How much longer will slsk stay under the radar?

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

?
Every article I read about file-sharing never metions slsk.

― jj, Wednesday, 3 March 2004 22:39 (twenty-one years ago)

SSSSHHHHHHH

― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 22:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Some secrets are worth keeping. Lock this thread and throw away the key!

― latebloomer (latebloomer), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 22:41 (twenty-one years ago)

That's because no one can pronounce it without any vowels. (Hey, it worked for Mr. Mxyztplk.)

― o. nate (onate), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 22:42 (twenty-one years ago)

I pronounce it 'slusk', sort of.

― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 22:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Hopefully for not too much longer. I'm tired of seeing people not having to work hard for their music, like I have to, with USENET.

― maypang (maypang), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 22:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh yeah, Usenet is terrible. Like my script that pulls everything I want without me even having to look at it - it just keeps a list of bands and albums to search for. TERRIBLE.

― Xii (Xii), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 23:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I thought slsk was already one of the ones RIAA was targeting in their latest salvo of pr suicide

― dleone (dleone), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 23:19 (twenty-one years ago)

(hence me sharing less stuff than I used to)

― dleone (dleone), Wednesday, 3 March 2004 23:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Wot!!!! The Soulseek server's under a radar contraption?!?!?!?

No wonder the thing's been down umpteen times!!!!!!!!!

― Old Fart!!! (oldfart_sd), Thursday, 4 March 2004 11:44 (twenty-one years ago)

slsk is a sourceforge creation and I think that makes all the difference. So is (m)aquisition for that matter. Leave it to the open source kids.

― scottontharox (scottkundla), Tuesday, 9 March 2004 05:15 (twenty-one years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.