Dud Side of the Moon?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Jack loves it. Since the idea of being punk and hating it is a MASSVE TIRESOME CLICHE, I haf spent 25 odd years trying to like it, but have come up dry. For example, I think the "story told" by its musical thematic coherence and unity of mood bears NO RELATION WHATEVER to the story attempted by the words (I do not think the makers even considered this was a possibility).

mark s, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"It is a brilliant mood portrait of modern alienated life in all its dullness and trite tedium" = "It is boring and whinily unimaginiative from end to end"

(Besides if firs claim were true, why did so many ppl buy it to fuck to?)

mark s, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Lyrics to DSOTM.

I am broadly speaking on Mark's side here but while googling this page was seized with a desire to hear the whole thing again.

Tom, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Poss. ans for Mark S - not an alb best heard by 'straight-edge' ears, maybe? Must be a v. common rec for ppl to first 'turn on' to - the 'profound' disembodied samples, the muggy production, the bliss out of 'Great Gig In The Sky', the anti-The Man sentiment of 'Money' , the 'mystery' of the sleeve that repays prolonged stoned staring, etc.

Also, its an 'aspirational' alb, in that the lyrics are SO bad, the playing so mediocre, it can't help inspire/encourage sixth form proggers to give it a go for themselves. If it were any better it would be too daunting to emulate. Punk prog, too, in that there IS some kind of self-hating anger underneath it all that Walters is incapable of properly articulating or critically unpicking (and which becomes his 'rage' against the 'machinery' of the rec industry and the 'stupidity' of Floyd fans on 'Wish You Were Here', 'Animals' and 'The Wall'.)

Andrew L, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The production IS terrible. What it sounds like - whole album done trad-style, then ENTIRE MIX (as opposed to track-by-track) fed into portentious-echo machine then compressed to shit. ('Animals' and 'Wish', everything sticks out, balanced enough to provide a context for the whizbangs. 'Wall' is a just a decadent 70s cocaine studio job.) As for the lyrics, they boil down to "I'm a rock star and you're not, but my life isn't peaches and cream either, only difference is my problems matter and yours don't" ('Run rabbit run'?). This can be done well (Prince, "Pop Life", any number of Stones lyrics), unless you're completely safe in your assumption that you're striking some universal chord like I fear Waters is.
Anyway, this should've stayed on the Radiohead thread just because 'headheads hate the Floyd comparisons so much!

dave q, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

'headheads :) Genius. Oh yeah, Dark Side = total classic, don't know why. Even love that misanthropic Me Rockstar Don't Understand Why You Prole Keep Doing Shite Jobs vibe.

Omar, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

As mark s has pointed out several times I am also PUNXOR (or something). I actually liked DSOM and earlier Floyd stuff before punk broke, then of course spent the next 10 years pretending that I hadn't. I haven't heard DSOM in its entirity since 1975 or so, (OK, maybe the odd sneaky listen up to 1977), but oddly I can remember just about every second of the album, having played it to death back then. I can't say I ever LOVED it, but I liked it a lot.

I agree about the lack of coherence, the overall mood serves some tracks quite well (Time, On The Run), whilst others don't fit. Lyrically it's dire, but no worse most other prog. I quite like the fuggy sound, and the lack of flash soloing, time-changes etc, which set it apart from yer standard '70s brit-prog which I couldn't/can't stand. (PF were at the time, my toe in the prog water vs a diet of mainly glam, Stones, Beatles and chartpop).

Like many, I've read the PF articles in Uncut and Mojo this month, and I've felt like hearing some of the old stuff again. The only PF I own is a vinyl copy of Relics which is fairly ace, and I keep mainly for the wonderful Arnold Layne. Based on my 25 yr old recollections, I say that Meddle is the best PF album, with honourable mentions for the live side of Ummagumma, and selected trax from the Barrett era (Lucifer Sam, Astronomy Domine, Arnold Layne, See Emily Play, Mathilda Mother). I hated Wish You Were Here - too slick, more Waters whinging and then...... The Ramones, The Damned, The Pistols!

