I went to see them when they played with TBHP at the GAMH a little while back and was totally turned off by them. They were totally annoying to me. Everyone was telling me how great they are but I couldn't get it.
After hearing this new album I understand why. I think it is absolutely essential.
― tk, Thursday, 26 February 2004 20:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Thursday, 26 February 2004 20:39 (twenty-two years ago)
Re: Blonde Redhead though, i always had a soft spot because the singer and guitarist would run into each other on stage on purpose. It made it interesting.
― caspar (caspar), Thursday, 26 February 2004 21:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Momus (Momus), Friday, 27 February 2004 05:32 (twenty-two years ago)
I have not looked forward to an album like this since In Utero, and I was really disappointed. I used to really like this band, if you check the archives, the only person who was more on BR's nuts was Momus. I hate to say they peaked on MCDL, but they did.
On a lighter note, you have a 1998 interview on Brave New Waves tonight, Mr. Currie. Appearantly, you have a sharp wit, and are a master of the pop idiom. Good for you Momus.
― Former Supposed So Called Nihilist Teenage Drug Disco Addiction Counselor (mjt), Friday, 27 February 2004 05:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Friday, 27 February 2004 05:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Russ, Friday, 27 February 2004 17:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― adam (adam), Friday, 27 February 2004 17:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― christhamrin (christhamrin), Friday, 27 February 2004 18:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― christhamrin (christhamrin), Friday, 27 February 2004 18:31 (twenty-two years ago)
I really like the album; I haven't heard any of their past work but it's just so beautiful, you could lose yourself in those textures.
― The Lex (The Lex), Friday, 27 February 2004 22:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 27 February 2004 23:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Sunday, 21 March 2004 19:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― alex in mainhattan (alex63), Sunday, 21 March 2004 19:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Sunday, 21 March 2004 20:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Chris F. (servoret), Monday, 12 April 2004 04:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― piers (piers), Thursday, 26 August 2004 05:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― alex in montreal, Thursday, 26 August 2004 12:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― n.a. (Nick A.), Thursday, 26 August 2004 14:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Charlie Howard, Thursday, 1 March 2007 16:07 (nineteen years ago)
― blueski, Thursday, 1 March 2007 16:12 (nineteen years ago)
― Pye Poudre, Thursday, 1 March 2007 16:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Charlie Howard, Thursday, 1 March 2007 16:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Charlie Howard, Thursday, 1 March 2007 16:20 (nineteen years ago)
― stevie, Thursday, 1 March 2007 16:42 (nineteen years ago)
― Charlie Howard, Thursday, 1 March 2007 16:44 (nineteen years ago)
― Turangalila, Thursday, 1 March 2007 17:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Charlie Howard, Thursday, 1 March 2007 17:08 (nineteen years ago)
― s1ocki, Thursday, 1 March 2007 17:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Zeno, Thursday, 1 March 2007 17:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Daniel Giraffe, Friday, 2 March 2007 08:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Display Name, Friday, 2 March 2007 11:16 (nineteen years ago)
― the Dirt, Friday, 2 March 2007 11:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Display Name, Friday, 2 March 2007 11:23 (nineteen years ago)
i had written this album off. i've loved pretty much everything they've ever done, but this one i thought was weak, murky and samey and missing the sting and rhythmic invention.
well, rong! it's great! funny how "murky and samey" changed to "incredible album-long sustained mood of resignation and heartbreak" with a few more listens.
― gff, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:36 (eighteen years ago)
do you like 23? because it's almost as good
― akm, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:45 (eighteen years ago)
Partially agree, though substitute "really nice" for "incredible". After the surprises of Certain Damaged Lemons, I guess anything so elegant & understated was bound to seem dull at first.
Same goes for 23, though with less enthusiasm.
― contenderizer, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:48 (eighteen years ago)
oh, i think 23 is way better actually. much more of the clarity and snappiness of melody. but now i've started to think the lack of clarity and snappiness on misery is part of its charm. kind of a season-in-hell vibe. i'm tempted to say it does for live-threatening injury what shoot out the lights did for divorce.
xp
― gff, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:52 (eighteen years ago)
also: isn't the chorus on "Equus" a self-quote of one of their early songs?? could have sworn it is, but i can't place it.
