Does anybody care that American Music Club has gotten back together?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not nearly on the news level of the Pixies reunion but absolutely one my favorite bands with California, Everclear and Mercury being one of my favorite triple headers in music.

Jim Reckling (Jim Reckling), Saturday, 28 February 2004 05:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Jesus. Not another one.

maypang (maypang), Saturday, 28 February 2004 05:10 (twenty-two years ago)

Not you, btw, just reunions in general. I'm a fan as well but I still find this kind of annoying.

maypang (maypang), Saturday, 28 February 2004 05:13 (twenty-two years ago)

I do. Reunion thread here. Biggest show yet coming up this Sunday.

anthony kyle monday (akmonday), Saturday, 28 February 2004 05:17 (twenty-two years ago)

I care, a whole lot. The one track ('Ladies and Gentlemen') that I've heard off the new album is fucking great. Loved Mark Eitzel's solo stuff, but this is the real deal.

retort pouch (retort pouch), Saturday, 28 February 2004 05:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Anyway, fuck the Pixies. At least you'll a) be able to get tickets for this reunion and b) they'll have written some new fucking songs for it.

retort pouch (retort pouch), Saturday, 28 February 2004 05:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Mercury is one of the few Froom produced cds I like.

Jim Reckling (Jim Reckling), Saturday, 28 February 2004 05:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Froom seems to be really hated by a lot of people I talk to, why is that? He produced Brutal Youth if I remember correctly, that album rocked ass.

MP3 for AMC fanz: Ladies and Gentlemen.

retort pouch (retort pouch), Saturday, 28 February 2004 05:36 (twenty-two years ago)

I am SO excited for this. Mercury is one of my favourite albums. Also, there's a web and tour only hits/rarities album coming out in March sometime.

derrick (derrick), Saturday, 28 February 2004 07:18 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, i guess. they're one of those bands for me that i loved loved LOVED Engine, then california and then i kept buying them like a fucking rolling stones fan way after what might be considered their use by date cos on all the albums there was one or two or three songs that hit me hard and now its been so long and i am a really changed person (no, honestly) and i listen to not much like them anymore but hey.

mullygrubber (gaz), Saturday, 28 February 2004 07:44 (twenty-two years ago)

three years pass...

Got an advance of their new one yesterday. I never got this band - I tried & tried back in the day, I knew so many people who thought they ruled & would tell me "oh just see Eitzel live, you'll get it then" - but no sale, over and over. Something about the timbre of his voice & the way he sang I think - always very hard for me to say why it just wasn't registering with me.

Maybe I'm just older or different, I don't know, but the new one fucking knocks me over. Utterly utterly gorgeous, so sad in a resigned way rather than an emo way. Totally, totally great.

J0hn D., Thursday, 22 November 2007 17:18 (eighteen years ago)

His voice sometimes reminds me of Elvis Costello and Bill Janovitz from Buffalo Tom.

I totally loved the first track I ever heard by them the instant I heard it on some midnight radio show almost 20 years ago and I still do, but - also after repeatedly trying - I've failed to find more that struck the same nerve.

Will check out the new one now though.

StanM, Thursday, 22 November 2007 17:59 (eighteen years ago)

I don't think I've ever met two AMC fans who've agreed on their favorite album. Mine's Mercury, but California and Everclear often get the nod from others. I haven't liked an Eitzel album since..yikes, 60 Watt? The cover of Rehearsals for Retirement was moving. And I liked a cut or two off Candy Ass. But the last AMC album was horrible. WIthout their pedal steel man, Bruce Kaphan, I have problems. But I'd be happy if Eitzel refound his muse and hold skeptical hope for the new one. That would be great. (And for the record, I liked San Francisco, the album. Not perfect but some stunning moments...Fearless, for starters....)

smurfherder, Thursday, 22 November 2007 21:54 (eighteen years ago)

Only problem with San Francisco was the production and mix -- the songs and performances were very good indeed.

Nubbelverbrennung, Thursday, 22 November 2007 22:39 (eighteen years ago)

Production, mix, and sequencing. But if you take 10-12 of the best songs from it and rearrange them,
you can make a really good album.

Edward III, Friday, 23 November 2007 01:20 (eighteen years ago)

Yes, arrangements seem to be the weak spot. I remember hearing most of SF on solo Eitzel tours and they were amazing and when the album came out it took a lot of getting used to...and I still prefer some live acoustic boots of tunes like "Sleeping Pills," "In the Shadow of the Valley," "Help Me," "I Broke My Promise" and "President's Test." Same for "Everything's Beautiful" and "Mission Rock Resort" off 60 Watt...not bad on album but so much more direct in person...

smurfherder, Friday, 23 November 2007 04:45 (eighteen years ago)

Great news about the new album - I never really connected with the last one (despite a couple of lovely songs) but what I've heard about The Golden Age fills me with optimism. Same goes for Mark's solo output too, some of it I love as much as AMC, some I never listen to. I've never really had AMC down as a great albums band anyway, there's always stuff that could have been cut and in full agreement that often the production and arrangements have torpedoed great songs. I'll always pay to see AMC and/or Mark when they tour though, reams have been written about his live presence but he is genuinely the most mesmerising performer I have ever seen.

I know that at this stage in their career they are unlikely to ever "make it" commercially, but a part of me has always wished they could just have one big hit (or license a song or something) to give them a bit of financial stability. Can that be too much to ask in a world where Maroon 5 still exist and are as rich as Croesus?

Bill A, Friday, 23 November 2007 15:16 (eighteen years ago)

if you liked 60 Watt then you will like the new AMC album, it feels like a spiritual successor. I wrote about it in another thread I'm too lazy to dig up at the moment. This album is more consistent than the last one (love songs, which I liked) in tone, I think because they worked with a producer this time rather than tackling it themselves. Also, rhythm section has been replaced (possibly a temporary thing); this one does a good job, they are more sedate than Danny and Tim though.

Generally I think this album misses some of the highs and lows of previous AMC albums, so I expect reactions to be kind of all over the place. But after being initially disappointed, I now think it's one of the best albums Mark's made.

akm, Friday, 23 November 2007 15:41 (eighteen years ago)

No Danny or Tim? Then it's just Mark and Vudi left? If so, that makes it even more of a Mark Eitzel and Friends album than an actual AMC record...who produced it?

smurfherder, Friday, 23 November 2007 17:40 (eighteen years ago)

dave trumfio produced it

akm, Friday, 23 November 2007 21:24 (eighteen years ago)

also, as someone pointed out in the other thread, Vudi started AMC, so it's pretty much up to him whether a band is AMC or not, as far as Mark is concerned. the offical reasons for danny and tim's departure were that mark wanted to record the album in LA so vudi could be more involved this time than he was last time and it didn't work with their schedules. danny at least will probably work with AMC again in the future.

akm, Friday, 23 November 2007 22:05 (eighteen years ago)

the song "windows on the world" on this record is fucking incredible. Just...incredible.

J0hn D., Friday, 23 November 2007 22:39 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.