Dr. C, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I feel a bit bad dissing the Floyd because I worshipped them so much when I was 10, I had one of those 'green pyramid' posters in my room as well as a t-shirt with the prism on it. Wow. It seemed like the intellectual's equivalent to Journey/Foreigner/Styx at the time. What did I see in them? The 'architecture' of 'Wish' and 'Animals', seemed like a harsh mechanical world you could STEP INTO - each album was its own concept, world even! Of course they couldn't play very well, so they had to resort to these 'concepts', and they worked a treat for young people into escapism (no surprise, I read alot of sci-fi at that age too). I couldn't get into prog-proper at the time - too fiddly, thin-sounding, not enough rock gtrs (Why did Steve Howe insist on that twangy telecaster? Why couldn't Jon Anderson kill himself?), everything sounding the same all the way through (I know, I know, but I was TEN, remember?) Their plodding, monolothic bottom end seemed to make more sense than Bruford's brushy noodling and Squire's electric adenoid, Gilmour's maximum distortion and blooze bends were good-tasty not bad-tasty, and the singing - okay, Waters was always terrible, but he didn't dominate things until 1979, and compared to Anderson or Greg Lake, PF sounded OK to me. I still have a soft spot for those albums, but lately it feels more like a sense of loyalty to whatever deracinated 'roots' a child whose only culture was AOR can have than to actual listening pleasure, for which I'll take 'Brain Salad Surgery' thanx!

dave q, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Also, how many people who (rightly) nail Waters for rockstar-special- pleading also notice this in Britney's "Lucky"? Eh? EH?

dave q, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

The NYLPM write-up did, so there. But Brit did it a bit better and in one song rather than 7 or so albums.

Tom, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yeah, but the difference is that "Lucky" was written *for* Britney as opposed to *by* Britney, so it makes the story vs life tension much more delicious (this is also, if Ian's reading this, why Britney's "meta-narrative" roolz, while N'Sync's sucks).

Always thought the appeal of The Dark Side of the Moon was as a social experience - it's the album that fourteen year-old guys buy because the fourteen year-old girls like the fifteen year-old guys who have it, Velvet Underground and the Violent Femmes. And because they are discovering dope at this point. The idea of listening to it for artistic merit alone strikes me as strange therefore - wouldn't you put on Echoes instead?

Tim, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Believe me, owning a copy of DSOTM at 14 doesn't get you laid. How do I know this? Um, I read it in a book, or something

dave q, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think I may have read that book too, Dave Q.

Tom, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

owning never mind the bollox meant you met wiv gurlz who despised the idea of sex as much as you hurrah! er wait a minute

mark s, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Why worry about the original when you could enjoy this instead?

Ned Raggett, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Oh it's horrible of course, right, but it did come with TWO posters and TWO stickers, which is kinda cool in an over-the-top way.

Sean, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

That webpage hurts my eyes, Neddy. Someone else has recently done a Floyd "tribute". A ...uh, bluegrass band named Luther Wright and the Wrongs have covered The Wall in its entirety. Check it.

Sean Carruthers, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Er, I mean Check THIS.

Sean Carruthers, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think it's a beautiful album, though not their very best (that'd be Meddle, probably). Of course it's not perfect, but I suspect that its flaws may seem far more egregious to those who come at it with a hostile attitude to begin with. But that's true of anything, at that!

Roger Waters has, by the way, gone on record as saying that he thought the lyrics were a bit wishy-washy -- i.e. not direct enough in their attacks on religion, war, etc. However, I think a more overt venom would've sunk it.

I played the whole thing live once, in college, and sang leads on a couple songs. It was a blast.

Phil, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

'Attacking religion and war'? That seals it, Waters would've been the poet of our age, if that pesky Ian Anderson hadn't beaten him to it

dave q, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I listed it as one of the worst records of all time on a.m.a. way back when.

sundar subramanian, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I have to confess (Tom might remember this) I used to think "Time" was a great, great song, though I always knew that sitting on my arse ruminating in that vein would be the quickest way to ensure that my depression lasted FOR LIFE rather than just the odd month now and then.