― gff, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:57 (eighteen years ago)
oh, i think 23 is way better actually.
-- gff
Really? Individual songs on 23 seem much less distinctive/memorable to me. It's as though they've so perfected the mood they're shooting for that they don't want anything too particular to stand out against it.
― contenderizer, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 21:57 (eighteen years ago)
I think 23 is better too
― Herman G. Neuname, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:00 (eighteen years ago)
It's definitely possible to like Blonde Redhead both during their current Misery/23 phase and their earlier stuff, ending at Melody (I do, at least), but I think it's hard to like both periods equally. I still prefer their earlier albums, especially Fake can be Just as Good. The last time I saw them, on the Misery tour, I was hoping they'd throw in "Kazuality", or some older song of that ilk, and I came away very disappointed. The last two albums have been decent, but if they were by a band that wasn't called Blonde Redhead, I doubt I would have given them more than 2 spins apiece, rather than the 10 each that they ended up with.
― Z S, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:33 (eighteen years ago)
I'm pretty much on the same page, preferring BH Phase 1 to the recent albums, though I like Misery a bit more than you seem to. Just listened to 23: as hookless and enervated as I remember.
― contenderizer, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:40 (eighteen years ago)
that seems nuts to me, 23 had way more obvious hooks than misery, but whatever.
melody, in retrospect, is the hinge album between their two periods, and it's the best thing they've done imo.
― gff, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:43 (eighteen years ago)
i like the last two much more than the earlier ones, but I think "melody" is pretty close to the last two; kind of a comfortable middle area. when I'd only heard their earliest stuff I kind of wrote them off as sub-sonic youth copyists (xpost!)
― akm, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:44 (eighteen years ago)
that seems nuts to me, 23 had way more obvious hooks than misery, but whatever. melody, in retrospect, is the hinge album between their two periods, and it's the best thing they've done imo.
That's the thing. I listen to each song on 23, and I think, "this is nice!" Mood & texture are consistently gorgeous. I hear what seem like memorable hooks. But each song closely resembles the last, and the next, and by the time a few have passed, I can't remember a single thing about any of them. Nothing sticks with me. It all evaporates into this dark-pretty, discreetly sexy fog.
Agree about the greatness of Misery, but it's hard not to see it as the peak of their career, with Misery a last fading gasp. Maybe the next one will change things up a bit.
Agree w/ akm that the very early albums wear the SY badge a bit too prominently.
― contenderizer, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:54 (eighteen years ago)
Umm, 1st "Misery" in 2nd par. above = "Melody". In case you were wondering.
― contenderizer, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 22:58 (eighteen years ago)
i'd rate the post skronk redheads like this:
1) melody 2) 23 3) misery
i always thought that misery had about 4 songs that were so good they made you overlook how the rest was kinda, like you said samey etc...
but either way this band is so great, it's a shame that TV on the Radio got so much more success for doing similar things in a way worse way.
― M@tt He1ges0n, Wednesday, 27 February 2008 23:53 (eighteen years ago)
sounding like the nightmare team björk plus the singer of supertramp
I don't see how this is a bad thing at all!
This is such a good depressio record.
― we are normal and we want our freedom (Abbott), Monday, 26 October 2009 19:09 (sixteen years ago)
def one of the best bands of this decade IMO
― i feel like i'm an antenna and i want to be that antenna (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 26 October 2009 19:25 (sixteen years ago)
you may well be right. and that says much more about this decade than about the band.
― alex in mainhattan, Monday, 26 October 2009 19:33 (sixteen years ago)
This is really the only album of theirs I like. I thought it was funny that the big sadsacktacular album they do is when they get on 4AD, like it stipulated in their contract they had to be sad.
― we are normal and we want our freedom (Abbott), Monday, 26 October 2009 21:16 (sixteen years ago)
did you hear 23? cuz to me they are sorta the same vibe but i still think 23 has stronger songs overall...
