of great stuff that way.

Soukesian, Monday, 15 June 2009 17:30 (sixteen years ago)

The O Level single is the best!

Anyway, TV Smith is opening up for Jay Reatard in NYC shortly.

dan selzer, Monday, 15 June 2009 18:13 (sixteen years ago)

In my defence for the sloppy thread title and saying 'rehabilitate' (jeez 8 years ago?) this was written at the time of "rediscovery of post punk". I was suggesting that the Adverts should have had more kudos in that "narrative" of the 'rip it up' history re-write.

But I intended no offence - otm for calling me on it and note again, I started it by saying I love the Adverts, though then again I like The Drones, the Lurkers et al (though Eater were pish).

Sandy Blair, Monday, 15 June 2009 19:10 (sixteen years ago)

Hey now Outside View's a pretty good song :)

Colonel Poo, Monday, 15 June 2009 19:16 (sixteen years ago)

Colonel Save-A-Punk

pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Monday, 15 June 2009 19:17 (sixteen years ago)

xpost: Sandy - fair enough, makes sense in that context. I'm getting kind of defensive about yer actual punk rock.

I was recently at an event where the speaker - I'm being vague because he may well be reading - rather pompously announced "I actually found the post-punk bands much more interesting". Felt like just getting up and leaving. It struck me just what a crushing consensus that has become, and in a relatively short space of time. No doubt about it, Reynolds has documented and drawn attention to a lot of worthwhile music, but it was a history re-write, and some good stuff got written off.

Needless to say, I find the bands that came before post-punk more interesting.

Soukesian, Monday, 15 June 2009 19:37 (sixteen years ago)

three weeks pass...

Just saw Tv Smith open for Jay Reatard tonight in DC. I found his solo Billy Braggish songs about how "they" don't care about the poor predictably simplistic lyrically and not exciting enough song arrangement wise to make up for that. He delivered them with passion there was just not enough there. Later he did a mini-Adverts set backed by Jay Reatard and his band--"Gary Gilmore's Eyes, Bored Teenagers," and 2 or 3 others. They rocked and were great.

curmudgeon, Monday, 6 July 2009 03:46 (sixteen years ago)

wow, "bored teenagers" with jay reatard backing sounds pretty damn cool

unbandictionary (k3vin k.), Monday, 6 July 2009 03:49 (sixteen years ago)

It was. Plus the gig was in the Black Cat Club smaller backroom that holds only around 100 people or so, and that added to the atmosphere.

curmudgeon, Monday, 6 July 2009 04:35 (sixteen years ago)

one year passes...

Am I all alone in thinking that Cast of Thousands is truly a magnificently flawed album?
It sounds like a street fight between Meat Loaf and a gang of demented glam punks, there's Kid Strange from the Doctors of Madness playing the synthesizer in the title track and closer I Will Walk You Home is one of the creepiest songs ever recorded.
Far from perfect but definitely unique.

Marco Damiani, Friday, 21 January 2011 08:33 (fifteen years ago)

You're not alone. The versions on the BBC sessions disc reveal how it was supposed to sound, and the songs are really strong. I thought there was a reissue that improved the sound somewhat? The Absolute Edition or something?

Gerald McBoing-Boing, Friday, 21 January 2011 15:25 (fifteen years ago)

I must say I quite like the bombast of the actual album, but it is interesting to compare the studio versions with the much more stripped down BBC versions.

I own a remastered cd that contain all the b-sides, but its not the 2cd deluxe version released last year.

Marco Damiani, Friday, 21 January 2011 16:11 (fifteen years ago)

one year passes...

urls that brighten your day: http://louderthanwar.com/top-ten-black-metal-bands-by-gaye-advert/

geezargh butlargh (DJ Mencap), Wednesday, 6 June 2012 08:58 (thirteen years ago)

And the documentary is still on BBC iplayer, folks.

Mark G, Wednesday, 6 June 2012 09:36 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.