I haven't heard the album as a whole but reading the lyrics I think I could find something to relate to in it, though it would be more reminding myself of the elements in my own character that I want to crush, than anything I like about myself.

Robin Carmody, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Not to derail the thread but:

Tim sez: Yeah, but the difference is that "Lucky" was written *for* Britney as opposed to *by* Britney, so it makes the story vs life tension much more delicious (this is also, if Ian's reading this, why Britney's "meta- narrative" roolz, while N'Sync's sucks).

Well, I agree about "Lucky". But I think the problem with pursuing meta-narrative in the pop song is that you have to make the regular narrative compelling first, on a purely emotional and visceral level, before you abstract it to self-awareness, or the whole thing becomes too clever and self-referential.

That's (one reason) why "Lucky" is a brilliant pop song to me while "Pop" and "Slave 4 U" aren't -- yes, the meta-narrative has a delicious tension in "Lucky", but the main narrative exerts a genuine emotional effect on me as well. It works on multiple levels.

Whereas in "Pop" the main narrative is nonexistent (it's all meta) and in "Slave 4 U" I think the main narrative is really flimsy.

(Maybe this is a bad analogy, but to me it's like Gorillaz vs Daphne and Celeste, both perhaps pop groups with layers of irony stacked on top, but D&C's songs work as unironic pop songs, Gorillaz don't.)

(Or maybe early Simpsons vs recent Simpsons -- early shows contained levels of self-awareness but built that on top of a genuine foundation of humor and story and sentiment which made the whole blend compelling, while the weaker new shows are meta before they're anything else.)

Am I making sense?

Ian, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I hate it. It's a ploddy as fuck, and the lyricks sux0r too. I like "Meddle", "Atom Heart Mother" & "Wish you wrer Here" tho'. Best heard on a bang & olufsen stereo, having just pix0red up chix0r in yr Truimph Stag, in room full ov orange crimplylene, w/ a big fattie to smoke perhaps?

xoxo

Norman Phay, Monday, 15 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

omar and andrew l have defended it as GRATE ON DRUGS; phil has defended it purely subjectively (he finds it beautiful); jack redelfs is currently elsewhere occupied I guess

I suppose i was hoping that it could actually be defended eg by phil as EXHIBITING in some way that which the nu-pop is supposed to lack: ie actually rendering specific and concrete relevant elements of the great edifice of technics of necessary aesthetic understanding that is allegedly so foreign to [insert unfave current chart-bod here]. I don't think it can: that's to say, I believe it fails the test of phil's version of required aesthetic content (which I believe it wd like to have passed), and fails it pretty miserably. It's bad pop (nu or not-nu), bad rock, and rotten jazz or classical.

Tell me the story differently: convince me!!

mark s, Tuesday, 16 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

(lyrically dr c i think watersworld IS worse than much other prog, actually, which is often merely fey and mimsy sound-colour — you don't understand it = you are entirely let off the hook of ever listening to it; but moon is ALL TOO EASY to understand)

mark s, Tuesday, 16 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Erm Mark you probably right...although I can't remember listening to Dark Side on drugs (that bloody shout at the beginning creeps me out) or saying it is anywhere on ILM :) Gotta do some work now, alas.

Omar, Tuesday, 16 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

sorry omar you are right: i collapsed what you actually said into a joke i was going to make about you in re andrew's post haha oops

mark s, Tuesday, 16 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Heheh no harm done. Must be one of the five albums i never listened to on drugs. :)

Omar, Tuesday, 16 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Roger Waters was a poor man's Frank Zappa. Believe it or not, I mean that mostly as a compliment to Mr. Waters.

That said, I'm not a particularly big DSOTM fan (probably because it had a lot of Gilmour wank) ... I prefer the Syd-era stuff, Ummagumma through Meddle, and Wish You Were Here and Animals (a nice bit of cranky, tuneful agitprop) to DSOTM.

Tadeusz Suchodolski, Tuesday, 16 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yo!