― i feel like i'm an antenna and i want to be that antenna (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 26 October 2009 21:19 (sixteen years ago)
yeah i prefer 23 as well
― congratulations (n/a), Monday, 26 October 2009 21:23 (sixteen years ago)
23 is good, but agree w/ Abbott that Misery is more sacktacular.
― from alcoholism to fleshly concerns (contenderizer), Monday, 26 October 2009 21:25 (sixteen years ago)
― i feel like i'm an antenna and i want to be that antenna (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, October 26, 2009 2:25 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark
yeah no kidding. whenever i bring it up, ppl are all "oh yeah, that band."
assholes.
― cialis morissette (goole), Monday, 26 October 2009 21:27 (sixteen years ago)
ha, still i haven't heard more than two songs by them
― how rad bandit (gbx), Monday, 26 October 2009 21:28 (sixteen years ago)
actually melody of certain damaged lemons is official dope on wax as well, don't know if i could choose between that and 23
― i feel like i'm an antenna and i want to be that antenna (M@tt He1ges0n), Monday, 26 October 2009 21:35 (sixteen years ago)
Yeah, I just wanted to use "sacktacular" in a sentence.
I find most of the stuff off the last couple records pleasant but forgettable. I mean, I like it while I'm hearing it, but after about half an hour, it all congeals into into this soggy, amorphous goo-vapor that is also a not interesting goo-vapor. A few standout tracks excepted, most of them on Misery. Plus the live show was crazy boring and the audience crazy off putting, and I don't think I ever entirely forgave them that. Melody is still gr8.
― from alcoholism to fleshly concerns (contenderizer), Monday, 26 October 2009 21:36 (sixteen years ago)
Even though I'll always prefer Fake, have to grudgingly admit that 23 isn't bad for what it is. I come back to it every six months or so, and am always slightly surprised to find that it's less generic indie than I remembered. Don't think they ever topped "Symphony of Treble," which is better than like 80% of the Sonic Youth that they were accused of ripping off!
― dlp9001, Tuesday, 3 November 2009 03:16 (sixteen years ago)
Does anyone have any idea whether there's any new material in the pipeline?
― Daniel Giraffe, Wednesday, 13 January 2010 12:37 (sixteen years ago)
http://www.blonde-redhead.com/news.html
Monday, March 30, 2009recording and a show
Friends, Sorry we've been a bit out of touch. We've been really busy, locked away writing for our new album. We're really excited about what we've been doing! At the end of April however, we're coming out for one quick show in Virginia. If you're able, we hope some of you can make it.
― We should have called Suzie and Bobby (NickB), Wednesday, 13 January 2010 13:07 (sixteen years ago)
Wait:
Blonde Redhead Composing Score For Dungeon and Dragons Documentary
― We should have called Suzie and Bobby (NickB), Wednesday, 13 January 2010 13:09 (sixteen years ago)
So, one old bit of news and one new bit of not-totally-awesome news.
― We should have called Suzie and Bobby (NickB), Wednesday, 13 January 2010 13:10 (sixteen years ago)
Thanks Nick
― Daniel Giraffe, Wednesday, 13 January 2010 14:15 (sixteen years ago)
this album is a total classic
― Steve Gunn Mann-Dude (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 14:08 (nine years ago)
never bettered, certainly, by them
― akm, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 19:40 (nine years ago)
i did like 23 a lot too but this is def the classic of the band's goth period
(i like the earlier touch & go mathy/shellacky stuff for different reasons)
― Steve Gunn Mann-Dude (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 13 July 2016 20:21 (nine years ago)
yeah I like 23 too. it's been diminishing returns since.
― akm, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 20:57 (nine years ago)
23 is good like all BR is good, but MIAB is their best by miles for me. It's like a fever dream. It makes me feel feverish physically, but in a good way; it's like a tale or nightmare to get lost in. It just sounds magical, and also that never before there was so much at stake. It's so honest in its urgency. Top 25 records of all time.
― Le Bateau Ivre, Wednesday, 13 July 2016 21:13 (nine years ago)