Secondly, isn't there a real sense of middlebrow about print journalism, when you're covering music. At the moment there's an understanding that I can't absolutely pan local Irish bands, and yet I'm given some to review. As far as I see there's nothing worse than a tepid sort of "this is ok, really!" review. Maybe I'm not good enough at these, is there some technique for saying you think a band are boring and going nowhere without panning them?
Is there always a sense of feeling shoe-horned into a particular mags style? Does this maybe get better over time as you gain respect and are allowed to be yourself a bit more?
Maybe it's all a different skill which I am still learning, I find I'm ok with praising the stuff I like and it reads well. Is this just par for the course in mags now, that everything is short enough that it reads a bit wishy washy anyway?
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:41 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm sorry but JESUS you've got a HUGE ego!?! : - D
― Jimmy the Saint (Jimmy the Saint), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:49 (twenty-two years ago)
No. "Music Journalism" is the lowest rung of a very, very tall ladder.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jimmy the Saint (Jimmy the Saint), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jole, Monday, 2 February 2004 15:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jimmy the Saint (Jimmy the Saint), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:53 (twenty-two years ago)
heh heh. If they did, I'd certainly watch it, though.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matos W.K. (M Matos), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jimmy the Saint (Jimmy the Saint), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jole, Monday, 2 February 2004 15:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matos W.K. (M Matos), Monday, 2 February 2004 15:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jole, Monday, 2 February 2004 16:00 (twenty-two years ago)
Is that somewhat close to what you're talking about?
xpost
― Huck If I Know (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 February 2004 16:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 2 February 2004 16:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 2 February 2004 16:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sarah (starry), Monday, 2 February 2004 16:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Huck Stable (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 February 2004 16:36 (twenty-two years ago)
I would be more sorry than anything else for an editor who had to work with my stuff. Do you think I should submit the Judge John Deed blog post to the Radio Times?
And as a critic I would hopefully change my opinions as often as I do as me the not-critic right now, that would be the capacity I'd be most concerned about keeping. KEEP THE PEONS ON THEIR TOES.
Peons appears to be my new word then. Bugger.
― Sarah (starry), Monday, 2 February 2004 16:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 2 February 2004 16:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Huck Stable (Horace Mann), Monday, 2 February 2004 16:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― roger adultery (roger adultery), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 04:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― Huck/Home, Tuesday, 3 February 2004 05:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Llahtuos Kcin (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 09:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sarah (starry), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 10:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― Llahtuos Kcin (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 10:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sarah (starry), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 10:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Llahtuos Kcin (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 10:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― t\'\'t (t\'\'t), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 10:36 (twenty-two years ago)
I'd have more of an opinion on Stylus if I had heard any of the indie rubbish you cover, of course. The Walkmen? The Fiery Furnaces? Dude. Remember when indie used to be fun?
― Sarah (starry), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 10:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Llahtuos Kcin (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 10:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sarah (starry), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 10:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Llahtuos Kcin (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 10:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sarah (starry), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 10:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Llahtuos Kcin (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 11:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sarah (starry), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 11:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Enrique (Enrique), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 11:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Llahtuos Kcin (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 11:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 3 February 2004 11:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Llahtuos Kcin (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 11:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 11:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Llahtuos Kcin (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 11:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 11:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sarah (starry), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 11:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Llahtuos Kcin (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 11:42 (twenty-two years ago)
Anyway I am on a diet.
― Sarah (starry), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 12:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Llahtuos Kcin (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 13:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sarah (starry), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 13:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Llahtuos Kcin (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 13:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sarah (starry), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 13:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Llahtuos Kcin (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 13:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― Huck Stable (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 14:45 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm on serious over the counter flu stuff.
― Huck Stable (Horace Mann), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 14:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 14:47 (twenty-two years ago)
The Beatles are the most important band in history. :-)
― The Beatles are the most important band in history. :-), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 14:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 14:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 14:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 14:58 (twenty-two years ago)
I love the feeling I get when reading this that somehow moaning about being a music journalist is one step above actually being a music journalist.
'Cynical music journalist' is not better than 'music journalist enjoying themselves'.
Of course, cynical music jouralist enjoying themselves is best of all.
...and if I had to review ILM and include a one line description to go above the article, that might be what I'd put.
― Jim Robinson (Original Miscreant), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 17:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jim Robinson (Original Miscreant), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 17:21 (twenty-two years ago)
Payment = ostensible justification.
― Jim Robinson (Original Miscreant), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 17:23 (twenty-two years ago)
music journalist < concert promoter < club owner < successful musician
now she's dating a lawyer
― joan vich (joan vich), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 19:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 19:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― the music mole (colin s barrow), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 22:21 (twenty-two years ago)
sorry dave i was away from computers for most of yesterday so have only just seen yr post above. if still needing help, drop me an email.
― Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 4 February 2004 10:25 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm not sure if we've ever talked about this but I'm curious what people's experiences are when writing for news/magazine markets outside major cities. If you're going to review a band that is coming to the city, do you try to discuss them in the context of the area? Do you totally ignore that this is (for example) Phoenix and not NYC and just write however you would write in NYC? If your piece is running to coincide w/ a live performance in that city do you try to write more about their live show and less about their album work?
― Mordy, Friday, 9 September 2011 13:47 (fourteen years ago)
I should add caveat by "major cities" I really meant national audience as opposed to local audience
― Mordy, Friday, 9 September 2011 13:48 (fourteen years ago)
If it's relevant to the performance I don't see why not? Then again the inside of a venue's the inside of a venue. I quite enjoyed this review of Bob Dylan in Vietnam, which spends a good chunk of it discussing the venue and location http://thequietus.com/articles/06062-bob-dylan-live-in-vietnam-review
― Yo wait a minute man, you better think about the world (dog latin), Friday, 9 September 2011 13:51 (fourteen years ago)
I haven't been to this particular venue, but I mean more like should I ask this guy when I interview him about other times he's been to the area and try to incorporate that into the piece to give it a more local feel? That feels very hacky but at the same time it makes no sense to me to write something that could've been published anywhere in the country.
― Mordy, Friday, 9 September 2011 13:59 (fourteen years ago)
i know someone here has strongly held opinions on this. help me out!
― Mordy, Friday, 9 September 2011 15:11 (fourteen years ago)
I don't think there's a right or wrong here in respect of what the readership in non-major cities 'want' - like some ppl really love/need to have their region *validated* in some way, even if it's as ephemeral as reading the singer from Cage The Elephant say he always enjoys playing there, and some ppl find it annoying and tokenistic and prickle slightly when they read it
― Amazing pic of the universe! - VERY NSFW (DJ Mencap), Friday, 9 September 2011 15:18 (fourteen years ago)
guess it depends whether you think that a show in NYC is demonstrably different to one in Phoenix?
― Amazing pic of the universe! - VERY NSFW (DJ Mencap), Friday, 9 September 2011 15:19 (fourteen years ago)
i do find it pretty pointless to see reviews of national acts in the free weekly here (especially since the writing is shitty). are there people that only get their music info from this local paper?
― hardcore oatmeal (Jordan), Friday, 9 September 2011 15:25 (fourteen years ago)
https://longreads.com/2019/06/26/if-i-made-4-a-word-this-article-would-be-worth-10000/discuss
― Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Friday, 28 June 2019 18:18 (six years ago)