Tadeusz Suchodolski, Tuesday, 16 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

This album isn't a personal favorite. I find it tolerable, though, like most Pink Floyd. They were probably the best prog rock band of their day, for whatever that's worth, and they're not that much more pretentious than Radiohead. Syd-era Floyd were far superior, of course, but it's not really a fair comparison - they're two different bands, really. It's like comparing the Faces to the Small Faces.

There was an interview with David Gilmour in Q a few years ago where he said he'd run into Johnny Rotten one day, and Johnny confessed that he'd never really hated the Floyd, and was actually a bit of a fan. We always suspected as much.

Justyn Dillingham, Thursday, 18 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm slightly tired of Pink Floyd being discounted as "drug" music. I've never tried drugs, not even once, and still enjoy the hell out of 'em. Like whatshisface, I really got into the Floyd, and this album when I was about 14, and I also read a lot of GOOD science fiction (not the hack stuff), so I guess I once fit the stereotype. I'm not much into either right now, but that stems from having been there and done that, not from somehow "growing out of it."

J.R, Monday, 22 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Mark S -- If you are still reading this interesting thread, can you think of an album that covers sonic ground similar to Dark Side but does so in a way you consider successful (that is, succeeds in the way the standard party line says Dark Side succeeds)? I ask because I feel like I *almost* know what you mean re the flat sound, but would love to see an example.

Mark, Monday, 22 October 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

eight years pass...

I heard this yesterday in a friend's car. This album is still horrible and completely indefensible to me. It's like the worst jazz rock fusion shit. Also, WTF @ that awful sax throughout.

Salvador Dali Parton (Turangalila), Sunday, 22 November 2009 23:25 (sixteen years ago)

http://academic.evergreen.edu/curricular/scirev/Galileo01.jpg

Welcome To The King Pleasure-dome (James Redd and the Blecchs), Sunday, 22 November 2009 23:30 (sixteen years ago)

I love Pink Floyd but I could never, ever get into this album.

mascara and ties (Abbott), Sunday, 22 November 2009 23:33 (sixteen years ago)

luv this record. no alice coltrane til you agree, Turangalila! :D

tylerw, Sunday, 22 November 2009 23:38 (sixteen years ago)

Hahaha. Evil.

Salvador Dali Parton (Turangalila), Sunday, 22 November 2009 23:38 (sixteen years ago)

I feel a bit bad dissing the Floyd because I worshipped them so much when I was 10, I had one of those 'green pyramid' posters in my room as well as a t-shirt with the prism on it.

That's so cool.

I AM NOT A BALONEY SANDWICH (u s steel), Monday, 23 November 2009 00:02 (sixteen years ago)

fantastic album. lyrics are't brilliant, but are mostly decent (excepting the occasional "don't be afraid to care") and even affecting. always saw both breathe and time, for instance as directed at a "you" that includes the singer: we. the album doesn't draw a distinction between the concerns of working proles and rock stars - point is that we all struggle, all hope for more than we get, all eventually wither and die.

side 1 depicts life not as a cycle but as an arc - a universe of possibility that progressively narrows until death and i feel that. side 2 is more fragmentary with money, us & them, and especially brain damage, which steps entirely out of the omniscient mankind-seeing that defines the rest of the album. but brain damage and eclipse bring back some of the emotional resonance & yearning of side 1, so they make a kind of intuitive sense, even as they seem to interrupt the thematic continuity.

and i LOVE the production. love how immersive & womb/dreamlike it is, how much attention it pays to 3D space in the mix. it's not just an ordinary production reverbed-out and overcompressed. every sound is handled with care and given a distinct place in the sonic architecture, and the dark cavernous feel isn't a matter of thoughtlessly sticking reverb x on everything.

what i like best about it is that it treats the experience of listening to an album as a journey - a single, coherent emotional/sensual/intellectual experience. i love that approach, and though it was common in the 70s, few albums do it as well as DSotM. the sense of "dark foreboding" & cosmic uplift in the last couple track is just incredible.

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, 23 November 2009 00:23 (sixteen years ago)

this is my musical Room 101.

Pedro Paramore (jim), Monday, 23 November 2009 00:27 (sixteen years ago)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypergraphia

Salvador Dali Parton (Turangalila), Monday, 23 November 2009 00:30 (sixteen years ago)

I Love Pink Floyd.

