what's an "undie"?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
can someone explain to me what is meant by "undies"? are they underground hip hopper dudes?

jeff trestler, Friday, 5 March 2004 05:14 (twenty-one years ago)

everything you need to know here:

http://www.onlyundiesclub.com

the surface noise (electricsound), Friday, 5 March 2004 05:17 (twenty-one years ago)

oh jesus fucking hellfire

Nate in ST.P (natedetritus), Friday, 5 March 2004 05:20 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.bry-backmanor.org/underwear.gif

Al (sitcom), Friday, 5 March 2004 05:20 (twenty-one years ago)

(to the thread question, at least. women in underpants = k-classic)

Nate in ST.P (natedetritus), Friday, 5 March 2004 05:21 (twenty-one years ago)

I just know this is the same person who started the "Best Female Artist" thread.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 5 March 2004 05:28 (twenty-one years ago)

You can buy dirty ones from Japanese vending machines.

Sym (shmuel), Friday, 5 March 2004 05:39 (twenty-one years ago)

What's an undie and can I eat it?

Rockist Scientist (rockistscientist), Friday, 5 March 2004 05:52 (twenty-one years ago)

only edible undie

the surface noise (electricsound), Friday, 5 March 2004 05:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Hmmm. I see a genre coming on. "Edible Undie" like "Intelligent Dance Music," sort of an earthier form of "undie."

Rockist Scientist (rockistscientist), Friday, 5 March 2004 05:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Isn't an "undie" an inverted nipple?

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Friday, 5 March 2004 06:01 (twenty-one years ago)

*sigh* It's underground indie.

the music mole (colin s barrow), Friday, 5 March 2004 06:08 (twenty-one years ago)

that's redundantly superfluous

Nate in ST.P (natedetritus), Friday, 5 March 2004 06:09 (twenty-one years ago)

I think it's perfectly cromulent.

the music mole (colin s barrow), Friday, 5 March 2004 06:15 (twenty-one years ago)

When someone asks a cromulent question, it embiggens us all to take it seriously.

the music mole (colin s barrow), Friday, 5 March 2004 06:15 (twenty-one years ago)

You are absoliferously correct.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 5 March 2004 06:35 (twenty-one years ago)

positronialistically!

Begs2Differ (Begs2Differ), Friday, 5 March 2004 07:07 (twenty-one years ago)

TS: Arglebargle or Foofaraw?

Nate in ST.P (natedetritus), Friday, 5 March 2004 07:10 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.