I have a friend that says they are not so suited for this attention deficit age.

Their dynamics are so subtle, you know...

Sometimes I think Radiohead is Pink Floyd sped up a good bit.

nicky lo-fi, Monday, 23 November 2009 00:48 (sixteen years ago)

plus it's a mistake to criticize the musical experience for not matching/supporting the progress of the lyrics. the music here, especially the production, aims to create a place, an environment - a room in which the experience can take place. So the music is more concerned with creating and sustaining a mood than with narrative. only track that breaks the spell is money.

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, 23 November 2009 00:54 (sixteen years ago)

to many "experience" there - pretend it just says "music" up top

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, 23 November 2009 00:55 (sixteen years ago)

pink floyd is great but atm i am listening to sic alps which is different so currently hard to relate

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Monday, 23 November 2009 00:56 (sixteen years ago)

I have a friend that says they are not so suited for this attention deficit age.

I am not sure of this, and I don't even like Pink Floyd. I think in a media saturated culture we will need to make space to decompress or whatever it is called. I mean this is how kids feel, we throw so much information crap at them that they need space. I think older people are having problems adjusting to information culture.

I AM NOT A BALONEY SANDWICH (u s steel), Monday, 23 November 2009 01:06 (sixteen years ago)

money is such a jam

oh (skeletor), Monday, 23 November 2009 01:07 (sixteen years ago)

gilmour solo shreds

oh (skeletor), Monday, 23 November 2009 01:09 (sixteen years ago)

Did not know Doris Troy was on this until I watched that youtube just now. Don't know anything about the other three backup singers.

god i wish i could hear anything the way i heard DSotM when i was like 13
I wish I could hear "Thirteen" by Big Star.

Welcome To The King Pleasure-dome (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 23 November 2009 04:27 (sixteen years ago)

xp - Oh, he's talking about All Blues -- that's pretty interesting actually. Never would have caught that.

Still, I mean a few jazz chords don't make jazz fusion. I mean I think rock with jazzy touches is more accurate as said above.


That sounds about right. When you hear Nick Mason, you don't really think jazz.

Welcome To The King Pleasure-dome (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 23 November 2009 04:29 (sixteen years ago)

The sax on "Money" isn't very jazzy at all--more '50s R&B.

if I don't see more dissent, I'm going to have to check myself in (Matos W.K.), Monday, 23 November 2009 04:30 (sixteen years ago)

"god i wish i could hear anything the way i heard DSotM when i was like 13"

THIS, man, THIS!

― Bay-L.A. Bar Talk (Hurting 2)

Jenny-Bea Englishman (Whitey on the Moon), Monday, 23 November 2009 04:33 (sixteen years ago)

Well I was more like 16, smoking w33d for the first time, but still. It was COMPLETELY AMAZING AND UNLIKE ANYTHING I'D EVER HEARD, MAN.

Jenny-Bea Englishman (Whitey on the Moon), Monday, 23 November 2009 04:34 (sixteen years ago)

that might have sounded facetious, but it really was and i will love this album forever.

Jenny-Bea Englishman (Whitey on the Moon), Monday, 23 November 2009 04:35 (sixteen years ago)

this was the very first CD i owned and i listened to it about 10 zillion with headphones on in the dark on my Sony Discman:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v374/barthez4/discman.jpg

i had no idea who Syd Barrett was, tho i had The Wall on vinyl.

that being said, i have absolutely no interest on hearing this again, maybe the weird electro running song or maybe the last song (technically 2 songs on CD)?

♪♫(●̲̲̅̅̅̅=̲̲̅̅̅̅●̲̅̅)♪♫ (Steve Shasta), Monday, 23 November 2009 04:42 (sixteen years ago)

Why ya frontin', y0?

velko, Monday, 23 November 2009 04:46 (sixteen years ago)

There was an interview with David Gilmour in Q a few years ago where he said he'd run into Johnny Rotten one day, and Johnny confessed that he'd never really hated the Floyd, and was actually a bit of a fan. We always suspected as much.

Was Chris Thomas the missing link?

Welcome To The King Pleasure-dome (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 23 November 2009 04:52 (sixteen years ago)

people bagging on pink floyd and the doors and whatnot are the most disgusting savages imo.

hope this helps (Granny Dainger), Monday, 23 November 2009 05:14 (sixteen years ago)

Pink Floyd, never; the Doors, I find pretty easy to bag on (even though I like some songs).

Mark, Monday, 23 November 2009 05:25 (sixteen years ago)

I'm a disgusting savage.

exploding angel vagina (Scik Mouthy), Monday, 23 November 2009 07:08 (sixteen years ago)

http://i36.tinypic.com/10csx8o.jpg

Salvador Dali Parton (Turangalila), Monday, 23 November 2009 08:54 (sixteen years ago)

http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/images/x0/x4671.jpg

Welcome To The King Pleasure-dome (James Redd and the Blecchs), Monday, 23 November 2009 15:18 (sixteen years ago)

this is my musical Room 101.

― Pedro Paramore (jim), Sunday, November 22, 2009 6:27 PM (Yesterday)

lukevalentine, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 03:13 (sixteen years ago)

well, maybe "great gig" has some nice slide guitar

lukevalentine, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 03:13 (sixteen years ago)

people who haven't listened to it in a while might enjoy the super surround sound anniversary edition. like hearing it for the first time on CD after owning only 99 cent used vinyl

kamerad, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 03:52 (sixteen years ago)

I wish the band would have changed their name after the Syd period

lukevalentine, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 08:05 (sixteen years ago)

I wish the band would've deleted their back catalog after the Syd period.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 11:24 (sixteen years ago)

Sike, just challopin'.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 11:24 (sixteen years ago)

challopin' off into the sunset

a dimension that can only be accessed through self-immolation (contenderizer), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 11:31 (sixteen years ago)

I don't think I've ever unconditionally liked this album. Even when I was a 15 year old acidhead, Money would come along and fuck up the flow of the album for me, and I only found more of it annoying as time went on. Still, I like the hell out of whichever one had the surfing imagery and Us and Them. The latter sounded really great in Dogtwn and Zboys.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 11:43 (sixteen years ago)

I thought the true "challop" move at this point was to say that you don't like the Syd Barrett catalog and prefer the later stuff. When I was in college, only liking the Syd Barrett stuff was pretty much a standard cool guy move.

Bay-L.A. Bar Talk (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:42 (sixteen years ago)

i like the syd catalog, but i prefer the later stuff. no challops intended.

oops i accidentally made it personal (surm), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:45 (sixteen years ago)

True Floydian Challopsters would say that Ummaguama is their best. Either that or The Division Bell.

tylerw, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:48 (sixteen years ago)

"Atom Heart Mother" ftc(hallops)

I Poxy the Fule (Tom D.), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:49 (sixteen years ago)

haha i DO think ummagumma (the live disc at least) is their best! either that or meddle

mark cl, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:52 (sixteen years ago)

The live disc is great.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:53 (sixteen years ago)

I love Pink Floyd but I could never, ever get into this album.

― mascara and ties (Abbott), Sunday, 22 November 2009 23:33 (2 days ago)

^^^this

Gimme That Christian Side-hug, that Christian Side-hug (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:54 (sixteen years ago)

yeah the live disc on Umagumma is pretty sweet. They were kind of a rad live band around that time. I have a BBC sessions bootleg (from 1970 I think?) that is super cool. All big and ominous.

tylerw, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:54 (sixteen years ago)

ummagumma live is the floyd's best, yes, i grew up on that shit

my fave thing to do on the computer is what im doing right now (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:55 (sixteen years ago)

Law school on the brain just made me come up with the sentence "Challops require at least a modicum of plausibility."

Bay-L.A. Bar Talk (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:56 (sixteen years ago)

That is awesome.

kingkongvsgodzilla, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 17:57 (sixteen years ago)

haha i DO think ummagumma (the live disc at least) is their best! either that or meddle

― mark cl, Tuesday, November 24, 2009 11:52 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

AND the album has "GRANTCHESTER MEADOWS"!!

Plunge Protection Team, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 19:12 (sixteen years ago)

also i am probably the only person ever who thinks that 'the narrow way' is kinda A+

my fave thing to do on the computer is what im doing right now (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 19:13 (sixteen years ago)

i don't think Atom Heart Mother is that challop-y though -- it's just really fuckin good, and different from all the rest. no?

oops i accidentally made it personal (surm), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 19:13 (sixteen years ago)

ugh i can't believe i'm having a conversation about challops.

oops i accidentally made it personal (surm), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 19:14 (sixteen years ago)

i mean even david gilmour has disowned it - witness the tedious splurge of 'tasteful' aor wanking his solo career has given us since then

erm xposts to self re: the narrow way

my fave thing to do on the computer is what im doing right now (acoleuthic), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 19:14 (sixteen years ago)

what's your fave part of AHM .. "breast milky" or "funky dung"?

Plunge Protection Team, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 19:19 (sixteen years ago)

True Floydian Challopsters would say that Ummaguama is their best. Either that or The Division Bell.

― tylerw, Tuesday, November 24, 2009 12:48 PM Bookmark

lol division bell got three votes in the floyd studio albums poll

Bay-L.A. Bar Talk (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 22:17 (sixteen years ago)

haha yeah i saw that. whoever the hell voted for that album, I salute you oh ye challops masters.

tylerw, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 22:20 (sixteen years ago)

I assumed they were 50-yr-old divorced men, who I think are that album's key demog.

mascara and ties (Abbott), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 22:25 (sixteen years ago)

http://teenormous.com/images/t-shirts/cdn.shopify.com/s-files-1-0009-5322-products-28378b_1.jpeg
A friend of mine had this shirt in high school. I begged him not to wear it.

tylerw, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 22:27 (sixteen years ago)

so embarrassing

oops i accidentally made it personal (surm), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 22:28 (sixteen years ago)

i forget how huge that album was, though. when it came out i heard that shit *everywhere*

jØrdån (omar little), Tuesday, 24 November 2009 22:29 (sixteen years ago)

yeah it was sort of a big deal! my friends and i actually saw them at the Rose Bowl that tour. We were pretty young, I don't even think we knew that it was a faux-Floyd, at best. Kind of a lame show iirc.

tylerw, Tuesday, 24 November 2009 22:31 (sixteen years ago)

I have a BBC sessions bootleg (from 1970 I think?) that is super cool. All big and ominous.

if this is "rhapsody in pink" (or one of its billion repackagings) it is a totally recommended record A+++ etc.

also i am probably the only person ever who thinks that 'the narrow way' is kinda A+

AGREEDO

armed with swords and hash (GOTT PUNCH II HAWKWINDZ), Wednesday, 25 November 2009 02:32 (sixteen years ago)

the bbc thing is my fave 70's floyd no contest:

do you know what i think my fave pink floyd thing is (post-syd)? i'll bet you never guess.

scott seward, Wednesday, 25 November 2009 03:09 (sixteen years ago)

I have some tape of a BBC concert -- back when the FM rock radio stations used to sometimes play old concerts like that in their entirety -- and I'm pretty sure I have that Pink Floyd show as well. that I taped to cassette from my boombox. I also taped the Zeppelin one, way before they finally decided to release it on "BBC Sessions". I can't remember if it was WLLZ or WRIF or WIOT that used to broadcast these things.

also, King Biscuit Flower Hour. I have a sweet King Biscuit Flower Tape somewhere of Robert Plant on the "Pictures of Moments" tour (with Phil on drums) and also Yes on the "90120" tour. that tape of Yes touring 90120 was actually the first time I ever heard stuff like "Starship Trooper" and "Yours Is No Disgrace" -- now my two fave Yes epics. But at the time that radio show was broadcast, I only knew them from 90120

Stormy Davis, Wednesday, 25 November 2009 03:56 (sixteen years ago)

There's a huge thread on the Flaming Lips official message board with people fighting over whether this album is boring or awesome.

Adam Bruneau, Wednesday, 25 November 2009 04:57 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.